"Sexism" is Heterosexuality
September 4, 2002
By Henry Makow Ph.D,
Feminists would be outraged if they knew they were being hoodwinked by the corporate elite.
They think they are fighting the "patriarchy" but in fact they are victims of a plot to bring down the birth rate by spreading sexual chaos among men and women.
Search for "Women's Studies, Rockefeller Foundation" in Google and you'll discover 15,000 examples of how the people who funded depopulation and Nazi eugenics are funding feminism. This is not a coincidence.
The Rockefeller foundation people and their allies own much of the world's wealth. They are responsible for war, deprivation, terrorism and disease. Ladies, do you really think they've suddenly taken a genuine interest in women's rights? Or gay rights? You are being used.
Second-wave feminism is part of a concerted attack on the heterosexual foundations of society. Starting in the 1960's, an orchestrated media campaign has disparaged the importance of wife and mother, father and the nuclear family. It has feverishly promoted the idea that, instead, women should find personal fulfillment in career. We naively believed this was spontaneous.
Both Communism and the CIA are instruments of the corporate elite. (Communism was funded by monopoly capitalism which naturally fears democracy and competition. Political monopoly is the counterpart of economic monopoly.)
Second-wave feminism is part of a wacky plot by the super rich to enslave mankind in a feudal fascist world government administered by the UN. This is the "New World Order."
The impending gratuitous attack on Iraq is the latest step in this long-term plan.
By making women compete with men for the male role, feminism is classic Communist "divide and conquer". They use race and class as well.
A friend who is divorcing his wife told me: "I fell out of love because she became too masculine." The major reason families are breaking up is that women are brainwashed to think they are oppressed and need to be more like men.
Feminists say they want to stop "sexism." This is typical Communist "doublespeak."
On the surface, sexism refers to social discrimination on the basis of sex. Who can argue with that? In practice, sexism means denying there are ANY natural differences between men and women. All differences are due to social conditioning.
By stamping out "sexism," which they equate with racism, feminists really want to expunge heterosexuality.
While championing "tolerance" for homosexuals, they are waging a hateful and underhanded war on your sexual identity.
A relentless barrage of pro feminist and gay propaganda fills the media; social engineering for a "brave new world" has overrun our schools. Yet we seem strangely passive, like frogs in a pot of water on a stove. The heat is gradually increasing, and we are gently being brainwashed.
How can we fight the New World Order?
Let's begin by reaffirming our distinct male or female identities. Perhaps this personal manifesto from a happily married male frog who finally jumped out of the pot will serve as a reference:
The essence of masculinity is power.
Isn't it obvious? It's what women respond to. Similarly, men are drawn to vulnerability in women. We want to protect them.
To equalize power is to eliminate sexual distinction. This doesn't mean that woman are not powerful and effective as women, but not by becoming men.
Men -- steer clear of any sexual relationship where you are not in charge.
Just as femininity should be respected, so should masculinity.
You emasculate a man when you take away his power. (The corporate elite is using feminism to do just that.)
A husband will consult his wife but eventually someone has to make a decision. A man who is ruled by his wife is less a man. He feels like a little boy with his mother.
On the other hand, when his wife accepts his leadership, he feels like a man. Women help to make men.
Similarly, a wife who follows her husband's leadership feels more like a woman. If she can't follow him, she should be married to someone else.
There is no such thing as "equality" in terms of power. (Feminist "equality" is really a ploy for female domination. For example, you don't hear feminists calling for equality at universities where women often outnumber men by 2-1 .)
Men should avoid opinionated, aggressive, demanding women. It's too late to save them. This will spare you a great deal of time, money and anguish.
The essence of femininity is for a woman to depend on the man she loves.
The intimate male-female dynamic is for woman to entrust worldly power to her husband, and for him to use it to make her happy.
Man wants power. Women want love (not power.) They ARE different.
A man wants to make the woman he loves happy . Does he consult her? How else can he please her?
She reciprocates by making him happy. The energy flows.
Woman must give man the power to love her. If she is "strong, bold and independent," as she is being taught, he becomes redundant ( i.e. the true feminist agenda.)
Woman shows she loves a man by empowering him, by surrendering and trusting. Women want to be possessed by a man's love. (They are not men.)
Of course the contract breaks down if the man doesn't keep his end of the bargain. He must be her champion, loyal and loving to the end. If this contract breaks down, the marriage is over.
A feminist tends to try to control a man, to tell him how to please her (without being asked, and as if she always knows what she really wants.) These relationships fail.
A woman is a vehicle by nature. She is waiting for a man's call. She wants to be used by the man she loves for a higher purpose. One such purpose is to create a healthy happy family.
A man, therefore, should have a clear idea of what he wants, and the role he wants a woman to play. Then he finds a wife who meets HIS criteria instead of contorting himself for every sexually attractive woman he meets.
A man's first passion should always be his work. As my father tried to tell me, "a man's work is his backbone."
Women think they want to be a man's first love, but they don't respect these men.
Age-old standards of masculinity still apply. A man must supply just leadership and sustenance to his family. Therefore he must have control. (Domestic violence legislation is designed to destroy families by undermining paternal authority. Ninety five per cent of the cases involve power struggles NOT battered women.
These days men have no way to measure themselves. They are like little boys looking for love. A woman needs to be enlisted, not entreated.
Woman's nature is to nurture and love her husband and children. She wants to be needed, honored and loved in return. A woman should never be taken for granted. (Nor should a man.)
When a woman identifies with her husband, they become one in marriage. If they remain "independent," they remain roommates open to every temptation. Certainly a woman has her own interests and career but these are not her first priority.
A woman has a limited "window of opportunity" (approximately 12 years) in which to start a family. Millions have been duped into concentrating on a career instead of a husband. They are consigned to lonely frustrated bitter lives thumbing well-worn copies of "The Vagina Monologues".
A woman wants to be an extension of her husband. She is the spiritual ground in which he plants his seed. She is the recipient of to his spirit. By "accepting" him wholeheartedly, he "belongs" to her. This union results in psychological maturity for both. Together they create a new world and bring children into it.
Millions of people suffer from arrested development due to elite sponsorship of feminism which has poisoned heterosexual relations. Societal obsession with sex and pornography is a symptom. Society has witnessed an unprecedented decline in the nuclear family with a parallel increase in personal and social dysfunction.
Events like the accounting scandals teach us that the corporate elite, with its political and media minions, are not our friends. They are out to ravage the general population. They have been doing this for a long time and it is becoming more obvious since Sept. 11, 2001.
However you interpret your heterosexual nature, affirming it is an essential step to resisting the New World Order. It is a way to remain healthy and find happiness in an increasingly difficult and bizarre world.
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at