How the Rockefellers Re-Engineered Women

February 1, 2007

feminist1.gif


By Henry Makow Ph.D.

Feminism is an excellent example of how the Rockefeller mega cartel uses the awesome power of the mass media  (i.e. propaganda.) to control society.

In 40 short years, many women have lost touch with their natural loving instincts. Consequently, the family is in disarray, sexual depravity is rampant and birth rates have plummeted.

I will expand on the Rockefeller's role, but first we need to remember that for a woman, love is an instinctive act of self-sacrifice.

She gives herself to her husband and children and is fulfilled by seeing them thrive and  receiving their love, respect and gratitude.

A woman makes this supreme sacrifice to only one man who will cherish her and provide for his family. Men instinctively want to fulfill this responsibility. This is the essence of the heterosexual contract (i.e. marriage): female power in exchange for male power expressed as love. Sex is the symbol of this exclusive bond. Marriage and family may not be for everyone but it is the natural path for most.

Feminism has trained women to reject this model as "an old fashioned, oppressive stereotype" even though it reflects their natural instincts.

On Thursday a British writer reported overhearing two young women:

"All men are useless these days," one said. "Yeah," said the other. "The trouble is that they haven't risen to the challenge of feminism. They don't understand that we need them to be more masculine, and instead they have just copped out."

That's their logic? If women are less feminine, men will be more masculine? Men aren't designed to fight with women. They need to be affirmed by a woman's acquiescence and faith. When women constantly challenge them, men will "cop out" of marriage and family.

Now that love and marriage have been "discredited," women have nothing left to exchange for love but sex. Thus, many are unnaturally obsessed with appearance and pathetically give their bodies to all and sundry. 

Permanent love is not based on a woman's sex appeal, or personality or achievements. Ultimately, it is based on self-sacrifice. We love the people who love us.


THE BIG PICTURE: THE CENTRAL BANKERS 

People do not realize that feminism is mass indoctrination because they cannot identify the perpetrator, the means or the motive.

Recently Aaron Russo, the producer of Bette Midler's movies and "America: From Freedom to Fascism" identified all three confirming what I have been saying.

While trying to recruit Russo for the CFR, Nicholas Rockefeller told him that his family foundation created women's liberation using mass media control as part of a long-term plan to enslave humanity. He admitted they want to "chip us." Google "Rockefeller Foundation" and "Women's Studies" and you'll get a half million citations.

The hidden goal of feminism is to destroy the family, which interferes with state brainwashing of the young. Side benefits include depopulation and widening the tax base. Displacing men in the role of  providers also destabilizes the family. 

A drastic paradigm shift is required to make sense of the world. The Rockefellers are part of the private world central banking cartel that also controls media, defence, pharmaceutical and other cartels. To protect their monopoly of credit and wealth, they are instituting a world police state ("world government") using the bogus 9-11 attack and endless war as a pretext. Rockefeller told Russo about this plan a year before 9-11.

The poet Charles Peguy said, "Everything begins in faith and ends in politics." The banking cartel needs a philosophy to justify enchaining mankind. That philosophy is Satanism. The cartel controls the world through a network of occult societies linked to Freemasonry, Communism, the Vatican and organized Jewry (Bnai Brith, ADL, AJC,  Zionism.) The highest occult rank is known as the Illuminati.

Modern Western culture is Masonic. Based on Luciferianism, Freemasonry teaches that man and not God determines reality. (Naturally, they need to overrule natural and spiritual laws in order to assert their own control.) They have noticed that people are diffident malleable creatures who prefer to believe what they are told than trust their own reason or perception. Thus, for example, the media successfully promotes homosexual values that conflict with our natural instincts.


MEDIA ERADICATES  LOVE

Every facet of the mass media (movies, TV, magazines, music, commercials, news) is used for indoctrination and social control with the ultimate goal of enslavement. There is a connection between what happened in Communist Russia and what is happening in America today. In both cases the central banking cartel is asserting its totalitarian control. 

The mass media's function is to distract us from this, and the imminent Iran war and North American Union. Currently they are using the global warming fracas for diversion.  

In order to destroy the family, the media convinced women that they could not rely on the heterosexual contract.

Myrna Blyth was the editor in chief of Ladies Home Journal from 1981 to 2002. In her book "Spin Sisters" (2004) she says the media sold women "a career in exactly the same drum banging way that the Happy Homemaker had been ..sold to their mothers." (38)

The Illuminati undermined women's natural loving instincts using the following mantras:

1. Men can no longer be trusted. Using the Lifetime Network as an example, Blyth concluded "all men are 1) unfaithful rats 2) abusive monsters 3) dishonest scumbags, or 4) all of the above. Women on the other hand were...flinty achievers who triumph despite the cavemen who...want to keep them in their place." (62-63)

2. Women are victims by virtue of their sex.  Blyth says the media sends "one message loud and clear. Because we are women, we remain victims in our private lives, at work, in society as a whole." (156) Thus women must have a sense of grievance, entitlement and rebellion. The same tactic was used to manipulate Jews, Blacks, workers and gays. (See my "Victim as Moral Zombie" )

3. Women should be selfish. "Liberation and narcissism have merged," Blyth says. Leisure now means, "time for yourself, spent alone, or perhaps with one's girlfriends but definitely without spouse and kids...Endless articles preached the new feminist gospel, that indulging yourself is an important part of being a healthy, well adjusted woman." (65)

4. Sex is not reserved for love and marriage. Magazines like Glamour and Cosmopolitan  urge young women to "put out on their first date,"ogle men openly" and be an athlete in bed. There is no discussion of marriage or family. (160) Such women can't trust a man enough to surrender themselves in love.

5. Self-fulfillment lies in career success and not husband and family. "The social rewards of holding down a job are critical to one's sense of dignity and self worth," Betty Friedan pontificated. In fact, "most work is deeply ordinary," Blyth observes (35-36.) (I'm not saying women can't have jobs, only they shouldn't be tricked out of having families if they want them.)

Thus many women are schizophrenic as they attempt to reconcile their natural instincts with constant exhortations to do the opposite. The wreckage -- broken families and dysfunctional people -- is strewn everywhere.

At the same time, Playboy Magazine etc. aimed a similar message at men. You don't need to get married to have sex. Marriage and children are a bore.


CONCLUSION

This consistent media drumbeat is organized brainwashing. Society has been totally subverted by the central banking cartel, using a Satanic cult, Freemasonry as its primary instrument. Most masons are unaware of the truth but the owners of the mass media certainly are.

We used to say, "as American as motherhood and apple pie." Only satanists would trash motherhood. Far from empowering women, feminism has unsexed many. It has   deprived them of a secure and honored role and reduced them to sex objects and replaceable workers.

Luciferians promote rebellion because they are defying what is natural and conducive to  happiness. Like their symbol, Lucifer, they wish to play God. 

God's love can be seen in a woman's dedication to her husband and children. Thus the bankers must destroy it.




Comments for "How the Rockefellers Re-Engineered Women"

Martin in France said (February 8, 2007):

I've had a fantastic reading yesterday night
It was a time , I used to thing I'd be mad Thinking like you
But no longer
Thanks to you !


Tom said (February 5, 2007):

" ... first we need to remember that for a woman, love is an instinctive act of self-sacrifice. "

Quite a big assumption here, Henry.

In the old days before feminism, love was all too often a survival mechanism and a route to security. I watched my mother have to go through life without any personal empowerment as basically an adult child and it was often maddeningly frustrating for her.

Today I am glad to see that many women have a wider selection of choices in life.

I have held the feminists to their own code in my own life and will follow through with it because that is what the women asked for back when I was young. So far, none of them have been able to hack their own new paradigm in my life as they all seem to be really needy at one level or another, but I think one will come along sooner or later. Meantime, I would rather stay single than have a frustrated adult child for a wife, followed by divorce, years of alimony, child support, etc etc etc.
----

Tom,

I am not advocating what your mother experienced.
When a man loves a woman, he encourages her to exercise her talents. Men want strong effective happy wives, not miserable frustrated ones. The return for woman's self-sacrifice is a man's genuine love. A woman shouldn't marry a man if she doesn't get that from him.

Henry


Anne in Los Angeles said (February 5, 2007):

I read with great pleasure your excellent article today. In a few paragraphs you covered this scam which really is to destroy humanity at large - a generation in the past and all generations to come. Women and men both need to understand this and start the slow process of recovering. That would be to stop reading silly magazines and women power books, turn off the TV and start interacting among both sexes on the level we were meant to - with respect, dignity and no feelings of guilt for not living up to an unreal "measuring stick" handed to us by those in "power". There is nothing more beautiful and satisfying than a relationship of pure love and desire between a man and a woman.


Jon said (February 4, 2007):

In all this, it is vital to understand the dialectical nature of the process. The intended aim of feminism is not to place women on top (as some men seem to believe) but, by bringing men and women 'head-to-head' in an artificially created conflict, to create a synthesis of the two 'gender roles'. Some feminists have been quite open about this. For example, the feminist icon Andrea Dworkin believed it possible and
desirable to create an androgynous society in which the terms 'men' and 'women' no longer apply. Were this not the case, men and women could at least take comfort in the thought that they are still permitted to display masculine and feminine characteristics, whereas it is increasingly obvious that women are becoming more masculine and men more feminine.

Additionally, it is important to remember that the
dialectical process is always controlled by an elite group interested in power for its own sake. The above examples clearly demonstrate that social groups rarely come together for revolutionary purposes of their own accord, but must be manipulated into doing so by a power elite. In this sense, the dialectic is not a
tool for analysing society (as is often claimed) but for changing society: it is prescriptive rather than descriptive.


SA said (February 4, 2007):


I completely understand and can relate to your views on the political and social engineering we are undergoing ... When you speak of a Satanic conspiracy ruled through the banking cartels many people may disregard your entire thesis and analysis of our world today, heck, they many even question your sanity.

However ...I can see exactly what you are talking about. I call on anyone reading this who has the slightest shadow of a doubt about this New Age conspiracy and the preparation of a one world government to be ruled through the UN under the orders of the Antichrist to do some research on the topic (read 'Behold A Pale Horse' by William Cooper or visit ex-Illuminati, Leo Young's web site http://www.illuminaticonfessions.webfriend.it/ just to name a few sources).

Are we not heading towards this �laughable� New World Order/Globalization? Is our economy getting any stronger? Is the World becoming anymore safer? Freer? Can we actually look to a brighter future? ... We won�t be any safer and stronger in denial then if we rise up to the call of acknowledging this evil conspiracy and doing something about it. We must shun all these Satanic programmings: �Democracy�, feminism, homosexuality, liberalism, conservatism, communism, capitalism, Nazism, Zionism, Popular CULTture, New Age Mysticism, Freemasonry, Polytheism, Romanticism, Idealism, Socialism, Fascism, Atheism, Satanism etc.

As far as feminism�Feminism is truly evil. It has reversed the natural God-giving roles and rules of both man and woman. We now have �free spirits�, �metrosexuals� and all this terms which we are spoon-feed and programmed to believed that are of our true nature and behavior...


Andrew said (February 3, 2007):

Of course, you�re right about feminism. It debuted as an article of Communist principle in the 19th century. At some point in the 1960s, the NWO introduced feminism into America and it was like lobbing a grenade into every home. The divorce rate skyrocketed. Most feminists today argue that feminism was a natural out-growth of the medical advances in birth control, but their arguments don�t explain why feminism became such a media darling or why the NWO gave it so much free advertising.

You should expressly separate women�s suffrage and other women�s political rights from feminism, because we could have had a women�s political revolution without a sexual revolution. This confusion was amplified by Playboy magazine and the pornographic revolution in the 1950s and 60s which was supported by the U.S. Supreme Court. The 1st Amendment was originally meant to cover only political speech, but the court ruled that it protected smut too. I believe that the various state legislatures in America should have been allowed to control the definition of pornography.

One of the main reasons that the PRC came down so hard on the Internet was to control Western pornography from promiscuously entering China. See http://www.china.org.cn/english/2004/Aug/103798.htm

In closing, I want to point out that much of your political revelations are rejected by young women because of your position on feminism. Galatians 4:16 "Am I become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" In your case Henry, for a lot of young and not so young women, the answer is yes.

Talk the truth about feminism and you can almost see the eyes of young women glaze over; the same thing happens to me when I talk about Building 7 and 9/11 Truth. Brainwashed folks hate the truth, because it somehow invalidates silly notions that they have incorporated into their self-image. They feel that it is the same as attacking them personally. Sad but true.



Erol in Turkey said (February 3, 2007):

When I skim through the blogs set-up by working mothers I often witness them having a hard time making a decision between "following a career" and "staying at home with their children".

As you rightfully state, women's nature tells her to stay home and look after the kids and the house. Besides the constant brainwashing, the ever rising cost of maintaining a family and the maxed-out credit cards force the women to work, too.

"Insufficiency of income" can easily be adjusted by the central bankers who have total control of the economy. They print the paper money, they decide the interest rate, they adjust the liquidity, they regulate the exchange rates, they run all the banks and financial institutions. They can give any shape to the economy they want.

More women in the employee pool means less negotiation power and lower income for the Goyim, besides a widened tax base. Also, children of working women are more vulnerable and become easier victims of "bad habits" such as alcohol, smoking and drugs


Craig in Australia said (February 3, 2007):

I stumbled across your website "savethemales" and I could not agree any more with what you have been saying about this issue. Feminism is merely an artificial curse that serves to systematically denigrade both men and women at the same time, hence reducing the moral calibre (and thus the mental strength) of the human race.

My studies of the geopolitical cimate have led me to believe that a massive population reduction campaign is now in place. This basically means that the issue of feminism is merely one of many tentacles that are connected to this ultimate campaign, the ultimate act of human desicration and enslavement.

Women gain power and strength through their husbands in a manner that is not much different to men. Women submit whilst men show leadertship, but both are working tirelessly to promote each other and their children (if any).

To elevate one sex above the other is to merely demote both sexes at the same time. let us all save the males, not just from feminism, but by the collective ignorance that propels the dark abyss of the Illuminati.


David Livingstone said (February 3, 2007):

From the beginning, I admired you for your courage to stand up against this issue. It's the core tactic of the Illuminati, like Lucifer himself, who sought to corrupt Adam through Eve. Likewise, the Illuminati are ensnaring us through our women. Men are susceptible. We are not predators, as we have been made out to be. Like you said, we need affirmation. Lucifer knows that, by first leading women astray, we eventually comply. Not all of us of course, but society in general for sure.


An interesting point is the origin of feminism in the occult. Just look at the similarity to the vices promoted by [Church of Satan's] Anton LeVay as liberation. He basically taught that the seven deadly sins of Christianity were virtues. Greed is good and all that. So he also taught women that it was ok for them to seek power, and therefore to use their bodies to achieve it. It was ok, he said, for women to dress seductively, and to sleep with whoever they needed to to advance themselves in society. Jane Russell was one of his chief disciples, and this is precisely the image she conveyed, as the "femme fatale".

As you point out though, this is not empowerment, but subjugation.

www.thedyinggod.org


Tom said (February 2, 2007):

Great summation of the situation. I tend to prefer Mammonism or Mammonite, as Shamir does, to your Luciferianism as the going philosophy of the culture and world wreckers du jour. (Same thing,
really.) I take that from Christ's statement that one either serves God or mammon (uncapitalized in KJV). Tracking mammon down etymologically reveals that it means simply money. Does not that say
it today? It's either the one or t'other...


Ordinary people I am now convinced can do nothing material against the present system but refuse to cooperate, which was what the Lord did when arrested. Russo asks that we join him in refusing
the National ID Card. Seems a good point for starters. We live in interesting times.


Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at