Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Below- Brendon O'Connell - Jailed Four Years for "Anti Semitism" (Scroll Down)

"Inherit the Wind"- How the Illuminati Brainwashed Christians

April 23, 2014

inherit-the-wind-original.jpg(left, In the movie, Clarence Darrow, played by Spencer Tracy, interrogates William Jennings Bryan, played by Frederic March.)

The movie "Inherit the Wind" (1960) based
on the Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925, helped make
Americans adopt the doctrine of evolution.
James Perloff shows how Hollywood
distorted the facts to advance the Illuminati agenda.












"We are constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories... Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism." (Protocols 2:2-3)

"Now only years divide us from the moment of the complete wrecking of that Christian religion." (Protocol 17:2)



by James Perloff
(henrymakow.com)


Darwinism used spurious "science" (evolution) to supplant God as man's creator.

Perhaps nothing advanced evolution so effectively as the play and movie Inherit the Wind. It depicts the 1925 "Monkey Trial." The defendant was John Scopes, a Dayton, Tennessee schoolteacher charged with violating the Butler Act, a state law that forbade teaching that man descended from lower forms.

Leading Scopes's defense was famed attorney Clarence Darrow. Assisting the prosecution was former Democratic Presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan. The most common impression about this trial is that Darrow humiliated Bryan in cross-examination, scoring a powerful victory for Darwinism over religious fundamentalism.

Public beliefs regarding the trial are based mostly on Inherit the Wind, which portrayed a battle between enlightened evolutionists and imbecilic Christians. My book Tornado in a Junkyard compares the screenplay (the Oscar-nominated Spencer Tracy version) to the trial transcript and other records. Here are highlights. (The complete comparison is posted on my blog.)

John Scopes.jpgTHE MOVIE opens with the grim town minister and other prudes marching to the local high school. They arrest young Scopes, who is forthrightly teaching biology using Darwin.

IN REALITY, Scopes was not a biology teacher. He taught math, but had briefly substituted for a biology teacher during an illness. The ACLU recruited him to challenge the Butler Act. Scopes never taught evolution. He wrote in his autobiography, Center of the Storm: "Darrow had been afraid for me to go on the stand. Darrow realized that I was not a science teacher and he was afraid that if I were put on the stand I would be asked if I actually taught biology."

"If the boys had got their review of evolution from me, I was unaware of it. I didn't remember teaching it."

IN THE MOVIE, we see Scopes in jail, a persecuted martyr. Aroused by the town preacher's sermon, a lynch mob gathers outside the jail, burning Scopes in effigy. A rock sails through the window, injuring him.

IN REALITY, Scopes didn't spent one second in jail. Violating the Butler Act was not an imprisonable offense. Furthermore, no bad blood existed between Scopes and Dayton's people, who were delighted that the trial put Dayton on the map.

Darrow.jpgIN THE MOVIE, Clarence Darrow arrives, bravely taking the case singled-handedly. The local Christians boo him; a mob outside his hotel threatens a lynching.

IN REALITY, Darrow, left, brought a team of lawyers, and here's what he himself said of his Dayton experience: "Yet, I came here a perfect stranger and I can say what I have said before that I have not found upon anybody's part - any citizen here in this town or outside, the slightest discourtesy. I have been better treated, kindlier and more hospitably than I fancied would have been the case in the north."

IN THE MOVIE, William Jennings Bryan is an ignorant bigot opposed to science. He says: "The people of this state have made it very clear that they do not want this zoological hogwash slobbered around the schoolrooms!" "The way of scientism is the way of darkness."

IN REALITY, Bryan was a member of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. What he really said about science during the trial: "Give science a fact and it is not only invincible, but of incalculable service to man."

IN THE MOVIE, the judge disallows any testimony from eminent scientists whom Darrow has brought. The judge declares "zoology" (which he can barely pronounce) and other sciences "irrelevant to the case."

Bryan.jpgIN REALITY, Darrow called as a witness zoologist Maynard Metcalf, who testified at length. Bryan, left, quickly recognized that the atheistic Darrow was orchestrating a parade of witnesses to promote Darwinism. (The trial was being broadcast on radio nationwide, and reported in newspapers globally.) Bryan asked Judge John Raulston: "Will we be entitled to cross-examine their witnesses?" Raulston said they would.

This enraged Darrow, who knew Bryan would ask his witnesses embarrassing questions like "Where are Darwin's missing links?" and "Are you an atheist?" Darrow therefore had his remaining witnesses submit affidavits. These totaled 60,000 words and occupy 54 pages of trial transcript; excerpts were read in court. The decision to stay off the stand was not made by a bigoted judge, but by Darrow himself, to elude cross-examination. Ironically, most of the "evidence" Darrow's experts discussed - Piltdown Man, "useless vestigial organs" - are long discredited.

THE "DEBATE"

But what of that famous "debate" where Darrow supposedly trounced Bryan, symbolizing Darwinian triumph over the Bible?

It was not a debate. Darrow called Bryan as a witness. Thus only Darrow could ask questions, completely controlling the exchange. He peppered Bryan with anti-Bible questions he had spent years developing. On the preceding evening, he rehearsed his inquisition with an associate; Bryan, on the other hand, had to answer everything off-the-cuff.

Naturally, with these advantages, Darrow looked better than Bryan - but not nearly as decisively as in Inherit the Wind, which grossly distorts the event. For example, it has Bryan say that the Bible defines sex as "original sin" (nothing resembling this was said.) And when the movie's cross-examination finishes, Bryan cracks up mentally, wildly shouting the names of the Bible's books (another complete fabrication).

Hollywood distortions aside, why did Bryan place himself in a position where only Darrow could go on offense? The answer is simple. Darrow tricked Bryan into believing that, after this, their roles would reverse: Bryan would be able to question Darrow about Darwinism. This was important to Bryan, since he had been denied cross-examination of Darrow's "experts."

But the next morning, Bryan sat stunned as Darrow changed Scopes's plea from "not guilty" to "guilty," thus ending the trial.

Darrow's words to the judge: "We will ask the court to bring in the jury and instruct the jury to find the defendant guilty."

Darrow had no intention of going on the stand and letting Bryan get revenge by quizzing him on evolution. The trial had NEVER been about John Scopes's guilt or innocence. Its sole purpose was to disseminate Darwinism and assail Christianity.

But in Inherit the Wind, Darrow fights to the bitter end for his client. The backwoods jury finds Scopes "guilty."

Gloom falls on the defendant and his noble attorney, as "bigotry and ignorance" have won the day.

---

James Perloff is author of several books; his latest is Truth Is a Lonely Warrior.

 








You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2014/04/inherit-the-wind.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for ""Inherit the Wind"- How the Illuminati Brainwashed Christians "

JG said (April 23, 2014):

Thanks for setting the record straight on this Hollywood spin of the Scope's Trial, 'Inherit the Wind'.

Like most of Hollywood's works an agenda is being promoted. This movie's objective was to belittle William Jennings Bryan and his Christian constituents of Dayton and also to put the Holy Bible on trial. This also was the agenda of the ACLU.

Bryan wrote a long paper of rebuttal on Darwinism, the movie did touch on this towards the end.

I own the DVD of 'Inheret the Wind' and do enjoy it because it's refreshing to experience the Christian atmosphere that's in the town of Dayton in this movie even though the screenwriters are doing it for a reason.

The acting in it was well done and Spencer Tracy was cunningly convincing at times. But, most of all, this movie does show a" well knit" part of a solid Christian Community that once existed in America. Yes the 'Old Time Religion' is good enough for me.


Andrew said (April 23, 2014):

On a personal level, we are our memories.

As a nation, America has become a land of false memories.

The quiet elite have hijacked our history and with it what used to be genuine American culture.

James Perloff makes it easy to see how Hollywood misleads Americans.

The 1980’s anti-drug cliché JUST SAY NO applies to Hollywood.

We should just turn off Satanically possessed entertainment, TV, movies, etc.

Perloff is a real gem.


Below - Feminism is the real Terrorism - Young Turk (scroll down)

Brendon O'Connell - Jailed Four Years for "Anti Semitism"

April 22, 2014

ifhaffhd.jpg

Australian activist Brendon O'Connell, 42, was arrested
and jailed in 2009 for making "anti-Semitic" statements.
He was released last January. Brendon reveals exactly what he said
and how an apology would have spared him
a four-year prison term. 





"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."- Voltaire



by Brendon O'Connell
(henrymakow.com)



I was arrested by 7 members of the State Security Investigation group on May the 12th 2009 for calling Stanley Elliot Keyser a "racist Jew" and "racially vilifying him in the process. Section 80B. That was one year jail time.

I then used words such as, "your days are numbered" talking about Rabbinic Pharisaic Judaism etc. This came under a different part of the legislation, Section 77, the most serious in that I was "inciting others" to go and kill Jews.

These are comments from my Blog at the time - after I was arrested - that got me more charges under Section 77 -

"1,500 Gazan's are dead, one million plus Iraqi's. We can only hope and pray that the international community strikes hard and makes sure that gaggle of Satan's children in occupied Palestine are brought to justice."
 
Transcript Page 626 - 2 years jail.

"Fairly soon Jews will realize that people are thoroughly sick of them, their whining, their perpetual victimhood and their demands for people to bow down and worship their dodgy religion of Holocaustianity."
 
Transcript Page 630 - 2 years jail

"The Jew community could of at least made their lies and slander half-believable, but I guess after years of inventive and over the top Holocaust memoirs they've gotten lazy."
 
Transcript Page 632- 2 years jail

"Former Ku Klux Clown lectures Aussies to stamp out racism. Unfortunately our former clown has never read the Talmud, so he forgot to mention Jews as the biggest racists of all."
 
Transcript p.633 - 2 years jail

Then 2 years jail for saying "your days are numbered in the video.

All up I was given 11 years jail which was then made "concurrent" which mean it all ran together as one charge. If they really don't like you, they run the charges "consecutive" and you do all 11 years. They were trying to scare me. I made sure I said, "Jail here is a holiday camp compared to Gaza!" which the media reported. I wanted to be as defiant as possible.

This Blog links to two video's I did explaining things

Here Justice Buss at my appeal indicates that if I would just say sorry they would let me out of jail. This was in December of 2011:

JA BUSS: One can readily understand that a suspended sentence would have been appropriate had someone in your client's position pleaded guilty even if not at the first opportunity, had expressed some remorse at some stage or even given an apology. If these had been the facts, then it is very difficult to see how a term of immediate imprisonment could possibly have been justified, but those are not the facts.
 
Transcript 13/12/2011 Page 18 WASCA

Below is a section from a synopsis I prepared for the High Court. It explains a lot. I have also included pictures taken from the raid video's. I don't think anyone has published these before.

[G] Hansard of Debate - Criticism of West Australian  Racial Vilification Legislation by Hon John Fischer Nov.. 2004
 
"This legislation is atrociously drawn up. It will not achieve what it is intended to achieve, although I am not sure what the intent is. The Government has introduced the legislation and I do not believe there has been any consultation with the general public. I believe this legislation has been brought on as a red herring. From the people I have spoken to, I believe that this legislation will do the Government a great deal of harm. It represents without doubt, a loss of freedom of speech and a loss of freedom of knowledge.
...
I believe these laws will increase problems. The whole of the legislation will be thrown out. It is absolutely pathetic. I cannot emphasize enough that this is probably some of the worst legislation I have read."

Criticism by Greg Craven,
'Conversations With The Constitution: Not Just A Piece Of Paper'. UNSW PRESS.

"The most obvious feature of this rights discourse is its unremitting focus on the rights of minorities. New constitutionalists are relatively uninterested in the rights of common or garden Australians to live dull, secure lives in dull, secure suburbs, unmolested alike by burglars and intrusive governmental gate crashers. They are transfixed, however, by the rights of minority groups: indigenous people, ethnic minorities, sexual and gender groupings though not (of course) by the rights of unfashionable minorities such as conservative religious groups or right wing nutters. New constitutionalists argue, with obvious force, that it is the rights of minorities that most need protection. But there is more than necessity at work here."
---

Related- Jailed Christian Activist on Hunger Strike
--------- Oz Foreign Minister Lifts Veil on Jewish Control




You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2014/04/Brendon-OConnell-Jailed-for.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Brendon O'Connell - Jailed Four Years for "Anti Semitism""

WK said (April 22, 2014):

My comment re the above story in response to comment (below) by Robert K.

Great comment, Robert! I believe that it is much easier for someone, upon hearing about someone saying something allegedly “offensive” to or about other persons, to accept that he or she must have done something improper and so perhaps deserves censoring or even punishment. But when someone is told that THEY cannot hear something the issue is brought clearly to “home base” and is much more likely to cause that person to “get their hackles up.” E.g., “You can’t dictate to ME what, or what not, I am going to listen to!" In other words if the situation is reversed so that the imposition is shown to bear directly upon the rights of the individual listener, it is going to be taken more personally and seriously than are more removed or distant rumours or reports of someone else’s rights being abused. Surely, this "reverse strategy" is a potent force to be exploited in the struggle for the preservation of freedom of speech and enquiry—without which intellectual freedom, life can have no meaning.


JG said (April 22, 2014):

The anti-semitism canard was basically designed to outlaw exposure and criticism of Jewish crimes against humanity. It has been a highly effective defense mechanism for the protection of the "perpetual victimhood" aspect of Jewish Identity.
This canard really should not be labelled anti-semitism because Arab Semites and Christian Semites are not protected under these laws.


Robert K said (April 22, 2014):

This business of abjectly apologizing is straight out of the communist rulebook. It is public acknowledgment, under coercion, that one is wrong in one's views, and thereby in fact a public nullification of one's self.

This is reminiscent of the congratulations to the court that apparently are de rigueur for convicted persons to express at the time of sentencing in, for example, China--a public profession of faith that the "authorities" are invariably on the side of the angels.

A proof of evil (i.e., alignment with the will of Satan), Jesus said, is hypocrisy. The world control system being installed ravenously craves evidence of your capacity for hypocrisy. Apparently, despite the penalty he risked, this man couldn't stomach the induction efforts of the kangaroo court that sentenced him to such a preposterous punishment for speaking his mind.

Maybe it's time to stop talking about the right to freedom of speech, which usually involves consideration for others--about whose character,sadly, it seems quite easy to insinuate doubt--and instead view the matter from the other end, i.e. from the standpoint of the individual's right to hear. What information or point of view do you believe you personally should not be entitled to hear? If your answer is "I should be able to hear anything I bloody well want", then you have clarified in your mind the "issue" of freedom of speech.


Below- Emails from Would-be Satanists (scroll down)

Feminism is the Real Terrorism, says Young Turk

April 21, 2014

Turkey_women_protests_295.jpg
Some day the Illuminati will answer for their vicious psychological
attack on women aimed at destroying love, marriage and family.
Osman expresses the rage of young men everywhere.







by Osman
(henrymakow.com) 

I am a 21 year-old-Turkish university student in Istanbul. It was very scary for me to realize that almost all of the girls in university have adopted feminist ideas and are telling the horror stories about the "male dominant, oppressive patriarchy".

In a class I take, whose lecturer is a feminist woman, we are asked read stories of lesbian-feminist authors such as Virginia Woolf and Katherine Mansfield. That's when I noticed that most of the girls are feminists who blame men for all the problems in the society and culture.

Turkey's family laws are copy-pasted from European countries. Sad to say, Turkey is showing the symptoms of social instability and destruction that the Western countries had 10-20 years ago. Marriage rates are decreasing, divorce stats have skyrocketed. Promiscuity and premarital sex are becoming normal and common. Laws are becoming more and more anti-male. I don't want my country to be like the USA or any other satanically-possessed countries.

I'd be more than happy if you would trim, edit and post my article. Because your website is one of the few addresses where Politically Incorrect ideas are welcome.
                                   
FEMINISM IS KILLING THE WESTERN CIVILIZATION

The arch enemy of the West is not Russia, China, Taliban or El-Qaida.  Feminism -which is originally a Western ideology- has damaged the West more than any Western-hating ideology. Since most of the people in my country look up to the Western culture and mass media, it is impossible for us to stop this trend, unless the West gives up feminist ideologies. Thus, take my opinions as a friendly warning and advice.

ourbodies.jpgThere are some slogans that are being loudly repeated by feminists in order to legitimize their sick ideas and turn men and women against each other. Feminism is terminating the harmony between genders and creating an imaginary war. Males are portrayed as predators and females as victims. So, women begin to think that they can demand everything they like, behind the shield of "victimhood." The most frequently repeated slogan of feminists is about abortion: "My body, my choice"

If women have right to make all the decisions whether the baby is going to live or die, then they have to take all parental and economic responsibility.  If women have all the rights, why do men have all the responsibility? Why do men have look after the kid in marriage and pay child support after the marriage?

Why can't men say "My money my choice." Family court says to men: "You caused this child. You are the father. You are the one who will take responsibility. So you have to pay for this child."

But the same court doesn't tell women "You were also volunteer for sex, you are the mother. You are responsible for carrying and protecting the baby for nine months. So you must give birth."     

Yes sir!

"My body my choice. Your money my choice again". Very clever! The Family Court system is full of contradictions and hypocrisy. It simply sucks.

And then women wonder, "Why are men avoiding marriage?" Why?

There is nothing attractive in marriage for men. Penalties are high, rewards are low. The risks are not worth taking. Once the marriage papers are signed, women know that the court and the laws are on their side. And they use the divorce as leverage against men. Because they know, after the divorce, they will keep the house, take custody of kids and make man paying alimony and child support. She, also, will be able to boast to her feminist friends about how badly she kicked her ex-husband's ass in the court.

Family laws unfairly favors women. This hurts women as much as, maybe even more than it hurts men. Since men began to bail out of marriage, women are no longer considered as wives and mothers. Today, unfortunately, all women have to offer to men, is sexuality. In days past, women had both marriage and sexuality as leverage.

tyrkia1_mindre.jpgNow, they think family and marriage stand in the way of their careers. They willfully abandoned the feminine qualities like motherhood and femininity which men really need and want. They pursued career, money and social status ehich men already have and don't give f**k about in women. Their sexuality is all they have left to trade, which leaves them very vulnerable and open to abuse and exploitation. So I am tired of hearing this stupid question: "Why are men taking women as sex objects? Why don't they want to commit to a woman, take responsibility of a long term affair? I don't quite understand..."

Feminism destroyed the reasons which used to force men to commit. They normalized the premarital sex and promiscuity with all these "sexual liberation" slogans. Sex is cheaper and easier to find than ever. Men do not need to marry in order to have sex.  Feminists could not understand that family and marriage were what valued sex and protected women from being sex objects. Feminists caused the problem that they are complaining about now.

So, I decided to find a girl to marry, whose mind is not polluted by feminism yet. Thankfully, it is easier to find such a girl in Turkey, compared to the Western countries. I want to rescue an innocent girl from those feminazi sharks and build my own family, so I can make both myself and my wife happy. Apparently, this is the only way to keep our bodies and souls away from the degeneration of Modernism.

My advice to fellow males in the Western countries is find yourself a girl who respects you and puts her family on pedestal.

Get informed about feminism and gender issues and stand against feminist militants. Don't back off.  You have to end feminism before it ends you.

---
First Comment from Dan:

"Feminism destroyed the reasons which used to force men to commit. They normalized the premarital sex and promiscuity with all these "sexual liberation" slogans. Sex is cheaper and easier to find than ever. Men do not need to marry in order to have sex."

How many times must I inform men that sex never "forced" men to commit.  Reducing the concept of marriage to a contract of sex access from a woman is exactly how feminists look at it.  Before feminism, men valued women who could handle a home, a family, and have many healthy children.  If she was pleasant to look at, that was a plus.  I heard it from enough old men born early in the last century that it was common wisdom that a man was better off to marry a smart but helpful girl with looks on the plain side - for the very beautiful ones were fickle, with other men always competing for them.

Osman is right, of course, that the incentives for men to marry were systematically removed.   No longer does marriage secure and insure a supportive homemaker and mother of his children.  It sets him up to be lawfully extorted for alimony and child support soon as the woman gets bored and decides she wants to do something else with her time.

I'm afraid the solution is to return to making it very difficult for a woman - or man - to get a divorce.   Abortion 'on demand' as birth control also needs to be illegal again.  Feminism depends upon girls growing up thinking that pregnancy isn't a problem.  Women should have to worry about getting pregnant.  That was their old incentive for being serious about marriage and very selective about whom they gave it to.  There was nothing wrong with anything that Feminism and 'sex liberation' targets for ridicule.



beavis.jpgfrom Anthony Migchels:

I agree with the article very much of course. But I want to emphatically support Salwa's comment:

Men have been bribed with cheap pussy and porn and many men behave utterly moronically concerning sex, family and women in general.

The porn addicts are feminism's biggest enablers.



From Scott:


 I agree with everything Osman has said. It's really something when a young man like Osman who lives half-way across the world from me, is experiencing exactly the same thing I am over here in the 'west', (Satan's masonic playground is what the West is now). The promotion of homosexuality,militant feminism and the evil family laws are all a orchestrated satanic contagion being unleashed upon the planet world-wide, and America is leading the way in re-programming all other 'countries' perceptions of reality that fit accordingly to the satanic NWO gameplan/playbook.

 I lived this nightmare Osman has described. My mother never paid one cent towards the mortgage of my old boy-hood home once throughout her 31 year marriage to my father. After 31 years of marriage, my mother demanded for a divorce. During one of their last fights, the police came into my home illegally, but because of the neo-Bolshevik  'domestic violence' laws, my father was arrested,put in hand-cuffs and taken to jail with no proof or evidence showing he laid one hand on my mother, but that doesn't matter when Satanic central bankers and their masonic Jew cronies have taken over the political,judicial,media and cultural institutions while bending them to their non-empathetic and satanic mindset. The family laws are satanic,pure and simple. I lost my home,wealth, and connection with my siblings. All because a evil masonic controlled court system rapes completely over men by design to destroy the traditional family paradigm.

I sadly have to say I also agree with Osman when he says  "no wonder men are taking women as sex objects". I agree, it's hard not to when the penalties are higher in a marriage than the rewards. The risks are simply not worth taking for a young man these days. Sadly because the system is rigged to destroy families and debase men of respect and dignity. ...

Possession is part of marriage, a good woman will acknowledge this and never ask a man for more time out with 'friends'. Unfortunately this is double-speak for "I can do whatever the hell I want". The masonic court system and the police state gave my mother the authority to completely rape my father financially, even though he did not want the divorce. No-Fault-Divorce laws were first passed by the so called "conservative" Ronald Reagan. This alone confirms the one-party-system and centuries old plan for one-world-domination. How do we stop all this ? Demand for interest and debt free currency, then they can stop funding their agenda into all of our political,judicial and cultural institutions.




You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2014/04/Feminism-is-the-Real-Terrorism.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Feminism is the Real Terrorism, says Young Turk "

Len said (April 23, 2014):

In case anyone hasn't figured this out yet: feminism is one of THE PRIMARY NWO means of destroying the family unit, emasculating men, twisting and destroying the God given traits of feminine in the female, and making men and women slaves to the incredibly greedy and control-freak corporate NWO Estate. The agenda behind it all is plain, flat-out EVIL to the core.

We simply MUST stand against this kind of evil.


Jennifer said (April 23, 2014):


Salwa is right! Men in the US want sex without any commitment. They demand it! Many women have sex hoping the man will marry. Many are heartbroken when they realize he lied & used them. Men want women with high paying jobs. American men are more feminist then the women. Many women I know got careers just to get husbands.

When both make the same money they
split all expenses & child care. I know many women who made more then their husbands thus they had to pay the x husband alimony.

Also in the US men do not have to pay child support if their child has a social security security number. One can legally argue the child is ward of the government and opt out!
Men love feminism they never have to grow up!


Roman said (April 22, 2014):

How to stop feminism:

1. Males and females in separate schools learning different subjects.

2. No female nor liberal teachers.
3. Trade school after 8th grade unless they're above 130 IQ.
4. Ban all contraceptives.
5. Ban sex ed and any homo propaganda.
6. Castrate any male who impregnates a female who is not his wife.
7. Castrate any male who gets an std a year after laws are passed.
8. Ban testosterone prescriptions.
9. Then you might need to legalize polygamy if there not enough viable males.
10. Any female who wears revealing clothes in public will be on trial naked with her family present and fined.
11. If divorced cannot remarry.
12. Nothing in the media that's not educational.
13. Ban bars and clubs.
Etc...

This is what required to reverse course. Never gonna happen. The west will give up every freedom except the "right" to fornicate.


Adrian said (April 22, 2014):

Thanks to Osman for his article.

The first step to social health is to boycott Hollywood. Kick out the TV and only watch movies prior to the openly satanic era, say pre-1985.

The "screen" is the Trojan horse throughout the world. If they are parked in front of a screen (TV,Tablet,Phone), women in so-called developing nations are all subject to the brainwashing. So beware.

Everywhere.


Salwa said (April 22, 2014):

I admire Osman for making a stand. Unfortunately, many males nowadays take advantage of the feminist situation to get what they want out of it, sex without any commitment. And this creates a never ending cycle that in the end destroys our culture and religion.

Everyone in the society right now has a role to play. We know that there is some “world order” trying to push moral decadence to everyone, regardless of religion and culture so that they can be manipulated more easily. Many people knows this, but choose to follow anyway, because it is not easy to go against the flow.

As a Muslim, I found my religion helping me to fight this never-ending campaign of moral decadence. I pray that there will be many more man like Osman to save our future. Not only in Turkey and other Muslim countries, but even in the Christian countries like US, Canada, etc.

Although I am a Muslim, I wish that more Christians learn about their religion and start practicing actively the original Christianity.

Good moral and family values is the basis for a strong society. Eastern countries now look up to the west, thus I think good, practicing Christian western societies would also contribute to moral improvement for the whole world, probably not something the NWO wants.


Emails from Satanists

April 21, 2014

teensatanist.jpgEmails from Satanists, Would-be Satanists and a Feminist


What if you got it all wrong, Henry?

Have you ever thought of that possibility? Have you ever noticed that all the conspiracy websites on the internet point to Christianity as the answer?

Isn't that odd, considering that those websites are built by so called free thinkers? Yet they all give the same answer; save your soul with Jesus because the world is gripped by a ''Satanic conspiracy''. Do you realize that you are promoting that which you say you don't want?

If we were are all Christians, a one world government would be in place soon. Like the Vatican used to rule the West, just a little bigger than that. You are promoting that which you say you are against.

I have seen this pattern when I was looking for answers, and obviously started to think something was off. Free thinkers shouldn't all give the same answers, maybe this conspiracy is not Satanic at all; but in fact Christian.

I have thought about this extensively; and my conclusion is obviously opposite to yours. For that reason I have become a Satanist. I believe Satan is the true liberator of mankind, which is why he is demonized and put away as 'evil''. The ruling elite have no use for independent thinkers, they rather have ''sheep'' who flock to their ''shepherd''. Christianity promotes weakness, turning the other cheek and being a good slave. Satanism is the opposite of that and stands for true liberation of the soul.

The occult is a system one can work to empower oneself, and therefore no longer be a slave to the elite. The elite don't want us to realize we are all Gods, and want to keep this knowledge to themselves. The letters ''JHVH'' are nothing more but the four elements of the Jewish magical system. JHVH is a false deity, invented to keep the masses quiet.

Thankfully, the Church is globally losing power. Religion is becoming less popular, and more people are questioning mindless obedience. The age of Aquarius is coming, and soon the tables will be turned. More people will openly oppose religion then ever, and more people will find the truth. I look forward to the coming time; we Satanists are growing in numbers. Soon the true conspiracy will be known for all, and we will reign victorious!

With all due respect,
Windigo

--

Sir I appreciate your article on how to spot a satanist but I find a few flaws in it. For one, Sacrifices are not requires, and there are no modern day cults. Satanists are not devil worshipers they believe in the power of them self. I know because I am one.

PDF
The_Satanic_Bible_Underground_Edition_-1.pdf

Henry Makow <[email protected]>
Apr 19 (2 days ago)

to Ashlyn

Can you expand on this email? I plan to post a feature by people like you. I won't use names or email addresses

henry

I sent you the satanic bible as an attachment. I worship me. I am aware that I am amazing. Men externalized divine cell because they feel like they are not worthy of a good in fact we are all god we are creators

--

my name is guyo saghav. i am kenyan...am 19yrs...i want to join
illuminati am ready to do anythg that you ask me to do as long as i
wll join so please am beggng you if you want i can be your slave as
long as i wll become rich and help ma family

------

Truly, your wisdom knows no boundaries. « Two people don't become one by fighting over the same territory. Generally speaking, the man "makes the house, the woman makes the home." ». Basically, what I am trying to say is : you are a butt-penis who likes to fuck donkeys. I know because I read the Bible everyday. If you were here, I would fart in your mouth. Are your parents siblings? If I ever need a brain transplant, I`d choose yours because I`d want a brain that had never been used. But have no fear, one day you will die, and the world will be a better place for all. --[email protected]

-----
From Tim:

In the end, think about it. The Jews liberated us from slavery to the traditional norms. In the traditional society, men were considered as cannon fodder.

In the modern society, both men and women have the freedom to pursue self realization and enlightenment. Remember, Lucifer was trying to give humanity KNOWLEDGE which would set them free. That pissed off Enlil, the "control freak god" and he threw them out of the garden.

Feminism has set men free from slavery to women and marriage!

Praise LUCIFER, the glorious Light Bringer!
Praise LUCIFER, the Light of the Star of David!
Heil Henry Kissinger!
Heil the Illuminati!
Heil Nathanel Rothschild!
Heil the Jews, the Master Race!

ALL HAIL SATAN!

-----------------------

Linda K comments:

Dear Henry...well, that was disturbing to read.
 
One of the posts said:
 
...they [Satanists] believe in the power of them self.
 
I got a perfect Scripture for that mindset: James 3:16
 
For where envy and self-seeking exist, confusion and every evil thing are there.
 

Abortion is a Rite of Witchcraft

April 10, 2014


Windle.jpeg(left, Patricia Baird Windle)

Abortion is a Rite of  Witchcraft


by Dan

There's a long history of abortions being performed by practicing witches.  This has come out in public again again all along, many times in blatant statements by the witches themselves.  It amazes me how the public simply tunes out things that don't into their little window on the world.
I can give you one quote off the top of my head right here:  Patricia Baird Windle, founder and owner of an abortion business called 'Aware Woman'.  She was an avowed witch who raised a stink years ago saying "You practice your religion and let me practice mine. My religion is a holy ritual child sacrifice." 

She got away with saying that because her abortion clinic is LEGAL.  In fact she meant to make the news to promote one of her books 'Targets of Hatred: Anti-Abortion Terrorism',  which labels the "pro life" position as fundamentalist fanatics endangering the lives of women, yada yada yada...

She's just one of five I can cite to show it's a religion and they're proud of it.  They share this insanity that claiming feminine power involves this initiation of taking the life she creates. That's how a woman graduates to 'goddess'.

The Masonic maxim is true.  Everything really is out there 'in plain sight'.  But people don't believe their eyes and ears if they don't believe evil is real and there's a non-human aspect to it.  That's why everything that came out in broad daylight in the 1980's about the epidemic of Satanism already went down the memory hole.   We're always having to start from scratch trying to explain these things over, and over and over.

Of interest, abortion clinics are on the run here in Texas. The Legislature and Governor have closed most of them down by pulling State funding from Planned Parenthood.  We'll see how long it sticks.



Canada's Political Prisoner - Dean Clifford

media-960x360.jpgCanada's Political Prisoner - Dean Clifford

(left, Dean Clifford)


This is what happens when you challenge the legitimacy of government.





(Editor's Note: I don't support the Freeman movement but think it's worth knowing about.)



by V
(henrymakow.com)

There is a political prisoner sitting in a Manitoba prison that few people outside the Freeman movement have ever heard about. Dean Clifford was abducted by the Hamilton Police Department on November 24, 2013 after he gave a 2-day seminar. His crime? Challenging the validity of the law.

Dean Clifford is a white male of Irish-Canadian heritage who lives just north of Winnipeg. Manitoba. A contractor by trade, he concluded the Canadian government and courts are detrimental to the health, finance and well-being of the people. Dean drives without a driver's license, has no government license plates and pay's no income tax to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). He does this lawfully (common-law.)

Of all the person's in the Freeman movement such as Winston Shrout, Max Egan, etc, Dean Clifford practices in real life what he preaches and his number #1 point is, 'Do Harm To No One'. For this he has been jailed many times over the years and has even been physically abused by the police.

Manitoba court records show that the charge was that Dean didn't show up for a court appearance in August 21st.

Dean has been in prison for over four months know with trumped-up charges. The "crown" and the powers behind the "crown" do not want other people to know the fahat Dean Clifford is teaching to the public.

Dean Clifford has shown in simple, clear language that the government of Canada is a separate foreign power and the only way the government of Canada can interact with us, private citizen's is to trick us into making us franchisees (employees) of the 'crown' through the fraudulent use of our birth certificate, driver's license, social insurance card, etc.

So far the courts have denied Dean access to a notary or commissioner of oath, and have tried every dirty trick up their sleeves to keep him in prison. The best guess seems to be to send a strong message to others out there in the "true" Freeman's movement that doing battle with the crown courts and crown prosecutors will only land you in jail for a long time. Mind you in Dean's case on trumped up charges and in a private statutory 'kangaroo court' environment.

http://deanclifford.info/2014/03/02/update-number-five/

For those of you that want to learn more of Dean Clifford's teachings go to his website (http://deanclifford.info/) and watch more of his video's on his website: http://deanclifford.info/media/