Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Below - Return of Gold Standard is Imminent (scroll down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Resist Biometrics - Your Liberty Depends on It

January 29, 2012



biometrics.jpeg

The vision of the goyim as cattle is coming true. Biometrics is the
 human equivalent of a dairy cow's ear tag.










by Chris Goodmenbetter
(henrymakow.com)

It's official. The biometric cataloging of the human race has begun. India's intent to record it's entire nations' 1.2 billion people by iris and fingerprint scans signals a devious high tech human monitoring and control agenda.

Although no one ever asks for such systems, biometrics will be sold to the populace as cool, sexy, convenient, safe and secure but will eventually prove to be a living hell for everyone on planet earth. Most just don't know it yet.

--- To surveil and identify, sold as to serve and protect

In order to recognize biometrics as the human equivalent of a dairy cow's ear tag, a brief explanation is in order. One of many current biometrics systems is referred to as "facial recognition" technology.

When someone volunteers to get their drivers' license or passport, photos are required to have an unobstructed, relaxed, static, straight-on portrait face.  The subjects' photo is then digitized and entered into a computer.

Via biometric software algorithms, the constant inter-relational dimensions are measured, such as height, width, relation of the nose to the eyes, mouth to chin's end etc.

Facial expressions, such as smiling for instance, alter these ratio calculations and are no longer allowed during photography.  Based upon these unique facial landmarks, an identifying number is arrived at, assigned and data based. Biometrics standards are also internationalized.

Similar biometrical examples in sporadic use include fingerprint, palm, retinal & iris scans, gait and speech recognition and cranial thermal ( measuring unique thermal heat signatures of a persons' scalp) recognition.

In order to operate, these biometrics systems require some kind of input device to connect the real world with database, such as a person placing their hands on a scanner or peering into one.

Facial, cranial and gait recognition rely on vast networks of un-invited CCTV video cameras which, not surprisingly, account for their dramatic weed-like proliferation into society.

The physically dangerous full body x-ray scanners used at U.S. airports (now thankfully banned in several countries which initially had them) can peer right through clothing and record and store a 360 degree  biometric profile for future use (travelers' personal ticket and/or passport info is stored in conjunction with their scan.)

Similar existing street level systems can scan anyone's body as they walk down the sidewalk without their even knowing it. These real time scans can then be compared to existing databases (which a subject previously provided at the airport, as example.)

Ultimately, biometrics offers a means to identify, surveil and monitor an entire populace's actions and whereabouts in real time. (see DARPA's Total Information Awareness Network)


BUILDING THE DATABASE AND GROOMING THE POPULACE

In February 2008, at a cost of one billion dollars per year, the FBI awarded a ten year contract to Lockheed Martin to develop a giant database of biometric data including fingerprints, iris scans, and DNA, which the FBI refers to as the "Next Generation Identification" (NGI). The goal is to have such personal data from every human being on file.

How perfect it is then that Lockheed Martin also be responsible for both the Canadian and British Census.

Like with any indoctrination form, it's important to get children friendly with biometrics as early as possible. SONY and Microsoft use facial recognition in their latest Playstation and XBOX.  Why not - it's fun! Many schoolchildren are thumbscanning to get school lunches or take out library books. Childrens' cartoons abound with biometric references.

Familiarizing society with biometrics is critical to it's adoption. Through "patient gradualism" (or in similar military terms, "mission creep"), the slow change takes place while minimizing resistance and reaction.  Humans are the most adaptable beings on the planet and if perceptions appear natural, we tend to accept them.

PERSONAL STATEMENT

I refuse to submit to a biometrics photo, iris or thumb scan. As a result, I am no longer able to legally drive a car, or get on a commercial airplane (international or domestic), despite 23 years on the road without a single accident or ticket (an insurance company's actuarial dream), as driver's licenses and passports now employ this loathsome technology.

You have to ask yourself: 'what's your own personal line in the sand'?

Michael Collins was instrumental in gaining Ireland's' independence from the British Crown.

He proved an indefatigable adversary who overcame Britain's' best not only because of his highly unorthodox (read: CREATIVITY) tactics but also undoubtedly due to the fact that the British authorities had no knowledge of him!

They had no known pictures, profiles or whereabouts of the man. Such un-predictable wildcards terrify monolithic oligopolies. Collins managed to free the Irish, from the back of a bicycle. If alive today, I doubt Collins would have submitted to biometrics either.

I recommend the movie "Michael Collins" with Liam Neeson as an introduction to the man. 

We still have the power of choice, for the most part, as to who gets what information about ourselves but the only sure way to secure this information is to never divulge it in the first place. In an information war, databases are the weapon of your foe.

Observe wild animals in nature. They carry no I.D., roam as they please, occupy no database and yet somehow they are able to thrive. They are free.

As it stands, your average crow stands freer than most humans.

-------------------------


---  References and suggested reading:

Citibank to roll out voice biometrics   http://www.zdnet.com.au/citibank-to-roll-out-voice-biometrics-339306609.htm?feed=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zdnetaustralia+%28ZDNet+Australia%29

http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/New-Iscon-Whole-Body-Scanner-Now-Offers-Integrated-Biometric-Capabilities-Detect-All-1343909.htm

http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2010/01/dutch_police_develop_mobile_bo.php

http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/01/17/nypd-testing-gun-scanning-technology/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6309917.stm    ( make sure to take in readers' comments at that link )

http://www.geek.com/articles/mobile/malls-go-big-brother-with-black-friday-cell-phone-tracking-20111124

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/6309917.stm

http://www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=837   "One generation is all we need"

http://www.wethepeoplewillnotbechipped.com/main/news_cats.php?cat_id=39  ( excellent biometrics & implantable microchip news archive )





You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/refuse_biometrics.html
Articles >>

Comments for "Resist Biometrics - Your Liberty Depends on It"

Derek said (January 29, 2012):

Chris Goodmenbetter suggests he was a proffesional driver at some point in his life. I too had my turn at commercial driving in my younger years (younger then I am now)

Just before I went on to do other things in life I signed up for the
"fast card" program, this is becoming pretty much mandatory for Canadian drivers.

As part of the process you have to show up to a port of entry and get scanned by American officials, didgital palm scan, finger scan, measurements and then an interrogation interview.

After that they tell you about all the nasty stuff they can do to you
if you goof up on any paper work... detain you indefinitely etc.

Below - The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged (scroll down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

Return of the Gold Standard Imminent

January 28, 2012


gold.jpg

The gold standard will precipitate a massive deflation. The ensuing chaos will help usher in their coveted New World Order and World Currency.







by Anthony Migchels
(henrymakow.com)

What has been in the cards for decades is now fully on the agenda: the return of the Gold Standard. Gold as currency is a weapon. It is a wealth transfer to those holding Gold, which is not the 99%, and will precipitate a massive deflation. The ensuing chaos will help usher in their coveted New World Order and World Currency.

Numerous stories pertaining to Gold as currency have appeared recently. Last week alone, it was reported that India will pay Iran in gold for their oil imports. In another development, China, Japan, Russia, France and a number of Arab states will pay each other with a basket of currencies, including Gold.

Yet another story was about World Bank President Robert Zoellick, who has been promoting a Gold Standard for years, 'admitting' the demise of the dollar reflects 'a changing balance of power' in the world. Even Newt Gingrich has jumped aboard the gold train.

These stories are framed as resistance against the dollar hegemony and of course that is only a part of the story. Another dialectic, US against the Rest of the World.

But were these Nations really acting independently, they would barter amongst each other, based on current account bookkeeping and basically crossing off all mutually outstanding debt. That would save them massive sums of currency and associated capital costs. They would need 'hard currency' only to settle negative balances.

Of course, when these developments run their course it could have a devastating effect on the dollar, as it would mean trillions of dollars would be repatriated from overseas as they are no longer used to finance international trade.

It helps the Money Power in its plan to bring the US down a few notches, which is indispensable to World Government.

But the decline of the dollar is only part of the story. The dollar is only the current vehicle the Money Power uses to rule international finance. It doesn't care for the vehicle itself, as long as it has a suitable successor and that will be Gold.

And in the US itself there also is a strong drive towards Gold as currency.

The onslaught by Austrian Economics in the Alternative Media comes to mind. And Ron Paul of course. He openly calls for Gold as currency. In this respect, he clearly is the ultimate internationalist candidate. This contrasts sharply with his patriotic 'constitutionalism'.

 But when he must chose between constitution and the monetary, it is clear what his priorities are. Ron Paul lies about 'constitutional money', saying the constitution says we should have Gold as currency. But it doesn't, it says we may have Gold as currency. But other units are also allowed.

This 'little detail' is really very telling. It is typical of a Money Power change agent. They hide behind a sympathetic and credible theme, meanwhile sabotaging or actually actively supporting the implementation of a worse and more important agenda.

And control of the money supply is all important. To the Money Power, anyway.

It also reminds us of how internationally the Money Power operates. We must not allow our national priorities to obscure the international context.

Austerity and Deflation

A Gold Standard would be an unmitigated disaster. It will lead to an excruciating deflation. Deflation is a horror for debtors, who see their debts and the interest they pay over them grow worse in real terms. And since everybody is complaining of debt, we might reconsider making it worse with deflation.

Winston Churchill, who was involved in the reinstatement of the Gold Standard in Britain in the twenties told the House of Commons in 1935, when the deflation of the Great Depression had made Gold untenable:

"Look at the enormously increased volume of commodities which have to be created in order to pay off the same mortgage debt or loan. Minor fluctuation might well be ignored, but I say quite seriously that this monetary convulsion has now reached a pitch where I am persuaded that the producers of new wealth will not tolerate indefinitely so hideous an oppression. . . . I therefore point to this evil, and to the search for the method's of remedying it as the first, second and third of all the problems which should command and rivet our thoughts."

Deflation destroys the economy, because people have an incentive to hoard cash, instead of using it for production and consumption.

The Banking Fraternity is well aware of the disastrous deflation that Gold promotes. For instance, the Protocols say in their financial program (Protocol 20): 'You are aware that the gold standard has been the ruin of the States which adopted it, for it has not been able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so that we have removed gold from circulation as far as possible.'

This quote also confirms that they are able, willing and known to withhold vast amounts of Gold from the market. So the idea that Gold is a safe bet because 'it cannot be printed' does not stand: the volume can be manipulated, because most of it is in the hand of the Money Power, who can inflate and deflate at will.

The social and economic havoc it created through the Great Depression led to the rise of fascism. It is quite likely that weaponized Gold is being used for similar purposes this time.

And of course we should also consider the one off wealth transfer that reinstating Gold as currency brings: it's price would have to go up maybe 10 or 20 fold to replace all the fiat currency in the world. The 99% having no Gold will as usually be holding the bag.

Conclusion

Far from a 'solution', the coming Gold Standard is the logical next step in the Money Power plan of destabilization and order out of chaos. We will have a long and painful depression.

Although it is not certain that Gold will completely replace paper, it is obvious that we will know scarce money and contraction for years to come.

The austerity and deflation that the Money Power's agents in the IMF, Bank of International Settlements and (Central) Banks are promoting will set the stage for major upheaval and the usual problem-reaction-solution, dialectically driven march to World Government.

Our answer must be to have the Government reclaim the monopoly it has surrendered to a private Central Banking Cartel. But the goal is not to 'end the Fed'. The goal is better money.

Government must print debt free money, preferably Social Credit. Since this is not going to happen any time soon, we should build free market currencies, which can actively compete with national currencies. Ellen Brown's Public Banking is another approach in the Populist spirit.

And we should take our money out the banks of course. Why would we patronize a business that is enslaving us with credit by bookkeeping, slapping interest on it, creating booms and busts and taking trillions of bail outs?
--

Anthony Migchels is an Interest-Free Currency activist and founder of the Gelre, the first Regional Currency in the Netherlands. You can read all of his articles on his blog Real Currencies

---

Recent & Noteworthy

The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged

http://www.henrymakow.com/theargumentfukushimasabotage.html




You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/return_of_the_gold_standard_im.html
Articles >>

Comments for "Return of the Gold Standard Imminent"

Tony said (January 29, 2012):

Henry, it's laughable how every time you post a truthful article about money, such as Anthony Migchels latest, some "long time satisfied reader BUT" pops up with an Austrian Idiot "refutation." The gold bugs just refuse to learn about money, spouting their false conclusions to their even more false beliefs (theories). That damned gold is a drug, there is no doubt about it. And none know that better than the criminal bankers of issue for whom the gold bugs are their best possible backup, sure to sabotage every honest attempt at monetary reform by turning it into a debating circus sans reason. That's the basic reason for the existence of the Libertarian Party.

I don't agree with Anthony on every last detail (Ellen Brown's push for state, now county, banks for instance does NOTHING to correct the real problem of money creation as debt at interest) but he is a young man who studies the real problems and acts on knowledge gained, unlike the unthinking parrots of Mises, etc. who call themselves Libertarians.

It's also very telling that those obstructors are not satisfied just to offer their counter reply, as most others are, but they want the "offending" article removed from your site. A sure sign that they do not have confidence in the persuasion of truth in their own agenda. Because they don't really know if it is true or not since they never think through what the "Austrians" are actually advocating, they just leap to that agenda, Pavlovian like. Here's a broad hint for them - The "Austrian" theories are definitely not able to pass a truth test. Which gives few outs for Ron Paul, none of which is complimentary. He is either not very smart or not very honest. Or both.

Anthony Migchels said (January 28, 2012):

In reply to Herbreck below

Just for your info: I've written extensively on Austrian Economics's 'free market for currencies', which is a total hoax:
Just google:

What Gary North is not saying about Interest
Discussing Gold and Interest with the Daily Bell
Top Ten Lies and Mistakes of Austrian Economics (see point 7)

Paul may have called for broader Gold ownership, the fact remains that a pathetically small percentage of Gold reserves is in the hands of the common man. So it's quite clear who will be winning with a new Gold Standard.

My statements are well considered and I stand by them fully, but is of course impossible to cover everything in a thousand words.
However, the 'free market' thing is quite often used by Austrians: they are suggesting the free market would see Gold rule.

This is complete and utter rubbish, as I've proved without a doubt in the above articles. However, because many libertarians believe Gold would win out in a free market anyway, they'll settle for a Gold Standard by decree as second best.

Herbreck said (January 28, 2012):

I'm a longtime reader and generally enjoy your articles and agree with most of the viewpoints. Unfortunately, the new article by Anthony Migchels "Return of the Gold Standard Imminent" contains many factual errors, obvious contradictions and serious omissions that amount to a cheap smear against Ron Paul.

On the one hand Migchels indicts Paul as for his support of Austrian school economics ( without mentioning to readers that Austrian economics have proven very accurate in the last 10 years ) and a gold standard ( without telling readers that Dr. Paul advocates "broader base of gold ownership" ). Migchels calls for "competing currencies" as one solution yet fails to mention Dr. Paul's bill "Free Competition in Currencies Act of 2011".

Migchels also seems to be willing to give the FED a "pass" on their numerous crimes against the American people, while Dr. Paul sponsored bills to fully audit the FED. Migchels calls for "government monopoly" on money creation, while Paul calls for "free competition" in currency.

It's clearly Anthony Migchels who is shilling for the elite while Dr. Ron Paul represents the common man as he always has.

"In this one detail — the critical importance of the gold coinage — I believe lies the key to establishing a new gold standard.

We should make no mistake about it: the more progress we make toward reestablishing the gold standard, the more aggressive our opposition will become. Some vested interests, as you know, have a lot to lose if we succeed in getting the monetary system reconstructed on a gold basis. The first political step is, therefore, to get the coinage into circulation.
One objective might be to aim for every American to become a gold owner. We must encourage a broader base of political support for gold ownership and the availability of gold for personal economic objectives. Certainly a broader base of gold ownership in the country would help to reduce the threats of discriminatory taxation or regulation of gold ownership and gold coin transactions, which are seriously favored in Congress today."

- Ron Paul

I ask you to remove this obvious smear and simply give Dr. Ron Paul fair and accurate coverage on your site.

references:

http://mises.org/daily/2826
http://thomas.loc.gov/
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/R?d112:FLD003:@1%28Rep+Paul+Ron%29:

HR1098 Free Competition in Currencies Act
HR459 Federal Reserve Transparency Act
HR1095 Freedom to Bank Act

Below - Philo - "Every Good Man is Free" (scroll down)

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

The Article Jeff Rense Doesn't Want You to Read

January 27, 2012

The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged

(Jeff Rense refused to link to this article. He thinks it is a psy-op to absolve the nuclear industry of blame for Fukushima. Fine. But when I posted it anyway so people could decide for themselves, he announced he would no longer link to my site. You will no longer be able to find my work on Rense's site. Sad that a 10 year relationship should end in this fashion.)  


Former NSA analyst, Jim Stone, argues that there was no mag 9.0 earthquake. The tsunami was caused by nuclear bombs in the sea and the Fukushima explosion and meltdown was caused by mini-nukes hidden in cameras installed by an Israeli security firm. The motive: punish Japan for offering to enrich Iranian uranium and straying from Illuminati diktat. This website reserves judgment but offers this introduction by James Farganne in the spirit of free discussion. 




camera.jpg.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


by James Farganne
(henrymakow.com)

When we compare the  6.8-magnitude earthquake which devastated Kobe, Japan January 17, 1995 with Fukushima, the evidence does not stack up.

A quick Google Images search of Kobe reveals incredible destruction of buildings, bridges, elevated highways, and other infrastructure.

The Fukushima quake, magnitude 9.0, struck about 70 km off the coast of Japan on March 11, 2011.

It sent a 15-meter tsunami crashing over perfectly undamaged bridges, houses, roads, and cars -- over a populace which had not been warned of the incoming tsunami, because there was no mag 9.0 earthquake. They were taken completely off-guard. Yet helicopters were waiting, and people all over Japan got to watch the tsunami roll in on live TV.

What on earth was going on? Ordinarily, the Japanese people are warned of tsunamis. Why weren't they warned? Why was there no structural damage, no reason for them to suspect that a tsunami was coming?

The quake must have seemed like nothing special to a nation of people who are used to quakes. In a video taken in one Tokyo newsroom during the Fukushima quake, staff were seen to continue typing at their computer stations, totally unfazed by it.

A 9.0-magnitude earthquake is more than 100 times stronger than a 6.8. A 9.0 should have devastated everything within a 1,000-km radius. There should have been widespread urban carnage, even worse than what Kobe suffered.

Yet the Fukushima quake of 3/11/11 did not cause a single structure to collapse.

But don't take my word for it. Go look up the helicopter footage on YouTube.  Look at the infrastructure the tsunami was crashing onto. Not the slightest bit of damage. Common sense is enough to make you wonder.

Jim Stone did more than wonder. He dug up and analyzed the Japanese seismograms. He proved there was no 9.0 quake, and no epicenter out at sea. Instead, there were three simultaneous quakes of much lesser magnitude, all of them inland.

The authorities lied about the 9.0 quake -- made it up out of whole cloth. An earthquake did not cause the tsunami. There must have been another cause.

blast door.jpgReactors Destroyed by Nukes

It turns out that the official explanation for the Fukushima reactor explosions was bogus as well. Nuclear power containment walls are extremely thick and strong. Hydrogen explosions could never have destroyed them. As a historical reference, hydrogen explosions occurred at Three Mile Island and caused no structural damage, nor even any injuries to plant personnel.

Furthermore, Reactor Four contained no fuel on 3/11/11, and was therefore nonoperational -- yet it exploded and was destroyed as completely as were the other reactors that day. Reactor Four is like Building 7 at the World Trade Center - an utter impossibility, a blatant smoking gun. A reactor containing no fuel cannot operate; a nonoperational reactor cannot explode unless someone explodes it. The destruction of Reactor Four can only have been the result of sabotage.

Israeli Involvement

In February 2010, Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran. Soon thereafter, an Israeli firm by the name of Magna BSP secured a contract to run security at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. They installed oversized cameras strongly resembling gun-type nuclear weapons. There is strong evidence that they planted Stuxnet, an Israeli computer virus that attacks Siemens power plant control systems, and which Israel previously used to damage Iran's nuclear program. Magna BSP also established internet data links in the reactor cores, in blatant violation of international nuclear regulations.

All twelve members of that security team returned to Israel in the week before 3/11/11. In the aftermath of the disaster, the Israelis publicly monitored the reactor cores via their illegal internet data links. Yet no one took them to task for this.

Jim Stone Targeted for Revealing Truth

What caused the tsunami? What destroyed the reactors?

Using skills honed as a former NSA analyst with an engineering background, Jim Stone concluded that Israel was behind the destruction of Fukushima Daiichi. Now he is paying the price.

Stone proved that there was no 9.0-magnitude quake to cause the tsunami. The tsunami must have been artificially induced, perhaps by an atomic bomb placed in the Japan Trench.

The tsunami was blamed for flooding the reactors and causing the explosions. But Stone presents compelling evidence that Israel destroyed the Fukushima Daiichi plant by installing gun-type nuclear weapons in the guise of security cameras, and then setting them off in the tsunami's aftermath.

Stone demonstrates that the Stuxnet virus continues to distort sensor readings at the disaster site to this day.

Unlike many others in the world of whistle blowers, Stone bases his conclusions on hard evidence and unassailable logic. Anyone can review and challenge his work. He is open to it.

Since releasing his report and making several radio appearances to support it, Jim Stone has been harassed, threatened, unlawfully detained, and is currently facing prison time on completely trumped-up charges.

I have watched the reaction to his work on the net. Some have slandered him. Others have railroaded his work.

No one has debunked him yet.

His conclusions have ramifications that make 9/11 pale in significance.

Why, all across the alternative media, this roaring silence on the work of Jim Stone?

Why haven't more truth sites simply linked to his report, directing people to review the evidence and decide for themselves?

Some have expressed suspicion that Stone might not be what he claims to be. That's irrelevant. Facts are facts. The report stands on facts.

If you haven't done so yet, I urge you to study Jim Stone's Fukushima report. It is well worth the considerable time and effort. Then, if you agree that his conclusions are correct, please do your part in spreading this information and dispelling the alternative media's silence on it.

To conclude, a 9.0-magnitude earthquake never happened in Japan on 3/11; the tsunami must have been artificially induced. Nor did hydrogen explosions obliterate containment walls of concrete and rebar several feet thick. The official story is impossible. Israel was punishing Japan, and Zionist operatives now are attempting to destroy Jim Stone, the man who exposed the truth.

--

The original report: www.jimstonefreelance.com/fukushima1.html

Interview with visuals: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1G9QlynPBcQ




 


You can find this article permanently at http://www.henrymakow.com/theargumentfukushimasabotage.html
Articles >>

Comments for "The Article Jeff Rense Doesn't Want You to Read "

Don said (January 29, 2012):

How insane, great argument, I posted it as did Icke and I'm sure many others….let the perceived truth fly and people will decide for themselves should be the MO, which has always been my beef with Rense and some others.

Let people decide, stop the filtering. What's to fear of the Truth?

Anyway, we're all a bunch of fluid serious heartfelt searchers and re-searchers and this needs to be dealt with on a much more loving and understanding level.

You're the real deal Henry…anyone who shunts you is suspect in my book.

PB said (January 29, 2012):

A few of Farganne's claims are far-fetched. Regarding the damage radius of an offshore quake, whether man-made or natural: by the time it reached the island, the quake would be weaker. On 3/11, the ground accelerations at Daiichi NPS were within design criteria, so certainly it wasn't a calamity. Tokyo newsroom staff continued work during the quake, because its magnitude was reduced by the time it reached Tokyo.

Without a warning of the approaching tsunami, there would have been order of magnitude more victims. Most of the population at risk has sought high ground.

The height of tsunami at the Daiichi NPS was not 15 m. There are no believable proofs. Damage recorded at Daiichi NPS is not consistent with such a wave -- see photo analysis here:
http://piotrbein.wordpress.com/2011/04/07/join-a-grassroots-investigation-of-311-nuclear-catastrophe-%e2%80%93-stuxnet-in-fukushima-daiichi/

Farganne believes that planted nukes have destroyed the reactors, since a hydrogen explosion could not damage a reactor's containment. A meltdown will destroy a reactor. Nuclear expert Tedd Weyman (Canada) wrote to my blog: "We know from the ballsitic features of #1 reactor’s first explosion that it was NOT a hydrogen explosion, it was a super criticality — prompt critical –event, indicating core melt and inner containment breach." http://piotrbein.wordpress.com/2011/05/13/alert-reactor-1-meltdown-unstoppable-extremely-dangerousstopienie-w-reaktorze-1-niemozliwe-do-pokonania-niezwykle-grozne/

Likely, hydrogen released by the overheated nuclear fuel rods (exposed due to loss of cooling water), made its way to the outer building envelope and exploded, stripping the relatively light upper structures in units 1, 3 and 4. Unit 2 was vented through louvers in the upper part of the reactor building. Tedd Weyman writes about hydrogen produced by fuel rods in reactors and SFP: "Several metals and ceramics in nuclear reactors, when exposed to water, experience chemical interactions called hydrolysis and radiolysis. One of the most dangerous non-nuclear kinetic energy products of these reactions the formation of hydrides and the explosive gas, hydrogen. The raw or new fuel rods (MOX fuel made of plutonium and urnaium) as well as the spent fuel rods both produce hydrogen." http://piotrbein.wordpress.com/2011/03/21/a-state-of-lies-not-emergency-is-declared/

Farganne is right that reactor 4 meltdown/explosion would be impossible since its fuel was removed before 3/11. Information from Daiichi is scant -- do we know the damage to the reactor itself? It was the contents of its SFP that caused an explosion, due to a "slow" chain reaction, according to nuclear reactor expert Arnie Gundersen (USA): the fuel pool likely had "a self-sustaining chain reaction" rather than receiving nuclear fission products in the fallout from the other units. http://fairewinds.com/content/gundersen-discusses-current-condition-reactors-tepco-claim-no-fission-fuel-pool-and-lack-rad

Farganne said (January 28, 2012):

Author reply to Ken Adachi below:


You posted your opinions on Fukushima, which were accurate, and which you backed up with some seismogram analysis and testimony of psychics.

Jim Stone was 10 weeks later than you because he spent more than 500 hours compiling hard evidence to back up his claims.

As for your assertion that he never published anything before his Fukushima report, simply search "Tainted Nightmare" at Google:

https://www.google.com/search?q=tainted+nightmare&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

He is not an ex-NASA analyst. He claims to have been an analyst for the NSA. You insinuate that his work history makes him untrustworthy. That is ad hominem and naive. There are good and bad people in every agency. Evil is not monolithic, but highly compartmentalized. TPTB are very good at harnessing intelligence. If they get hold of a brainiac with principles, they will employ that person to perform specific tasks while keeping them in the dark about the more nefarious things that go on.

Jim Stone produced a massive report based on lots of research and real, hard evidence. You gave opinions, with almost no evidence. There's a big difference.

Ken Adachi said (January 28, 2012):

Hello Henry,

Jim Stone did not break the Japan nuke story when he published his article for the first time on May 28, 2011 claiming that the March 11 Japan Tsunami was caused by undersea nuclear explosions. Nor did he break the story on May 28, 2011 that the Fukushima, Daaiichi reactor containment building explosions were caused by planted nuclear devices (rather than an
explosion of hydrogen gas).

I broke both of those stories fully TEN WEEKS earlier, BEFORE we ever read a word from Mr. Jim Stone, ex-NASA analyst.

I published an article on March 12, 2011, ONE day after the Japan event, Japan's 3/11/11 Mega 9.1 Earthquake: Another Illuminati Production? (Mar. 12, 2011)

From Ken Adachi, Editor
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/japanquakemanufactured12mar11.shtml
March 12, 2011

in which I said:

1. The tsunami was not a genuine, earthquake-provoked tsunami, but rather was a sea SURGE that resulted from planted undersea nuclear devices.

2. The Daiichi explosions were due to mini nukes that were planted inside the Fukushima facility in order to CREATE the APPEARANCE of a massive nuclear leak (as in Chernobyl) in order to perpetrate a Radiation psyops HOAX upon the world. The purpose was to turn public opinion against nuclear power plants in favor of the "safer" gas turbine plants that Merkle's Germany announced a few months ago would now become the norm in Germany as they phase out nuclear plants (does this sound like a setup to you? Think there's any connection to that natural gas pipeline that Russia wants to run from the Caspian sea across Afghanistan, etc?)

3. i reported on March 12, 2011 that the March 11, 2011 Japan seismographs were NOT showing a natural earthquake release, but rather the sudden vertical spike that can ONLY be seen with underground nuclear explosions, not natural earthquake activity.

4. I also reported that the radiation being detected in the sea water was not coming from Daiichi, but rather was due to the undersea nuclear explosion that created the sea surge that was erroneously reported to be a tsunami caused my a Richter 9 earthquake.

All these claims were made on March 12, 2011 at educate-yoursef.org.
I re-posted Jim Stone's May 28 article on my web site on June 1, 2011 . I was somewhat miffed that he did not mention my web site or my March 12 article in his piece, but I felt the story was too important to ignore as he CORROBORATED and affirmed what I had already stated 2.5 months earlier.

No one ever heard of (or read anything by) "freelance reporter" Jim Stone before he "broke" the Japan nuke/faux earthquake story with his May 28, 2011 article. Now that I know of his NASA affiliation, I have greater suspicions as to WHY he didn't mention my web site or my March 12 article in his write up.

Richard said (January 27, 2012):

Also, Kudos to you on the current Fukashima article on your site. I have long felt that there is something extremely fishy about that event.


The article you posted is the first I have read of the
"exploded-by-design" theory. Of course, I am sure the criminals that did this will get away with it, just as they did on 9/11.


Thank-you for the work that you do!

Treat Yourself to a Bubbeleh!

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

January 28, 2012

bbubeleh.jpegTreat Yourself to a Bubbeleh!

Unknown, this Jewish version of a pancake is a delicious treat that serves to be better known!








Bubbaleh/Bubbeleh 
 
Serves: 4

 3 eggs, separated
 1/2 cup water
 1/2 tsp. salt
 1/2 cup matzo meal

 Beat whites until stiff.

 Beat egg yolks with water, salt, and matzo meal. Fold in beaten whites.

 Drop onto greased pan. When bottom is brown, flip over to brown on the second side.

 Serve with cinnamon sugar or jam.


My Morning in Female Court

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

January 21, 2012


femalejudge.jpeg

My Morning in Female Court


A reader feels a gender bias against men in an increasingly female-dominated judiciary. Of course, he is delusional since only women, homosexuals, select minorities and Jews can be discriminated against, and he is none of these.  











by Daniel
(henrymakow.com)

Today I spent my morning sitting in a court room patiently waiting my turn to plead not guilty and present my evidence in a case of speeding and photo radar.

The Judge was stuffy and fierce, she almost seemed to be aging at an accelerated pace.

The crown prosecutor was young and slender, just the right amount of curves in the right places... O.k. she was hot! There !.

I had the luxury of sitting through the entire mornings proceedings and getting to hear all the cases and arguments before me.  Most of these were half-assed pleas for mercy to avoid shelling out a few bucks and hey why not?

A few of the defendant's didn't  have a clue what was up or down; no case no arguments prepared. Even the cops in the back row were chuckling to themselves.

Watching the judge through all the proceedings, she seemed dead and lifeless but actively engaged in taking notes.

legallyblond.jpegThe crown prosecutor was a little more lively I think I almost caught her smiling a few times!

Now, I actually had a case based on solid facts, nothing to do with my opinion.

I finally get my turn to present my case and defend myself. I constructed my defense based on a portion their own evidence. I used the photographs, reported speed, lapsed time stamp and measurement of the vehicle to prove the car was actually going much slower then reported.

I made very nice diagrams and a written explanation for the Judge. The case I thought was nearly bullet proof but she made no attempt to look at any of the contrary evidence. The cute little crown attorney came at me with the speed of a viper (I must be onto something here I thought)

"ARE YOU A MATHEMATICIAN!!" she barked, "Did you make those calculations yourself?"

 Yes I replied, here is a copy for you. She went on to tell me that I am not qualified to do that. She never looked at the evidence nor did the judge. She just grimaced at me the whole time and I didn't see her making any notes. I was quickly found guilty.

Now can anyone please correct me but I thought the court house is a place where the judge carefully reviews facts and evidence?

Did I think too much? Maybe that combined with my gender intimidated them?

-
I have since spoken to the guy who runs www.wiseupwinnipeg.com and he has informed me that what I thought was "court" really isn't. My case was heard by a magistrate. They make you think its court. He went on to tell me that at that level you could have the most iron clad defense and they'll still convict you: "its almost criminal" in his words.

I was also informed that my defense has been used before and its nearly indisputable; you just don't hear about it in the media. He was kind enough to provide me with all the details on how to appeal and have it heard by an actual judge.


50,000 Feminists Take Umbrage at Pink Legos

Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text |

January 18, 2012

pinklogos.png

50,000 Feminists Take Umbrage at Pink Legos


You'd think feminists would want to encourage Lego's pitch to young girls.
Building blocks rely on spatial skills normally found in males.









by Jon Harrison
(henrymakow.com)

I'm a little bit conflicted on this, because I know stirring controversy is exactly what they want to draw attention to their "cause". This sort of thing should probably just be ignored, but they've gotten on a nationally syndicated radio show. The presentation was particularly objectionable. It was taken for granted that  feminist theory is proven and academically sound.

A consumer product targeted at children is so unsafe and dangerous  that an organized campaign to have it be banned from the marketplace had arisen with growing support.

What was it this time? Tainted Chinese baby formula. Choking hazard happy meal toys? Collapsible asphyxiation strollers? According to the presenter, this was a far more sinister menace.

Pink Legos. The snappable building block toy enjoyed by generations of children.  So what's the big deal? As it turns out, when viewed through feminist prism lenses any girl who is exposed to (let alone plays with) this toy will become a wife and mother, someone who is feminine and forfeits  her chance to be a brain surgeon or win a Nobel prize in astrophysics.

Lest you think this is a hoax, the original petition (with 47,000+ signatures & counting) can be found at "Tell Lego to Stop Selling Out Girls."

All interested parties who want to support women's right to choose the color of her daughters Lego's are invited to sign my counter-petition.

You'd think feminists would want to encourage Lego's pitch to young girls.
Building blocks rely on spatial skills normally found in males. Oops, have I just committed a sexist "gender stereotype"?