Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Below - Following the Rothschilds on Twitter (scroll down)

Indie Scotland Would Remain Masonic Roadkill

August 28, 2014

scotland.jpgLeft, Scottish National party leader, Alex Salmond (center) with his two lawyer stooges, Justice Min. Kenny MacAskill and Deputy Nicola Sturgeon acting on behalf of their Freemason masters at the terrorist cell of the Law Society of Scotland.

On Sept. 18, a referendum will ask:
"Should Scotland be an Independent Country?"

Independence would just be a changing of the guard,
says men's rights activist who lived there recently.

"Salmond will be just like Obama in America. Just after he was voted
in, we warned that America's black population will see no improvement in their live

MacLeod, (comment below) disagrees. This is a vote about stopping immigration and Zionist control.

by Duncan
International Men's Organization

More than most, our group has VAST experience of what is going on in Scotland primarily because we have been the victims of the thugs ruling Scotland with an iron fist.

Salmond portrays a future utopia of being free of English rule despite the fact the SNP party are ruled over by the biggest terrorist group the Law Society of Scotland. They are no better than the Labour and Tory thugs that have been behind the Crown's massive property theft from men during divorce.

The biggest crime in Scotland that neither the YES or NO camp has even touched on is the ease with which the Crown has been able to transfer assets and estates from decent Scottish men into the hands of the vile masonic network that dominates ALL life in Scotland.

Will Salmond and his lawyer henchmen MacAskill and Sturgeon change that ? Well our group provided mountains of evidence about crooked lawyers, judges and cops to them during many legal investigations carried out during the past decade and more and they did NOTHING to improve the vast theft of land and property that continues to this day in the courts that are dominated by the Speculative club of the judicial and legal mafia.

We can say with absolute certainty Salmond is as big a liar as the other major political parties opposed to independence . Salmond will be just like Obama in America when we warned just after he was voted in that America's black population will see no improvement in their lives and Ferguson alone proves that is the case with ghetto's of vast poverty that continue to blight America's poorest.

Salmond thinks he can convince the Scots that being ruled over by a Scot will make a difference but as long as he bows to the demands of the law society terrorists within his ranks he will, like Obama, provide only sound bites and nothing else as they had every opportunity to do something when we were part of the evidence-gathering that to this day despite lots of promises have done NOTHING to address the ease with which crooked judges, lawyers and their partners in crime cops and sheriff officers are thieving vast estates with impunity.

That is our frank account of the real issues behind the smokescreen of utter bullshit both sides of the argument are putting forward. All the evidence that was fully exposed on the Scottish Parliament website was removed as soon as the SNP were voted into power and shows the degree to which they fooled the public into thinking they would do something about it.

Many Scots want independence and rightly so but the SNP version will be to hand more powers to the Freemason mafia that dominates all aspects of Scottish life.


Related: SNP Scottish Independence a Freemason Ruse

First Comment from MacLeod: A Vote against "Multiculturalism"  and the Zio World Order

Scotlanddemo (1).png1. Check out the difference in demographics between London, and Edinburgh and Scotland in general (left.)
London is 60% White; 20% Asian and 15% Black. The Scots have always been pretty good at protecting their own turf from outsiders (as they have done in many areas of Canada for generations). Call me a racist, but I believe the subtext of the Scotland Yes vote is anti-diversity and anti-Zionist. That's why it's an important vote for all of us, IMHO.

As for Duncan's views that the Scottish independence vote is meaningless, as a Scot living in the USA, I would submit that what is happening in the "auld country" is that the predominantly white, Christian population of Scotland doesn't want to end up in the same sorry state as England -- overrun with criminal immigrants and with a native population stewed to the gills on cheap booze.

2. The author of this article states that Obama has done nothing to improve the lot of black citizens in the USA. Nothing could be further from the truth. Obama's single biggest achievement in office so far has been to allow the states of Washington and Colorado to legalize cannabis, which will have a profound effect on the rates of incarceration of Americans of all ethnic groups, but especially young blacks and Latinos.

 Former GOP California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, in one of his last acts in office, defied his own party and signed a Democrat-sponsored pot decriminalization bill. The following year, there were a staggering 20,000 fewer arrests of juveniles for pot offenses. These kids were getting raped in juvenile hall for carrying a joint. That's not happening anymore in California, thanks to "The Governator." The pot laws are the biggest tool that the cops have for "stop and frisk" and other oppressive policies. As other states "just say no" to cannabis prohibition, America will finally cease to hold the dubious distinction of incarcerating a larger percentage of its population than any society in world history.

Duncan is right about one thing: Obama "has done nothing" -- nothing to stop the juggernaut of cannabis legalization, which is the first step in ending the heinous "war on drugs," the most destructive public policy in US history.

glasgow (2).png3. Scots want free university education for their children, good health care and respect for their millennia-old culture. They won't get it from Westminster. There is a reason that the flag of Gaza was recently flown in front of City Hall in Glasgow and Edinburgh, and it wasn't because the Scots are fans of the international Zionist banking cartel that controls Westminster!

Related-- Zionist banker-owned US Corporations Boycott Glasgow Over Palestinian Support

Pros and Cons of Independence Strenuously Debated

Rixon writes:

I'm glad to hear that MacLeod is living in the U.S. That means someone so ignorant won't be able to vote. Because Alex Salmond has promised to encourage immigration. In fact one of the figures being used by the Scottish Nationalists is a recently arrived immigrant from the Indian subcontinent.

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Indie Scotland Would Remain Masonic Roadkill "

Dan said (August 29, 2014):

Actually, Black Americans have seen exponential improvement since 2008. What you mean is that Obama did photo-ops and speeches in the poorest neighborhoods to excite them to turn out at the polls, then he forgot about them.

The role of government is to hold the public back from helping ourselves, and also from helping others. the 'Urban Renewal' program of the 1960's destroyed black communities and bulldozed local jobs in the name of "Integration". Integration really meant re-forming 'the melting pot' into the new kind of slaves for the 21st century. Consumer/producers driven by the cattle prod of debt and carrots of entertainment and various addictions.

Rather than look to what these guys didn't do for their constituents, it's more telling to look at what they do TO them. Obama has done more for Planned Parenthood and GLAAD than any previous American President. Planned Parenthood kills TWICE as many black Americans as violent crimes, cancer and heart disease combined. While Obama has been ram-rodding sodomy as a civil right, young black males receive more AIDS diagnoses and experience more HIV-related deaths than any other racial or ethnic group in the United States. Both these facts are suppressed by the media, but all you have to do is look on medical websites. (and I don't mean doctors Phil, Oz, or Mercola).

As for Scotland, look at the fate of the Republic of Ireland. They won their independence by force in 1922, and they're already hopelessly enslaved to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), given the same Masonic political whores to govern them, inflicting the same EU policies are wrecking European culture.

Black Americans think Race Relations have Deteriorated under Obama

Tony said (August 27, 2014):

Dan writes that "Actually, Black Americans have seen exponential improvement since 2008."

Not true. They are always the first to suffer unemployment even though given jobs they often are not qualified to do over whites who are qualified plus other perks politically designed to hopefully hold down their frustrated rioting. Blacks are naturally more prone to violence when made to feel misused than are other races. Plus black crime against whites remains multiple times greater that white crime against blacks, much more that ten times greater and they are only about 12% of the population. There is no viable solution to the racial plight in America. At one time deportation of the blacks to Africa would have been fair all around. Not today. There will be a massive explosion, probably as the final excuse to install martial law.

What is happening is the opposite of what Dan writes. Whites are being dragged down to the same "standard" of living as the blacks and hispanics. All are being leveled at the lowest common denominator except the 1% who live in ever expanding opulence as their ever unceasing theft of the nation is condoned by all bought and paid for government agencies.

Also, Debra writes "The Ten Commandments are the Principles upon which all The Laws of God are based." Not true. These were God's physical laws for a physical rule through the Israelites that passed away with Jesus Christ. He gave the whole world God's superseding spiritual law of first loving God and then by loving one's neighbor as one loves himself. If most in the world obeyed this simple law all the evils existent and growing by huge leaps would simply disappear from the earth as good will toward all would reign.

JG said (August 27, 2014):

Whether it be Scotland, England or once Northern Ireland independence and sovereignty have been superseded by World Government through International Banking and the World Economy.
You can't let a foreign entity control your bread and legislature without being a servant to that entity.

Political elections have become mere theater between the all the candidates that this foreign entity has bankrolled. You can't get on the mainstream ballot without their consent and money.
The greatest political theater in modern history was the campaign of Barack Obama.The American public was sold on this candidate like none other in recent memory. Things were really going to be different this time and both the House and Senate were going to drop everything they were doing and listen to this man. Americans finally had a real "underdog" in the White House who was going to implement the agenda of the masses who overwhelmingly voted for him. He wasn't going to betray the voters like the establishment candidates had done in the past. This was John Kennedy and Abraham Lincoln rolled into one. The theater was great but the results of his presidency have been far divorced from his campaign rhetoric of world peace and prosperity for the masses. Sadly, the American public had duped been again.

The NWO agenda is in full steam now and their isn't a corner left on planet Earth that is not feeling their influence or wrath either directly or indirectly.The chess game is also over now with the world being held in "checkmate".

linux user said (August 27, 2014):

Good article on Scottish independence -- I agree that the SNP is not really an alternative.
Nevertheless, my advice to Scotland is to vote for independence (and stay out of the EU!).
Initially, it's handing the country from one bunch of Illuminati terrorists to another -- but afterwards, the chances of overthrowing them in a relatively small and insignificant country are much higher than the chances of overthrowing them in one of their main (and therefore best guarded) territories.

Use the SNP to get out of the UK, then dump them at the earliest possible opportunity. And find some way to stay out of the EU -- trading the dictators from London for the virtually identical dictators from Brussels is senseless. (In fact, I think the sole reason why they allow this referendum to happen is because they know this -- and they're so sure of themselves that they don't even see the possibility of a non-EU Scotland.)

Debra said (August 27, 2014):

Scotland, of all places, should be the easiest nation to remove from the fangs of the vampires; because it is believed (and said) that in Scotland is The Stone of Destiny.

One does not have to be a Biblical scholar to know that there were two artifacts that God used to mark sovereignty:-The Stone of Destiny and The Ark of The Covenant. -

What is holding the Scottish Nationalists (who claim to know the whereabouts of The Stone of Destiny) back from declaring Liberty under God according to the Holy Bible?

Maybe it is too far gone to declare Liberty under God at this point in time? No. I know for a fact that is not true. It is the people’s refusal to obey God exactly as Commanded. The Ten Commandments are the Principles upon which all The Laws of God are based.

Below- Anti-Semitism is Zionism's Bread and Butter (scroll down)

Should Children Shoot Guns?

August 27, 2014

(left, Charles Vacca,39, before he was accidentally killed Monday by nine-year-old girl
he was teaching to use a Uzi)

Over a million American children are enrolled in IRA
gun training programs.

I oppose gun control but I don't think children
should be armed. They're not responsible.
A reader, B.J. Armstrong, takes exception. 

by B.J. Armstrong

Wednesday, I came across a tweet from Mr. Makow about the 9-year-old girl in Arizona that killed her instructor when she lost control of the Uzi she was shooting.  This is a very sad and unfortunate incident.  Also a completely unnecessary circumstance as NO child should be shooting this type of gun because of its short barrel length, and not to mention it being a fully automatic.

Mr. Makow tweeted that "Teaching children to use guns is ridiculous".  As an avid target shooter I took offense to his comment and sent him the following email:

I have read your website for almost 4 years now and this is the first time I adamantly disagree with you.  I am from West Virginia but currently reside in North Carolina.  I am a 34 year old male and I was taught to shoot when I was about 7 years old.  My father taught me well and I took his instruction about firearm safety very seriously.  I have shot guns for 27 years without a single accident.  Let's not jump the gun and follow the media bandwagon.  Better yet let's not lead the media bandwagon either.

Makow replied: "Do you think they should drive cars too?"

I replied:
That's an extreme analogy.  That smart ass reply is making me lose some respect for you Mr. Makow. I come from a hunting culture and gun training at a young age is the norm.  In the 7th grade our middle school even had a "Hunter's Safety" course during school hours.  I was 13 then.

vacca.jpg(left, Charles Vacca, who died prematurely.)

Makow invited me to expand:

 I am from rural West Virginia where hunting and target shooting are traditional and therefore a way of life.  When a child is mature enough and has the appropriate training some fathers take their children squirrel or deer hunting.  I even remember having a 'Hunter's Safety' course while in middle school.  This took place during school hours in the gym.  It was no big deal because most boys at that age went hunting with their fathers.

My father taught me to shoot beginning at around 7 years old.  He taught me well and I took his instruction very seriously.  As a result, I have shot guns for 27 years now without a single accident.

I don't think we should allow the media to dictate the national discussion when it comes to firearms.   Everyone familiar with this website should know who the media work for anyway!  They consistently pump up these news stories to make it sound like these incidents are happening everywhere and all the time.  The whole gun hysteria is initiated by the media to crush the 2nd Amendment.  The Founding Fathers of America included the 2nd Amendment because they knew firsthand how important it is.

I don't expect someone from New York City or Chicago to know what it is like to have this RIGHT and tradition passed down to them.  I just hope people can use reason and include someone else's perspective on this very important issue.
 Teaching children to use guns is NOT ridiculous.  What happened in Arizona with the 9 year old girl is very sad and unfortunate, but let's not let a few isolated incidents ruin it for the whole.

Daily Mail story about the accident and a video of the moments preceding it

Makow comment:
I invite readers to weigh in on this issue.  All the comments can be found at the archived address.

First Comment from Richard S:

I read your site daily and I appreciate that you cover aspects of the illuminati/NWO agenda that I don't see anywhere else.

For those of us that understand how the NWO works, certain social programming is seen again and again: feminism, the break-up of families, pornography, moral decay, "political-correctness", and so on.

One of the most consistent and fervent memes the NWO and their media lackeys push is that GUNS ARE BAD!  Indeed, an astute observer can see how the media will take every opportunity to demonize gun ownership and gun culture.  Why do you suppose that is?  It is because they *know* the only chance humanity has to resist their total subjugation is if they have the means to fight back.

Gun control is not about crime, it is not "for the children" - it is about CONTROL!

What happened with the 9-year old  shooting her instructor is a terrible tragedy, but only the instructor is to blame.  He was an idiot.  I am sorry, there is no polite way to say it.  Just check through Youtube searching on "Girls with gun fail" or "Girls with Magnum" and you will see an unfortunate multitude of videos where idiot boyfriends or husbands thought it would be really funny to have their 100 lb. woman shoot a 12 gauge shotgun or a magnum pistol and fall on their ass.

Not only is it dangerous to have a person shoot a gun that is too much for them to handle safely, it *also* serves to turn the wife or girlfriend away from the shooting sports.  This is a kind of "win" for the New World Order as the death of American Gun Culture will allow them to marginalize shooters and gun owners much as anti-smoking campaigns demonized smoking and made it socially unacceptable.

Personally, I have been a life-long shooter and 2nd Amendment defender.  There is no jewel so sacred to our liberty and none so targeted for destruction by the NWO than our right to keep and bear arms.  This right was enshrined in the Bill of Rights NOT to go duck hunting, but to defend ourselves against tyrants!

And for those who question whether a population armed with simple semi-auto rifles and pistols has any chance against drones, tanks, and modern armies.....I would suggest they study the outcomes of conflicts in places such as Vietnam and Afghanistan.  Sure, a lot of folks might die in a revolution, but if the price of "victory" is high, and the occupation unsustainable, the people DO have a chance to keep their sovereignty.

Without firearms, there is NO CHANCE.

So please Henry, defend the right to keep and bear arms every chance you can.  Do not let one incredibly stupid act frame the discussion.  Recognize that the illuminati/NWO gang want us completely dis-armed and are working continually and incrementally towards that goal.

Anthony Migchels writes:

I favor the second amendment. I'm convinced it's a key part of the NWO's troubles. I also believe it's a man's duty to take full responsibility for his own security. Guns are a part of that.

But in America it's just a fetish. Only a jerk, in my mind, puts an Uzi in the hands of a little girl. The kind of garbage that comes out of the NRA ('we need more, not less guns at school') confirms all rationality concerning the issue has long been thrown out of the window.

America is dealing with shootings everywhere. Nowhere else in the still somewhat 'civilized' world is there even a somewhat comparable level of people being murdered. Gun proliferation is most obviously a part of that. Americans are also blind to the fact that the police state and associated murderspree by the pigs (for lack of a more appropriate word admissible in polite society) is to a large extent because the cops are sweating from the arm pits every time they approach someone.

Guns are not toys. They are dangerous, high powered tools. They must be wielded responsibly by responsible adults. The deceased did no such thing.

I see absolutely no reason why children, girls in particular, should be wielding guns, although I can understand a man in the country wanting to take his son hunting, for instance. In general I'd say there is more scope for guns outside of cities.

I think guns should be controlled like cars: every adult should be able to have one......after they have shown they can use it appropriately.

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Should Children Shoot Guns? "

Ken Adachi said (August 29, 2014):

I see you got avalanched with a lot of cogent mail on this.

The story is probably legit, but I'm now open to the possibility of a setup, as some commentators have suggested. In this case we have video of the moments before, but we don't actually see Vacca getting shot. We have officials reporting that the video of Vacca's being shot is "ghastly" etc. However, after Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon hoax, who in their right mind is going to believe ANYTHING that the police or Feds or hospitals, or attending physicians, or crisis actor "friends" or "witnesses" etc. have to say?

Unless we see many more conclusive photos of the bleeding and dying instructor, and find out with certainty from the ambulance crew, the nurses, physicians, family members and friends, neighbors, and see the body in the coffin,etc. , we can't REALLY be sure because we now live in "Faked News" America.

We can't forget that all recent national news stories involving shootings are setup events, either carried out by programmed, mind controlled proxies or are completely staged altogether with lying crisis "actors', lying media, lying medical examiners, lying police officials, etc.

Luke said (August 28, 2014):

Henry, I was in the US Army and National Guard for 12 years and have been on a gun ranges for years.First thing they teach you is to keep the weapon pointed down range AT ALL TIMES. After looking at the video, the instructor should have been directly behind the girl holding the weapon, not letting her hold and being positioned on her immediate left side. I agree with you in a sense about your position with children and guns. This girl's first weapon should've been a bb gun, air rifle, or at a minimum a smaller gun like a .22.Until you fire a gun or rifle, you have no idea the recoil it produces, that's why you take a balanced firing stance while holding your breath before you squeeze the trigger.
What I find strange about this is this a combat veteran and not some private right out of bootcamp. This doesn't pass the smell test at all

Dan said (August 28, 2014):

Lauren is right. The only reason this story is being played up is to manufacture more consent for gun control. I could show you dozens of photos of West Bank "settlers" teaching nine year old children, male and female, to shoot serious assault weapons. It's only stupid when Americans do it. When Palestinians do it's presented as an excuse to bomb them, children and all.

I submit that all the "crazy shooters' and incredibly stupid gun accidents paraded on TV are either made to happen, or just plain made up. It's done to create a dialectic and "the gun debate" where there was no need for debate before. If we even answer the question, we consent that there's a problem.
That's the trick.

The older I get, the more I stand on the knowledge that the common people do best when they're left to take care of themselves, their families, and each other. The same agenda that's bent on criminalizing citizen ownership of guns has decriminalized sodomy without referendums.


ps: I learned to ride a horse to trot, swim in the Atlantic surf, dive from the 'deep end', and clean, load, aim and fire a .22 revolver and carbine by the time I was seven years old. I didn't 'need' to know these things, but I learned how much a boy is capable of almost as soon as he can walk. A boy needs a father for these things, and they don't want boys to have fathers, or learn how to be fathers anymore.
I mourn the systematic extinction of self-reliant men I've witness during my lifetime.

Peter C said (August 28, 2014):

When I was growing up, I was introduced to
an AIR RIFLE that shot lead butts and trained into
gun handling safety. No pistols, No live ammo.
Lots of aiming at a target without firing just to get the sense of handling the gun.

Nobody got hurt and that training was still with me when I enlisted in the military. My knowledge simply fitted in with the military training & moved forward.

One should never introduce automatic weapons to
a child. The trigger assembly is not like some guns that have a very tough trigger to squeeze. The tough squeeze is a safety factor and the trainee must acquire far more training before graduating to a highly sensitive trigger assembly.

Wade said (August 28, 2014):

A nine year old learning to shoot any fully automatic weapon is probably
a very bad idea nearly 100% of the time.

However, children are classified as anyone under the age of eighteen. I began
with a 22 caliber rifle and a single shot 20 gauge shotgun at around the age of
sixteen. With proper training and supervision I could have safely started much earlier.

Common sense is the key to safety in this issue. Kids are very different in their ability
to operate a firearm at different ages. My wife is 41 and not really safe yet. She needs
training because unfortunately she was raised by a single mother. It would have been
extremely beneficial to my wife to have been trained with sensible firearms by a competent
instructor when she was a teenager.

My wife's mother has a paranoid (unreasonable) fear of all firearms that has been transferred
to my wife. My wife's mother is 70 and to this day has never learned to use a firearm, and
probably would be afraid to even touch one.

I have a CCW and have had one for approximately 40 years with never having occasion
to use my weapon. My mother in law was uncomfortable with me being armed in her home.
One day I asked her...If you call 911 because you need police protection, do you want the
officer to show up armed or disarmed? I am more competent with a firearm than are
80% of police officers.

Females have a need to be trained in firearms just as much, and maybe even more, than males,
and it is difficult (sometimes nearly impossible) to start that training after they reach adulthood. Sensible and safe training of children, under the age of eighteen, with firearms is critical in my opinion. Just what the safe and proper age is...depends on the individual.

Bert said (August 28, 2014):

For her own future health, this little girl, needs to know that it's just not her fault. She has been forgiven, by everyone, and by society, completely and instantaneously. As she gets older, she will ask herself -- Why was a 9-year old girl pushed, even if indirectly, by comic books and MTV, into experimenting with military weaponry? She was pushed into this -- so, who was behind this "accident?" Could it be ... (perhaps you guessed it ...) the Illuminati? Absolutely.

Doug P said (August 28, 2014):

The reason that nine year old are not permitted to shoot guns is that their brains do not have the maturity to know the difference between right and wrong. If the child is supervised when shooting, I see no issue with it, and if guns are part of the culture it may make someone more safe around guns as they get older - perhaps not have that fear of them as I do. I nearly blew my foot off with a .45 once, as an adult. I have a fear of guns and its why I shouldn't be using them. Fear makes people irrational and we all have our fears.

People that have guns should know how to use them and there is no better time to learn when you are young. But a child should not have access to them unsupervised.

Of course this accident is unfortunate. No doubt the Liberal media will use it to seize upon the emotions of the public to make them more in favour of gun control.

It was an accident and should be seen as such. Nothing more.

Ken Adachi said (August 28, 2014):

Ken Adachi writes:

I find myself in agreement with both of you. Charles Vacca only lived half of his life span because he made an enormously stupid and fatal decision to put an Uzi in the hands of a 9 year old girl for the reasons that BJ Armstrong already stated: a short barrel, fully automatic machine gun has a runaway recoil unless you have the size and strength to hold it firmly enough and prevent the barrel from rising upward.

If I was there and I HAD to teach that 9 year girl how to shoot it, I would have kept both of MY hands firmly holding the Uzi, while she pulled the trigger. There is NO way any man with a lick of common sense is going to allow that little girl to control that military grade killing weapon on her own. I'm sorry for the family and children and wife of that man. But there's no one to blame but him.

On the other hand, I'm completely opposed philosophically to the idea of teaching young girls, at least before reaching high school age, to fire any kind of gun. I do understand and agree with the young boy and father scenario for those areas where it's common and normal, but not for little girls. It's just flat out wrong. The dumbed down, Illumined, warped, perverted, unthinking, brutalizing American culture that we now must endure, offers every possible means and avenue to strip every single vestige of gentleness, femininity, naivete, innocence, girliness, warmheartedness, and tenderness from American born females and devolve them into hard faced, rough talking, rough acting, and 'machoized' caricatures of American males.

You see the end product when you see photos of those absolute abominations wearing police badges or prison guard uniforms. Long live those relatively few, wonderful and abiding females who still preserve the gentility and sweetness of their God-given gifts and do everything possible to keep them intact. God bless every one of them.

Below- "Following the Rothschilds on Twitter" (scroll down)

Anti-Semitism is Zionism's Bread and Butter

August 26, 2014


Mercifully, Zionist terrorists have reached a ceasefire with Hamas whereby
the Jewish terrorist state will supposedly relax its blockade of the Palestinian enclave. I doubt whether world opinion had much to do with this.
Historically, Zionists have thrived on anti-Semitism, to the extent that they
actively organized it. Now, with false flag terror and ISIS, they are using the same tactics
to frighten and manipulate Westerners.

george-orwell-8-obvious.jpg(Editor's Note: "Are Israeli Policies Entrenching Anti-Semitism Worldwide?" This is the subtitle of a May 2010 article in a Jewish magazine when Israel last pounded Gaza.It expresses a naive Jewish misconception that Zionism is there to protect them from anti-Semitism. In fact, Zionism is there to create anti-Semitism in order to force Jews to carry out the Illuminati agenda, i.e. central banker world government based in Jerusalem. Israel is the Rothschild's private fiefdom; their private army, secret service and nuclear arsenal. All these are being used to advance the Rothschild world government agenda.

The brutal unwarranted Israeli attacks on Lebanon in Aug. 2006 and Gaza in Dec. 2008, May 2010 and July 2014 created widespread anti-Semitism, as intended.  In this light, I am updating and re-posting an important Dec. 2005 article: "The Zionist Protection Racket." )

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

A "protection racket" is a scam where an aggressor instigates an attack, blames a bogeyman, and then offers to protect the victim from this bogeyman in return for money and power.

 "Terror" is a protection racket. The aggressor is the world financial elite known as the "Crown" based in the City of London. Their instrument is the Zionist project, specifically Israel, the Mossad and its Neo Con allies.

The victim is the people of the United States and the West in general. The goal is the overthrow of Western Civilization, and the establishment of a Luciferian (Masonic) world police state called the "New World Order."

"Zionism is but an incident of a far reaching plan," said leading American Zionist Louis Marshall, counsel for bankers Kuhn Loeb in 1917. "It is merely a convenient peg on which to hang a powerful weapon."

(Louis Marshall: Champion Of Liberty: Selected Papers and Addresses, Band 2, Jewish Publication Society of America, 1957, S. 721f)


The Zionist Jewish leadership regards the Jewish rank-and-file as a pawn to be manipulated. "Anti Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren," says the author of Protocols of the Elders of Zion (9-2) a "forgery" that reads like the blueprint of the New World Order.

The holocaust took place in order to create Israel.Jews had to be terrorized into setting up Israel as a "national home," i.e. colonizing the Middle East. World Finance funded the Nazis. Zionists actively collaborated with them. See "The Holocaust as Mental Paradigm." See also "Zionism: A Conspiracy Against Jews" and Hitler: A Godsend for Israel.

Zionist betrayal is the reason Jews went passively to their deaths, says Rabbi Moshe Shonfeld in his book "Holocaust Victims Accuse." Non-Zionist Jews were worth more dead than alive to the Zionist leadership who, Shonfeld says, reaped the moral and financial capital from their forced "sacrifice." "Zionism: Compulsory Suicide for Jews."

The Jewish elite has a long history of manipulating Jews. For example, in 1950 a wave of anti Semitism and terrorism in Iraq made Naeim Giladi, 21, join the Zionist underground. Giladi was imprisoned, tortured and sentenced to death by Iraqi authorities.

He escaped and fled to Israel only to discover that the bombings had been engineered by his fellow Zionists to dupe Iraqi Jews into going to Israel. An ancient community was deprived of its wealth and reduced to second-class citizen status in Israel, replacing Palestinian labor. "Zionists Double Crossed Iraqi Jews"

Israel provoked attacks from its neighbors in order to "retain its moral tension" according to the secret diary of Prime Minister Moshe Sharett. The state must "invent dangers" to start war and thereby "acquire our space," he wrote. See "The Zionist Roots of the War on Terror."


The pogrom on Sept. 11 2001 was designed to stampede Americans into forfeiting their civil rights and invading the Middle East, like Zionists.

There is a drumbeat in the media to convince Americans that they are victims of Muslim fanatics. This propaganda campaign is carried out by Neo Cons (a.k.a. Zionists.) In his book, "The New Jerusalem: Zionist Power in America," Michael Collins Piper writes:

"In the build-up to the Iraq war, Zionist propagandists and the media increasingly began touting the message to Americans that "the whole world is against us"... and the Israelis are our only real solid dependable ally ...The theme that anti Americanism had run rampant was instilled in Americans for the very purpose of making them "anti" everyone who refused to support the...Iraq war...and the more broad ranging Zionist agenda." (157)

Sound familiar? This is the tactic they use on Jews.  "How Jews are Brainwashed and Manipulated."

Piper says that Zionism is being equated with Americanism. Zionist agents like Nathan Sharansky crafted the overblown and specious rhetoric of Bush's second inaugural speech that committed the US to advancing the Zionist agenda using force.

History provides a sobering warning as to where this could be leading. In his essay,
The Nature of Zionism, Russian author Vladimir Stepin writes,

"During the civil war in Russia, the Zionists also performed another task. Using some units of the Red Army - Trotsky was the chairman of the country's Revolutionary Military Council - they organized the Jewish pogrom in Seversk.

The result of this was the "Law on Those Involved in Pogroms" of 27 July 1918. In accordance with this law, a monstrous Zionist terror raged in Russia for ten years: a person accused of anti-Semitism was, without any argument being allowed, declared to be involved in pogroms and placed against the wall to be shot.

Not only anti-Zionists, but the best representatives of the intelligentsia of Russia, could be accused of being anti-Semitic, and so too could anyone one felt like accusing of it. People saw who was exercising power in Russia and expressed their discontent with it. 90% of the members of the Cheka - the Soviet security organ, 1918-1922 - were Zionists.

Apart from the law on those involved in pogroms, the Zionists practiced genocide against the ethnic groups inhabiting Russia, and they did so by accusing people of counter-revolutionary activities, sabotage, and so on, irrespective of whether or not the people in question really had conducted such activities. It was standard practice merely to put them against the wall to be shot."


My hunch is that the central banking elite, using Masonic secret societies in the military and intelligence agencies, is responsible for 90% of terrorism. The purpose is to manipulate people into advancing the goals of the New World Order, which includes destroying true religion, nation states, democracy, race and family.

In their mind, they have to destabilize and enslave us to protect their monopoly on government credit i.e. money creation.

They are running a protection racket to protect us from their bogus "terror." In the same way,  Zionism is a response to the "anti-Semitism" they create. In the process, Jews are brainwashed and manipulated, while Westerners are losing their civil rights and habits of freedom. 


First Comment from Dan:

Webster Tarpley joked recently, "if the Obama Administration really wants to stop ISIS, they should bomb London".  

The acronym iSIS - being no doubt an Illuminati pun - may be a play on 'iPhone' and 'iPod', with 'SIS' referring to the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), also known as MI6.  Two British Special Forces commandos were caught red handed by Iraqi police in Basra in 2005, in the act of planting a bomb in Mosque, dressed in Muslim terrorist drag.   A British tank broke them out of jail. 

Later, in March 2011 in Libya, a team of seven British commandos and an MI6 agent were captured by low level 'rebels' in Benghazi  who held them for ransom.  There's a valuable lesson here:  no matter what you see in the news, just remember that whatever they say something is, just think of the opposite.
Orwell called the way they present things as 'Doublethink'.   "War is Peace".

What do you get when you apply this formula to Zionism?   ZIONISM = ANTISEMITISM?    (I also can't help noticing that the only 'Semites' being slaughtered in the Middle East are indigenous Arabs.) 

Growing up I thought the public of the world had learned the folly of believing any 'enemy' is collectively subhuman.   It's really been a shock to see how quickly Jews were suckered into applying the same dehumanized stereotypes to Palestinians as they had just endured from the Nazis.   The explanation is trauma-based mind control.   I think that's what you see with the Zionist capstone's trauma-based control of Jewish minds.    With Americans, the ones always so quick to cheer bombing total strangers have in their history a lot of death from ancestors that fought in America's perpetual wars.

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Anti-Semitism is Zionism's Bread and Butter"

Dave said (May 6, 2010):

You have convincingly put a lot of pieces together with this article. Who would have thought that the Zionists were, most diabolically, intentionally "sowing the wind." See the related poem I wrote back in February of 2001 at Note that who the "we" are in the poem is not spelled out. Maybe when the U.S. vice president publicly declares that there is no space between Israel and the United States, this is what he means.

gk said (May 5, 2010):

Henry this is your best article on this subject. I believe most Jews will truly "GET" this...

This is what i wrote on my FB page under the posting of this article...

it is so important that good Jewish folks understand what Makow states in the first paragraph...Zionism isn't designed to protect Jews from anti semitism it is designed to create the article to understand why...

Imagine you are a group of friends and one of your friends hates somebody, and that person tells you that that person hates you and said nasty things about you to get you to hate them too...

Happened throughout life hasn't it?


Having grown up in Deerfield Illinois as Catholic I did notice that there was an underbreath dislike for the Jews of the neighboring town of Highland Park...However, we were forced into the melting pot and Archie Bunker was created to convince us that anyone who had some sort of bigotry or prejudice was a dumb buffoon when in actuality there is usually a reason birds of a feather flock together, from tribal custom to herds, packs, and identity defined by skin color, religion, economic status and even sex.

Having watched Defamation on the internet it drove home many well hidden truths...the world Jews who have no intention of returning to Israel contrasted with the Israeli born Jewish children who were told that EVERYONE hates them and they were only safe as a tribe in Jerusalem--- launched an epiphany for me...

MJ said (May 5, 2010):

Your present article about Zionism and anti semitism being its bread and butter is outstanding and powerful. Praise God for the Truth!

Inas said (May 5, 2010):

This is very interesting. Nearly thirty years ago while a uni student in Melbourne, Australia I was tuning my radio and accidentally stopped at what must have been the Jewish program. I was really surprised as it was telling the listeners not to be complacent about anti-semitism and that it was alive and well and basically frightening Jews to be vigilant. I was really taken aback I had always felt Australia to be an easygoing and tolerant society. Living in a Jewish neighborhood, near a synagogue, I saw no evidence of anti-semitism. I had a number Jewish friends, including my best friend at Uni, and never dreamed of blaming them for what Israel had done. When I heard it I thought "what was that all about?" Now I know.

Following the Rothschilds on Twitter

August 26, 2014

rothschild (1).jpg

Following the Rothschilds on Twitter

mr_burns.jpgThe resemblance to Mr. Burns of The Simpsons is purely coincidental. Both are misanthropes but the one on the left is
Jacob Rothschild, 78, the Fourth Baron Rothschild. Both have a pack of angry dogs, but Jacob's apparently are stuffed.

Our boy wonder Scottie Spencer has been following Jacob and his son, Nathaniel on Twitter. 

Scottie writes: "I was thinking the other day, why not confront Rothschild and his Masonic cronies on twitter ???!!! So I decided to do a quick search for "Rothschild" on twitter, and low and behold, there they were ! We don't have to fight violently, but only with our fingers and hands on a keyboard to make all the difference ! I myself have taken a few tweets to Rothschild myself...take a look at the few below (Scroll down.)

RothschildSmolokoTwitterMeme.jpg(UPDATE - )


Disclaimer: I don't agree with spamming these people. I do think it interesting that they put themselves out there where they can be contacted.

Related:  Tracking the Illuminati on Facebook
Also by Scottie Spencer - Young Man Fights for His Rustbelt City

Russian advisor part of the Charade?

August 20, 2014

Russian Advisor Part of The Charade?

This interview by Sergei Glaziev has received great interest. An adviser to Putin, Glaziev's message is that the current technological cycle is winding down, and that a new one is needed. He says Putin was trying to create an economic zone stretching from Portugal to Siberia and China. However the US wants to dominate Eurasia, and is sabotaging Putin using Ukraine as a linchpin. 

I stopped watching because, like Noam Chomsky, he acts as if the US is a sovereign nation rather than a sock puppet of the Illuminati Jewish bankers agenda of world domination. For this reason, I think he and Putin may be part of an Illuminati false dialectic, which in the end will advance the Illuminati agenda by fomenting a world war.  

Putting America Last by Philip Wyeth

August 6, 2014

obama-illegal-immigrants-610x400.jpgPutting America Last

by Philip Wyeth
This situation on our southern border has me asking myself, do our leaders have any remaining interest in or loyalty to America at all? How else to account for the slavish desire to accommodate a seemingly unlimited number of foreigners from Central America who are attempting to move into the United States without following the formal immigration procedures that people from Asia, Africa, and Europe must abide?
Our own people here at home are hurting right now. With no manufacturing base our economy and national purpose are like a rudderless ship yet instead of making a plan to get America spiritually and physically back on its feet, the politicians are fawning over a large potential new voter block to take under their wing. Last century our leaders inspired us with an optimistic vision of America to build dams and skyscrapers and bridges--today cynical politicians and their retinue of lobbyist barnacles see us only as serfs who need to be ruled and as sources of tax revenue for their pet projects and lavish lifestyles.

The everyday dupe looks at the "crisis on the border" as a chance for us to show our compassion as the most generous nation in the world. He is oblivious to the implications of what anecdotes like one-third of births in an Ohio county being born to illegal immigrants means for the future of our country.
Furthermore, why not just let everybody in? What if a million children from China, Russia, or Saudi Arabia were at the border? What if the entire 77 million-strong population of the Congo had fled civil war and was knocking at our door? At what point does generosity give way to the psychotic exit of a people through its own cultural suicide?
And I say this as someone who lived in Los Angeles for a long time. Not only do I have sympathy for the experience of the "anchor babies" who I knew personally, I've conducted business with a man who snuck across the border back in the early 90s. Illegal immigration is a longstanding fact of life in Southern California, and anyone who sees the new strip malls popping up in the once dangerous black ghettos that Latinos have taken over can't help but acknowledge the improvement in these areas.
But no nation should be required to take in any number of foreign citizens for any number of heartrending reasons. It doesn't happen in Canada and it doesn't happen in Mexico, so why is it allowed to happen here? Is it simply demographics--white people aborting and "waiting" themselves out of existence? Black people aborting and gangbanging themselves into a bloody epitaph? The need not just for labor but new consumers to replace the dying out whites and blacks?
Have you noticed all the semantic games the media plays when referring to the people sneaking into the country? They employ a selective and suggestive application of descriptive terms as part of the agenda to shape public opinion. These Central Americans on the move are referred to very gently in context-neutral terms like "undocumented immigrants," "migrants' and "dreamers."

I say hell, why stop there? If calling someone an invader or illegal alien is considered offensive and judgmental, let's cast that treacherous journey across jungle and desert in a more heroic light. Not mere refugees, these brave people are adventurers...and pilgrims...or better yet, young explorers!!!  The merit badges and green cards are in the mail...

Obama's Cloward-Piven Strategy