Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Freemasonry for Jews (Below- "The Dubai Financial Nuke," scroll down)

Jews Defined by Occult Ideology, Not Nation/Race

December 6, 2009


invention.jpgBy Henry Makow Ph.D.

I had an "Eureka" moment when I read an interview with Shlomo Sand, the author of "The Invention of the Jewish People."  He shows that the Jews today are not the descendants of Biblical Hebrews but are people of different races who converted to Judaism down through the centuries.

According to Sand, the description of Jews as a wandering and self-isolating nation of exiles, "who wandered across seas and continents, reached the ends of the earth and finally, with the advent of Zionism, made a U-turn and returned en masse to their orphaned homeland," is nothing but "national mythology."

"I asked myself how such large Jewish communities appeared in Spain. And then I saw that Tariq ibn Ziyad, the supreme commander of the Muslims who conquered Spain, was a Berber, and most of his soldiers were Berbers...who converted to Judaism."

Elizabeth Dilling said the same thing in 1964 in "The Jewish Religion: It's Influence Today"
(Chapter IX)  Somehow I missed it.

"Present day Jews are a pot pourri of every race of man," she writes, "and they do not have any genealogical or racial derivation from the ancient peoples of the Holy Land."

MY NEW PARADIGM

I had the misconception that Jews were a race because of their traditional antipathy to intermarriage. This was enforced by Hitler's racially-based treatment of Jews. But I couldn't explain why Jews differed racially and discriminated against each other on this basis.

Moreover,  I couldn't reconcile race with the fact that the Illuminati, the secret inner core of Judaism, actively sought intermarriage with non-Jews and were happy to sacrifice other Jews to slaughter.

My paradigm has now changed. My latest thinking is that, like its proxy Freemasonry, the  defining element in Judaism is the "ideology." Race doesn't matter. Anybody can join the club: Marilyn Monroe, Sammy Davis, Elizabeth Taylor, Madonna, Britney. As with American Express, "membership has its rewards." 

And like Freemasonry, Judaism is characterized by the fact that the membership is ignorant of the true agenda. Only the "Illuminated" are in on the secret. The rest are expendable.

As with Freemasonry, the hidden agenda is Pagan and Satanic. Judaism uses the Old Testament to draw people into the fold. But it is actually defined by the Talmud and Cabala which spurn the Old Testament.

dilling150.jpg(left, Elizabeth Dilling, 1894-1966)

Talmudic Judaism used "the Old Testament to cover its negation of every moral law of the Old Testament as its promotes practice of all the occult demonistic abominations excoriated by the Old Testament," writes Elizabeth Dilling.

Dilling shows how Moses' injunctions against bestiality, sodomy, adultery, incest, necrophilia etc. in the Old Testament are overturned in the Talmud. (Chapter V)

The picture of Jews as a nation-race is another way of controlling and manipulating them. It's essential for Jews (and Freemasons) to understand that the best parts of the ideology are for public consumption and to attract the innocents. From this pool, only the corruptible are informed of the true agenda and allowed to rise. They become part of the Illuminati.

But if there is trouble, the Illuminati will plant the blame on the innocent Jews and Masons, the outer layer of dupes who run interference and serve as their human shield. 


SATANIC?

The hidden (Talmudic/Cabalistic) agenda of Judaism and Freemasonry is to supplant the natural and spiritual laws of the universe (God) with the tyranny of the Illuminati bankers. They will define reality. For example, homosexuality, bestiality, incest etc. are being normalized. What is healthy (i.e. marriage, family) is deemed sick; what is false (i.e. climate change) is deemed true; what is obscene and ugly (modern art, entertainment) is deemed beautiful.   This is the New World Order. Ordinary Jews and Masons are in jeopardy by virtue of their association with it.

According to the Old Testament, Jews must wait for the Messiah before reestablishing Israel. But the Talmud says, the Messiah is already here and it is the "Jewish people" themselves. By "Jewish people" they mean the Illuminati bankers who sponsor and run organized Jewry.

For example, the Talmud Kethuboth 111a, states: "The Messiah is without metaphor the Jewish people." (Dilling, Chapter VI)

The Cabala teaches that God ("En Sof") is not moral, and has no characteristics. God is composed of nature. Since the highest expression of nature is man, he is God. And since only Jews are human, and above the level of beast, Jews (i.e. Illuminati bankers) are Divine.

According to the the Jewish Encyclopedia, the Cabala teaches that the relation between man and God is erotic, "religion being identical with love, sensual pleasure, and especially intoxication."  (Ch 6)

The Passover song "Only the Kid" heralds the day when all the world's great nations destroy each other in war, and only Israel is left.  (Chapter XIV)


CONCLUSION

Have no illusion, mankind has been inducted into a Satanic cult based on the Talmud and Cabala. Gradually we are being sedated and offered up as a tribute to Lucifer by his disciples, the Illuminati bankers.  

Anti-Semites are protecting the Illuminati by blaming the "racial" Jew. The true villain is the Illuminati banker and his lackeys of every ethnicity and "religion," who embrace the Satanic ideology of the New World Order.

 


You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/jews_a_religion_not_a_nationra.html

Comments for "Jews Defined by Occult Ideology, Not Nation/Race"

Rodney2 said (December 7, 2009):

You have stated several times Henry that you are a 'Jew'. But how can you call yourself a 'Jew' following your "eureka moment?" We know that the word 'Jew' does not define a race and never has. So, that rules out you being a Jew genetically. We also know for sure that you do not believe in the Talmud so you are not a practicing Jew. That rules out you being a Jew in the 'spiritual' sense. Can we not simply know you as just an ordinary guy -- a brother -- who hails originally from Switzerland? Your genetic history might be an interesting one (and one day you might like to tell us more) but whatever your distant background is it ain't Jewish!

--

Dear Rodney,

I identify with many positive traits I have found in some of my fellow Jews; warmth, humor, intelligence, idealism, among them. The idealism has been used to deceive them.

I have also noticed negative qualities in others: dogmatism, intellectual dishonesty, immorality and materialism.

I want to stand up for the good Jews I know.


Rodney2 said (December 7, 2009):

Your first three commenter each posted excellent opinions but 'Spirit is Light' (December 7, 2009) has really hit the nail on the head. We whites are indeed on the receiving end of a slow-acting project of annihilation. This whole Jewish issue is ultimately about the destruction of genes ... primarily the genes of the Germanic people worldwide; or at the very least the former beacon of western civilization, the German people. Unnecessary miscegenation between the Zulus and other races is also a 'crime' as the Zulus are a pedigree ethnic group but the genes of the Germanics of Europe is the greater prize for the Illuminati and their Jewish Elite allies.


Alan said (December 7, 2009):

Congratulations on your "Eureka" moment. I wish more people could have them.

In my research on all of this I came to the conclusion that the "Jews" used both the race card and the religion card to advance their Culture of the Cabala. From the work of Benjamin Freedman and Arthur Koestler, we know that 90% of the so-called Jews have no relation to the ancient Hebrews and are a product of conversion. So what then unites them? I observed that sometimes they used race to unite and find kinship, other times religion. From this technique, they could pick and choose from a wide variety of justifications for their behavior which was often informed from the Cabala.

I relate it to a shell game or of juggling balls--it's impossible to keep your eye on the original pea. But even if you could, it would not matter since if you agree to play their game, you are setting yourself up to lose the moment you do so.


Michael said (December 7, 2009):

xcited to read about your "eureka moment". I had not heard of the book, or Sands, the author...he is Jewish...I suppose. I should send you a copy of my report on Lilienthal's book...perhaps you have read some anyway. He has a chapter among 800 pages, "The Racial Myth". He covers several aspects, among them the Khazar's adoption of Judaism in 740 AD, saying that "The Khazar's
adoption of Judaism and that they are the lineal ancestors of Eastern European Jewry is historical fact" (though dismissed often he says as Arab
propaganda).

" For all anthropologists know, Hitler's ancestry might go back to one of the ten lost tribes of Israel; while Weismann (early Zionist leader) may be a decedent of the Khazars...who were in no way anthropological respect related to Palestine."

" ..a most ingenious paradox: In anthropological fact, many Christians may have much more Hebrew-Israelite blood in their veins than most of their Jewish neighbors."


Spirit is Light said (December 7, 2009):

The ultimate goal is to totally corrupt the gene pool, the DNA, of all things on earth.

You see it with the food being feed to people.
You see incest being promoted.
Vaccinations are being promoted.
Spraying the atmosphere, Chemtrails that effect DNA is happening.
Pharmaceuticals in the drinking water is happening.
And yes, You see it more and more, that interracial marriages are being promoted.

Everything that the Satanic spirit of this world is about, is about doing everything in promoting anything that makes ones DNA, their Genes, of the most impure form possible.

DNA is none other than a transmitting device, and the more pure the device, the better the transmitting between one and the Creator of it all.

Corrupt the Gene pool of everything on earth, and thus its communicating with the Creator is diluted.

Noah was perfect in his generation, his genes.

It is much deeper than these few truths, but make no mistake about it, it is the DNA their after.


Below- "The Dubai Financial Nuke" by Clive Maund (scroll down)

UN Plan: World Religion and Poverty For Americans

December 5, 2009

satchi.jpg
(Swami Satchidananda, left)

by Rollin Stearns

(For Henrymakow.com)

In the 1970s my wife and I lived in a Yoga community, or ashram, on thirty acres in rural Connecticut. It was quiet and peaceful, in many ways idyllic. We grew most of our own food. We had some cottage industries and published a magazine and some books. And we lived very simply.

There were about 40 of us, mostly young, from widely varied backgrounds. Some of us were married, but most were single, the men and women living on separate floors of the old mansion where we lived. We were a little, self-sufficient world, or so it seemed.

The Guru

But one way we were not self-sufficient (and this seemed good to us) is spiritually. We had a guru, a Hindu swami named Satchidananda. With a flowing orange robe and a flowing beard, which was growing gray, he was like a father and we were his kids. There was a great feeling of security in his presence. If we had questions, personal or moral or spiritual, he seemed to have the answers. I don't say this sarcastically. He was, in fact, a wise and benevolent figure. Although he never made this claim for himself, we all believed he was "enlightened," which in the Hindu view is something akin to being God.

Though Swamiji (as we called him) had come from India, he spoke English quite well in the melodious way many people from India do, and he was not sectarian. For him, the highest form of Hinduism was Vedanta, a very pure metaphysical view which accepts all religions as vehicles to the one divine reality. We would meditate early each morning in the ashram temple, in front of a large "yantra" -- a geometric pattern centered on a stylized lotus flower. It had eight petals, forming a circle, and each petal represented one of the world's religions. It was summed up in the saying, "Truth is one; paths are many."

This global ecumenism was at the heart of Swamiji's teachings, and he taught it widely. Although he had a separate house on the ashram grounds, he had many teaching centers around the world and traveled a great deal. He spoke before large audiences (I had first heard him myself at a public lecture in New York City), and he knew many prominent people.

The Guest

One of those prominent people was C.V. Narasimhan. Certainly he was not
a household name in America, but as Under-Secretary General of the United Nations, he was a man of great responsibilities. Those of us who lived at the ashram met him because one weekend he came to Connecticut and spoke to us at the evening "satsang," the time of gathering together to be in the presence of truth.

cv.jpgThat night, Sri Narasimhan talked about his work at the UN: how difficult it was to have to deal so often with the urgent, rather than the truly important, for there was much important work that needed to be done if mankind was to have a future. We needed to create a unified world, free of war, and to overcome the terrible inequities that plagued the world, where so many lived in poverty.

We could feel his passion and commitment as he spoke. And then he turned his attention to us. He was happy to have this opportunity to speak to us because we were, in part, the hope of the world. Not just because we believed in the unity of mankind, but because of the way we lived. We had eschewed the values of materialism and lived a simple life, one that did not consume the limited resources of the planet. We didn't live richly, at the expense of all those multitudes who lived in poverty.

The problems of poverty that plagued the world, he said, could never be solved unless America consumed less, unless America came to accept the kind of life style, the standard of living, we had chosen. This change would have to come about -- would come about -- because there was no other way. We were the model for the future.

As he spoke, a slight uneasiness formed in the back of my mind. Yes, we lived simply. We slept on the floor, sometimes 2 or 3 or more to a room. We donated our labor to the ashram, in the spirit of karma yoga (the yoga of working without attachment or gain). All we received materially was room and board (and the board consisted of a vegetarian meal in the early
afternoon, with a little fruit in the morning and evening). But we did so voluntarily.

I was uneasy about an agenda, however idealistic, that would create such a life for others whether they wanted it or not, an agenda for the severe reduction in the American standard of living, to be implemented without the consent of those who would be affected.

L'Envoi

A year or two later my wife and I left the ashram. We had both become uneasy about many aspects of life there, both practical and spiritual.

It wasn't a sudden break or an outright rejection. It was just a gradual moving away, which gathered momentum once we were no longer at the ashram. We continued to see Swamiji, but less frequently.

Today I see many things differently than I did then, but I still appreciate the wisdom and good will that Swamiji showed to many, and to me personally. He died in 2002 at age 88 (his followers would say he achieved "mahasamadhi," the great or final exit from the physical realm). I think of him now as a man who did much good and some harm, a man who was committed to fulfilling a certain role that he wasn't really comfortable with, a man whose spirit was greater than the form into which it was cast, like the religions symbolized on his altar.

Today, I also think about changes here in America -- how a once prosperous and productive society has been hollowed out -- how American jobs have been outsourced and American companies moved overseas, how countries like China and India have been promoted by American policies while America has been opened up to massive immigration.

Sri Narasimhan (who also died at 88 but in 2003) seems more and more like a prophet now, a man who knew what was coming and how it was going to come. I wonder now if his vision will prevail, and if it does, whether it will be a new world of peace and justice or a nightmare world of even greater poverty and war.
-----

Related- (Sexual Exploitation Charges Against Satchidananda)

Satchidananda --The Temptation Was Too Great



You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/un_message_poverty_and_ecumeni.html

Comments for "UN Plan: World Religion and Poverty For Americans"

Dave said (December 6, 2009):

Sustainability as a CHOICE and by design, can, and for those who CHOOSE it, is a GOOD thing.

Sustainability as an imposed world-view, is just tyranny clothed in "humble" garb.

That's the problem with idealists, who endeavor to impose their ideals on others. Whether they realize it or not, they are just fascists, initially well meaning and maybe even very nice, but fascists none the less.

Sustainable housing... that's my passion. I see nothing at all wrong with choosing to build a home that maximizes space usage, and costs next to nothing to heat and cool. My pending home build is designed, in part, for those very reasons.

Building a structure that uses almost no energy, and that can run on sun and wind, that has no mortgage, and affords one the ability to grow much or most of their own food. Sure, that's "sustainable."

But not owing money to The Powers That Be and their minions, sure sounds like a good thing to me. It's all about CHOICE.

Modern residential architecture and building practices with a few exceptions, are designed to make homeowners dependent on "experts" and "bankers", and fit within the construct of a debt driven culture.

The folks slamming sustainability... I would love to know if they are financially self sufficient. I will defend their right to be terribly in debt and spend more than they make to buy "stuff", because I am a patriotic American.

But I think it's a dumb ass way to live, and leads to financial slavery....


Steve said (December 6, 2009):

As for materialism, sure, there is no inherent contradiction between technological progress and spirituality. But that's not the way this has played out. We wallow in the materialism and the robotic culture that was designed along with it that has all but eradicated spirituality so as to enable precisely this very sustainability-poverty project which is intended to be the "end of history." Just more dialectic. It's all top down and nothing happens by chance. The world's separate religions have served their purposes, and now comes the final dialectical synthesis into the world feudal state with a form of earth worship. But let's not forget that pagans were originally simply those "in the country," that the Catholic (meaning explicitly "universal," as in subsuming all other religions, sort of like the Vedanta of its day but with the Sun God as the nucleus for subsumption) Church hunted own and exterminated if they didn't adhere to the new religion of the day.

So here we are, on the doorstep of the servitude for the ages. No one is coming to save us, not Jesus's second coming, no New Age ascension, no 2012 events, etc. This is just what the Illuminati want us to think as they script all of this as "fulfillment of prophecy," as it creates quiescence in the face of this agenda. The peak oil/Darwinian/running out of resources/global warming "scientific' throng are just pure pawns of the reactive materialist paradigm itself, willing and self-guiding their own suspicious minds into the sheep pen to which they are being led, though supposedly in pristine protest. Though polluting the place does have its purposes.

Praise be to Gaia. She deserves better than the Illuminati and the dumbed down sheeple that inhabit it. The real message of Jesus was that God was within each of us. Which means we are charged to enlighten and save ourselves.


Sonya said (December 6, 2009):

In reading the Sexual Exploitation Charges, unfortunately these charismatic, talented people have feet of clay. The same thing happened at Kripalu, an ashram in Massachusetts that I attended. Many disciplined disciples spent years there living the life of poverty and celibacy....only to discover that the married (with children) guru/founder had been having an affair with a married women (perhaps more than one). It was detailed in the Boston Globe. What heartbreak for them and shock for the rest of the attendees. Which goes to prove again that it is unwise to put one's wholehearted faith on another human being. I believe the ashram survived it all and is still in existence.

As for the UN, it was well known back in 1968 that the UN was a nest of communists --- guess it hasn't changed.


Joe said (December 6, 2009):

Americans are very likely to experience poverty in the not too-distant future, in spite of the UN's Agenda 21.

One reason why is the United States no longer has much of a manufacturing sector anymore - most of it was sent offshore to China and India.
You cannot sustain an economy designed to deliver high living standards on a foundation of consumer credit, the sale of essentially worthless securities, and a service economy. You have to produce something of tangible value to others.

For far too long, Americans have lived with the delusion that their high-tech know-how would save them. The problem, though, is that America
doesn't have much of a high-tech sector left, and Third World countries can afford to buy only so much of that high-tech know-how. Besides,
most of those Third World countries will just reverse-engineer the technology you give them anyway. It's how China has managed to become an industrial and technological powerhouse so quickly.

In short, America has ceased being able to supply things that others want to buy.

America's economy is already on the ropes, and not just for the reasons I mentioned earlier. Stimulus money and bank bailouts are all well and good - to a point. After that, your currency gets massively devalued and hyperinflation results, with a concomitant drop in living standards and decreased purchasing power.

Reducing world population to 500 million is probably an unreachable goal. The only way the UN could succeed in this endeavour is to engineer
large-scale wars, pandemics, famines, and feed people poisoned food and water. - all at the same time The UN would probably also need to find some way to enforce total birth control on a world-wide basis. One way to do it is to tie food supplies to birth control. No birth control, no food.

In short, to kill off 5.5 billion people by 2050, you would need to ensure that at least 150,000,000 die each year. That's a pretty tall order.

However, one way the UN has been successful in slowing population growth (at least in the West) is by creating a huge amount of discord and
dissension between the sexes and supporting things like feminism and regimes where women's rights trump those of men. When men and women can't get along with each other, they're not likely to mate and produce children. More to the point, men are not likely to marry if marriage imposes only liabilities and no benefits.


Anton said (December 6, 2009):

I read the article "UN Plan: World Religion and Poverty for Americans", as well as I read lots of others from your site. Especially those about "feminism" I found very good and enlightening. So I want to give something back to you.

Concerning spiritual matters you are not very critical. When I hear about "one word" and "one religion" I can not help but remember that this
is exactly what the gospel propeciesed. This "one religion" would be man made, and therefore without god and based on lies. It would be anti-Christian to its core.

The "truth is one; path are many" view is very common today, it is a very subtle trap and a lie.

To understand the relationship of the different religions form the view of gods word,
I want to forward you the book "What about the other religions?" by Werner Gitt.
It is well worth the effort. You can download it as pdf from:
http://clv.dyndns.info/pdf/255765.pdf

Werner Gitt's site is:
http://www.wernergitt.de/down_eng.html


Dan said (December 6, 2009):

This article hits a bullseye. I can follow up later on if you're interested, on how 80% of American Christian churches are on board with the same agenda.

Sri Narasimhan was no prophet. He knew the glimpse of the agenda he shared with the commune. He was told a lot more at his level at the UN.

The plan is documented in the UN's own business plans such as Agenda 21. Reading UN plans makes it clear their idea of 'sustainable population' is half a billion people, and they have a deadline date for that - 2050. 40 years from now. Current world population is over 6 billion and growing. How do they plan to reduce the population by 5.5 billion people during the next 40 years?

Fuzzy buzz words like 'sustainability' are repeated like mantras daily by Presidents, Prime Ministers, Fed Reserve chiefs and Wall Street bankers. They appeared first in books like Voluntary Simplicity by Duane Elgin during the 70's on the New Age and Ecology shelves of New Age and Occult bookshops and college campuses.
Communism forced simplicity at the end of a gun, in the West they've taken the Huxleyan Brave New World approach, using entertainment, free sex, recreational drugs and New Age relisions and 'therapies' to move people into sleeping 5 to a room on the floor living on nuts and berries.

As far as I've known since the 90's the wave of Hindu/Buddhist Ashram communes didn't get enough traction to become a widespread 'lifestyle choice' of the public. As far as we know though that may be all they're planning to keep around through 'The Transition". The keep them in remote areas in the United States isolated from contact with the general population, including limiting contact to former family and friends as possible. I've been to several of those places myself. I thought I wanted to join two of them, but I was quickly put off by serious internal 'red flags' when I learned of the freedom they required giving up. One was the infamous Rajneeshpuram near Antelope Oregon in 1983. The other is a Tibetan Ashram in Sonoma, California. Northern California north of Bohemian Grove to Mt. Shasta is full of them. Other large ones nobody hears about are in Colorado, Montana, other smaller ones scattered about the West and Southwest and one I know of in the Texas Hill country west of Austin. .

If living like that is what it takes to get to live in the New Age, I decided I'd rather go down with the scuttled ship of the old free world and the few who would have lived decent lives, and make my peace with God. I supported the new one far too much for far too long


Origin of Illuminati Behavior?

Does Talmud Teach Pedophilia, Incest, Bestiality?

December 4, 2009

freedman.jpgExcerpts from a long letter by Benjamin Freedman (left) to David Goldstein, dated October 10, 1954.

Freedman (1890-1984) had been part of the American Zionist inner circle but, like Goldstein, converted to Christianity. The complete letter appeared in a pamphlet entitled "Facts are Facts."

In spite of the centrality of the Talmud to Judaism, I doubt if more than 10% of Jews have read any part of it. These articles are as informative to most Jews as to non-Jews. This article is significant because the Illuminati engage in incest, pedophilia, and bestiality. Is the Talmud their guide? Is this why this behavior is being mainstreamed?


Verbatim quotations from the Soncino Edition of the Talmud are required to illustrate the enormity of the Talmud's iniquity. My comments with verbatim quotations will prove inadequate to do that. In spite of the low language, I will of necessity therefore include in this letter to you I have no compunctions in the matter because the United States Post Office authorities do not bar the Soncino Edition of the Talmud from the mails. Nevertheless I apologize in advance for the language which will of necessity appear in this letter to you. You now understand.

The official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud published in 1935 was "Translated into English with Notes, Glossary and Indices" by such eminent Talmudic scholars as Rabbi Dr. I. Epstein, Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches, Rabbi Dr. Israel W. Slotki, M.A., Litt.D., The Reverend Dr. A. Cohen, M.A.', Ph.D., Maurice Simon, M.A., and the Very Reverend The Chief Rabbi Dr. J.H. Hertz wrote the "Foreword" for the Soncino Edition of the Talmud. The Very Reverend Rabbi Hertz was at the time the Chief Rabbi of England.

 The world's leading authorities on the Talmud confirm that the official unabridged Soncino Edition of the Talmud translated into English follows the original texts with great exactness. It is almost a word-for-word translation of the original texts. In his famous classic "The History of the Talmud," Michael Rodkinson, the leading authority on the Talmud, in collaboration with the celebrated Reverend Dr. Isaac M. Wise states:

 "THE TALMUD IS ONE OF THE WONDERS OF THE WORLD. During the twenty centuries of its existence...IT SURVIVED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and not only has the power of its foes FAILED TO DESTROY EVEN A SINGLE LINE, but it has not even been able materially to weaken its influence for any length of time. IT STILL DOMINATES THE MINDS OF A WHOLE PEOPLE, WHO VENERATE ITS CONTENTS AS DIVINE TRUTH..."

  
The following are but a few of the many similar quotations with footnotes from the Soncino Edition of the Talmud, the "sort of book" from which Jesus allegedly "drew the teachings which enabled him to revolutionize the world" on "moral and religious" subjects:
  
    
    SANHEDRIN, 55b-55a: "What is meant by this? - Rab said: Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty with a child above that. Samuel said: Pederasty with a child below three years is not treated as with a child above that (2) What is the basis of their dispute? - Rab maintains that only he who is able to engage in sexual intercourse, may, as the passive subject of pederasty throw guilt (upon the actual offender); whilst he who is unable to engage in sexual intercourse cannot be a passive subject of pederasty (in that respect) (3). But Samuel maintains: Scriptures writes, (And thou shalt not lie with mankind) as with the lyings of a woman (4). It has been taught in accordance with Rab: Pederasty at the age of nine years and a day; (55a) (he) who commits bestiality, whether naturally or unnaturally: or a woman who causes herself to be bestiality abused, whether naturally or unnaturally, is liable to punishment (5)."
    
    This "divine truth" which "a whole people venerate" of which "not a single letter of it is missing" and today "is flourishing to such a degree as cannot be found in its history" is illustrated by the additional verbatim quotations which follow:
   
    SANHEDRIN, 55b: "A maiden three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The penalty of adultery may be incurred through her; (if a niddah) she defiles him who has connection with her, so that he in turn defiles that upon which he lies, as a garment which has lain upon (a person afflicted with gonorrhea)."

    (footnotes) "(2) His wife derives no pleasure from this, and hence there is no cleaving. (3) A variant reading of this passage is: Is there anything permitted to a Jew which is forbidden to a heathen. Unnatural connection is permitted to a Jew. (4) By taking the two in conjunction, the latter as illustrating the former, we learn that the guilt of violating the injunction `to his wife but not to his neighbor's wife' is incurred only for natural but not for unnatural intercourse."
   
    
    SANHEDRIN, 69b "Our rabbis taught: If a woman sported lewdly with her young son (a minor), and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her, -Beth Shammai says, he thereby renders her unfit for the priesthood (1). Beth Hillel declares her fit...All agree that the connection of a boy nine years and a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is not (2); their dispute refers only to one who is eight years old.
 
   
   KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rabba said, It means (5) this: When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this (6), it is as if one puts the finger in the eye (7), but when a small boy has intercourse with a grown up woman, he makes her as `a girl who is injured by a piece of wood' ".
    (footnotes) "(5). Lit., `says'. (6) Lit., `here', that is, less than three years old. (7) Tears come to the eyes again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years."
   
    KETHUBOTH, 11a-11b. "Rab Judah said that Rab said: A small boy who has intercourse with a grown up woman makes her (as though she were ) injured by a piece of wood (1). Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."
    (footnotes) "(1) Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood."
   
    ABODAH ZARAH, 36b-37a. "R. Naham b. Isaac said: They decreed in connection with a heathen child that it would cause defilement by seminal emission (2) so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty with it...From what age does a heathen child cause defilement by seminal emission? From the age of nine years and one day. (37a) for inasmuch as he is then capable of the sexual act he likewise defiles by emission. Rabina said: It is therefore to be concluded that a heathen girl (communicates defilement) from the age of three years and one day, for inasmuch as she is then capable of the sexual act she likewise defiles by a flux.
   
    SOTAH, 26b. "R. Papa said: It excludes an animal, because there is not adultery in connection with an animal (4). Raba of Parazika (5) asked R. Ashi, Whence is the statement which the Rabbis made that there is no adultery in connection with an animal? Because it is written, Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog etc.; (6) and it has been taught: The hire of a dog (7) and the wages of a harlot (8) are permissible, as it is said, Even both of these (9) - the two (specified texts are abominations) but not four (10)...As lying with mankind. (12) But, said Raba, it excludes the case where he warned her against contact of the bodies (13). Abaye said to him, That is merely an obscene act (and not adultery), and did the All-Merciful prohibit (a wife to her husband) for an obscene act?"

---

Related:

 Elizabeth Dilling -"The Jewish Religion and Its Influence Today"  Ch 5
"Talmudic Immorality, Asininity and Pornography: The Reprobate Mind"
 




 



You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/does_talmud_condone_pedophilia.html

Comments for "Does Talmud Teach Pedophilia, Incest, Bestiality?"

Hans said (December 6, 2009):

I am always stunned - positive meaning !!!! - when I read your articles and the feedback of your readers. I can honestly say, with a PHD in Philosophy, that you and Mr. Bob Chapman have turned my Weltbild upside down. I am presently working on a small essay on the student revolution in which I try to show how the movement was from its inception directed (?) by Tavistock, MKUltra, whose agents influenced/infiltrated the SDS in your country as well as in Germany, and jewish groups advocating homosexual and lesbian lifestyles, as shown in congressional records 1963. Add the abortion issue. All aiming at the destruction of the social fabric.
No professor of History mentions this in Germany. You can go through all the relevant books and articles on the subject. And I have seen quite a lot of them. My friend and I we are presently translating a book of Gilcher-Holtey, who is the leading expert on the topic in Germany, into Japanese. She does not mention these connections as she sticks to the chronology of events.
Your work has proven enormously inspiring.
Thank you so much for the stimulus.


Lynda said (December 6, 2009):

You have to ask the question: why is The Talmud which for millenia has been the most secret / sacred of texts now being published? The Talmud proscribes a sentence of death for any nonJew who reads it. Fr Pranatis (www.thetalmudunmasked.com) of the Hebrew University in St Petersburg translated it into Latin. He was murdered by judicial execution (under Talmudic Law) at the time of the JudeoBolshevik Revolution in Russia 1917.

The edition you are discussing is The Babylonian Talmud ed by Rabbi Dr Isidore Epstein. It is the edition of The Jews' College/Soncino English translation. It is online with rabbinical commentary and hypertext at
www.come-and-hear.com/talmud/.

However, to get to grips with its hermeneutic, what is needed here is the magisterial and definitive Judaism Discovered by Michael Hoffman. The work of Eisenmonger is also important. Both are available at www.revisionisthistory.org.

In order to answer the fundamental and decisive questions of our times, many people are reading The Talmud in either primary, translated or secondary sources. And they are all coming either under the sentence of the Law or in conflict with the Law by so doing.

The dialogues of Jesus with the Pharisees in N.T. clearly indicate that for those with whom he would make a New Covenant in his own blood, they were to be "as wise as [the] serpents" and that it was given to them to know the mysteries of the Kingdom (which is the subject proper of Qa Ba' alah). It does not follow that Christians need to either read or be instructed by either Talmud or Qa Ba' alah to know these things.

Think about this. The Law guards itself (by its proscriptions) from the eyes of the noninitiate. And the time has come in the Master Plan - The Protocols of the Elders of Sion for "the killing out of the goyim". And the King's Torah is now published in Jerusalem. The term 'King' here will certainly refer to their Messianic King.

For those initiated into the Law, it is possible to make the Talmud and its magick (the Qa Ba' alah) the hermeneutic of any religion of any conquered nation. Both of the these traditions are from Babylon.

This is a history of bringing nations, their religious beliefs and practice 'under the Law.' That law (its codex) is The Talmud. As an oral tradition, it predates Babylon going back to Ur of the Chaldees. The Chaldees worshiped the stars - that is the fallen of the host, the b'nai h'elohim which did not keep their first estate but who descended upon Mt Sion (Hermon) and swore oath to Lucifer upon its summit which is Ardis.

This is the Secret Doctrine as recorded in the Book of Enoch and in the work of Helena Petrovna Blavatsky in her work by the same name (also summarized in the Bible). And this doctrine was kept by the ancient priesthood of Lucifer where it originated in Ur. Their dynasty, their will (plan) to dominate and conquer all nations and set Lucifer upon the throne of the world has come down through history as the 'all conquering wind'. The Moriah.

The conquest / subversion and retooling of the Covenant nations which worship the one, eternal, creator and true God according to revealed knowledge - have always been priority one for the Moriah and the Elders. And today they cloak themselves in the nation with ancestry going back to the nations where they have been most successful - the descendants of ancient Canan, Edom and the Israelites they subverted and the Khazarim. All these peoples ultimately go back to Ur. And today the name of this nation is known as the Jews.

Most, I would agree with you are as clueless about their (covert) government as the Americans are about the American government. And both populations are going to be sacrificed by the collaboration of their respective governments unless they become in the words of Jesus "as wise as [the] serpents."

The branch of Ur that became the Turkic peoples, the Finns (originally), the Ossetians, the Khazarians, the Tatars etc migrated north to the Caucasus. Probably alone of all the nations, the Khazars had no use for the angel of light cloak in which all peoples clothed their idolatries. As Freedman tells us, up there on the Caucasus of the Urals they worshiped the devil as the devil and made no bones about it.

While some may take this as an insult, to Freedman it obviously spoke of an inclination for plain truth. Because from the standpoint of the Covenants: the gods of the heathen, those outside the Covenants, are devils. Deut 32:17; Ps 106. And it all goes back to Lucifer.

If you look at the military elite and cavalry of Christendom in central Europe of the middle ages - the paintings that hang in the museums - you see that they incorporated the device of the crossed flags which they wore on the back. This comes from the Khazarim in their long wars for or against the Christian nations during the Dark Ages. They used this device because to the thunder of their cavalry it gave the sound of the the Samael or devil wind roaring over the steppes and high plains of Central Asia. Interesting. Lucifer's name (Lucifer is a Latin title for Light Bearer) - the true spiritual name of th fallen Archangel is given in the Talmud. Samael or Lord Sama.

That is what they called the all conquering wind up on the steppes of central Asia: the Samael.

The Samurai code must have gone right across central Asia because we find the same thing in the Sam(UR)ai of Japan. The crossed flags of their cavalry, the kami k(h)azi - the divine wind. Or should that be the 'all conquering wind.'

John Todd, of whom you have written, called this dynastic priesthood of Ur, the Moriah. The all conquering wind. The Moriah is also the ridge of Mt Hermon / Sion where father Abraham met his great test in the sacrafice of Isaac which the Angel of God prevented.

Now is the time, a unique time in history for all people who want renegotiate their Faustian Bargain and turn in whatever is their character's script in this bad movie. According to the New Covenant, there is only one basis upon which to do that. For as Lucifer said to Jesus himself, showing to him all the kingdoms of this passing age of the world and the glory of them in a moment of time: "All these I will give to you FOR SUCH ARE GIVEN TO ME if only you will worship me." He refers to the 'ye shall be as the gods' deal that he struck with our first parents. When they agreed, they delivered to him the title deeds of the earth.

Those who think this is a stupid picture have not grasped what this story is fundamentally about.

.


NJ said (December 5, 2009):

But the Talmud IS a book of laws. it is the major part of the Jews Holy Writ of the Torah SheBeal Peh, and is the guiding light of Laws of Rabbis and Orthodox Jews.


What needs to be understood and emphasized in the Torah to Gentiles is:

1. the absolute, deep, long lived, and active hatred that most Judaism's practitioners have for Christianity and Christians;

2. their thinking Gentiles to be sub-human;

3. ergo, Judaics can take over anything of Gentiles as they would from a dumb animal; and

4. ergo, Judaics properly could and should rule the world over the Gentiles in a New World Order, (as is moving apace).


This last point is of the Illuminati, not just Judaics, but isn't the Illuminati dominated by Judaics, Rothschilds and all?


Granted, non-orthodox Jews don't know a whole lot about this, but have heard something about it and kind of get the drift of it. Because of that, these semi-unknowing Jews are in a way, "gatekeeper Jews" who, for the most part, still do not like criticism of their Holy Writ and block that by calling it hateful or even "anti-semitic". So they cannot really claim to be innocents by way of ignorance.


Tony said (December 5, 2009):

The "work" has been done very well. It is absolutely amazing how so few people are capable of differentiating between Jew, Israelite, Pharisee and Talmudist.

Even after you posted proof that the word "Jew" is a modern word and did not exist in Christ's time people insist that he was a Jew for whatever superficial, unreasoned reason. To recognize that, in the time of Christ, Judah was only one of twelve sons of the origins of Israel, that the religion was that of the Israelites, not that of the Judeans, or even that "Judean" no longer meant from the tribe of Judah (and Benjamin) but meant citizens from the land those tribes had long since claimed, regardless of their beliefs. Similar to a state like Texas or a province such as Alberta. People seem unable to separate geographic labels from religious labels in the case of Jesus.

But the whole point of your dissertations is being buried by these side points. It is ONLY the Talmudists (Pharisees and modern rabbis are basically all Talmudists, which ancient writing IS THEIR REASON FOR BEING AND THEIR CONSTANT GUIDE IN WHAT THEY DO TODAY) who are demanding such self-serving things as "hate crime" laws and laws against open investigation of certain "judicially confirmed" "truths," in other words, cover ups. Of course all people have their faults but only these mentioned are unwilling to admit any and do all in their power to criminalize anyone who says they also have warts.

The best reasoning for this difference in "warts" is that these people DO consider themselves, as the Talmud says, people, while all others are "goy," that is cattle for them to use, and they Do have a plan to control the whole world for their own benefit and to the detriment of everyone else. This is the driving force behind all their planned destruction of the ethics and morals of all others and their corruption of all political organizations, education, media and other religions.

No other group in the world has such satanic purposes pushing their every thought, their every action. To belittle this difference is cognitive dissonance to the point of insanity.


Darrell said (December 5, 2009):

Why do you and others continue to engage in things you have no first hand knowledge of? The truth of the creator (I believe) is not left to the mere corruptible words of man. Faith in a Creator is evidenced in everyday occurrences around us everyday if one chooses to see and look. This quoting and referring to the bible or whatever book (from man) really should come to an end. The fact that if, God/Creator is all seeing and all knowing, god /creator would not leave the word/truth in the hands of men for it to be corrupted for generations to come, but rather may leaves clues contained in the natural world for those to see of their own free will as opposed to following the dictates of what amounts to man or a group of men who seek to corrupt and pervert what is natural and beneficial to the people.


Dan said (December 5, 2009):

You know the Didache, the 60AD summery of the teachings of Jesus. Scholars say it was written by Jews for Jews of the Jesus sect of Jewry as a kind of teacher's manual for teaching Gentiles. It's significance here is that it was composed by Jews when the Kohen Priesthood and Sanhedrin still controlled the 2nd Temple.


There was a council of the sect held Paul and surviving Apostles present to establish rules on what terms Gentiles would be accepted. Some though Gentiles should convert to Judaism first, but Paul and Peter convinced such conversion wasn't necessary.

Those now famous extractions from the Talmud rang a bell and I recalled the Didache has a section that may be explicitly condemning those abominable practices. Why would they include a specific condemnation of homosexual pedophilia if it weren't being practiced in Jerusalem?

"Now the second precept of the teaching is: " You will not murder. You will not commit adultery." You will not sodomize young boys. You will not have unlawful sex. " You will not steal." Do not practice magic. Do not practice sorcery. Neither murder a child by abortion, nor will you destroy what is born. You will not strongly desire your neighbor's things. You will not make oaths. " You will not bear false testimony." You will not say bad things. You will not remember bad things. You will not be double-minded or double-tongued, for the double-tongue is a snare of death. Your message is not to be false or empty, but being filled with practice. You should be neither greedy nor a swindler, nor hypocrite, nor malicious, nor high-minded. You will not take evil counsel against your neighbor. You will not hate any people, but you will reprove some, and you will pray for some, and some you will love more than your life."

This passage seems to be a direct contradiction of passages in the Talmud endorsing these acts. Those passages hardly forbid them outright, only prescribe whom you're permitted or should do them to. In some passages some of these are mandatory to do to Gentiles.

The contents of the Christian New Testament which contains the full story an dialogs of Jesus with Pharisee and the Sanhedrin are a must read for any discussion involving Jesus. It must be understood that everything he did and said deliberately referenced to Torah law, the prophets, Psalms. That identifies Jesus not only as a Jew, but a learned rabbi of one or another of sects of 'old school' Jewry that at the time of Tiberius and Herod Agrippa had been pushed out of Jerusalem by the Pharisee current that set themselves up as the authority due to their wealth.

The narratives of Jesus in the Gospels is a series of confrontations between Jesus and Pharisee and the Sanhedrin, challenging them in duels of interpretation of Torah law. The last time Jesus enters the Temple is the day of the Eve of Passover. Drawing a large crowd, he knocks over the counting table of the money changers, and proceeds to preach till after dark angrily against the hypocrisy of the Pharisee and Sanhedrin. "These things they tell you to do, do them! But know they do not practice what they preach."

Can Jesus be revealing the secret of high Freemasonry revealed by Pike in Morals and Dogma? That there's an 'Outer Temple' for the suckers told to obey the laws of Jehovah and the Inner Temple illuminated priesthood who worship Satan?

That era in the history of that location - Jewish history -has naturally been the focus of Biblical and Hebrew scholars, archeology and socio-anthropological research most intensely for over a century and much is now known about it.

My point is, clearly yet another schism - a head on collision was coming to a head in Jerusalem and the surrounding deserts at the time. The 'old school' sects retreated to communes in the desert. Qumran's just the best organized and preserved. One of the functions of Qumran was a fortress of scribes compiling an archive of holy scriptures.

These sects condemned the Pharisee as blasphemers and false prophets that had turned Jerusalem and Judaism into a charnel house.

(Note: Contrary to years of assumption Qumran wasn't the dwelling place of the fabled 'Essenes' nor was Jesus an Essene, nor is there any evidence Jesus came from Qumran. Also, there was no place called Nazareth. Nazarene was likely one of the non-Pharisee sects.)

The way Qumran was set up in a defensive posture atop a bluff with an ingenious internal water supply and food storage and food production self contained atop a rock bluff to withstand siege, they were obviously fearful of reprisal or intervention.


Muhamed said (December 5, 2009):

Thank you Alicia [below] for pointing to me to such well written and researched articles like pedophilia in Islam,I see that got a special section on the Jewish owned Wikipedia.

You seem like a very nice, fair and righteous woman,and very balanced,roles eyes.

Seriously Henry these people are insane,they are corrupt to the core,they do nothing good,or produce any good,other than enjoy them self's in lies, deceptions and evil schemes.

You can not argue with these people nor can you prove anything to them,but you are left with two choices,you ignore them if you can or you fight them.

These people are serving a purpose but their time is short and they will surely end up in hell,a place they justly deserved.

If you click on the link she posted in her comment and read the article you will notice it mentioning such things as pedophilia in the Quran (God forbid).

It only mentions one single verse from the Quran which it is taken out of context as much as possibly possible.

Now Having read the whole sura which contains that verse many times and never,ever,did I connect it to pedophilia?

That short sura can be read here in its entirety http://www.submission.org/suras/sura65.html
The mention of pedophilia is no existent,but to people like Alicia that don't matter they just make it up,puff,out of thin air,its magic.
Those kind of people count on the readers to take their words for it and not check it out for them self.

Its the classic devils tactics.
Also here is a good article about Prophet Muhammad's marriage from Aisha http://www.submission.org/women/Aisha.html

Alicia clearly has no problems with the evils of the Talmud (it seems like) but she sure like to point at other religions while ignoring her own.
She doesn't want you to be even talking about it.
Alicia if you want this to be fair make sure we get a TalmudPedophilaWiki before you start complaining about this being unfair.


Alicia said (December 5, 2009):

I think it's unfair that you post an article about how evil the Talmud is (and therefore Jews, since as it falsely states: IT STILL DOMINATES THE MINDS OF A WHOLE PEOPLE, WHO VENERATE ITS CONTENTS AS DIVINE TRUTH..."), even though only a small minority of Jews actually have read any part of it, much less base their life on its teachings. Furthermore, the Talmud is not a book of laws, but a book that recounts interpretations of the Bible by different rabbis (mostly from the middle ages). So if a Rabbi has a twisted interpretation of some law, so what? It's like judging Americans today based on law books from 200 years ago, and being scandalized about their slavery laws.

I think if you are going to post nonsense like that, you'd at least be fair, and post similarly biased and unjust articles like these one on Islam: http://www.wikiislam.com/wiki/Islam_and_Pedophilia . Or at least something more timely, like the controversy surrounding the Catholic church and paedophile priests.

If you dig deep enough, you'll find dirt on any religion that's been around for as long as Judaism, Islam, or Christianity. Especially when you have a text from the middle ages the size of an encyclopedia!


The Dubai Financial Nuke

December 6, 2009


boom1.jpgShock Waves from Dubai Default About to Hit Markets

Expect Deflation, Dollar Rally, Gold Retreat

by Clive Maund

(abridged by Henry Makow)

You've seen the flash - now get ready for the shock wave...

What happened in Dubai just over a week ago was the bright flash, and the media have used the intervening period before the shock wave hits to reassure everyone that everything is going to be just fine - "You just relax, nothing will come of it, it's only $60 billion down the drain or whatever - have a cup of tea". The trouble is that it's not $60 billion at all - the reality is that this is a default on a massively larger scale. 

Dubai was a vast sinkhole into which western banks and governments unquestioningly poured not just billions but trillions of dollars which was then leveraged enormously by means of derivatives enabling Dubai to build itself up into a latter day Rome, with a level of opulence and extravagance that would have made Caesar green with envy.

When people think of Dubai the things that come to mind are the massively extravagant 7-star hotels, the towering record breaking skyscraper, palm-shaped island resort complexes etc and forests of new office buildings and apartments etc. What the vast majority don't realize is that the stupendous leverage afforded by derivatives has in addition enabled Dubai to create an immense global empire of businesses, most of the elements of which are broke, having racked up staggering levels of debt. Dubai is the nexus of the derivatives pyramid and it is flat, stony broke.

Where did all the money come from to pay for all these things? - why from taxpayers and pension fund contributors the world over of course, but especially in the US, with Wall St acting as a giant conduit sluicing a torrent of cash into Dubai. The interesting thing is that there was never any accountability - countries and companies vied with each other for the privilege of pumping money into the exalted kingdom, seduced by its supposedly limitless oil wealth, and requesting or requiring guarantees was regarded as impolite. Now that Dubai is broke, the Dubai government has suddenly distanced itself from Dubai World, and the attitude towards the Western banks and governments who have poured trillions into Dubai is "Tough luck - you lose, suckers".

What this means is that trillions of dollars which are now counted as assets on the balance sheets of banks worldwide and especially in the US are actually liabilities. So what do you think is going to happen to the stock prices of these banks - and stock markets generally, when the world wakes up and acknowledges this reality - when the shock wave hits?? Small wonder that the charts for Goldman Sachs and J P Morgan look very like the market charts before the '87 crash, but that was "small potatoes" compared to what is coming down the pipe this time.

Complete article found here


Introducing Ro'i Tov's "The Cross of Bethlehem"

December 5, 2009

crossofbethlehemcover.jpgEscape from Israel, Escape from Error

Book by Ro'i Tov

Review By Leland Lehrman
leland@mothermedia.org



When a person's heart sets on the road to understanding, acknowledges
the need to abandon imperial doctrine, and internalizes the moral filter that instinctively guides us from truth to good policy, saints and
angels jump from cars and airplanes to lend us the wings that carry us from error. So it was, that fateful day - as I planted Kucinich for
President signs on a street corner - that a former military intelligence officer leaped from his Bronco to congratulate me on my choice of
candidate and ask if I was aware of the problems with the official story of 9/11.

Sure I said, having thoroughly investigated the matter and concluded that it was probably a false flag attack designed to legitimate imperial adventures of the far-flung variety. "It was a CIA-Mossad operation," this particular angel announced with tragic authority, leaving me with a phone number then leaping back into his
Bronco. Under my angel's careful tutelage, I proceeded to discover certain intellectual filters and foundational historical documents that permanently alter one's political vision and point of view for the better - if one values truth that is. Even with respect to that most controversial and dangerous aspect of modern history, it is still a blessing on the path of even the humblest brother to understand the
Jewish / Zionist questions within the larger New World Order controversy.


Predictably, I started a radio show, was just as predictably attacked by the ADL, and in my defense chose to present the basic truths I had learned to the world at large. These truths were immortalized in a widely distributed paper now called "ADL, Zionist Policies Causing Rise in Anti-Jewish Sentiment." The central point of this paper is that Jews can expect additional problems similar to those of the twentieth century if we - I am Russian Jewish on my father's side - are not among the first to criticize and restrain our brethren when we err on the side of, shall we say, Lucifer.


On the other side of the Equator, a man saw my star rise hesitantly. His own was in trouble and he contacted me with a broken English Israeli SOS filled with familiar-sounding tragedy and estrangement, intrigue and wilderness. His name was Ro'i Tov. For months I heard from him on and off. Each time he earnestly communicated a sub textual belief that I - a poor exiled journalist living amongst the Siberian Elms in a rustic New Mexico shack with a growing family - could do something substantial to improve his persecuted life.


Eventually I became hopeful, if doubtful,that perhaps we could one day improve conditions in Israel / Palestine and around the world for all people through a constructive process of education and balanced critique. I hesitated to offer assistance. I was already under attack from Ro'i's long-armed opponents, but his faith in me gave me strength. One day, this angel stepped off an airplane in New
Mexico and we met at a safe house in downtown Santa Fe.


Soon we got down to business, working on early versions of The Cross of Bethlehem while discussing the sordid and tragic religious, historic and political details of the last several thousand years. Ro'i's contribution to my personal understanding of Judaism, Christianity, Israel, intelligence, surveillance and the Hebrew language and culture constitute the type of mountain that Jesus might have been referring to
when He mentioned moving them. When it comes to understanding these topics, moving mountains is easy compared to the faith and devotion to truth required to move the established imperial and dogmatic craggy peaks from the soul.


Ro'i's brilliant, gentle and persuasive intellectual medicine has been crystallized and distilled for all of us through an enormous effort worthy of the attention of religious, political and intellectual leaders worldwide. It is now, finally, available as an inexpensive paperback that deserves pride of place in all libraries, Alleluia. Break bread, drink wine and settle into your favorite arm chair with this book. Most
likely just the first of Ro'i's books, "The Cross of Bethlehem" is a monumental contribution to the English language reader's understanding of the State of Israel and Judaism as it really is. It is a moral victory on such a scale as to simultaneously redeem Ro'i, Judaism and Christianity all at once. If he weren't such a modest man, I would shout his name from the rooftops. God Save Ro'i Tov!

--
The Cross of Bethlehem is available at Amazon

Biblical Jews Were Black, says Will Newman

December 2, 2009


biblical jews.jpg

Dear Henry,

Here is a draft below of the information I am trying to spread to the truth-seeking internet community.  I would be very grateful for any advice you have for me.  I think that the association of today's Illuminati/Jewish bankers/Talmudists with the Jews of the Bible is an incredible stumbling block in understanding the spiritual side of the NWO. I know it was for me.  I want to know the best way to make it clear to others that the modern day Jews have no connection to the Jews of the Bible nor do they have any right to the land of Israel.
 
As illustrated in your articles, the [Cabalist] Jews today and their cohorts are Satanists, plain and simple, yet Christians and others still fear them as the Chosen People despite their behavior.  Lack of understanding about Jewish identity turns off many people to the truth of the Bible and the belief in God and his system of morality which is needed to fight the NWO.
 

I'm sure the initial reaction of many who discover the Satanism behind Judaism is to reject God because they would still consider the connection between the Jews and their God of the OT. People may feel if they are to reject the Jews that they must reject biblical morality and this is not true. The Ashkenazi Jews are not the authors of the Bible and this is an important fact for people to grasp. The true Jews in the last days were cursed to be suffering oppression, not ruling the world. Please help me in spreading this message. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Will Newman
 

Job 30:30 My skin is black upon me, and my bones are burned with heat.


The Jewish state of Israel was established on the presumption that its inhabitants descend from the same Jews who occupied the land during the time of Christ. Based on the extent of violence and loss of life that has directly resulted from the proliferation of this controversial settlement, one would assume that there exists irrefutable historical evidence to substantiate the claim being made that the Jews of today and the Jews of old are in fact the same people. However, it is curious that the Hebrew Scriptures explicitly describe the Jewish people as a "black" skinned race.


Song of Solomon 1:5-6 I am black, but comely, O ye daughters of Jerusalem, as the tents of Kedar, as the curtains of Solomon. Look not upon me, because I am black, because the sun hath looked upon me:


Lam 5:10 Our skin was black like an oven because of the terrible famine.


What's more, the Biblical prophecies of the Jews eerily echo the history of the so-called "African-American Negros." Based on scriptural and historical evidence, it can be concluded that the "Blacks" who were shipped to America as slaves are in fact the modern-day descendants of the Tribe of Judah.


Deu 28:68 And the LORD shall bring thee into EGYPT [the house of bondage] again WITH SHIPS, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy [redeem] you.


[Washington D.C. is replete with Egyptian symbolism. America is also known for its pyramid on the $1 bill, its obelisks, and slavery...just like ancient Egypt!]


The topic of race has been labeled regressive and irrelevant despite the fact that nearly all wars and international disputes are ethnically or racially motivated to some degree (e.g. the Arab-Israeli conflict). God forbid a citizen of the global community, especially an "African-American" to express any interest in learning about the history of his people outside what he learned in school or in church.


Blacks have the twenty-eight days in February to remember their history--about which it is not necessary for them to know anything prior to 1860. The concept of ethnic pride must be abandoned in order to form a homogenous population of world citizens (read slaves). All men were created equal after all.

This is of course, unless you are Jewish--God's Chosen Race! This ethnic group can, and does, boast about its rich culture and history every chance it can find.


Even Christians, who attend church (presumably) to gain spiritual understanding and knowledge, cannot escape being informed on a weekly basis that they are the Gentile and that the Jews are God's favorite. If an "African-American" decides to ask his pastor why God suffered his ancestors to endure slavery, he will be told that his people are suffering the curse of Ham (see Genesis 9) even though the Zondervan Bible Dictionary defines Ham as: "the progenitor of the dark races: NOT THE NEGROES, but the Egyptians, Ethiopians, Libyans, and Canaanites."


He will be told "slavery was in the past. Let's move forward." Yet everyday he and the rest of the Gentiles will in some way be reminded to "never forget the holocaust." Conveying the message that your ancestors who were shot, whipped, beaten, and hanged over the past four plus centuries should be forgotten, but we should remember the Jews' six years of persecution.


Former Jewish Prime Minister of England, Benjamin Disraeli, once made the provocative statement; "The racial question is the key to world history...all is race, there is no other truth." The truth is that the Jews in Israel today are Europeans who were given land in the Middle East that has never belonged to them because they were persecuted by another group of Europeans...in Europe!


The truth is that the Bible says that Jesus Christ was black and so were his people. Why don't they teach this in church? The truth is that in 70 A.D. the Caucasian Romans crushed the Black Jewish city of Jerusalem, as foretold by Christ, and that the survivors fled into Africa where they settled among the other black races (Mt 24, Mk 13, Lk 21). The truth is, according to Revelation, that twelve thousand men from the Tribe of Judah will rise up to fight against the Satanic plan for a New World Order. How can they stand up if they do not know who they are?


Reply

Forward




Reply from Doug

Thank you for your work. I wish to comment on the piece by Will Newman titled "Biblical Jews Were Black", as I feel there are some serious errors in his interpretation of the scriptures used.  In the Song of Solomon 1:5-6 it is quite clear (if one reads far enough) that this is a Shulamite girl doing the speaking and not a "Jew". And even so, her skin is not "black" from birth, but
rather "because the sun hath looked upon me" because "they made me the keeper of the vineyards".

While she is "comely" she does not have the fair and blush complexion of the "daughters of
Jerusalem". Also, the references in both Job and Lamentations indicate an unnatural coloration of
the skin due to unhealthful circumstances of the individuals, not the person's color from birth.

As in any translation from one language to another, there are rarely word for word exchanges. Often times several words or phrases are needed to properly convey an idea or concept into a different language. Since all three of the aforementioned verses were originally written in Hebrew the challenge in even greater.

We need to be careful of our presumptions.