Direct Link to Latest News

Below- Poland in Crisis -- Globalist Traitors Battle Nationalists (scroll down)

The Feminist Formula for Killing Love

July 25, 2017

A woman's love for a man is expressed as trust. By attacking this trust, feminists kill love. 

Masculinity is defined by Power. Femininity is defined by Love. Heterosexual marriage involves the exchange of female worldly power for male power expressed as love. This requires "trust."

I have written on this subject  for 15 years but periodically the truth resounds again with greater clarity. If our culture wasn't controlled by Communists (Satanist bankers), my book Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the NWO would be a bestseller. We are being deliberately subverted. 

Woman loves a man by surrendering her worldly power and putting her trust in him. Female love is epitomized by trust. If she doesn't trust him, she doesn't love him. This is how two people become one in marriage. A husband "possesses" his wife; this is symbolized and consecrated by the sex act. 

Communist bankers use feminism to destroy love, marriage and family. They teach women to seek power instead of surrendering it. This is lesbian since masculinity is defined by power. Women get love by surrendering power. Instead of becoming one, man and woman compete for power.  

A constant drumbeat of propaganda (infidelity, domestic violence, sexual harassment etc.) disparages men and teach women NOT to trust them. Women are taught to be self-seeking, and promiscuous. By killing trust, they have killed love. This is the feminist formula for purging the world of love.

Communism is Satanism, and until we realize we are under daily occult attack, we will be helpless to defend ourselves. 

The difference between an alpha and beta man is that an Alpha Male convinces a woman to do what he wants. He makes her want to be his. A Beta Male hopes she'll love him if he does what she wants. A Beta Male can never satisfy a woman. 

But a woman must choose to belong (surrender) to her husband. And, of course, a husband must first earn her trust (through courtship) and keep it. 

Feminism cries out for "equality."  Equality does not mean the same. Men and woman have different needs. Men need power; women need love. Heterosexual love is the exchange of the two. 

Below are excerpts from a 2013 essay by a man who accurately describes the damage done in the real world by feminism


"Woman is a violent and uncontrolled animal... If you allow them to achieve complete equality with men, do you think they will be easier to live with? Not at all. Once they have achieved equality, they will be your masters."
- Cato the Elder

The New Age and Spiritual movements are fond of saying that history has been controlled by patriarchal societies which have suppressed the "feminine energy", hence causing imbalance and destruction. For example, the popular Internet films "Esoteric Agenda" and "Kymatica" make this point.

However, what these movements are afraid to admit, is that modern day feminism totally suppresses and destroys this "feminine energy" more than any patriarchal society ever did. And that's the irony, that feminism destroys femininity. So then, why use such a term when its effects are the exact opposite? Why isn't this movement called "masculinity for women"? 

Obviously, whoever was behind this movement knew something about neurolinguistic programming - that by pretending to be the opposite of what you are, you trick and lure people by using deception. In this case, women who consider themselves "feminine" will uncritically assume that a movement called "feminism" must be on their side in helping with their womanhood and femininity, when nothing could be further from the truth. 

The sad thing is that many women are tricked into thinking that this "new feminism" is somehow liberating them and allowing them to reach their full potential. Yet how can they become self-actualized by suppressing their own natural life force or feminine energy? 

How is that wholesome or harmonious, when it's destructive to relationships and forces men to emasculate themselves and deny their own masculinity? 

Any time you try to bring up something by oppressing others, it will be a formula for destruction. These women are tricked and lured in by the promise of "equality", which eventually turns them asexual, bestial and dominant before they know it. That's the "trap of feminism". 

The natural female energy is loving, caring, nurturing, tender, and seeks a symbiotic relationship with the male energy. This results in the creation of life, the highest power. Whatever you want to call it - God, Mother Nature, the Universal Creative Force, etc. - that is how it was naturally meant to be. Male and female energy were meant to complement each other, not compete and tear each other down, or engage in any "battle of the sexes", which is what has happened (and may possibly be engineered by the global elite according to some sources, Google "Nick Rockefeller and feminism").

Yet the feminist movement and its values preach the complete opposite and antithesis. Not only do they incite male bashing and double standards against men in society  but they indoctrinate women to look down on men, NOT NEED men, NOT WANT men, be independent, and view males as lower forms of life that are creeps and oppressors by nature. Men are not respected or admired, but seen as immature and dumb.


Feminism ... makes dating a nightmare of epic proportions, and totally disrupts the natural harmony of men and women. It turns women hateful and apathetic toward men. In effect, it gives women an unaccountable status where they can get away with anything, and demonetize anyone who resists. As a result, they can abuse and mistreat men without judgment or consequences, for it is taboo to argue or stand up to them.

Females in America are given role models in the form of action stars, like Angelina Jolie, who in Tomb Raider as Lara Croft, is rough and tough, kicks ***, does not need men, does not act sweet, feminine or tender, does not giggle or blush, and all the while looking sexy at the same time.

Yet any honest natural man will tell you that such a woman with no feminine qualities is not attractive at all, and dealing with her is very awkward. How can you have a loving, intimate, fulfilling relationship with a woman who is rough and tough, doesn't need you and tries to act stronger than you? You can't flirt with her, court her, or charm her without feeling like you are violating her "independence from femininity". Yet you can't treat her like a male buddy either, because no matter how hard she tries to act like a man, she is not one, in ANY way. So what can you do with her?! You can't treat her like a man or a woman! It's the most awkward and unnatural thing.

Plus, a feminist can never become a man, because a normal man is not high strung or easily offended by little things the way a feminist or masculine woman is. Thus these feminists are more like bestial freaks of nature, rather than men, which is a horrible thing.

Furthermore, these feminists and independent women do not like to dress feminine. They hate wearing skits and high heels (which they view as oppressive) and like cutting their hair short to look like men. How can that be beautiful or feminine to men? How can that bring out the male attraction for the feminine? How can being strong, masculine and independent soothe a man's need for tenderness and fulfill his need for love and romance and his need to merge with the female energy?!

What strong independent American women don't understand, is that you can't make a man become more masculine by becoming masculine yourself. You bring out the masculinity in a man by becoming FEMININE! That's the key truth that feminism hides from you. Obviously feminism has F***ED up relationships in America, whether it was engineered or not. There's no way around it. And that's NOT a good thing. 


It's a total scam against women. It masculines women and emasculates men, twisting the male/female dynamic out of whack, turning America into the most unnatural dating scene in the world. It is also tyranny in disguise, which seeks to placate and weaken males, while giving women unaccountable power, which corrupts and ruins relationships. 

Feminists NEVER win on logic or reason, because their movement is not a rational one at all, but a hateful emotional one that uses shaming tactics rather than reason. Overall, it is destructive and deceptive to both men and women. Worst of all, it destroys and suppresses the most beautiful thing in the world - the feminine beauty and soul. 

So if you are really pro-women and pro-female, you'd expose this scam and bring awareness of it, so people can see what it really is. You'd help women get back in touch with their true divine female energy inherent in them, and stop this scam which tries to get women to deny their own femininity. 


Scruples, the game of moral dilemmas

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for " The Feminist Formula for Killing Love "

Santiago said (July 27, 2017):

You say, communist bankers use feminism to destroy love, marriage and family.

There are two reasons more!

To tax the other half of population,

And to get the children into they educational system of mental control

sorry my English

keep the good work, is admirable

Below- Dunkirk Proves WW2 Was a Charade (scroll down)

Poland in Crisis -- Globalist Traitors Battle Nationalists

(Left, Soros' useful idiots take to the streets) 

We're in a life-and-death struggle
for the future of the human race 
between Communists (satanist, globalists,"liberals") 
and nationalists. 
As in America, globalists in Poland are 
resorting to extreme behavior to intimidate
their opponents. In the article below
a Polish reader conveys the
urgency of the situation.

by Patriotic Pole

Poland is under massive attack right now. They want to destroy the present right wing government (PIS Law and Justice party) and get back the former communist, traitor PO government that served the Germans and Brussels. Majority of Polish media belongs to German owners, which continually attack Polish right wing, conservative party.

They produce fake news and horrible, lying propaganda among Poles and abroad to discredit PIS and the President as well. They mock and ridicule them and are very vicious in what they do.

Poland, like Hungary does not want to OBEY Brussels, Merkel and Big Brother, so now it's going to be destroyed like Ukraine and many other countries. This is always the same plan, to make people hate the government and riot against it, and we know what happens next.

It's getting serious; they have a very detailed 16 points plan to do it, step by step. There are people connected with Soros, this woman- Lyudmyla Kozlovska, left, is Ukrainian, (a friend of Soros). She started the foundation called -Open Dialogue. They spread lots of info, how to act, what to do, and agitation against this government through Facebook. 

On Facebook she talks people into switching this government off and paralyzing the country in order to force this government to give up on introducing changes in the old, communist and corrupted judiciary system and to resign.

 Since this gov was elected by the majority of Polish people, the former government which is full of traitors and communists cannot stand it. They are afraid of being exposed, their frauds and thefts, their corruption and connections, so they (the present opposition) have been doing all they can to destroy the present government which is very bravely and steadfastly trying to repair the country. If it was not for this government, Poland would be no more, just a shell with nothing left, no jobs, no money, no babies as thousands of Poland emigrated to various countries for lack of prospects, very low wages etc. This was done and promoted ( emigration) under the former leader, the prime minister Donald Tusk. 

They are pure evil, the opposition is extremely arrogant and will not hesitate to destroy the present gov in any possible, vicious way in order to get the power back into their hands. 

The head of the former gov was Donald Tusk, left, who now works as the president of European Council in Brussels. Many people mock him calling him the king of Europe. He is the traitor, always working against Poland, even now, the best friend of Merkel. Sold out most of Polish industry; whatever was worth anything he sold it for pennies. 

This is his latest letter Donald Tusk (@eucopresident) on Twitter where he urges the President to veto judicial reform measures. 

It's such a shame as this man always acts against Poland. He is not on our side, he has no respect among Polish patriots and Polish people.

The people who are rioting in the streets now are also spreading fake news abroad on purpose. Their call to action is : "Act in the streets and abroad" (to slander and destroy the present gov). So they scream - "Dictatorship!, They take away our freedom! They destroy our democracy!" etc. which is all lies. They go to Brussels and report on this gov accusing it of various, evil things, which is all done for the sake of destruction of this gov as they hate everything that comes from PIS ( Law and Justice ruling party).

This is the best gov, Poland has ever had since WW II. It's very patriotic, Christian, supporting family and tradition, national identity, traditional values, Polish history and it's working for people not for their own benefit, it's trying to repair and restore what the previous one had damaged and stolen or sold out. 

For the first time in history Polish parents are receiving financial help for their children which helps them in a huge way to supply their needs, so the number of new born babies started growing sharply, 14,000 more babies born this year than a year ago. This government exposes lots of frauds and also murder in Smolensk, the plane crash with the Polish gov and president Kaczynski). The ruling of former gov under Tusk was just constant lies, emigration, poverty, fraud and deception. Many believe that it was involved in murder of 90 people in the plane crash in Smolensk. They have always had pure hatred towards PIS and Kaczynski brothers. (One of them was the President of Poland who died in 2010 and the other one is now the head of the ruling party but does not hold any formal function in the government.)

Obviously Brussels is not happy as Poland is getting stronger and richer, and the gov listens to Polish people who said clearly, they do not want Islamic invasion so the gov is strongly against any so called refugees in Poland. This drives Brussels mad as they try different tactics to take those people in. They threaten Poland with sanctions, isolation etc. The former gov agreed to take thousands. 

They blame now the new law, which is going to change the judiciary system but the change is very much needed as the system is terribly corrupted by the former, communist governments. Moreover, the changes are to make that system just as it is in Germany and many other Western countries so this is just an excuse to overthrow this government. 

This government is very gentle with rioters. The former one, led by Tusk, would have had police forces chasing away all those people by water guns etc, which happened many times. 


Most Polish people support this government and many have changed their mind and started supporting it seeing what is going on. 

And this amazing speech by D. Trump. I have never been his fan but that speech was amazing. It happened two weeks ago and now there is destruction of Poland going on. It's too brave, too rebellious, too family and God oriented for communists, for Soros, for Brussels for the devil himself.  

This is the info in main media

Victor Orban, Hungary supports Poland, He built a wall to stop refugees, very strong leader.

Scruples, the game of moral dilemmas

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Poland in Crisis -- Globalist Traitors Battle Nationalists"

MN said (July 26, 2017):

I'm Polish and I can confirm this article being spot on target! It encompasses most important facts in a nutshell and even though there is so much more that could be said this is pretty much it. One thing to add is that the the socialist system never really fell in Poland it gently transformed into this ugly and very corrupt mafia style regime which robbed our citizens viciously for nearly 30 years, no former high calibre oppressor was ever trailed and sentenced, and now when we fight to rid ourselves from the "solid beton" judiciary system which does everything to prevent any justice happening we not only are being attacked by our own crooks but also by their masters from the EU who want to be able to rape our country continuously as up until recently...

MG said (July 26, 2017):

To me this is more a battle between Stalinist's (Total Opposition which consists of 3 parties in the Parliament and the EU President Donald Tusk) vs Trotskyst's (the governing party led by the Kaczynski brother who is the one steering the government from the back seat and he was steering the President until the nullification of the bill)

First of all what all these 4 parties have agreed on; TTP, CETA, GMO food into Poland, Forced vaccinations and staying in the EU.

Now what these parties disagree on;

Total Opposition sees Poland as basically an extension of Germany and are for International Socialism

Law and Justice for the most part want to be an extension of the US and Israel and they want National Socialism

While I really like Law and Justice's policy of not letting in any migrants I really don't like their brainless Americanism/Zionism, their disturbing Russo-phobia and their tendency for economic socialism.

By the way I voted for the 4th opposition party a party that calls it's self an anti-system party and it's main goals are a new constitution and overall political reformation of Poland as well as to bring new ideas, young Poles and new people into the political scene that is filled with names that have been being recycled for over 25 years (all the other parties are filled with those recycled names).

This party was not a part of the protests but decided not to vote for the bill which they said (and I agree) would give way too much power to the Minister of Justice over all judicial decisions. They congratulated the President when he made the decision to nullify 2 of the 3 parts of the bill as well as saying he is for judicial reform but a fair and balanced judicial reform.

PR said (July 26, 2017):

In no way am i defending the former ruling party PO.
But you have to know that the deceased president - Lech Kaczynski was the one who brought back b'nai b'rith to Poland. Most of PIS is being accused of being jewish, under changed names. I can not confirm this, however it seems plausible. The party is definately dancing in the tune of the establishment, although the music strikes a chord in catholic, nationalist Poles, it in no way strays from the plan. They are still letting Poland to be raped by foreign capital like Chevron with fracking.

There are also voices that it is starting to get "hot" in Israel/Palestine, and that the Jews may want to return to their "Polin". While it sure sounds great that PIS is listening to the voters and not letting in "refugees" (called "uchodzcy" in Polish but jokingly referred to as "nachodzcy" wich means "impostor") but more probably it means that the Jews may not want any "nachodzcy" in their future home. Poland is also being molested to pay up reparations for the Jews for the 2WW. Can You believe it ? Us ? They want a sum that totals our whole one year budget.

I believe forgetting that all major and visible political forces are part of the problem is letting yourself to be fooled by the oldest trick in the hat.

Below -"British Israel" and Cabalist Supremacism (scroll down)

Dunkirk Proves WW2 Was a Charade

July 24, 2017


The evacuation of 340,000 Allied soldiers from Dunkirk in 1940
was an ignominious defeat being painted as some kind of
victory in a hit movie that opened last week. The real story is
that Hitler let the British army depart because he was a "British"
 (i.e. Illuminati Jewish) agent.  

"If Hitler were really interested in peace with England, he would have taken its army prisoner. 
to be drawn into a two-front war and be destroyed, which was the goal 
of his Illuminati Jewish masters." 

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

The "miracle at Dunkirk" is regarded as an extraordinary peace overture to England. We don't normally associate Hitler with such magnanimity.

In May 1940, the British were on the verge of defeat. The English army was trapped at Dunkirk. Rather than take them prisoner, Hitler halted his generals for three days allowing 340,000 men to escape.

A common explanation is that Hitler didn't want a world war, and had no stomach for fighting England. According to Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Louis Kilzer, author of Churchill's Deception (Simon & Schuster, 1994),
Hitler believed the future of Western civilization depended on the cooperation of Germany and her Aryan cousins: England and the United States. His territorial demands were limited to Communist Russia, which he regarded as a proxy for Jewish world ambitions. He was determined to avoid fighting a war on two fronts.

"The blood of every single Englishman is too valuable to shed," Hitler said. "Our two people belong together racially and traditionally. That is and always has been my aim, even if our generals can't grasp it." (Kilzer, p.213)

According to Kilzer, Hitler was trying to convince the English to make peace. In exchange, he was ready to retreat from Western Europe and from much of Poland.

CHARADE: Hitler Must Have known England is also Jewish proxy

A more truthful explanation is that Hitler was false opposition. He regarded himself as a British (i.e. Illuminati) agent. It was common knowledge both in England and Germany that far from being "Aryan", England was a proxy for the same Jewish bankers Hitler pretended to oppose. A book by Wolf Meyer-Christian, "The Anglo Jewish Alliance" published in Nazi Germany in 1940 states: 

The unity of the continent is threatened from one direction alone: the English isle. It is not threatened by the English people but by English imperialism: the will to conquer by a relatively small group. This group is as much English as it is Jewish and Jewish as it is English, and therein lies the problem...

Again, the German and European jewish problem can only be resolved when...the alliance between the British ruling class and the leaders of world Jewry is dissolved forever. For this alliance is Europe's deadly enemy. (pp. 24-25)

In 1941, Friedrich Wilhelm Euler, Nazi Germany's leading expert on Jewish genealogy, published a lengthy article entitled "The Penetration of Jewish Blood into the English Upper Class." Virtually all of his 148-page article consisted of a catalog of Jewish conversions and subsequent marriages with non-Jews, starting in the fourteenth century. The evidence proved that the English aristocracy had literally sealed a "marriage with Jewry" in terms of its "blood substance." 

This was also common knowledge in England. In 1922, British social critic Hilaire Belloc described the British Empire as a partnership between Jewish finance and the British aristocracy.

"After Waterloo [1815] London became the money market and the clearing house of the world. The interests of the Jew as a financial dealer and the interests of this great commercial polity approximated more and more. One may say that by the last third of the nineteenth century, they had become virtually identical."   ("The Jews" 1922) 

If Hitler were really interested in peace with England, he would have taken its army prisoner. That would have forced England to sue for peace.  Instead he allowed Germany to be drawn into a two-front war and be destroyed, which was the goal of his Illuminati Jewish masters. 

General Guderian later reflected, 'What the future of the war would have been like if we had succeeded in taking the British Expeditionary Force prisoners at Dunkirk is now impossible to guess.'


When Winston Churchill was visiting Germany, in 1932,  Putzi Hanfstaengl tried to arrange a meeting with Hitler. Hitler was dining at the hotel where Churchill was staying but apparently declined. It wouldn't do for two Zionist political actors --future "antagonists" -- to be seen huddled together before the show began.   

Both Hitler and Churchill were pawns of the Zionist bankers. According to historian Thomas J. O'Keefe,   Churchill said in his Memoirs that ex-German Chancellor (1930-1932) Heinrich Brüning  revealed  the identities of Hitler's backers in a 1937 letter:

 'I didn't, and do not even today for understandable reasons, wish to reveal from October 1928, the two largest regular contributors to the Nazi Party were the general managers of two of the largest Berlin banks, both of Jewish faith and one of them the leader of Zionism in Germany."

Churchill was funded by a different branch of the same Illuminati Jewish banking syndicate. O'Keefe cites a speech by David Irving on the "Focus Group" set up by Bernard Waley Cohen, a prominent Zionist banker.  

wc.jpg "The Focus was financed by a slush fund set up by some of London's wealthiest businessmen -- principally, businessmen organized by the Board of Jewish Deputies in England, whose Chairman was a man called Sir Bernard Waley Cohen, left. Sir Bernard Waley Cohen held a private dinner party at his apartment on July 29, 1936. This is in Waley Cohen's memoirs.

 ... The 29th of July, 1936, Waley Cohen set up a slush fund of 50,000 pounds for The Focus, the Churchill pressure group. Now, 50,000 pounds in 1936, multiply that by ten, at least, to get today's figures. By another three or four to multiply that into US dollars. So, 40 times 50,000 pounds -- about $2 million in US terms -- was given by Bernard Waley Cohen to this secret pressure group of Churchill in July 1936. The purpose was -- the tune that Churchill had to play was -- fight Germany. Start warning the world about Germany, about Nazi Germany. Churchill, of course, one of our most brilliant orators, a magnificent writer, did precisely that.

    For two years, The Focus continued to militate, in fact, right through until 1939. And I managed to find the secret files of The Focus, I know the names of all the members. I know all their secrets. I know how much money they were getting, not just from The Focus, but from other governments. I use the word "other governments" advisedly because one of my sources of information for my Churchill biography is, in fact, the Chaim Weizmann Papers in the State of Israel.

strakosch.jpgIrving then revealed further details of Churchill's financing by the Czechs, as well as the facts of Churchill's financial rescue by a wealthy banker of Austro-Jewish origins, Sir Henry Strakosch, left, who, in Irving's words, emerged "out of the woodwork of the City of London, that great pure international financial institution." When Churchill was bankrupted overnight in the American stock market crash of 1937-1938, it was Strakosch who was instrumental in setting up the central banks of South Africa and India, who bought up all Churchill's debts. When Strakosch died in 1943, the details of his will, published in the London Times, included a bequest of £20,000 to the then Prime Minister, eliminating the entire debt.

Irving dealt with Churchill's performance as a wartime leader, first as Britain's First Lord of the Admiralty and then as Prime Minister. The British historian adverted to Churchill's "great military defeat in Norway, which he himself engineered and pioneered," and mentioned the suspicion of Captain Ralph Edwards, who was on Churchill's staff at the time, that Churchill had deliberately caused the fiasco to bring down Neville Chamberlain and replace him as prime minister, which subsequently happened."


The Second World War was orchestrated to fulfill the long term Zionist goal of Illuminati one world government. Irving spoke of Dunkirk:

bankerwarsuffering.jpeg"In May 1940, Dunkirk, the biggest Churchill defeat of the lot....Letters between Churchill and the French Prime Minister, Paul Reynaud, revealed the ugly truth that Churchill, himself, gave the secret order to Lord Gort, the British General in command of the British expeditionary force at Dunkirk, "Withdraw, fall back," or as Churchill put it, "Advance to the coast." That was Churchill's wording. "And you are forbidden to tell any of your neighboring allies that you are pulling out. The French and the Belgians were left in the dark that we were pulling out."

Of course Hitler quixotically allowed 340,000 British and Allied soldiers to escape at Dunkirk. The Zionist choreographers wanted the Nazis to succeed initially, but not to administer a knockout punch.

The war had to be long and costly both in lucre and in life. Germany had to be completely destroyed and Judeo Communist Russia had to conquer Eastern Europe. Non-Zionist Jews had to be sacrificed so they would dedicate themselves to building the Rothschild fiefdom known as Israel.    

Revised & Updated from Dec 29, 2011


Thanks to Peter Myers for his invaluable news list. He sent Moore's article to my inbox.


Related-  80,000 Allied Soldiers Left Behind

Makow- Are World Wars Orchestrated?

Hitler & Bormann Were Traitors

Bankers Planned World Wars to Destroy Germany

Illuminati Used Appeasement to Trick Hitler

Hitler Used Rothschild Banker's Typewriter

Winston Churchill Illuminati

Nazi Zionist Collaboration- Josef Ginsburg Interview



Scruples, the game of moral dilemmas

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Dunkirk Proves WW2 Was a Charade "

Luther said (January 3, 2012):

Constantly the media has beaten us over the head with World War II as the 'greatest generation', but this article puts it directly in perspective. People who do not know their history are doomed to repeat it over and over...

The unsubstantiated proof given in this article destroys the notion that the above statement is true and rather, shows that generation to be one of the most blind and gullible. I knew about the North American support of Nazism by Prescott Bush (grandfather of George W. Bush) through Chase Manhattan Bank and Brown & Root, along with other ruling elite families including the Fords and Rockefellers.

It was good to have the information on the British and European bankers especially Zionists that fueled the war effort in Europe leading up to an eventual "showdown" between the allied effort and Hitler's Nazi Germany and their allies. How else could a conflict as huge as a world war be launched by nations that were in the grip of a worldwide depression?

Guy said (January 3, 2012):

Further to your 29th December piece on Churchill ( and Hitler's ) financial backing readers might be interested to know that the Churchill family's collusion with Zionist bankers actually goes right back to the Duke of Marlborough, his supposedly esteemed ancestor:

For Marlborough and Solomon Medina read Churchill and Strakosch, Waley-Cohen.

Ross said (January 1, 2012):

Don't leave out the role of the Whore of Revelaition.

The Luciferian Jesuits are the movers and shakers who infiltrate anything for the purpose of advancing the whore church.

All roads lead to Lucifer's useful fools headed by Kolvenbach and Nicholos.

Tavistok mind control is nothing more than Loyola's "spiritual" excercises.

Cliff Shack said (January 1, 2012):

Here is one of the first articles that I had written on the subject in the 1990's. David Icke had subsequently posted it on his site:
It may provide additional info for those interested in the matter.

Michele said (December 31, 2011):

Churchill was not the grand old man that everyone makes him out to be, he was a petty tyrant and my Welsh roots would attest to that in the Tonypandy riots of 1910. As the article shows Churchill was a traitor, if not a traitor then as good as because he lacked military skills and was in charge of several "defeats". He cared little for civilians, they were just pawns in the Great Game. He wasn't a total insider however, he was a puppet politician greedy for money and power. He may not have been in on the real aims of the power holders but he was a willing dupe for them and followed orders from above just like any good little pyschopath. Follow the money.

Dan said (December 31, 2011):

Brinkmanship is routine for power brokers. During the Thirty Years War in the 17th century, Cardinal Richelieu secretly funded a mercenary expedition of Dutch and German Lutherans to fight Spanish Catholics in the interest of French politics.

During the early 1980's, the Reagan/Bush government covertly provided Iran with replacement parts for the arsenal of American weaponry left by the Shah, while arming Saddam Hussein during the ten year Iraq/Iran war.

Today corporations make hefty contributions to all political parties for the same elections. It's the ancient game of buying influence, hedging bets, or simple bribery

Think Outside the Propaganda Matrix, says Tony Blizzard

July 15, 2017

blizzard (1).jpg
Think Outside the Propaganda Matrix, says Tony Blizzard (left)

Most people never think "outside the box" and the box is created by their enslavers.  Whether too timid or lazy or intimidated, makes no difference.  People must think things out, investigate and act as individuals rather than one more sheep in the herd.

An example:  

When I lived in Idaho my wife and I bought an older home in a town in an area which had been a federal land grant even before Idaho was a state.  We paid off the property before long.  I got out the records in the county assessors office, found the original land patent signed in the name of the President of the United States at that time and upgraded our portion of it through all the owners from the time the patent was granted until us.  Disregarding our warranty deed (which only warrants that no one else is claiming the property, similar to a quit claim deed - deeds do NOT grant title) I had the updated land patent notarized, advertised and took it to the county assessor who understood that my wife and I, indeed, DID now have title to our property as he rightly told me he COULD NOT ISSUE US A TAX BILL (as we actually owned the property).  All that was reserved from us were mineral rights, which no one had an interest in since the gold rushes were over, and water rights, which we understood as I was running the irrigation ditches in our part of town.  

The point is that I did what was necessary to actually OWN my property instead of whining about the government always keeping ownership and taxing at will.  Granted, I could not have done this had there not been a land patent but I took the initiative to find out if one existed and acted upon it.

Similarly, I home schooled my kids back when it was a jailable offense, moving every year so as to avoid the do-gooder sheep who would turn me in to the "authorities" in a NY second.  Now in their sixties, not one of them runs with the herd, all my grand children and great grand children either are or will be home schooled when they reach the age.  There is not a brainwashed person in the bunch.

Before my teens I began doing my own thinking, which soon branded me a rebel, a maverick.  So already at the end of WW2, being an independent thinker was being disparaged.  I suppose this propaganda program is also the reason for so much blather about peer pressure which I never understood as I didn't care what the other kids thought of me and wondered why such an idea would matter to them.

We each have our own mind.  If each uses his properly the most sophisticated propaganda cannot capture one's mind.

Barbara Kulazska RIP

July 8, 2017

(Barbara left, with Doug Christie & Marc Lemire)

Barbara Kulazska RIP  

Canadian free speech lawyer and close associate of Doug Christie, Barbara Kulaszka, passed away at age 64 from lung cancer on June 15. Barbara and the family insisted on secrecy.  Even long-time allies were not informed of her death of the funeral on June 19.
Barbara played a key role in research and drafting legal facta in the second Zundel "false news" trial in 1988. She was a huge help in Doug Christie's attack on Canada's war crimes law in the Finta case in 1990. The appeal to the Supreme Court virtually destroyed the law's usefulness to the vengeance lobby as the following of reasonable orders was accepted as a defence.
In later years, Barbara was a vigorous defender of free speechers charged with libel by Richard Warman, people like Marc and Connie Fournier (a long and complicated case) and myself.
She was Marc Lemire's lawyer in his heroic confrontation with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. He was prosecuted -- another Richard Warman complaint -- under the notorious Sec . 13 (Internet censorship) which was repealed by Parliament in 2012. Marc's was the first victory -- even if partial -- under Sec. 13. She continued to represent him as the  question of the constitutionality of Sec. 13 moved to the Federal Court and then the Federal Court of Appeal in 2013. She also represented Henry Makow in a complaint from the Canadian Jewish Congress to the CHRC. 
Barbara had been in delicate health for many years.
She was first trained as a librarian and then switched to law.
She died in her hometown of Brighton, Ontario, surrounded by family.

Memorial Event

* Music by Christian Klein, Dieter Kahl and Grace-Eki Oyama

* Tributes by Marc Lemire,  Christian Klein, Lynda Mortl, Paul Fromm and others.

* Tributes read from people across the world.

TORONTO. Wednesday,  July 12, 2017. Richview Library, Auditorium (1806 Islington Ave, Etobicoke, ON.  -- two blocks north of Eglinton (6:15 p.m). **** NEW LOCATION & TIME****Admission $10.00

Trump in Poland--Observations from a Polish Canadian

July 6, 2017

1707052226-Trump-In-Poland-To-Attend-20-Summit.jpgTrump in Poland--Observations from a Polish Canadian

by MG

As you've probably heard Trump was in Poland Wednesday and my did he get a welcome party ... the propaganda machine was in overdrive last night and all day today in Poland.  So he had a meeting with our President and then he made a beautiful speech about Poland being the heart and soul of Europe and our determination and will as a nation and people ... he probably won over tons of Poles with it being that he even pulled at my heart strings even though I new there was a game of emotional manipulation going on here.  Later there was a press conference with the media where he took shots at Russia and North Korea.  Finally late last night it was announced that the US is selling Poland the Patriot missile defense system.  All of this added to the already 10,000 or so American soldiers that have been in Poland since Obama sent them over here last fall; interestingly all of them are being stationed in the Western part of Europe closer to Germany and none in the east close to Russia.      

Now my take ... American and British freemasonry (like your recent article showed they always have been one and the same) are preparing Polish freemasonry to be ready again to sacrifice their young Polish men and women as a part of the Wests political and military chess match with Russia and China.  Like Poland was sacrificed before and after WW2 to the Nazis and Soviets it looks like we are being set up for a repeat; there are 2 major forms this could take  ....

1 - The more obvious is the Polish government sending thousands of Polish soldiers to Ukraine to help the Ukrainians in their losing battle against the Russian separatists.

2 - The less obvious but I think equally as possible is the sudden beginning of a Polish - Belorussian war that would be a proxy war between the West and Russia.  I don't have to explain why the West would want this war; they like every war as they see all of them as a business.  As for Russia, they might want this war because President Lukaszenko of Belarus over the last year or so has been making moves that seem to show that he wants be the like an Orban in Hungary or Erdogan in Turkey ... so a free agent in the whole chess match and not a Russian puppet state.  A war with Poland might force Lukaszenko to jump back into Putin's outstretched hands.