Direct Link to Latest News

BELOW- Why All Porn is Gay (scroll down)

The Real Agenda Behind "Gay Rights"

April 24, 2018


(left, Prime Minister Castro and wife at Toronto Gay Pride Parade 2017) 

Because of the Masonic control of government and media, society is

stupidly oblivious to the hate-filled attack on our heterosexual identity, an attack more vicious, insidious, and pervasive. Do you remember any public debate and vote on this subject? The article below documents the real agenda behind "gay rights"

i.e. destroying the heterosexual character of society. 

Written 17 years ago, it is prescient.

The Other Attack on Our Manhood ( Updated from Sept. 2001) 

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Since 1970, gay-feminist activists have waged a campaign to foster homosexuality among heterosexuals. They are candid about this goal. 


"The end goal of the feminist revolution is the elimination of the sex distinction itself," says Shulamith Firestone (The Dialectic of Sex, 1972, p.11) "Heterosexual hegemony is being eroded," says Gary kinsman.

 "The forms of sexuality considered natural have been socially created and can be socially transformed." (The Regulation of Desire: Sexuality in Canada, 1987, p.219) 

"In a free society, everyone will be gay," says Allen Young, a pioneer of the Gay Liberation Movement. (John D'Emilio, Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America, p.322)

Unlike us, gays understand that their campaign for "equal rights" will erase the distinction between gay and straight. In the words of gay historian Jonathan Katz:


In one sense the right is accuse the gay and lesbian rights movement of threatening homogenization....if gay and lesbian liberationists ever achieve full equality, they will do away with the social need for the hetero/homo division. The secret of the most moderate, mainstream gay and lesbian civil rights movement is its radically transformative promise (or threat, depending on your values). The Invention of Heterosexuality, 1995, p.188.

Gay and feminist activists have found common cause because ignoring all scientific evidence, they insist male-female distinctions are artificial. While many heterosexuals consider themselves "feminists", feminism is a homosexual movement. It believes that men and women are not only equal but the same and only social conditioning makes us different. Homosexuality is love of the same.

Today, gay and feminist activists want "people" to make love to "people" regardless of their sex. They depict normal heterosexual behavior as pathological. They demonize men as abusers and the heterosexual family as oppressive. The way to social justice, they believe, is to abolish heterosexuality altogether.

Gay-feminist activism is founded in Marxism and is a subversive force. Both the Gay and Woman's liberation movements were spawned by the 1960's Marxist "New Left" These groups transferred the Marxist analysis of class to gender. The goal is the same: the "patriarchy" (white men, capitalism, class) is the source of all evil and must be destroyed ("transformed"). Women (the proletariat) and anyone else deemed "oppressed" (gays, certain favored minorities) must be handed position and power.


Why have straights passively endured this attack?

 1) The gay-feminists have waged their war with impunity by asserting their victim status. Guilt, whether founded or not, is a very potent weapon. Straights can't even defend their own sexuality for fear of accusations of "homophobia" and "sexism." These days anyone who does not want to be gay is homophobic. 


(Current Toys R Us Ad in Sweden)

2) Typical Marxists, they practiced deceit successfully. They attracted widespread support by pretending to champion women when in fact they always had a revolutionary homosexual agenda. Now politicians and media are in massive denial because they have empowered these radicals and even put them in charge of educating the young. The situation is comparable to the liberal refusal in the 1940's and 1950's to admit the government was riddled with Soviet Spies.

Many public schools virtually "break the ice" for gays. For example, the Grade Seven curriculum in Ontario introduces 12-year-old children to oral and anal sex. Phyllis Benedict, president of the Ontario Elementary Teacher's Federation said the union is "trying to promote a more positive [homosexual] environment in schools." (National Post, Aug.16) This extends to undermining the heterosexual family by reading books like "Aasha's Moms" and "Two Dads, Brown Dads, Blue Dads."

On the other hand, heterosexuality is virtually a taboo. Our children's textbooks have been rewritten to eliminate any hint that men and women might be different, live in traditional families, or behave in "stereotypical" ways. 

As a university lecturer, I tried to teach novelists like D.H. Lawrence, who portrayed male-female love in positive terms. I was accused of "sexual harassment" by feminist activists and lost my job. (Sexual harassment is now defined as anything that makes a feminist uncomfortable.)


As heterosexuals, we cannot explore our sexuality because homosexuals may be "uncomfortable." This has led to the demoralization of society. We cannot celebrate men as masculine and women as feminine. We do not celebrate heterosexual love, the greatest gift that life offers us. This daily denial of our sexual identity amounts to persecution. It used to be 'live and let live.' Now gay and feminist activists will not let us live.


In a recent episode of the TV show Friends, Ross and Rachel are in a sports car. Rachel avoids paying a speeding fine by flirting with the handsome traffic cop. Ross takes the steering wheel and is stopped for driving too slowly. Well, if Rachel can do it, so can he. Ross tries to flirt with the male cop. I found Ross' behavior demeaning and embarrassing. The message is that we can all go both ways -- even the cop. This is the reality behind the gay activist demand for "equality". It isn't enough to tolerate them, we must become them. It doesn't matter if we are comfortable, as long as they are.

There was more on the same Friends episode. Chandler's father apparently is a drag queen. (Hypocritically, "he" is played by Kathleen Turner.) Chandler and Monica attend a drag performance by his father. Chandler reveals that he and Monica are getting married soon. There is awkwardness because dad wasn't invited. But don't despair. Chandler invites him to the wedding and we all enjoy a liberal "feel good" moment.

This situation would be deeply humiliating to any male who honors his own masculinity. We model ourselves on our fathers. Marriage is a heterosexual sacrament. A drag queen represents everything the son has rejected. But heterosexual values don't matter as long as drag queens are made comfortable. It's a wonder Chandler isn't gay himself. Stay tuned.

Homosexual behavior makes straights uncomfortable. Most men find the sight of two men kissing deeply repulsive. Gay families are not the same as ours. The adoption of straight children by gays denies their differences and distorts development. Gay marriages are different from hetero marriages and should have a different status. The gay demand for "equality" deliberately distorts our perceptions of ourselves. It implies the gay experience is the same as ours. It is not. As Katz says, the "secret" purpose is to "do away with the social need for the hetero/homo division."


In conclusion, the homosexual model does not fit heterosexuals. It's time to recognize that homo and heterosexuality are in fierce competition. There can only be one model. The most important domestic issue of the dawning 21st Century is:

Will ours be a heterosexual society that tolerates a 4% gay minority?

Or, will it be a homosexual society that persecutes a 96% straight majority? History is full of examples of minorities that have persecuted majorities. Take Communism for example.

If straights don't establish the norms, gay activists will. 


Related - Gays Acknowledge their Lifestyle is Toxic

------------------- Charles Socarides MD   - How America Went Gay 

-------------------- Gender Ideology Goes off the Deep End 

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Scroll Down for "Migrants funneled into Health Care Jobs in Canada are Illiterate" "

Why All Porn is Gay

April 23, 2018


(Porn king relied on gay porn)

Think of heterosexuality as monogamous 

and dedicated to rearing children; 

homosexuality as promiscuous 

and concerned with sex for its own sake.

Porn is creating new generations of heterosexuals who behave like homosexuals. 

(Updated from Feb. 2006) 

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

In 2004, a woman revealed details of Hugh Hefner's sex life.

If the Playboy founder is any indication, a life dedicated to porn and promiscuity leads to homosexuality and impotence. The 60's icon of suave masculinity was, in old age, a grotesque self-parody.

Hefner, who died last September, paid a bevy of whores $2000 a week to be his "girlfriends" and have sex with him every Wednesday and Friday. He used Viagra and watched male gay porn to stay erect while as many as ten concubines mounted him in succession. The other girls simulated lesbian sex to arouse him.

"He doesn't really do anything," says Jill Anne Spaulding, author of the book "Upstairs." He just lies there with his Viagra erection. It's just a fake erection, and each girl gets on top of him for two minutes while the girls in the background try to keep him excited. They'll yell things like, "F-k her daddy, f-k her daddy!" There's a lot of cheerleader going on!"

No one becomes a playmate without having intercourse with Hefner. The "girl next door" is now a whore, and Hefner's maudlin example of arrested development is a fitting epitaph for his Playboy Philosophy.

Playboy was not a spontaneous phenomenon. It was social engineering designed to foster homosexuality and family breakdown. See my "Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution." This is why Spaulding's revelations got so little publicity.


The "establishment" agenda is to destabilize and neuter us by encouraging homosexual behavior. This ensures we don't propagate since homosexuals have sex but generally don't have children.

They redefine "homosexual" as a "sexual preference" or "lifestyle choice" rather than a developmental disorder to entrap us. Never mind that the vast majority of homosexuals come from dysfunctional families or suffered sexual abuse as youths. Our reluctance to embrace homosexuality is considered "bigotry."

In response, let's take some liberties with these definitions ourselves. Having the right paradigm is the key to healthy behavior.

Forget about what you normally think of gay (same-sex) or straight (opposite-sex attraction.) Think of heterosexuality as monogamous and dedicated to rearing children; homosexuality as promiscuous and concerned with sex for its own sake.

Heterosexuality involves bonding permanently with a member of the opposite sex for love and usually procreation. It is participating in the natural life cycle, in the intrinsic meaning of life. Personal and societal health depend on heterosexuality.

Homosexuality is a form of arrested development caused by an inability to form a heterosexual bond due to identifying with your biologically opposite gender. As a result, homosexuals compensate using sex as a surrogate for love.

In these terms, society has become more homosexual because, due to social engineering (i.e. the "sexual revolution," feminism) many heterosexuals now fail to permanently bond. Normally, happily married heterosexuals can put sex in perspective and move on to more important things.

A perceptive reader recently wrote me: "If heterosexual sex outside of marriage is acceptable, if we eliminate the procreative aspect from sex, are heterosexuals any different from homosexuals in regards to the sexual activity?"

Exactly. I know these definitions are not "politically correct." PC is propaganda, social engineering and mind control. PC is an old Communist Party (i.e. Illuminati) term.

I do not disparage gays. According to my definitions, the vast majority of homosexuals are really "heterosexuals" like Hugh Hefner. And a small minority of homosexuals are monogamous and partake in some traditional heterosexual values.


Last year I wrote: "Throughout modern history, Illuminati bankers have used "sexual liberation" to subvert society and establish their subtle tyranny. As Masonic revolutionary Giuseppe Mazzini wrote, "we corrupt in order to rule."

The Illuminati bankers need to introduce "world government" to translate their unjust monopoly over credit into total world control.

They realized that they couldn't take control until they destroyed the family. This was a main plank of the Communist Manifesto in 1848, along with the creation of a private (Rothschild) central bank.

Every major "revolution" in modern history has increased Illuminati banker control and the sexual revolution is no exception.

The Illuminati used Hugh Hefner's "Playboy" to divorce sex from love, marriage, and family. They own the major cartels and control the media through advertising.

The movies are very effective in fostering homosexuality. Sex is often something reserved for your enemies. Recently I saw "Dr. No" (1962) again. The fashionable James Bond has sex with a woman even after he realizes she is involved in an attempt to kill him. After they have sex, Bond has her imprisoned.

In the movie Munich (2006), the Israeli assassins confront an attractive woman who killed their colleague. She displays her goods and suggests her death would be "a waste of talent." She thinks they might have sex with a woman they intend to kill.

Human beings are malleable and take their standards from movies. There is nothing so destructive to human society as the separation of sex and love. It reduces men to dogs, and women to fire hydrants.

The Illuminati wishes to harness sex in the interests of hate. Love is the enemy of hate and must be destroyed.


According to our definition of homosexuality, (i.e. promiscuity outside of love and/or procreation), all pornography is gay. The porn consumer is engaged in a promiscuous masturbatory fantasy. He is not focused on his marriage and progeny.

From what I have said, it should be clear that homosexuality is incompatible with heterosexuality, just as promiscuity is incompatible with monogamy. Gay activists admit their goal is to destroy heterosexuality.

Pornography is poisoning heterosexuality. There is a place for tasteful nudity as a stopgap while seeking marriage.
(See my "Managing the Male Sex Drive" ) But as you know, pornography has reached epidemic proportions. "Adult Video News" predicts revenue of $12.6 billion this year. The Internet has literally thousands of porn sites. TV and pop music increasingly are pornographic.

Pornography warps the way a man sees all women and girls. Many sites include girls as young as 14. See "Erototoxins"

Young females think they are useful for one thing only. Thousands in the porn industry display what everyone has instead of cultivating what is rare and valuable: femininity and the qualities sought in a wife and mother.

I hate to burst the bubble on a billion-dollar industry: Young naked women are practically identical. They have identical equipment. Boobs and bush. Symmetrical faces. Do men need to see literally thousands of examples?

There is something addictive here. Why don't men get sick of it? Why don't they suffer from gynecologist's fatigue? The plethora of breasts and splayed legs takes the wonder out of sex and causes contempt for women and impotence. Maybe this is the point: new drugs keep people running on empty. (See "The Porn Pharma Complex")

Sexual attraction is mostly a function of a woman's fertility. (Are men attracted to postmenopausal women?) Women are designed to marry and procreate when they are young and most attractive. Marriage ensured that men would have to commit if they wanted sex. By undermining marriage, occult social engineers have turned a critical social and reproductive activity into a lifetime obsession, better to divert, degrade and control the masses.


We were not prepared for the attack on our humanity by "sexual liberation" and porn. We didn't know our leadership had been subverted by the Illuminati.

Marriage and family are the essential building blocks of society. Family ensures that each new generation is properly nurtured and prepared for life. Most people receive values, purpose, identity, and love from their family roles. Heterosexuality provides life with profound meaning. There is no greater potential for love than marriage and parenthood.

Raising a child is the supreme act of devotion and faith in God; and is practiced and tested every day.

Homosexual social engineering is gradually destroying these sources of happiness and health, personal and societal. Porn is creating new generations of heterosexuals who behave like homosexuals. 


Related-   YouTube - What You Didn't Know About Hugh Hefner 

PLAYBOY and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution 

 "Confessions of a Survivor of the (Homo) Sexual Revolution"

A sex addiction web site.

New York teens turning to Lesbianism

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Why All Porn is Gay "

SJP said (April 24, 2018):

Re: Why All Porn is Gay - I don't disagree with the article's premise, yet I suggest porn addiction and homosexuality are likely both a result of children being raised by out-of-control mothers and weak or absent fathers, i.e., a yearning for The Father.

I neglected to make clear that I think the appeal of pornography comes from anger at mothers and a sublimated desire to control and commit violence against them.

My own experience was that overcoming anger by forgiving my mother caused the appeal of porn to evaporate.

James C said (April 23, 2018):

What a biased, narrow-minded, ignorant question: "if we eliminate the procreative aspect from sex, are heterosexuals any different from homosexuals in regards to sexual activity?" The writer is probably a Catholic who believes that the sole purpose of sex is procreation. There are many valid reasons why some heterosexuals may choose not to procreate. For example, given the existing state of the world, I cannot imagine why anyone would want to procreate. Second, many heterosexuals suffer inherited genetic diseases, which they do not want to pass on to offspring. Third, the state of the economy has become so hideous that raising a family in this day and age is an ongoing nightmare. Unless you have a secure six-figure income, you shouldn't even remotely consider having a family.

In conclusion, heterosexuals are not gay simply because they choose not to procreate. On the contrary, it can be the wisest, most humane thing to do.

Howard said (February 26, 2009):

Great article Henry; few are honest enough to tell it like it is. 2 obvious points. If homosexuality is a trait born in DNA, by definition the trait exterminates itself with that generation. One of your detractors pointed out he was a gay Christian. I mean no offence here, but that's as impossible as a person being a Christian murderer, liar, pedophile, astrologer, or witch. I used to think the ultimate oxy-moron was Military Intelligence, now I think it may be Military Chaplains. Christianity like the bible is not negotiable; we can take it or we can leave it. Just don't complain to Jesus is He decides to do the same.

Don said (February 26, 2009):

Good article about all porn being gay. I have one question that I think readers should ponder. Why should anyone pay for this stuff when it is given away for nothing?

Anyone who surfs the net will sooner or later be re-directed to a porn site. There must be thousands of sites. If one chooses, they could look at these sites for days on end without paying a penny. So why would anyone pay for this stuff? In a way it is like a restaurant that serves happy hour hors d'oeuvres without limit in order to entice patrons to stay for dinner. I have witnessed that scenario firsthand and almost always the people eat and drink their fill and leave without buying dinner. Internet porn is similar in this respect.

Looking at it strictly as a business, I have serious doubts as to whether it could survive giving away free samples of everything virtually without limit. I would bet that the sites are supported by funding other than the viewers or that there is a mixture of “sponsored” porn and viewer supported porn. The banksters promoting this filth have no qualms about collecting money for something they are giving away for free anyway, so the fools that pay are an added bonus to them.

I don’t buy nor do I know anyone who buys – porn or magazines such as Playboy, and I’m not writing about 700 Club members etc. In addition, I’ve never seen anyone purchase such a magazine when I’ve been at a store. Maybe someone buys this stuff at 3 AM, but with the economy being what it is, there must be some cutbacks and we should expect to see some of these businesses fail. That is - unless people are so addicted to it they buy it instead of food, or it is financed by other means this industry will collapse. I believe that the porn industry is financed by other means and will always be available for viewing regardless of the economy.


Dear Don,

I suspect it is being subsidized to corrupt young women (the models) and all men. -h

BM said (February 26, 2009):

Your article "Why All Porn Is Gay" is certainly provocative. I think that "Why All Porn Is Male" would be a more accurate title, though: it involves the "male gaze" and biology. Of course, male-on-male sexuality would only compound this basically male phenomenon of... voyeurism? objectification? promiscuity? (This promiscuity is nothing new: look how much appears in the Bible for example, among various religious patriarchs. For one thing, look how many wives they had!)

The Illuminati religion is a SOLAR PHALLIC CULT. This idolatry is at the core of modern Freemasonry. I'd recommend looking into the relevant presentations by Bill Schnoebelen, and William Cooper's "Mystery Babylon" series (on YouTube), for ample documentation.

The Cabalistic/Talmudic traditions you rightly decry represent PATRIARCHAL traditions (the "Traditions of the Fathers", which Jesus condemned). They embody male supremacism - not only Jewish supremacism. When male supremacism revs up, you're likely to see a lot of porn and promiscuity (or, alternately, a lot of hypocrisy, repression, and sexual abuse/pedophilia).

Lesbians and straight women, in my experience, do not tend to be nearly the porn aficionados that many gay men and straight men are. It's primarily a MALE phenomenon - not a "homosexual" phenomenon. (If you notice a lot of porn within the gay male community, that's essentially because it's male-on-male, i.e. male squared!)

I would agree with you that the sex act has primarily a reproductive function (as many traditions affirm). From that base, we can perceive a continuum of sexual activity that spreads further and further from this center. You seem hung up on the "homosexual identity" issue, implying that there is such a fixed state as a "heterosexual identity": in fact, any such rigid division is arbitrary, manmade, and not found in nature. Nor do you address bisexuality adequately. (I certainly don't find that self-identified homosexuals and bisexuals are any better served by the Illuminati than are self-identified heterosexuals! We're all in a similar cultural mess: and ought to show more compassion to one another. This will help thwart the Illuminati's divide-and-conquer strategy.)

Animals, like humans, are sexual: period. Gender attraction is a complex continuum. It's perhaps unfortunate for sexual theorists that the messy reality doesn't fit into neat conceptual boxes... but there you have it. Reality is not binary - contrary to what the machine-mind would have us believe!

Sexual intercourse can be a lot of fun: but eventually it's probably time to "put away childish things" and aim one's sights higher, rather than prolonging Peter Pan priapism! Beyond physical beings and sexual beings, we are spiritual beings. Yet many monastic traditions have sought to repress natural human sexuality - with disastrous results! Perhaps there is a time to explore one's sexuality and go a bit wild (youth), and a time to become more disciplined (maturity).

Randy Rimmer said (February 26, 2009):

I have just read your article and could not keep from laughing. The internet is a wonderful illuminator for showing just how utterly
stupid some people allow themselves to become when their critical thinking and logical functions are overwhelmed by prejudices, bias
and/or underlying mental deficiency.

Unfortunately there is no cure for foolishness so you will just have to suffer as you do from craziness. You poor creature.



I love your name. Fitting.


Bill said (February 26, 2009):

nteresting coincidence that this was rerun on rense today. i visited today.

it features lesbian vids, hetero vids (but mostly anal or oral), strange fetish vids like vomiting and an occassional shockingly violent vid (real, not staged). its totally free. the combination seems to be a witches brew of some sort.

not sure how to trace a websites origin but i have a feeling it is a psyop.

Jubin said (February 26, 2009):

At first, I did not understand where you were coming from on any issue. Slowly, I started to come around, when I would read from other sources, lines of thought or events that you clearly and cogently had already confirmed. I fought you all the way though, always looking for holes here and there, mostly finding none, actually at this moment I cannot think of one. I am good at looking for and finding holes, inconsistencies, but reading your work, and looking up your background, I found none really, and like I mentioned I was looking all the way, every time, but came up against a logic that pointed to my own holes. ha! kind of the ultimate switcheroo. proof of something. anyway, for some reason at first i was put off probably because i was equating some of your work vis-a-vis men with robert bly (cooky). But as I mentioned the logic and the argument is so very tight and revealing at the same time that all you can do is say yes. so thanks. very valuable. For example, regarding ' why all porn is gay [encore]' , you put into place and words ideas that i have been aware of but could not quite make sense of, until reading some of your work. and then having it confirmed by outside independent events or persons. so thats good. take care.

(Below- New Documentary Celebrates Jewish Superiority (scroll down)

Feminism Can be Cured (If Diagnosed Early)

April 22, 2018


(Left, Modern womyn, Communist dupes, go feral without healthy heterosexual intercourse. These are incurable,  up a creek without a paddle, but there is hope for less severe cases. See also, Women's Protests are a Cry for Male Love

The New World Order is a fait accompli.  They put "mission accomplished" (annuit coeptis) on the US dollar in 1929.

The Illuminati bankers control the life-blood of the economy, government credit, i.e. currency.  Yet no one is suspicious of their motives for promoting feminism and homosexuality in general? Feminism is Communist in origin.  The goal of Communism has always been to destroy the "bourgeois" i.e. nuclear family.

Most women need a husband's passionate devotion and the intimacy that comes from lifelong marriage.  Anonymous sex cannot compare to married sex. Women (and men) have been sold a bill of goods. 

But the cancer can be fought without radiation. 

Nicole writes:

 I have cited your Rockefeller/Feminism article hundreds of times over the years and I re-read it frequently to counteract the programming! One of my other favorites is your Politically Incorrect Advice for Young Men, which nearly all of my young male friends have received.  An article like this, aimed at women, could be equally powerful as the men's advice.

(updated from Nov 26, 2006)

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

I've had many emails from young feminists cussing me out for things I never said. So I was surprised to hear from "Megan" who actually read and understood my website. She realized feminist indoctrination had made her dysfunctional and she wanted help.

man_asking_woman_to_smile.jpg.653x0_q80_crop-smart.jpg"I am a woman, 20-years-old, who is grossly independent, and grew up with a "no boy can be better than me" complex. I was very capable in school, which my environment encouraged, pushing me to always be smarter, better, faster; having heard all this from such a young age, nothing seemed out of place. An eating disorder, troubled marriage, broken relationship with my mother and other problems later (which the few female friends I have managed to keep also share), it's obvious I need to rethink certain elements of my life: your work has found words for the silent, internal chaos which plagues my generation.

It is ironic to think that people, after having reached full physical maturity, could still need to READ to learn to become something as basic as the gender they were born with--but if we've been raised to be broken, we have to start somewhere.

I've noticed that ... you say [feminists] are lost causes. For all of the lost causes out there, you may want to consider publishing an essay or some material which points to the road of redemption: God knows there are a lot of us, and I'd hate to have the opportunity to heal, written off as "too late," and nothing more."

Megan, congratulations for being so wise and articulate for your years. Here are some ideas:

1. Find a feminine woman, a wife and mother, who is willing to act as your role model and mentor. This is a woman who is glad she has built her life around her husband and children. You might find such a woman in traditional settings, church or ethnic community center. This may be an opportunity to learn about Islam or Hinduism or Christianity. Get the pastor-person to help you find a role model. Obviously, you will decide whom you like.

2. My mother-in-law advised my wife: "Find a man to look after you, but be able to look after yourself." In other words, make husband and family your first priority while pursuing your career interests. If you go to university/college, focus on acquiring a marketable skill. Humanities are an indoctrination in feminist Masonic dysfunction. Ideally, you will marry and start a family before going to university, if you go at all.

3. Don't sleep with anyone unless you are in a loving long-term relationship hopefully leading to marriage. Consecrate yourself to your future husband and children. Date men five-or-more years older who want to get married.  

For intimacy, you must have exclusivity and permanence. Sex is an act of possession. You cannot be possessed by many men and ever belong to one. The ability to love/ trust dies. Your womb is not some stranger's spurinal. [More on sex later.]

4. Stop being "smarter, better, faster" than the men you meet.
To some extent, a woman self-effaces and lives through her husband and children. 

Find a man you naturally look up to, respect and trust. Don't waste time with boys. Men want power; women want love. Heterosexual union involves the exchange of the two: female power (in the worldly sense) for male love (his power expressed as love.) 

A woman loves a man by acquiescing and trusting, not challenging and competing. She gives him the power to grant her wishes (i.e. love her). Of course, he will consult her. Find a man with a powerful positive vision of life in which you have a central place. There is an implied message here for men. Men have to know what they want,  provide leadership and earn trust.

5. Two people don't become one by fighting over the same territory
. Generally speaking, the man "makes the house, the woman makes the home." This division of labor is natural and complementary. Women are designed to have and nurture children. They need men to support them. Learn how to be a homemaker and mother. Develop your personality and skills to be more desirable as a wife and companion.

Once the power-for-love arrangement is established, sex roles don't have to be rigid. The key is that a wife is willing to be First Mate to her Captain because he loves her, looks after her interests and is totally loyal. After that, who does what can be dictated by respective preferences, abilities and practical considerations.


(Rendered psychologically unfit for marriage. Groomed to become lesbians.)

6. Not all women need to marry and have children but the majority do. We are a pair-bonding species. Children represent our organic growth. As recently as fifty years ago, the role of wife and mother was honored. After 1960, society was subjected to an unprecedented campaign of social engineering designed to disparage these roles and make women seek fulfillment in career instead.  Led by the Rockefeller Foundation, this media campaign was made to look spontaneous and "modern." In fact, the goal was to decrease the birth rate and destabilize society by pitting men against women. Divide and conquer. 

Women were taught to abandon their femininity and challenge men for the masculine role. They were taught heterosexuality and family by nature are oppressive to women. Domestic violence was publicized to trample on woman's tender tendrils of trust. As a result, the divorce rate doubled and the birth rate was cut in half. 40% of all births are now out-of-wedlock.

Nicholas Rockefeller admitted to Aaron Russo that his family foundation started Women's Lib to get women out of the home, expand the tax base and indoctrinate the children from a young age. In 2000, Rockefeller foretold Sept. 11 and invited Russo to become part of the coming Fascist state.

The Rockefeller Foundation is also the major sponsor of Planned Parenthood (Formerly "The Eugenics Society") contraceptive research and Feminism. There are 87K hits for the "RF and Women's Studies" on Google. Previously, the Rockefellers sponsored Josef Mengele's research on how to make a human slave at Auschwitz. Feminism is also dedicated to this long-term goal. (See this video on the history of Rockefeller Social Engineering)

7. The sex act is sacred. It is the reenactment of Act of Creation. The man selects and prepares the special ground and plants his seed which represents his spirit. The woman receives and nurtures it.  Ultimately, a child is the fruit of love. Sex is an uplifting experience in this loving context. Don't settle for less.

8. Check out Helen Andelin's book "Fascinating Womanhood" which reminds you that Femininity is an art. Not everything will be relevant to you, but it has many useful hints. Also, check out sites like "Surrendered  Wife" and "Ladies Against Feminism." 

See also this website about healthy womanhood and homemaking.

In conclusion, nature does not give rain checks. The Rockefellers trick women into squandering their most fertile years pursuing a career and debauching themselves sexually. They are part of a natural cycle; the ages of 18-25 are critical to starting a family. In the same way as the apple tree blossoms in the Spring, young women who want families should do so when nature intended.   

Marc White sends these suggestions:  

"I don't know if you're aware of several female Christian blog sites that are excellent."

Related- Makow - Possession is Part of Marriage 

---------------------------It's OK to be a Woman 

First Comment from Jennifer:

I would add to No. 4 -Find a man you naturally look up to, respect and trust -Spiritually -But before that - First find a Father or Father Substitute (someone who is at least 20 years older then your man) who you naturally look up to, respect and trust who can screen potential husbands for you.  

Young females are incapable of discerning men because of oxytocin bonding. [Oxytocin is a naturally occurring hormone that is made in the hypothalamus and is stored and released by the posterior pituitary gland in the brain. When released it produces a feeling of love and satisfaction.]

 I always chose [I thought] men I looked up to -they had great qualities, moral, smart, hard-working, athletic and I respected them as human beings and trusted them to do the right thing. But later I learned my trust and respect were oxytocin motivated. When a female is oxytocin addicted she cannot see clearly and its very easy for a man to pretend to be a wonderful person.  

Historically fathers always screened their daughter's potential husbands.  That's why culturally fathers gave away the bride. The father gives the bride to the groom with a handshake -which is an agreement that he approves him. This ceremonial gesture came from an actual meeting the father had prior to his daughter marrying the man.  

Oxytocin bonded women are naive today to think they can see through a man's manipulation and lies or simple ignorance, especially if a man is saying and doing all the right things. If we want young women to create healthy families we need to start with The Father in a traditional context of a family.  Instead of telling a young woman to be a man -her own father and do the discerning herself - It's not going to work!  Fathers have failed and abandoned their daughter to blue beards.  

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Feminism Can be Cured (If Diagnosed Early)"

LH said (April 22, 2018):

The image you used for this article is grossly misleading......
For one that person can never be cured of feminism.
You selected a tranny.
It has an Adam's apple easily discernible once our mass programming has been broken
Second, it has a longer left-hand ring finger than the index finger. This is 95% male indicator along with brow ridge, sunken inset eyes within the socket which a woman does not have the deep sunken eyes.
Strong angular jawline male traits.

I had to look for these details to share with you. I did not need to look closely for myself. It shouted I'm a man in women's get up.
It has taken me over six months of studying the transgender / Baphomet worship cult of Hollywood and all entertainment media.Now the hypnotic spell is broken and spotting trannies is getting easier for me. It takes time but more people need to be made aware of this huge deception.

This is a topic I do not think you have covered in detail. There is a whole medical industry that supports the transition, rib removal nose jobs boob jobs hormone therapy etc. . There is also a clothing industry that supports the baby bump, hips.
It is difficult to find a real woman. Most ALL A-lister actresses are trannies.
Most all Country singers especially grand ol opry, rock stars, etc.

AS said (April 22, 2018):

All these female contradictions create an emotional charge that pushes you down the emotional scale and communism is low on that scale, very low.

In fact, you can cure communism just to raise a person on that scale. Communism is a low emotional charge on the level of hostile in a veil.

EFT is fast, free of charge and easy to do on yourself. Open source and free of charge.
Investment: some hours of first reading then doing.
Extra bonus is body problems vanish in seconds.

Dawn said (April 22, 2018):

Henry this article is absolutely fascinating.

I think there are a lot of things that gave rise to feminism and that it initially had good reason for existing. Women working in WWII, women being isolated and bored at home in the 50s and not realizing that connection rather than work was the answer, and the hyperfocus on babying children instead of loving them but not coddling them.

But this is one thing that I have never ever thought of, and it makes perfect sense. "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned". I've been lucky to find gentlemen in my life but I've also known players. The way you describe how your sweet relationship changed... and then she became a rabid feminist! Of course, you know now how wonderful and transcendent actual making love is, and that causal relations don't hold a candle to this.

It makes sense to think that this sexual freedom everyone partook in, and the subsequent loss of the experience of true love and intimacy could cause chaos. People don't always make conscious choices, they just follow the easiest path. A woman's behavior and attitude completely changes around a strong man who loves her and is devoted to her. If that doesn't present itself, or if those men start leaving her or mistreating her bc of porn and easy sex, how does she know? I dated someone from the eastern block so I was luckier than most and got to experience this right off the bat.

Anyway, no man is perfect that's for sure but the culture of respect for women is lost. Even though they think they've gained everything :(

Jason said (April 22, 2018):

I really enjoy your work Henry. I have a couple of brief comments to add.

1) feminists are not independent at all since they rely on the government to fight all their battles so all feminists are married to government.

2) if women were to be truly cured of feminism they have to give up their government protector/aggressor in favor of a man.

Since women are generally far more practical and cunning than men I do believe that neither of my conditions above can ever be admitted to, much less given up, and thus there can be no cure.

Skip said (April 22, 2018):

Wow Henry, seems this writing brought in several negative comments , which I see as progress, as it means that they have not only come to your site, but are reading the articles and voicing an opinion.

Now this will lead to communication, which can lead to change. I enjoy your site and articles though agreeing with all of them of course is foolish at best, I tip my hat to you sir for proving nothing is
completely lost, until the fat lady sings. Although Emily appears to be screaming for the Fat Lady to come on stage.

CJ said (April 22, 2018):

Jennifer and I both want to tweak paragraph 4.
4. Stop being "smarter, better, faster" than the men you meet. (Just because you can run circles around a man doesn't mean you should.) To create a successful family, a woman self-effaces and lives through her husband and children.

(This is feminine power, and not a weakness. To think otherwise means you are deceived.)

Tony B said (December 30, 2015):

Always an early complaint of the feminists is that the men they meet only want sex. But none of them seem able to understand that the very reason for that is that feminists offer men NOTHING ELSE. After all, the only surface difference between the feminist and men is her vagina and boobs. What else is there for a man to like?

Nature has created men more apt to try for sex and women to be the ones with the words "yes" or "no." True the pill and other anti life means have put a large crimp in nature and it is now easier for women to say "yes" and not "pay for it" with pregnancy, an action long known as one of the very worst sins for both partners, married or not.

The fact that life worked much better all around before planned nonparenthood shows immediately in all the hell between the sexes today as compared to the past. What is consequently almost completely lost by both sexes today - at least among the young - is the concept of family, and without that concept civilization is doomed. Can anyone deny that the present in-your-face faggots and dykes, a direct result of sex without responsibility, are not a sign of the death of civilization?

Sex selfishness at the expense of real responsible love is not just self-destructive, it is civilization destructive. Feminism preaches the opposite.

Faye (from Ohio) said (November 25, 2006):

You are so right. Men confronted with a question, or making a decision, think it through before answering.. They tend to see all sides.

Women, see through their emotions, and sometimes want quick answers. THats where patience comes in for a man. He needs to show her why. and stand fast when he knows the outcome.

A real man has control of himself and knows his role. He is the provider and protector. He avoids temptations which divert him from his goal, married or not.

Power does not fulfill a women in her deepest needs. They do everything to attract a man, then are at a loss when they get one.

Everything we see is sex, sex, sex..No wonder things are so out of control

Migrants funneled into Health Care Jobs in Canada are Illiterate

April 23, 2018

 Capture (13).JPGMigrants funneled into Health Care Jobs in Canada are Illiterate  

by M

Here's something you that may be concerning to you, as it is to me, which no one really seems to talk about -- Canadian healthcare. 
I am enrolled in a college health science program that acts as a bridge towards numerous other courses, such as paramedic, nursing, radiology, etc.
I have done numerous group assignments this year, and one thing which is seemingly consistent is the broad lack of academic capability students have. 

Of particular concern is all the aboriginal and foreign students (middle eastern, etc.) who come here as International students but who literally cannot even write a sentence in English correctly. 

These people are enrolled en mass in programs for next years, such as nursing which will set them up to be in charge of the well-being of vulnerable Canadians.

If you put someone who can hardly write a sentence in English and who do not have the intellectual capability to realize that their school work is totally unacceptable, what are the implications in allowing these people to become professional highly-paid caretakers in potentially life and death scenarios?

I don't think these people are here to receive an education in Canadian nursing only to fly back to their country of origin to employ themselves there with their knowledge of Western healthcare policy and methods. 

I'm afraid we are going to become a third world country, or thousands more will end up dying due to incompetence in allopathic care because unqualified people are being passed through college and being admitted into the profession. 

These people must be receiving accommodation agreements where their material is not scrutinized as harshly as your typical white candidate because I literally do not see how these people were even admitted into higher education - they are illiterate.


It's not just migrants, it's millennials!    from Dave B 

Immigrants and other incapable of getting a proper education in health care are not the only problem in the system.
Millennials nurses are at least half of the nursing staff in the hospital where I live.
Their need for initial approval and constant self-esteem boosting takes away from their effectiveness in dealing with patients.
Their self-assessment of situations without doctors orders has lead to situations that can be detrimental to the patient.
Older nurses know what they can and cannot do on their own..And they are far better at caring for patients..And it's not just their years of experience..But their understanding of how the system works.
I get the feeling that each slight that a snowflake receives might have lead to simple vengeful actions.
So the danger of millennials is real. 
The feminist movement has given a false power to more stupid people to speak out, act out without the understanding of how dangerous they are.

Marijuana a gateway to decadence and evasion

April 21, 2018

Marijuana a gateway to decadence and evasion 

Marco's Disclaimer: I don't care if people smoke weed personally or use it medicinally for beneficial purposes. This is simply an attempt to look deeper into the strong march towards cannabis legalization and the true motivations behind it. I am speculating where this all may lead - I am not certain. But I think I may be close to hitting the mark. 

by Marco A

The decriminalization and legalization of cannabis have nothing to do with the benevolence of government listening to the public opinion they manipulate and manufacture. 

Cannabis legalization is simply another cog in the progressive juggernaut moving towards manufacturing an incapable mass of people; a people so far removed from any semblance of moral integrity and connection with past normality that they will be helpless like a rudderless ship in the stormy seas of change. 

In a morally relative society, if you allow one thing, everything soon becomes justifiable. Already, there is a push towards changing legislation towards hard street drugs and the "sex trade" (prostitution) - Trudeau is not being progressive enough! There will be small hope for women dependent on drugs who are being pimped out once both street drugs and prostitution become just another accepted lifestyle normalcy.

These are all steps towards the international agenda of human enslavement, where human beings are so debased and dependent on the system for everything, they will never break free. This system is one in which all forms of degeneracy are accepted; human beings are debased to nothing more than biological processes and normalcy is relative towards the changing times, along with morality. 

This must be obvious to everyone deep down.

A people that is dependent on drugs for their pseudo-euphoria are lost - they have forsaken the joy of God for the world and its pleasures. 
Life is about the embracing the full spectrum of human emotion, dulling your senses or manipulating your biological processes so that the difficulties of life become more bearable is a cheap excuse for living. 

The greatest challenges in life require long-suffering and perseverance, perseverance builds character, character builds hope, hope is a beautiful spiritual attainment that leads to God and a beautiful life. With drugs and all the cheap thrills of the world, you miss out - life is meant to be hard. 

I was just reading a propaganda article regarding the "health benefits" of cannabis (which seem to be appearing frequently now that it is time to legalize it), alongside it there was another article entitled "Vaccination against stress and anxiety made...". The placement of this article is no coincidence. From cannabis to vaccination - 'never feel the unpleasantries of life again, allow the world to take care of you.'

When you lose your ability to experience human emotion, you are lost. There would be no worse Mark of the Beast than one that makes us incapable of experiencing our humanity to the fullest which Christ died for, "I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full."

Society is dying, the medication they offer us to make their world bearable is a poison that promotes a false sense of euphoria and manipulates our minds to believe everything is all-right, when there is every reason to be concerned. 

I asked Marco if he had ever tried cannabis-

Only once a long time ago and I didn't get high. I know some people use it medicinally and for some, it may be necessary for mental health / or pain management, but I don't trust the motive behind pushing it as a normal thing for everyone. 

I think its just another sign of decadence and it won't be used responsibly especially in the context of Canadian culture. Frankly, if I had children, I wouldn't want them growing up to believe that smoking a joint is the same thing as having a cigar and a glass of red wine.

Also, its hard to describe but a lot of the proponents pushing for its usage, arguing for it as if it is such an amazing thing, just make me cringe, they seem like such socialist losers who want the government to wipe their asses and let them get high... a type of perpetual victim scared of their own shadow that wants to inebriate themselves towards life and cry if the government doesn't allow it. 

Well the government will allow it now. If you shake hands with socialism they always take more from you. The nanny state always grows stronger with legislation like this. Soon they will allow more and more, the people demand the progressive wheel get rolling so it will eventually running them over with unbearable changes.

Anyways, at the end of the day it's still a drug... there is so much more to life. 

That's how I feel about it. 


April 20, 2018



by Jeanice Barcelo

I couldn't wait to share the great news.  PSEG Long Island came to our house today and removed the "opt-out" digital meter and replaced it with a non-transmitting analog meter.  Radiation levels in this house immediately dropped significantly.  This has brought a tremendous relief as my bedroom is now in "the green" and this is so even though there is a wifi router turned on in a distant part of the house. 

We also had Optimum come out today to move the modem and wifi router to the furthest corner of the house away from the bedrooms.  Bedrooms are now either totally in the green (excellent), or in the low yellow reading (very good).  This is a tremendous difference since yesterday.

Wifi router is now covered several times with radiation shielding and is STILL putting off radiation levels in the red.  As soon as I get close to the router (or the cordless deck phone base), the radiation meter goes off the charts.  These devices are totally toxic.  Baby monitors are even worse. Check out the graph above.

The wifi router will be the next thing in this house to go.   I first need to get a "low voltage technician" to come to our house and wire the house with ethernet cables and in this way, we will no longer need wifi. 

Everything has to be done one step at a time due to finances.  It cost me $80 just to get the Optimum guy out here today to move the equipment. Luckily, PSEG did not charge us any money to remove the digital meter.  I am still absolutely AMAZED at this outcome!

Below are some pics of the new analog meter which, prior to installation, PSEG repeatedly told me did not exist, were no longer in use, were not able to be used in combination with solar panels, etc., etc., etc.  Strange how they completely changed their tune when I told them paperwork was being prepared to hold them legally liable for their refusal to remove their toxic, radiation emitting, trespassing meter from our home.