Direct Link to Latest News


Osama bin Laden Endorses John Kerry

October 30, 2004

osama1.jpgOn Friday, terrorist bogeyman Osama Bin Laden released a video that successfully ridiculed George W. Bush.

Coming just four days before the Presidential election, that's awfully suspicious.

Bin Laden implied that he could work with John Kerry.

Furthermore he exposed himself as a CIA / MI-6 Illuminati asset by taking responsibility for 9-11 and praising Mohamed Atta as the "overall commander."

I am confining myself to the excerpts cited by Al Jazeera, which broadcast the Bin Laden video. Here is how Bin Laden ridicules Bush:

"It never occurred to us that the commander in chief of the American forces (Bush) would leave 50,000 citizens in the two towers to face those horrors alone at a time when they most needed him because he thought listening to a child discussing her goat and its ramming was more important than the planes and their ramming of the skyscrapers. This had given us three times the time needed to carry out the operations, thanks be to God."

I saw the classroom tape. George was obviously stunned by the news. Sure he didn't jump into action; marionettes rarely act on their own accord.

This damning attack on George Bush reflects the desperation of the Zionist-Rothschild-European branch of the Illuminati (the real terrorists, Osama's bosses) to dump George Bush, now that he has done their dirty work for them.

They want him to step aside so they can enjoy the lion's share of the spoils. But George, forgetting that his nickname at "Skull and Bones" was "Temporary," seems determined to outstay his welcome and champion the interests of Dick Cheney and an American-based faction of the Illuminati.

This assertion of national ambition is a perennial problem for the London-based Globalists. Their nightmares consist of names like Napoleon, Stalin and Hitler. They don't want to add George W. Bush to this list.

Without using so many words, Bin Laden implies that electing John Kerry could be the way to avoid another terrorist attack. (Italics mine)

"O American people, I am speaking to tell you about the ideal way to avoid another Manhattan, about war and its causes and results.

"Security is an important foundation of human life and free people do not squander their security, contrary to Bush's claims that we hate freedom. Let him tell us why we did not attack Sweden for example.

"It is known that those who hate freedom do not possess proud souls like those of the 19, may God rest their souls. We fought you because we are free and because we want freedom for our nation. When you squander our security we squander yours.

"I am surprised by you. Despite entering the fourth year after Sept. 11, Bush is still deceiving you and hiding the truth from you and therefore the reasons are still there to repeat what happened."

But to avoid the suggestion he supports Kerry, he says:

"Your security is not in the hands of Kerry or Bush or al Qaeda. Your security is in your own hands and each state which does not harm our security will remain safe."

Despite what Kerry said about hunting down terrorists , he does represent change and a more "international" (i.e. New World Order) approach to problem solving.

To me, Bin Laden's implication is clear: Get rid of Bush and you will be spared. This could backfire in Bush's favor but I believe this was the intention.

I predict that Americans, who are Stockholm Syndrome hostages to the Illuminati in the "War on Terror" charade, will take the hint. For this and other reasons, such as the surge in new voter registration, they will elect John Forbes Kerry on Tuesday.


The video tape is authentic. It's OBL who isn't

Bin Laden reveals himself as a CIA-Illuminati asset by taking responsibility for the attack on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon. A cursory examination of the facts proves that the Iluminati perpetrated this atrocity using their Mossad, CIA, MI-6 and US Military Intelligence assets. These agencies work for the globalist cabal not their national governments. I refer you to my article
"Bush and Kerry Represent the Real Terrorists."

But most revealing is Bin Laden's praise for 9-11 commander Mohamed Atta. This nails him by association because Atta (not his real name) is probably an Israeli agent with ties to the highest levels of the New World Order.

Daniel Hopsicker has revealed that during the 1990's, while living in Hamburg, Atta was part of an elite "exchange program" with ties to Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller:

"Mohamed Atta, before becoming a 'terrorist ringleader,' enjoyed the patronage of a government initiative, known as the "Congress-Bundestag Program," overseen by the U.S. State Department and the German Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development..."

"News that Mohamed Atta had been on the payroll of the elite international program surfaced in a curious way just a month after the 9/11 attack: a brief seven-line report by German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on Oct. 18, 2001, under the headline "ATTA WAS TUTOR FOR SCHOLARSHIP HOLDERS."

"The U.S. end of the program is run out of an address at United Nations Plaza in New York by CDS International. The letters stand for Carl Duisberg Society, ...named for Carl Duisberg, a German chemist and industrialist who headed the Bayer Corporation during the 1920's."

In another article entitled, "Ten Things You Didn't Know About Mohammed Atta," Hopsicker reveals that this devout Islamic fundamentalist ate pork, snorted coke, loved nightclubs and had connections to US Defence contractors.

One other thing. He was a psychopath. When his American girlfriend Amanda Keller (an "escort" by trade), threw him out because he had a "flanky ass" and couldn't dance, he retaliated by disembowelling her pet cat and six kittens. Keller returned home to find bloody cat carcass pieces all over her apartment.

This is the man Osama bin Laden salutes as commander of the 19 heroic martyrs of 9-ll, with the words "may God rest his soul."

Jigs up Osama! Your cover is blown. You can come in from the cold.


I'm not writing this because I want you to vote for Bush. On the contrary, I think we could use a different gang of crooks, perverts and Satan-loving "Christians" and "Jews" in the White House. The Press will create a warm Kennedy-like excitement about the new Kerry administration. It will be the kinder hipper Communist brand of Fascism.

And I am looking forward to seeing how America takes to First Lady Theresa Heinz Ketchup. That will be the stuff of endless late-night comedy routines and editorial cartoons.

It might be a good thing to have all the Conservatives and Patriots outside the tent heaving grenades in. They are less likely to be suckered by UN-globalist policies than if Bush introduced them.

And with the Republicans expected to hold on to Congress, the government might be gridlocked, the best scenario from the point of view of the harried population.

On the other hand, if Tim Rifat is right, this may be a case of execution at noon as preferable to execution at dawn. He believes that the London-based Globalist plan will be derailed if Bush is elected. (See "Bush Victory Could Foil Occult Plot" )

You see Bush will expand the Iraq war to Iran. Kerry, who Rifat says is a Rothschild puppet, will give the Iranians time to prepare for World War Three, which is scheduled for around 2012. This will ultimately destroy Israel and the US, which might explain recent reports of Israeli and Illuminati types accumulating large acreages in Patagonia.

If this is true dear Americans, your real choice Tuesday is between one last decade of frolicking in the sunshine before the night descends forever, under Kerry; or a rocky dangerous ride under Bush that might throw a monkey wrench into longtime Globalist plans for World War Three and world dictatorship.

See also "The Zionist Roots of the War on Terror"

and "Bin Laden, Bush Serve the Same Master"

also Below (Scroll Down) "In Case you Didn't Get their Message, Zionists Translate Bin Ladin"

Bin Ladin may be dead. Then his effigy is being used by Zionists to promote Kerry.

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at