Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Below- "Zionists Determine Good and Evil"

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

A Young Man's Escape from America

February 8, 2010

swami_vivekananda1.jpgby Caitanya Dasa  (ccananza@hotmail.com)

I am 25 years old. I was born and grew up in a suburb of Dallas, Texas. I went to an expensive private school for most of my schooling. I got my first car at age 16, my second car at age 17, my third car at age 18, my fourth car at age 19. I lived in a very expensive neighborhood where the average annual income was $100,000 dollars.

In other words, I had the American dream and much more. I had written four books by age 20. I could have potentially gotten into any upper class university I wanted, if I had chosen that route. Even though I had so much wealth materially, I did not feel satisfied and I began asking philosophical and spiritual questions about life.

Around age 20, I started reading Srila Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada's translation of Bhagavad-Gita www.asitis.com, and it very quickly answered all of the questions I was asking, questions that I did not even have the ability to conceive, and dispelled a few philosophical misconceptions as well.

I quickly renounced all of the riches and material wealth I had, and became a celibate monk of the Gaudiya Vaisnava order at age 21. I donned the saffron robes that monks of both the Hindu and Buddhist traditions wear. I traveled around America for the next two years, distributing Bhagavad-Gitas at different colleges and universities. Internally I was experiencing tremendous spiritual happiness and felt all of my material attachments and conditioning gradually disappearing.

INDIA

Around age 23, I finally did something that I had always wanted to do- I went to India to live. It was quite a big cultural shift, but I felt at home here in India. In America, I had felt like an outsider, someone who didn't fit in. As soon as I stepped off the plane in Bangalore, I felt like I was home finally.

Over the course of the next three years, I traveled all over India and saw many holy places. Vrindavan, Krishna's birthplace, south of Delhi, made a particularly strong impression on me. Now I have decided to settle down in south India, stop traveling, and leave behind the monk way of life.

All throughout this whole journey, as I studied different Vedic scriptures, especially Srimad-Bhagavatam, I began to experience an internal change of heart, something that many saints and spiritual leaders in many different religions have tried to express and explain.

Bhakti means devotion, devotion to God. The goal of religion is to develop love of God, a state of being that Hindus call prema. God is one, although different religions may call Him by different names such as Allah, Krishna, Christ, and so on. The goal of religion is one, which is to try to become a humble servant of the Supreme Lord.

CHANGES

Why am I leaving the monk way of life? That is a difficult question to answer, one that many monks of whatever tradition or order eventually have to ask themselves. At first reaction, most people assume it is because of a physical agitation, the desire to engage in sexual intercourse. In most cases, that is not it at all.

The desire to have a family, to have a loving wife, is a natural desire and emotion of any balanced and healthy human being. To artificially renounce women will not work. Women make up half of the world and thus to try to renounce or avoid them is not really possible, unless you live on an island where only male monks live. And even then, the desires still remain in the mind, so it is usually futile.

Do I have any regrets about becoming a monk for 5 years of my life? Not at all! It has been a tremendous period of growth, one that I feel was absolutely necessary.

I have no regrets at all about having lived as a monk, but as the character in Herman Hesse's Siddhartha book realized, he needed to move on and learn how to become a human again, how to become part of the world again. Temporary celibacy or monk life for 2 or 3 years can be tremendously beneficial to a person's spiritual development. But lifelong celibacy is practically impossible in this modern age.

What do I plan to do now? I plan to live a very simple and peaceful in a rural village in south India, living an agrarian based lifestyle. There are a couple of Americans living there already and are engaging the local villagers in different ways. So there is already a pre-existing framework there, but still, I will make a little bit of money from various things, and I will also live as simply as possible, so I do not foresee requiring a great deal of money. This is an issue I have thought of before, and one that I am presently working on.

The way of life in rural India is very different from the lifestyle of the fast paced Western countries. It is difficult to all of a sudden shift gears, so to speak, and change from a passionate and fast paced lifestyle to a more simple and peaceful one, but I have faith that I can make the change and learn how to live naturally and in harmony with nature and God.

In these turbulent and uncertain times, when the world is being ripped apart by war, social unrest, famine, crime, and chaos in general,------- people of all religions, whether they are a Christian, Hindu, Jew, Buddhist, Muslim, or whatever else, must come together in unity and realize that we are all children of the same Supreme Father, and thus we are all a part of the same family. We are all God's children, and when we realize this, then there can be peace.
----

(Editor's Note: I'd like to hear from other Americans/westerners who have "escaped" their countries of origin. hmakow@gmail.com)





You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/by_caitanya_dasa_ccananzahotma.html
Articles >>

Comments for "A Young Man's Escape from America"

Larry said (February 9, 2010):

Why don't you ask for letters from people who decided to stay where they are, and correct the problems around them? It's easy to run away. It takes guts to stay where you are and work within the society around you. I could also run away and "monk it." I call it a cop-out.

BD said (February 9, 2010):

I read with interest and surprise the article by Caitanya Prabhu (Caitanya dasa) posted on your site Tuesday Feb. 9 and especially your ed. note expressing interest in other people who have "escaped" their country. I'm that guy who has written to you last in 9/13/09 advocating "international Community" and other things. Well I too am a "Hare Krishna" and lived in our community New Vrndaban in WV for over twenty years. I have been living main stream for about 13 years now . So I am living in this country but not of it. But its hard to raise my boys right out here in Babylon. --Bimba Dhara dasa

JD said (February 9, 2010):

Our Indian friend almost got it right. Material wealth has it's draw backs, however material wealth is not solely the AMERICAN DREAM!

So he threw the baby out with the bath water; a move that seems quite common these days. Oh, by the way, those Indian monks live off the fruits of the labors of those who seek after a meager prosperity. Isn't that a bit hypocritical?

The American Dream is LIBERTY and with liberty comes prosperity. It's the latter that is dangerous just as our misguided friend perceives, but prosperity is only as dangerous as the beneficiary's handling of those blessings. So he goes to India and found what he could have discovered in America. There are millions of religious/prosperous Americans that manage their good fortunes well. Mr. India just had too much, too soon, and too easy, but failed American Civics. I must give him credit for throwing off these material things until he gets it right.

He should have studied the founders documents on the creation of the American Civilization. He would have realized the true dream was to be a free and self-governed people able to keep the fruits of their labors, worship as they see fit, speak their minds without the danger of government reprisals, and kick the asses of those who try to destroy their LIBERTIES.

One last note: My father used to say, "For every 1000 people who overcome adversity only one overcomes prosperity." In this sense, Mr. India was the wiser for rejecting the easy money and connecting with his inner self and soul, but as I will repeat again prosperity for the sake of prosperity is not the American Dream. Good day.

Paul said (February 9, 2010):

I believe and I am convinced that one need not "escape from America" in order to exit Mystery Babylon.

The state of one's mind and soul are far more important than the physical location of one's body.

As Christians we are commanded to come out of Mystery Babylon, and so I have, as much as humanly possible:

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Rev.%2018:4&version=NIV

I have terminated all contracts -- whether expressed or implied -- with demonstrably corrupt State and Federal governments.

This has not been easy, but it was not impossible.

My own experience proves that God would not have ordered us to come out of Babylon if He had not given us the wherewithal to do so -- without necessarily moving to rural areas in other countries.

The larger challenge is thus to live among those who are still seduced by Mystery Babylon, and to show them the way -- by means of examples
which they can witness, up close, and not necessarily hear from afar.

This is one of the ways of Christian Mystics, of whom I am one:

"The truth will set you free."

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John%208:32&version=NIV

... implying that one can still be enslaved, regardless of one's location
and even after emigrating to a foreign country ostensibly to "escape".

Thus, it is the truth that will set us free, not moving to a different country ...
and not "may", "might' or "could" set us free, but WILL set us free.

Dan said (February 9, 2010):

Here's one young man who heard his calling at an early age, despite the distractions and temptations of personal wealth living in one of the busiest American cities who wasn't blinded by any of that. He joined a Hindu order so his calling took him to India in saffron robes. I know a Vietnamese seminarian here in Houston, and another Vietnamese holy order Catholic priest who came here from Dallas. They immigrated as children with their families from Viet Nam.

don't see Dasa's choices as motivated by a desire to escape from one country or culture to another. His story holds certain features instantly recognizable to any cleric or religious person whether Krishna Consciousness, Catholic, Buddhist or the rest. Christians refer to it as hearing 'God's calling', or vocation. Vocations vary between being single, married, consecrated, religious or a priest. The vocation of a monk or priest requires celibacy. But a single person in a non-clerical calling is chaste. The marriage vocation is by no means 'less' holy when it's properly conception and raising of children.
These protocols are universal to all religions traditionally. Doctrines and theologies are secondary to that.

From the way he writes I see no conflict in his deciding after 5 years being a consecrated Bhakti monk to leave the order to seek the marriage vocation at his age. Dasa seems to me to have been living in awareness of God's calling for him. Now he's matured to be fit for taking on the responsibilities of marriage vocation. None the worse for 'wear' of 5 years of celibacy.

In Buddhism they have the Mahayana tradition of the monastic life and Theravada in which one lives 'in the world'. Dasa will know about these anyway since they derive from Indian Buddhism. In reality no place on earth is closer or further from God. That's why Jesus didn't fear entering shady parts of town the laws of the day said were 'unclean'. Corruption around us doesn't have to corrupt us.

So I think if someone merely escapes from point a to point b live is probably going to be on the same wavelength where ever they go. If somebody's running away from personal problems in New Orleans they're probably going to fall into similar problems in Timbuktu.

But someone like Dasa who's able to hear his calling will hear it anyway, where it takes him is secondary - the difference is where ever it takes him will be the right place, because that's not 'escaping' that's following God's Will.

Gary said (February 9, 2010):

Regarding the article "A Young Man's Escape from America", I do not doubt the young man's sincerity, and I applaud him for recognizing that wealth does not guarantee happiness, but out of love and concern for his soul I must warn him that he has fallen for the "New Age" type of thinking that is setting the stage for the prophesied one world religion of the Antichrist. The same people who are behind the "New World Order" push for a Luciferian one world government are also behind the ecumenical inter-faithism movement in an attempt to effectively nullify any "Christian" resistance to the "New World Order".

In order to achieve their occult objective, New Agers have to deal with the obstacle of Christianity which had been the main threat to their vision of a one world "utopia". They had to figure a way for Christians to be either neutralized or deceived into unwittingly supporting their agenda. The modern ecumenical movement is playing a key role in accomplishing this mission. Most people do not realize that today's ecumenical movement is an integral part of the push for the New World Order one world government.

For more insight and specific details about the plans the NWO has to use religious unity to further their one world government agenda please read the article at this link: http://kenraggio.com/KRPN-UnitedReligions.htm

The above scenario does not surprise those that have read the prophetic warnings to be on the alert for such deceptions so as to escape being an unwitting pawn of the NWO globalists.

War on God

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Zionists Determine Good and Evil

February 7, 2010

dershowitz-020410.jpg

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Alan Dershowitz (left) recently called Richard Goldstone "an evil man" for censuring Israel's Dec. 2008 Gaza War in his UN Report.

If God is synonymous with absolute truth and justice, Dershowitz exposes Zionism as a war on God.  Zionists turn good and evil on their head, and define "good" as whatever benefits them.

This is the New World Order folks; "Good" is "what's Good for the Jews."

Speaking on Israeli Army Radio Jan. 31, Alan Dershowitz called Goldstone a "traitor."

He is "using his Jewishness to malign Israel...He is an evil man, one who allowed himself to be used against the Jewish people, an absolute traitor."

Goldstone accused both Israel and Hamas of war crimes but singled Israel out for inflicting a "collective punishment" on civilians.

In "Operation Cast Lead," (Dec 24 2008- Jan 21, 2009) Israel killed 1400 Palestinians, 80% of whom were civilians, the majority women and children. Over 5000 more were wounded. 22,000 structures and 280 schools were destroyed. About 200 Factories and 700 Businesses Damaged. Eight hospitals and 26 clinics were destroyed.

This was in retaliation for the death of four Israelis in all of 2008 from Hamas "rockets." (Another four died from rockets during the conflict.)

In January and February 2008 alone, 63 Israelis died in road accidents.  
That's 378 on an annualized basis.

richard-goldstone.jpg(Richard Goldstone, left)

Just as 378 fatalities are the price of driving, four deaths in 2008 from rockets is a small price for stealing a whole country and confining over a million refugees to an open air prison.

But let a few Jews question Israel's savagery and they are "traitors...evil [men.]"

If Zionists like Dershowitz want to get metaphysical, surely they represent evil, and are the greatest threat to world peace.


SUBJECTIVITY

In his book "Sex and Character," (1903), Austrian Jewish philosopher Otto Weininger compared Jews to women in that some are incapable of moral objectivity or intellectual honesty. They don't seem to understand that good and evil, truth and untruth, are independent of them, their dictate or interests.

As the self-chosen leaders of a self-chosen people, Zionists have a mission to reorganize the world and reality itself. The Illuminati bankers, many of whom are Jewish or part-Jewish, are tapping into this tendency to play God and turn reality upside down.

As God usurpers, organized Jewry is incapable of admitting doing wrong, or that anti-Semitism is the result. Why should they? They are God. They would sooner convince the whole world it is wrong.

I was living in Israel Feb 21,1973 when the Israelis shot down a Lybian airliner killing 105 passengers. The plane had accidentally strayed into the Sinai. I was appalled by the self pitying hand wringing and mealy mouthed excuses. "We'd look into your blue eyes and do it all over again," one commentator wrote. I didn't stay.

"UNDERDOG"

In a recent article, Robert Fisk remarks on the Israeli need to play underdog always at the edge of annihilation.

"Forget Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 1982 and the 15,000 Lebanese and Palestinian dead. Forget the Sabra and Shatila massacre that same year by Israel's militia allies as their troops watched. Erase the Qana massacre of 1996 - 106 Lebanese killed by Israeli shellfire, more than half of them children - and delete the 1,500 in the 2006 Lebanon war...- if you believe the security elite of Israel's right wing here in Herzliya - [Israel] is now under an even more dangerous, near-unprecedented attack."

Despite having over 200 nuclear bombs, Israel fans this hysteria better to wage an endless war of aggression. Ordinary Israelis feel they have no choice but fight. (See, my "The Zionist Protection Racket.")

Jews are on the defensive because they think they're hated for no reason. They think that to admit wrong would justify their extermination. Not true. Many Jews are agents and scapegoats for the agenda of the Illuminati Jewish bankers. No one wants to exterminate them, but anti-Semitism will grow as the New World Order becomes more apparent and more onerous.


CONCLUSION

As a Jew, I am tired of Zionists defining the Jewish interest; tired of their relentless distortion of truth.

I am sick of the US Congress and media towing the Zionist line; sick of how Zionists manufacture anti-Semitism to make Jews conform.

The New World Order is redefining reality (Good and Evil) in terms of the Illuminati banker agenda. Jews (Neocons, Liberals,Communists, Socialists, Feminists) have been brainwashed to advance their world government agenda and to destroy all collective identity, i.e. race, religion, nation and family (gender.)

Ordinary Jews will take the fall. If they remain complacent, they'll have no one to blame but themselves. But I'm thankful for righteous Jews like Richard Goldstone who recognize truth and have the courage to tell it.

----
Makow--On the July-August 2006 Lebanon War

"Gaza in Plain Language" (YouTube)

More Gaza Background   (YouTube)



You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/zionists_define_good_and_evil.html
Articles >>

Comments for " Zionists Determine Good and Evil"

Kurt said (February 9, 2010):

To answer Rony’s question, a Jewish homeland in Israel was never the goal of the Cryptocracy who funded and promoted the Zionists. Israel was to be the ‘fly’ in the Middle East ointment; a catalyst for war and misery against the Islamic States until they acquiesce to banker control of their economies. The end goal is rapidly approaching as we watch.

Hans said (February 9, 2010):

Henry, Zionism and Satanism is the same, both disregard the Commandmends given by God and replace them with man-made rules, fitting exactly to the wishes of those in power, or those who are "would-be" leaders!

The principle is a clear pattern - if someone can not be what he wants to be, he is changing the rules until they fit!

That is not restricted to Jews, even though Zionism is often and mistakenly attributed to Jews alone - it is rather a state of mind, a "value-system" if you like, one where moral values are corrupted and re-defined.

I met an American, self appointed "Leader of a Church" - an evangelical "Christian", who stated flat out: whatever i do is justified, as i serve the Lord" - well, every crook and murderer can say this in a vain attempt to justify his crimes.

If people are seeking their own will, and are bending a reality in which they are not what they want to be, they become Satanists and they follow his example, and fall for his promise and lie, to become "God-like."

Hans said (February 8, 2010):

enry, Zionism and Satanism is the same, both disregard the Commandmends given by God and replace them with man-made rules, fitting exactly to the wishes of those in power, or those who are "would-be" leaders!

The principle is a clear pattern - if someone can not be what he wants to be, he is changing the rules until they fit!

That is not restricted to Jews, even though Zionism is often and mistakenly attributed to Jews alone - it is rather a state of mind, a "value-system" if you like, one where moral values are corrupted and re-defined.

I met an American, self appointed "Leader of a Church" - an evangelical "Christian", who stated flat out: whatever i do is justified, as i serve the Lord" - well, every crook and murderer can say this in a vain attempt to justify his crimes.

If people are seeking their own will, and are bending a reality in which they are not what they want to be, they become Satanists and they follow his example, and fall for his promise and lie, to become "God-like."

Felix said (February 8, 2010):

Sir, you wrote in your article: "In his book "Sex and Character," (1903), Austrian Jewish philosopher Otto Weininger compared Jews to women in that some are incapable of moral objectivity or intellectual honesty. They don't seem to understand that good and evil, truth and untruth, are independent of them, their dictate or interests."

This is precisely why Judaism itself is NOT part of the western tradition. The tradition of the west, largely transmitted down to us through Christianity, is that truth is knowable and exists outside of the knower. (In fact, in most traditions other this is commonly held.)

In Judaism, however, the paramount question is not "Is it true?" but "Is it good for the Jews." With a central philosophy as racist as this, is it any wonder adherents to such a religion smugly believe their superiority?

We in the West will do well to recognize that the Hebraic tradition is as alien to us as Islam, and that it must never have more than a minor place in our society if our traditions and cultures are to survive.

Brent said (February 8, 2010):

Just wait Henry until they finally pull the whole rug out from the world economy.

Should have read the bank stocks message boards during the Fall of 2008. It was quite ugly.

All fingers will be pointing at the Jews Henry, and ordinary Jews will be pretty much be forced to go to Israel.

And those not forced will do so in fear for their very lives. The Exodus from the West is coming soon.

So your absolutely right Henry, good peace loving Jewish people are going to take the fall for an evil few.

But yet it seems history has always had the masses suffer for the evil few, no matter what race.

Soon it will all be over though, and the good will prevail.

Becky said (February 8, 2010):

Henry--it is not just Jews that are being maligned for telling the truth about Israel and its genocidal behaviour. We Canadians will be before the hate crimes facist group for stating the truth about Israel--by dictate of our own government.

'Turning reality upside down' is a ploy that works for our government in relation to their dictates about Israel. We are in Afghanistan to 'save the women and children' and 'give female children an education' but 'stand with Israel' when they kill children, demolish schools and hospitals and say not a word.

What I don't understand is why does 'victimhood' protect Israel from sanctions while the Palestinians have no recourse to any aid. They are held in the biggest outdoor refugee camp in the world while having their homes and land stolen and we do nothing? Who are the real victims here?

Interestingly the Jews already have a homeland. It is Birobidjan http://www.tellingfilms.co.uk/birobidjan.htm and has been their homeland for the past 76 years, so why are they stealing Palestine?

I thank God for people like Richard Goldstone. We must know the truth to be set free. The majority of us know the difference between good and evil--but sadly evil seems to be the side that our governments and their controllers have chosen for us.

becky

Morris said (February 8, 2010):

Even though it was instilled and beaten into me from circumcision till bar mitzvah, the jew identity just could not stick.

i was fortunate to have acquired an oppositional/defiant behavior syndrome due to perinatal trauma, which put me at odds with authority from the get go.

so the brainwashing did not work and it inspired me to investigate and i continue to research and uncover more of the true history of the so called JEWS.

just the last one hundred years of jewish atrocities would fill volumes of indictments against them.

but they know very well how to use deception and secrecy to remain incognito.

as this dark period ends, the increasing light and consciousness will wither their bullyboy bravery and put them in their place.

karma is not off by a hair and the hells are vast and deep.

we who laugh, last. and isn't this pathetic group and it's world power fantasy a hoot?

who, is a self hating JEW? the pedophile rabbid or the renunciate of judaism who lives by universal accepted precepts.

the JEWS can't get along with the various goyim nations and they cannot get along with other so called JEWS.

it is the ultimate exclusionary philosophy which results in extinction of worlds. this world is our classroom and they want to bomb it out of existence.

we have the ability to cultivate and become enlightened here on planet earth. this potential they want to destroy.

they want all to be in thrall to their satanic power and serve them as shabbas goyim.
it is time to do some jew-jitsu and put these demonic and deluded people where they belong.

Rony said (February 8, 2010):

In fact, the very basic idea is that nothing serves Israel better than playing the underdog.

Despite it's military superiority in the Middle East and its diplomatic superiority world wide (the UN is one sample among many), Isarel has never stopped pretending to the world that it's a victim threatened in its very foundation.

As a Lebanese, I deeply like the fact that Jews, Muslims and Christians share Palestine (or call it whatever you want). I just don't know why people there are bound to fight each other endlessly...

True that the Illuminati agenda hurts Jews as much as it does to non Jews, but, meanwhile, I wonder why zionists would bear all these wars and all the blood shed since the foundation of Israel.

Are they silly enough to be convinced that killing and being killed is the best way to advance their agenda and make Israel their heaven on earth?

I really doubt it. And this again begs the question: Why do they proceed in this violent perspective?

Too bad that the answer isn't anywhere near to be found, at least to someone innocently dreaming of peace among human beings, the way I am

Below - "Feminist Law Persecutes Men" (Scroll Down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Defending Yourself Against "Legal Fiction"

February 6, 2010

corporate_personhood3.gif(Editor's Note: Again, I don't pretend to understand this "legal fiction" argument, and welcome clarifications by knowledgeable readers.)

by Rino

The 'false allegation' industry also exists here in Australia. We need to draw back the curtain and begin to pay attention to the man behind the curtain.

There are critical points to understand. Once the world went off the Gold standard, the people now in effect became dead to the Law.. All courts are courts belonging the central banks, being the creditor in any case. A Judge cannot see the substantive Law in relation to a man or woman's God-given rights anymore under public policy. Public policy refers to the bankruptcy/insolvency of that nation.
 
All charges are against the created Birth Certificate Trust estate/prepaid account recognized by the all capital letter name.

The person who is charged is NOT the man but his corporate entity account. All the courts want is to settle a public account and they want access to your Birth Certificate trust/prepaid estate account.

When you argue/defend and a claim, which in commerce is a demand for money, you are in effect saying 'I don't want to pay' and at this point of dishonour there may be more bogus charges/claims come forward due to this. So all legislative acts apply only to these corporate persons, individuals, taxpayers, residents, etc.; and guess what, they are all created fictions of law. They are not real they are created fictions of law.
 
The idea is not to argue/defend because the living man or woman is not even named as a party in any court action, only the birth certificate/Corporate Trust entity is named.

That is why it is said that 'arguments are for fools'. This information applies in Canada, Australia, America and anywhere else where a central bank exists.

So what happens when there is a 'Charge' against someone? An account is created and it must be settled otherwise someone is placed in prison as collateral for that debt. Arguing and defending creates problems.
 
This is what they do when they create a charge. The courts/agencies use the important concept/principle of 'Bankers Acceptance law'. It is the important concept and principle of primary liability.  The newly created charge is created by the 'maker' of the instrument, i.e, lawyer, agency, court or any other third party entity and the bankers acceptance law goes like this, 'The primary liability to 'pay' an instrument rests with the maker ( i.e lawyer, agency, prosecutor, court etc) of that instrument UNLESS someone else (The charged entity) refuses (argues or defends) to pay.

Under the rules of Admiralty Law, he who brings forward a charge must also bring forward the remedy and that remedy is your birth Certificate/Trust prepaid asset account. The reason they 'falsely charge' people is because they are well aware of the existence of this Trust account and you are deemed to be in control of your estate, operating as a Trustee of that account.

However they will never openly admit to this under public policy and they will always remain silent and refer you to some legislative act and make you think it applies to you.
 
When they say to you that 'anything you say can and will be used against you', what they are really saying is be careful how you respond to our presentment/claims because you may not know what it is that we are really asking of you!

They know and understand that all energy comes from the living man who in reality is the creditor, however if you create dishonour they will treat you as the debtor and the debtor has no rights.

What is the false allegation industry really all about? It is proof that you have in fact an prepaid Trust/estate account created at your birth and evidenced by your birth Certificate. Your birth certificate is evidence of two things: 1) that a Trust does in fact exist and 2) it is a security, which is used as collateral by any government to receive funding from the central banks.
 
If you understand that the Bible tells us not to charge your 'brother' because you make a debtor of him and this is why those in power know and understand this concept. This is why they created the fiction corporate entity because it is supposed to protect/buffer you.

Once Adam and Eve dishonoured the creator, they were taken out of the Garden of Eden which was no longer a commercial free zone and absolutely everything that is done, is done in commerce involving commercial accounts.

Ever since then the same principle has applied, creditors are winners and debtors are losers! Were we not told to be the 'head' (creditor) and not the 'tail' (debtor)? Its all about an account, the rest is all illusion, just ask for the bill so that you can do a bankers acceptance by your endorsement of the charging instrument/complaint and proceed to settle and close the account. However be prepared they will test you first.
 
We as living people no longer know or understand who we are and everything has been inverted upside down. We have lost our identities and once again have given away our birthright for "bowl of pottage."
 ----

First Comment: Paul

Greetings Henry,

In our work to date, we have come across these claims
several times:  it's important to realize that some of them
can be substantiated with good authority, while others
appear to be theories that have somehow "morphed" into fact
primarily for the one(s) asserting such claims.


These two short essays are good places to begin,
to acquire a necessary foundation:

http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/cracking.title.28.htm
http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm
(Note well that the U.S. Supreme Court has held that
the Federal government is NOT a corporation!)


Our letter to Bill Gates re: USA v. Microsoft, Inc.
goes into many similar issues:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/microsoft/transmittal.htm


In actual litigation we have already established that the entity
"UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" incorporated twice in Delaware,
but both corporations were later revoked by the Delaware
Secretary of State:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/registered.agent.2007-02-12.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.corp/registered.agent.2007-02-12.gif

When this fraud was exposed by our office,
The Conspiracy (of which you write so often),
re-incorporated "THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
also in Delaware, as if adding "THE" would cure the manifold
problems that resulted from impersonating the Federal government
with a Delaware corporation, when both are legally "foreign"
with respect to each other:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/usa.inc/THE.UNITED.STATES.OF.AMERICA.JPG


Legally speaking, all corporations chartered in any of the 50 States are
"foreign" corporations with respect to the District of Columbia:

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chaptr11.htm

Foreign corporation. 
A corporation doing business in one state though chartered
or incorporated in another state is a foreign corporation as to the first state, and,
as such, is required to consent to certain conditions and restrictions
in order to do business in such first state.


Now, we went the next step and inquired with a sample of
Secretaries of State in other States of the Union, and
all confirmed that UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
failed to register as a "foreign" corporation with their offices:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/
http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/al/
http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/al/usa.corp.certificate.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/al/usa.inc.certificate.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/ca/
http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/ca/usa.corp.certificate.gif
http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/ca/usa.inc.certificate.gif


This next one, domiciled in Washington State, is likewise quite deceptive:

http://www.supremelaw.org/sos/wa/Corporations%20Registration%20Detail.htm

UNITED ESTATES OF AMERICA, LLC


The use of "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" [sic] as the "Plaintiff"
on all Federal criminal "INDICTMENTS", and on all Federal civil cases, initiated by the U.S. Department of Justice, appears to be an expertly concealed attempt to avoid invoking the Judicial Power of the United States, by which the U.S. Constitution very clearly requires that the "United States" (Federal government) be the Proper Party:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#3:2:1

Instead, they are invoking the legislative power of the United States (Federal government) chiefly by convening a legislative tribunal instead of a constitutional court.


A much longer, and much more detailed explanation, can be
found in these two briefs which I filed at the U.S. Supreme Court,
to which 48 UNlicensed ATTORNeys either fell silent, or
formally waived their clients' right to answer:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/cert.htm#drama
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/mandamus.2.htm

Soon after filing those 2 briefs at the U.S. Supreme Court,
Justice O'Connor retired and Chief Justice Rehnquist died.
Also, Ginsburg, Thomas and Breyer turned up withOUT
PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSIONS:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/aol/letter.2004-02-12/letter01.gif


Lastly, there is some documentary evidence to support
the notion that parties who are in fact at war with each other
may not refer formally to each other by their Proper Names;
instead a "nom de guerre" is a customary legal requirement
under the Law of Nations.  For authorities in support of
this proposition, see:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/barber/2-A-MEMORANDUM%20OF%20LAW.htm




You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/defending_yourself_against_leg.html
Articles >>

Comments for "Defending Yourself Against "Legal Fiction""

Jim said (February 9, 2010):

We in the United States of America live in areas governed by Admiralty Law, not Common Law that once was the law in our court system.

It's a law of contracts. According to Admiralty Law only entities created by the State are subject to this law. Any entity created by the State is called a Person. Therefore that entity is a fiction. Examples are a corporation, trust, or a limited partnership.

When you and I were born from our mother's womb we were considered human beings, not persons. Once our parents were issued a Birth Certificate we now had legal status under the Admiralty Law of the Sea.

Common Law is law of the land where human beings have rights under God. Human beings are creatures created by God's miracle. Under the Law of the Sea only persons are recognized and they no rights, only privileges granted by Admiralty Law.

To differentiate between a human being and a person all government agencies use capital letters when referring to a person. Only persons are subject to Admiralty Law. Human beings have no standing in their courts. Human beings do not need a drivers license, need to pay taxes, need any license a license of any kind, nor can they be sued.

Example: Look at the spelling of your name on any document issued from a government agency. Your name is in all capital letters. Now look at the spelling of your name on any of your diplomas, capital H small enry, capital M small akow. Human beings go to church and school.

Only fictions created by a governmental agency goes to court, pays taxes, serves in the military, drives a car, hunts ducks, is engaged in business, etc.

It was all done years ago for the benefit of the international bankers because of the bankruptcy of the corporate UNITED STATES.

Once you learn this, and more you will get an even bigger picture of the illusion we Americans and you Canadians are living in.
It truly is a Matrix.

Robert said (February 8, 2010):

You & your readers might want to check out the introduction of the living temple audio at www.creditorsincommerce.com. In the first 30 minutes he explains how the international bankers have taken the sovereignty of the American people.

Here's a video of a guy in Canada who was exercising his common law right to travel & his encounter with the police.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfbfpz4iYDU

Keep us updated with this "Freeman on the land" information. I believe this is how we will defeat the nwo.

David said (February 8, 2010):

It has occurred to me that one reason why Obama and his handlers/managers have gone to so much effort to prevent anyone from finding his actual birth certificate is connected with this stuff, and they may have arranged that there is no actual birth certificate for him. He has been CIA property since before birth. Consider that.

Wayne said (February 7, 2010):

Eldon Warman has a well researched explanation for all this at www.detaxcanada.org

Jimmy said (February 7, 2010):

Is there any way by which anyone charged with some crime or misdemeanor, can settle this "debt" with the courts/bankers without further incurring into any other legal charges being posted against your record, as for example being actually convicted of these crimes or misdemeanors? In other words, is there a pay-your-way-out-of-it method?

P said (February 7, 2010):

Proving what the 'legal fiction' mess is all about and proving that the courts are commercial (ie: Admiralty Law) is hard to do as the villains left no handbook as to how they constructed this whole false 'legal' realm. One thing that IS easy to prove is the legal fiction that they have hung around your neck (of course you and your Mother voluntarily accepted it - that's how everything from driver's licenses to income tax works in this country). Check everything you have with an ID on it that is issued by governments, Banks, Credit Unions, Insurance companies, tax forms, or corporations and you will find that it is issued to or sent to JOHN DOE and not John Doe. There are only three entities that I can think of that have ALL CAPS names: Trusts, corporations, vessels (ships).

In legal terms this is known as 'idem sonans' = 'sounds alike' and 'stramineus Homo' = a straw man, a substitute put forward as bail or security (from Black's Law Dictionary). When the Judge calls for JOHN DOE and you, John Doe answer, you have accepted (without knowing it) the responsibility for all of the legal fiction's ('ens legis' being) liabilities. Once you have answered for the 'fiction' - you are screwed !

It is easy enough to get out of this Babylonian system but first you have to understand it completely. You must first understand who you really are (this requires you to have some Biblical knowledge and some knowledge of the founding Father's intent, then you need to fully understand how you have been hood winked. For that knowledge I recommend that you study the following website: http://www.usavsus.info/ and watch the 'It's an Illusion' video that can be found here: http://www.tpuc.org/node/558

PJ said (February 7, 2010):

HI Henry, WIKI: The Seventh Amendment (Amendment VII) of the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, codifies the right to a jury trial in certain civil trials. Unlike most of the Bill of Rights, the Supreme Court has not incorporated the amendment's requirements to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment.

“ In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.”

PS: For the ordinary person who is called into the court room in any dispute over $20, at the first hearing it can be a good idea to "Demand a Jury trial."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

Jeffrey said (February 7, 2010):

Henry: This will help explain Rino's "legal fiction" argument.

In addition, you may purchase the book, "They Own It All, Including You"


Edward Mandell House had this to say in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson (President) [1913-1921]

[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be non the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor or to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.”

Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”

Illuminati sites

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

February 6, 2010


Illuminati Web sites



http://www.clubofrome.org/eng/home/

http://www.clubmadrid.org/

http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/

http://www.isgp.eu/organisations/1001_Club.htm

https://www.cosmosclub.org/

https://www.cosmosclub.org/Default.aspx?pageindex=1&pageid=31&status=1

http://www.esalen.org/

http://www.rothschild.com/

http://www.rothschildfoundation.eu/

http://www.rothschild.info/start.asp

http://www.rothschild.info/home/

http://www.edmond-de-rothschild.com/default-en.aspx

And how about Apostate Zionist Israel & Rothschild???

http://www.edris.co.il/
המובילות MORNING STAR ו-S&P. לרשותך עומדים צוותי השקעות מהמובילים
בענף ההשקעות בארץ ובעולם הנשענים על מסורת של ביצועים, שירות ואיכות חסרת
פשרות המאפיינים את קבוצת רוטשילד ב 200
http://www.edris.co.il/ItemPics/LCFRothschildIsrael.pdf


CALIFORNIA'S GAY MARRIAGE BATTLE By Cartier McCloud

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

January 29, 2010

prop8.jpgI'm 56, live in Hollywood and am a firm and devoted Christian.  I've been married twice but am single now.  Homosexuality, with all of its attendant and deadly trappings, is being used by the Illuminati to destroy everything that we hold dear.  Unable to reproduce, this perverted coupling tells the world that the values of love, marriage, children and family no longer count and should be dismissed from society forever.  And without society holding us together, we will be unable to resist the Illuminati agenda of total destruction.
 
 

 

On February 12, 2004, the mayor of San Francisco, Gavin Newsom, who is gay himself, decided that his city would start performing same-sex marriages at their courthouse.  This was in complete defiance Proposition 22, which was passed by the voting majority, which defines marriage as a "personal relation arising out of a civil contract between a man and a woman."  This gay mayor maintains that California's State Constitution's equal protection clause nullified that law.  On August 13th of this same year, the California Supreme Court ruled that Newsom overstepped his authority and nullified some 4,000 marriages in San Francisco during this period.

 

Most proponents of gay marriage compare their fight to that of early racism, which so divided this country for decades.  However, those with this view miss the point.  Racism is defined by Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary as:

 

            Racism:  As a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits

            and capacities and that racial differences are an inherent superiority of a

            particular race.

 

I think that all races firmly believe that in some way or other they are superior to all other people and cultures.  To hate another just because of their skin color, which is what racism in America really means, is a sin against God, as He created us all, and in His great wisdom wants us all to enjoy equally the fruits of the earth.

 

However, the homosexual's desire for the traditional marriage enjoyed by men and women for the past 10,000 years, is not a case of discrimination, but a desperate need to appear "normal" in the eyes of society, and in so doing, become an accepted part of the mainstream of American culture.  If they achieve this, then their perverted sexual proclivities will be more and more accepted as just another alternative lifestyle, instead of the sick and disgusting perversion of the normal sex act between a man and a woman that it is.  An act that, in the eyes of God, is the spiritual worship of their Creator.

 

To discriminate: to discern: from Middle English and French-discerner; form Latin-discernere: to separate, to distinguish between-from dis-apart and cernere: to sift.

 

We had damn well better discriminate against this insidious madness or else we are lost forever.

 

This is not a battle for a discriminated minority to win the same rights as all others enjoy. 

 

 This is a Satanic war hell-bent on destroying traditional marriage, the normal relations between men and women, love, and, in the end, humanity itself.

 

 


Feminist Train Wrecks --Send Us Your Stories

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

January 28, 2010

teenage_feminist.thumbnail.jpgMike writes:

re. Why Young Men Are Avoiding Marriage

Actually, Kevin's comment really hit home:

" I had a cute 26 year old neighbor I dated. She was obtaining her masters. She was also over $80,000 just in school debt. At this point she was 27, and still not done with school. She sort of wanted kids, but also wanted the nice car, big home, career, vacation, etc. In order to afford her, and start a family, I would have to earn over $200,000 per year. She also could not cook and liked fancy restaurants. Her degree was also in something that would never translate into making money."


I'm 31, and recently dated a 35-year-old graduate student.  Now, before you lecture, I did, in fact, know better.  I knew to run away even before the first date was over.  I didn't even stick around for sex -- there's plenty of that around anyway.  No, I was curious.  I wondered if it was possible for a highly educated female to have any common sense, among other things.  Maybe it was like rubbernecking at a highway accident.  You can't not look.  It's not that I don't believe the sordid tales related by your readers; I had to see for myself.

Debt?  Oh, yeah.  I didn't get an exact figure, but did establish it at well over $150,000.  Field of study?  Humanities!  What can you do with that?  Teach, if you're lucky... and... flip burgers.  Only a wealthy man could afford to take on this blushing bride, but such a man would be looking for women 10 years her junior, with fewer brains and less baggage.  I am... and wealthy I am not.  A third-grade grasp of math makes such a relationship untenable, to say the least.

The sad reality is that this woman is headed for spinsterhood, if she doesn't find a suitable lesbian.  Her childbearing years (she wants children, yes) are nearly gone, probably gone by the time she finishes that oh-so-important PhD, and she's saddled with enough debt to buy a house AND a car.  Women used to come with trousseaux.  And what about kids, anyway?  Will there be time for them as that illustrious career is started?  Maybe get tenure first?

Anti-depressants?  You betcha.  (Wonder why!)  A string of relationships gone sour because her "work" was too important to spend time with a man?  Uh-huh.  Pets endearingly termed her "children?"  Yeppers.  Divorced parents?  Check.  Cook?  Nope.  Flaky?  More than a box of Post Toasties.   It's formulaic.

Oh, the common sense part... There must be some mathematical formula to determine how the longer one spends in academia, the more myopic and... stupid... one gets.  I had to explain the global warming hoax and the fact that it's a giant global tax scam -- like explaining it to a child.  Very slowly.  We went to watch "Avatar," after which I received a lecture on the evils of "whiteness" and Western civilization.  I'm white, she's white, and telling me that white people are evil.  Sean Connery was right.   Sometimes the only thing you can do is slap a woman.  (I didn't.  Too busy driving.  It would take too long to slap out 15 years of "higher education" anyway.)

As I said, I wanted to see how bad the train wreck was.  It was something to see, up close and personal.