Below - Brexit- What is the Hidden Globalist Game? (scroll down)

Third World Tsunami Sinks EU

June 27, 2016


"The decision to flood Europe with combat age savages in a hurry was clearly a major error, probably a fatal one for EU masters."  

Europeans have awakened to the genocidal agenda of their traitorous leaders.

by Dan

We must not forget for minute that the BREXIT referendum was a gamble, a reaction of the political class to losing control of the narrative, and thus the British public.  The Brits have been coming out of the consensus trance they'll been held under for seventy years.  The owners of the Bank of England and the BIS in Brussels only rule as long as the public believe they do.  

The EU is falling apart because they didn't meet their true goals before the general public got wise to its real agenda.  Too many people know the goals now: the extinction of the indigenous European, and disintegration of the Nations, in the Biblical sense of the word.  The decision to flood Europe with combat age savages in a hurry was clearly a major error, probably a fatal one for EU masters.   

Remember; there were nationalist riots in London in May 2015 with the re-election of Cameron. There were riots in 2014.  Cameron gambled that a BREXIT referendum would fail.  If it had, his government could have claimed to beneficiary of the people's mandate and proceed to use force against rising opposition. 

We anticipated exactly what to expect for the rest of the year.  Media will blame the British public for the economic collapse that's been in progress anyway.  The Crown will shuffle its deck of puppets to hold onto Number 10 Downing Street.   While eyes are on Boris Johnson initially, he's already under suspicion, so more likely they'll use a new broom.  Probably Tory MP Theresa May. 

(left, May has been Home Secretary since 2010)

Her 'cred' is having given a speech against rampant immigration, but when you examine the fine print, she's lying.  Like Cameron, for three years she's been pushing the notion that Britain could have it's cake with the EU and eat it too.  (For a reminder how that sort of thing pans out, see Trump's story about the lady and the snake.)

Nigel Farage vs Theresa May (06Oct13)  liar politicians


Meanwhile expect the Internet reacto-sphere to fill up with deafest nonsense about how everything that's happening in the UK and Europe is 'under control'. 

Nothing could be farther from the truth.  They're sitting on a powder keg and playing with matches.   Why do you think Merkel and the rest of the Continent are trying to speed up the creation of Pan European militarized police? 

Never forget that the key to the Pan Europa plan was revealed in it's brainchild's own books about it, 'Practical Idealism' and 'Pan Europa', was to be the breeding out of Europeans through miscegenation and rape to lower intelligence and culture to the point the mass could be more easily ruled by a clique of inbred bankers and degenerate aristocrats.   The words below were written in 1923, and everything that's happened since has essentially been one long World War. 

"We are experiencing the most dangerous revolution in world history: the revolution of the State against man. We are experiencing the worst idolatry of all time: the deification of the state."

-- Richard N. Coudenhove-Kalergi

The British frog has been sitting in the pot of water gradually being brought to a boil for decades.  But now it's jumped out of the pot.  Remains to be seen if the "chef" can catch and get it to sit in the boiling pot again.

First Comment from Glen:

God, you don't know how bad I want this article to be true, but for the life of me I just can't make myself believe this was nothing more than another evil scheme by the elites for some purpose we do not yet understand. I have spent my entire life waiting for someone or something to change the direction of not only America but the entire world, and yes I'm still waiting.
 In the article  "Brexit False Flag (Part 1): Gaslighting The Public" from the rga website it is 
pointed out that: "As always, when the Elites find a situation spiralling out of control, they do not allow events to 'play themselves out', following a trajectory which leads to an undesirable outcome. Instead, they create 'chaos' of some form, then within the chaos they can present their proposed solutions as the 'only' course of action, which allows them (via the Controlled Enemedia) to steer things back in their direction. This is Ordo Ab Chao (Order out of chaos), and the method is known as the Hegelian Dialectic."

 As I would so love to hoist a pint and drink to Britain's new found independence, I'm afraid I'm going to have to see what becomes of the whole mess. The proof as they say, will be in the pudding.

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Third World Tsunami Sinks EU"

IF said (June 28, 2016):

All I saw in this article was faith in politicians and hyping of the media's narrative of a "Brexit". It was an unbinding vote and the Bank of England still prints the world's money. How do citizens even know there was a vote?

Because a TV told them so and they threw a piece of paper in a bin. It saddens, embarrasses, and disappoints me that despite knowing from their own personal experiences and lives that people have no power over our political situation whatsoever, people still choose to fantasize about grandeur and look for salvation outside the Lord in politicians and your destroyed culture. You guys are dancing on the rubble as if you have no idea whats going on. Does the author want to recommend a football team too?

Marco said (June 27, 2016):

"We must not forget for minute that the BREXIT referendum was a gamble, a reaction of the political class to losing control of the narrative, and thus the British public. "

I disagree entirely. Our 'leaders' don't gamble, they have been creating and following agendas, consolidating world power for generations; they would never risk losing that power. Anyone who thinks that they make gambles, really doesn't understand what is going on in this world and is not being perceptive enough, I'm sorry if that causes offence.
The strategy we are witnessing right now is simply different methods to relieve public tension; they are doing this through Trump and more recently through Brexit. They never lose control for a moment, they are simply offering people little distractions and making them think they are making progress against 'them', when in reality everyone is still on their treadmill.

Can we all be mature adults and stop losing sight of who we are dealing with here? These people are demonic and incredibly clever, lets stop being stupid, these people are Freemasons etc.

They haven't lost a fight in God knows how long - a century? They would never let us win any ground, we are in their system.

Below-Exile in Thailand Better Than Exile at Home - US Retiree (scroll down)

Brexit- What is the Hidden Globalist Game?

June 26, 2016

Boris Johnson's stepmother Jenny, the second wife of his father Stanley, is the stepdaughter of Edward Sieff, the former chairman of Marks & Spencer

The prompt acceptance of the narrow referendum win should make you suspicious. Brexit is supposed to be a blow to the masonic Jew World Order. But all the usual suspects including the mass media supported it. What trick do the globalists have up their sleeve?

"Brexit is pure political theatre for the gullible masses and nothing more...Throughout the campaign, Brexiters lamented how the establishment was ranged against them, but in truth the reverse was the reality."

By Northsider
Brexit- Another Jewish Dialectic?

There is great rejoicing in much of the so called alternative media over the "Brexit" result in yesterday's British referendum on membership of the European Union. If more proof were needed that the alternative media is often misinformed and credulous, this is it.

Alternative types, from David Duke to David Icke, have of course been insisting for months that the Brexit movement represents a mighty blow against Zio-globalism. There may be some excuse for Duke to believe this guff: he is, after all, an American and presumably relies on British "white nationalists" for information about such matters. There is little or no excuse for British white nationalists themselves, or for British critics of Zionism like Icke, to be so deceived.

(l. Borris and his buddy in Masonic handshake)

Unless they have been paying very scant attention indeed, they should have noticed that the Brexit movement is overwhelmingly dominated not just by common or garden variety Zionists, but by hard-core Zionist ultras of a particularly toxic variety. For example, Boris Johnson, the part-Jewish de facto frontman for Brexit, describes himself as "a passionate Zionist" and supports with an equal passion both the corrupt City of London and mass migration to Europe.

But compared to Michael Gove, the other leading Tory Brexit spokesman and senior British cabinet member, Boris is a veritable peacenik. Gove has never seen a Zio-war he didn't like. A former journalist with the Zionist London Times newspaper, he once penned the following excruciating line about war criminal Blair: "I can't help myself! I love Tony!".

It's worth pointing out, by the way, that Johnson, and more especially Gove, are close personal friends of British Prime Minister David Cameron, which makes it, therefore, more than plausible to suggest that their dispute over Brexit is pure political theatre for the gullible masses and nothing more.

Chris Grayling, another senior Tory Brexiter, is a member of British Israel Communications and Research Centre (BICOM), a Zionist lobby group. When he was secretary of state for Justice and Lord Chancellor, Grayling declared war on "extremists", the working definition of which, he made clear, amounted to anyone who criticized Israel or the War on Terror.

Theresa Villiers, the British Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, and Brexiter, is an "officer" of the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) and ardent Zionist.

Iain Duncan Smith, a long standing supporter of Brexit, who resigned recently from his senior ministry in the Cameron government, also belongs to the CFI, as indeed do nearly all the leading Tory Brexiters.

Then there's Liam Fox, left, another Neocon ultra, who was forced to resign from his job as Secretary of State for Defence, after it was revealed that billionaire Israeli arms dealer, Poju Zabludowicz, was funding his jet setting playboy lifestyle, and that of his erstwhile "adviser" Adam Werrity.

It isn't just on the Tory side where Brexit goes with passionate Zionism. One of the small handful of Labour Party Brexit supporters was Gisela Stuart, a German born Zionist, and a member of the Neocon "Henry Jackson Society". Stuart received lavish media coverage throughout the campaign - courtesy of her Zionist friends at the BBC. Other Labour Brexit supporters like Kate Hoey and Frank Field, also strongly support Israel.


Then there's the media: Murdoch's soft-porn rags have fervently advocated for Brexit since well before the vote was called. Ditto the soft core porn Daily Mail, and the Daily Express, owned by Zionist hard-porn baron, Richard Desmond. The Telegraph is if anything even more Neocon than the Murdoch press, and likewise took a strong pro-Brexit stance. Even those media one might normally expect to be pro-EU adopted a distinctly ambivalent approach to the issue.

For example, the Guardian and the Independent published many articles in support of leaving the EU. By the same token, in one of the key televised debates on the Brexit issue, the BBC slanted the panel three to two in favour of Brexit. One of the two pro "spokespersons" ... was Eddie Izzard, a buffoonish and widely despised transvestite "comedian" who appeared on the panel with bright red lip stick, mascara, nail varnish and clad in a woman's jacket and blouse, and a pink beret. Not exactly an advocate designed to appeal to the undecided voters of  middle England...

(Julie Burchill of The Guardian, draped in Israeli flag, part of the pro-Brexit Pressitute corps.)

When it comes to individual journalists, the roll call of pro-Brexiters in general corresponded to the leading names in "Zio-presstitution": Julie Burchill, Douglas Murray, Charles Moore, Julia Hartley Brewer, Matthew Parris, Toby Young, Janet Daley, and even Peter Hitchens - who in spite of his stated reservations about western invasions around the world, always can be relied upon to stoutly defend the Israeli state. 

Throughout the campaign, Brexiters lamented how the establishment was ranged against them, but in truth the reverse was the reality. Indeed, ironically enough the corporate media eagerly spun the Leave campaign meme of the referendum as a David and Goliath contest between the plucky Brexit underdog and the nasty pro-EU ruling elite. Moreover, unlike the case of the Scottish independence referendum two years ago, there were very few corporate celebs rushing to support the pro-EU side.

In the Scottish referendum, almost anyone who was anyone in showbiz - Mick Jagger, Paul McCartney, Kate Moss, et al - put their name to a letter calling on Scotland to stay in the United Kingdom. No such closing of celeb ranks took place against Brexit - which in itself goes a long way to refuting the notion that Brexit was an anti-establishment cause.


So if the Zio-globalists favoured Brexit, what was their game? Not for the first time, the Russians seemed to have got closer to the reality than many of the western alternative media did.

Last week Putin suggested that Cameron had called the referendum in order to "blackmail" the rest of Europe. The evidence for this theory is compelling. It should be remembered that for all their self-serving chauvinistic rhetoric, the British Neocons don't dislike the EU on account of its control by corrupt transnationals and even more corrupt bankers: au contraire they want it to be even MORE controlled by these forces than it already is. 

The referendum was clearly a move to force the EU to undertake "root and branch reform", i.e., to surrender completely to Anglo-American Zionist warmongers and corporate privateers. In all the phoney euphoria over the Brexit result, it's easily forgotten that in so far as there has been opposition to Zionist war-mongering, surveillance and privatization within the EU, it has certainly not come from Britain.

Furthermore the desire of British Neocons to force the EU's hand is not really a secret: in the very early days of the referendum campaign, Boris Johnson and another leading Brexiter, former Tory leader, Michael Howard, both stated that a Brexit vote was a way of forcing Europe to make better terms with Britain.

For all its bellyaching, the British Zio-masonic state already gets much better terms from the EU than most European nations - not surprising since the EU is not, as British chauvinists of Hitchens' type ludicrously claim, a German imperialist project, but rather a vehicle for Anglo-American Zionist dominion.

For instance Angela Merkel agreed to take in a million refugees to Germany, while Britain has agreed to take in a paltry 20,000 over five years. By the same token the French are compelled by their Anglo-masters to oversee huge refugee camps on their northern coast - in order to prevent migrants making it to Britain.

None of the above is to in any way argue that opposition to the EU is misguided, but simply to illustrate that in this particular referendum there were no good guys. A triumph against globalism, Brexit most certainly was not.

Related- Jew Leads Bexit Reorganization Unit
------------Was Brexit Israel's Revenge?  Gilad Atzmon
------------"Brexit Will Strengthen UK-Israel Relationship"
------------EU Disintegration Irreversible-Soros
-----------------More evidence of hidden agenda? Farage Excluded 
------------------Brexit Plan- Worldwide economic collapse?

Makow comment:  Evidently the powers that be have decided that England can be a more effective instrument of Masonic central banker world tyranny outside the EU. Possibly England, as Illuminati HQ, is to be spared some of its ravages, like integrating more migrants and bailing out Greece ad infinitum.

First Comment from Kevin Boyle:

While much of Northsider's analysis about Zionists leading both sides of the Brexit debate is correct, it is ridiculous to suggest that the Zio-plan was a Brexit victory.

This is the greatest reversal the globalist Zionist project has suffered in a very long time. The effort at shuffling all their controlled sheep under a single tent in Europe has taken (what will probably prove to be) a deadly hit. There is no way this result is a good thing for the familiar Zio-playmakers.

Now they will change their game in ways that are difficult to foresee. They may judge that it is time for a major financial collapse or, perhaps, a new mega-war ... who knows?

The good thing is that increasing numbers understand what 'government' is or, more generally, are on to the reality that the 1%, as they get called (an inflated percentage), that own government are lying thieves who do not care about the rest of us at all.

As someone who moved around the country quite a bit before the referendum I can tell you that 'LEAVE' posters were everywhere and the  'REMAIN' side had very low public visibility by comparison. My own belief is that the real margin of victory was much greater than 52-48%. 70-30% at least ... that MI5 stuffed 'Remain' ballot papers into the Postal Votes boxes in a massive way but that they failed to go far enough with their interference. That they did not realize that the majority for Brexit was so overwhelming. (Postal votes are 20% of total poll and by law MUST be mixed with normal ballot papers before counting....thereby leaving an open door for undetectable fraud as a built-in part of our system). The counting itself is carried out by ordinary honest folk and the process at this stage cannot be manipulated.

The Zionists did NOT engineer this result, though they made arrangements that "sympathetic" leader types would be around to make the right noises to pacify the angry sheep after the vote.

They miscalculated. 
The phenomenon (akin to 'Trumpism) is well described by Scottish Professor Mark Blyth here.

Northsider replies to Kevin Boyle:

I fear Kevin Boyle is letting his love for the British nation - together with a large dollop of wishful thinking - govern his attitude to Brexit. He has not in any way refuted my point about the huge number of hardcore Zionists in the ranks of Brexit. Contrary to what he implies, this was far from a token presence, but overwhelming in both the political sphere and the media. In fact I only scratched the surface in those I named. Apart from Nigel Farage and George Galloway (both of whom were marginalised and pilloried by the main Leave campaign), almost all the political big names in the Brexit campaign were Zionist extremists. The same applies to most of the journalists who supported Brexit.

(left, Meanwhile Nigel Farage in Masonic handshake with UKIP MP Doug Carswell)

Again, contrary to what Mr Boyle implies, I never suggested that the result was rigged in favour of a Brexit.  I don't believe it needed to be. What I said was that the line spun by many British nationalist anti-Zionists (very much including Mr Boyle), that the "Zionist establishment" was terrified of a Brexit vote, is complete fantasy. When the Sun, the Telegraph, the Daily Mail, the Express  and most of the leading Neocons, are all on your side, it's safe to say you're not a plucky underdog. In fact many of the pro-Brexit journalists who kept insisting this was a titanic struggle against "the establishment" are themselves establishment mouthpieces, e.g. Richard Littlejohn, Tony Parsons, and Charles Moore. 

It's noteworthy that the Remain campaign has stated since the result that they were consistently "hobbled" by David Cameron and the British government, when they attempted to go on the offensive - raising the question of just how real the alleged  "vicious internecine feud" in the Tory Party was. (By the way another Zionist bonus in all of this is that it has facilitated a move to oust the bete noir of British Zionists, Jeremy Corbyn, from the Labour Party leadership.)

If that weren't enough to refute the  absurd "terrified establishment" thesis, George Soros is reported by the msm to have made a huge killing on the Brexit result.

Mr Boyle appears to take the Brexiters' claims of Euroscepticis at face value. Sooner than even I anticipated, they have already begun to row back on their pledge to completely withdraw from the EU -  a development which gives  further credence to Mr Putin's theory that the whole Brexit process was a move to blackmail Europe. Douglas Carswell, the Neocon mole within UKIP, has already stated that the Zionist ultras, Michael Gove, Chris Grayling, and Daniel Hannan, should lead Britain's team for the post-referendum negotiations. One can easily guess what will  top their list of priorities.

Since we're on that subject, I notice that Mr Boyle made no attempt to address my point about Britain's role as primary Neocon agent of influence within the EU. It is in fact the only major EU state, that, regardless of which party is in power, has supported all the Neocon wars. It also leads the field in implementing the Orwellian surveillance and Neo-liberal privatisation agendas. Gove, Grayling, Duncan Smith, and Carswell support all of these things, not to mention mass migration and SSM.

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Brexit- What is the Hidden Globalist Game?"

BF said (June 27, 2016):

Brilliant!! I believe this has been done to trigger the financial collapse and social unrest that the Globalts want and will exploit. Yes it is an attractive ruse or shall we say Trojan Horse?

It's worth pointing out, by the way, that Johnson, and more especially Gove, are close personal friends of British Prime Minister David Cameron, which makes it, therefore, more than plausible to suggest that their dispute over Brexit is pure political theatre for the gullible masses and nothing more.

Oliver Hansen said (June 27, 2016):

I read about a map from Orwell´s 1984. There the world is divided into 4 major regions. Interestingly England on that map is singled out from Europe and is part of “Oceania” (America/South Africa/Australia). All the rest of Orwell´s Europe is part of “Eurasia” (from Spain to Russian Pacific Coast). (Orwell Map)

Nevertheless according to the bureaucrat´s own numbers 51.9% Brits are not buying into the narrative. Sounds like the “scientific dictatorship” is running on 3 wheels.

Peter said (June 27, 2016):

So if Northsider is right with his analysis, is he saying it would have been a loss for the Zio establishment if the Remains had won? Some loss. Can they EVER lose? Or is this simply another attempt to spin a loss into a win for the Zios to make them appear all-powerful and invincible? Can they now be winners both ways? Something is not right here. If the Remains had won, it would surely have been presented as an establishment win.

James C said (June 27, 2016):

Why am I not surprised? The Zionists brought us World Wars I and II, and it looks as though they will bring us World War III. But the Zionists will never realized their dream of a one-world, debt-ruled superstate under their control.

James C said (June 27, 2016):

Why am I not surprised? The Zionists brought us World Wars I and II, and it looks as though they will bring us World War III. But the Zionists will never realized their dream of a one-world, debt-ruled superstate under their control.

IF said (June 26, 2016):

Henry, I'm not sure what the fuss about the "Brexit" is. The media already had a hashtag nicname for this BS before it even was confirmed? People do realize of course that the Bank of England IS the first central bank of the fractional reserve system, and still is a top member of the groups of central banks that make up the Federal Reserve and the central banks of the other countries. So whether the Uk are in the "EU" or not, the same bank still prints the money. I'm sorry to say, but I'm sure those in the Illuminati relay on this gullibility of the common people to push their agenda. It really is sad and embarrassing to see white people glorify the Brexit as some kind of show of you are still owned by the same banks. It's sad to say it is this gullibility and false enthusiasm that characterizes the elite's attitude towards the white masses.

As a Jew I know that among some Jews there is a scornful attitude for the seeming gullibility and blind gung hoism of the Caucasian culture. I would like to see the English free themselves too, but if they think this is freedom they won't get far.

Tony B said (June 26, 2016):

I have to agree more with the Boyle comment. For one thing, in all the web sites I visit for information I had not seen one single comment even close to what the interestingly anonymous "Northsider" claims was common media rhetoric before the vote. One would reasonably expect that at least one would have picked up comments by the elite and warned against it. Perhaps the elite was only "talking" to itself.

Also, it should be common knowledge by now that the EU control is ONLY at the prostitute governing top in every last European nation; that the common people of every EU nation want out and back to being their own nation under their own control. Thus the Brexit vote, which you can bet was as criminally corrupted for "STAY" as the money powers could possibly corrupt it, was NOT what those powers wanted as it could very well preview a complete breakup of their European conquest with multiple overthrows of those paper-thin ranks of Rothschild prostitutes in charge. Makes me believe the actual vote to leave may have been as high as 90%.

Of course, the Rothschild cabal of the City of London will do everything possible to make some sort of gain out of the vote but it will be a re-building gain, not a further enslavement of Europe. Remember, these satanic egoists had confidently expected to have undisputed rule of the whole world by the year 2000.

--Northsider replies re anonymity:

Perhaps Mr "B" (how's that for irony?) is unaware of the various hate speech laws which exist in Europe - in which case he shouldn't really be commenting on European issues. If he IS aware of such laws, perhaps he feels brave enough to visit, say London, and tweet some of the stuff he says here under his own name, and see how long it is before he ends up in a police cell. If he accepts this challenge, I'll be suitably impressed. If he doesn't, I think it would be better for him to keep quiet about other people's motives.

Ryan said (June 26, 2016):

It seems obvious to me that the elite would secretly favor Brexit. With several European countries now vying for a possible exit from the EU; this would cause considerable chaos to not only Europe but world markets and inflame the already volatile manufactured migrant crisis/immigration situation . It seems quite clear they are sticking to their masonic mantra - Order out of chaos.

Below- Real Men Want Real Women (scroll down)

Exile in Thailand Better Than Exile at Home - US Retiree

June 25, 2016


Marcus who retired to Bangkok says the many drawbacks are manageable compared to the increasing "insanity of the West."




(Disclaimer- We are not endorsing sexual mores described herein.)  

by Marcus 

I am a retired businessman from the USA, now living in Thailand for 10 years.  This is encouragement for other white men that escape is possible and life outside The West can be safe and pleasant. 

 My primary goals in escaping were:

1. Escape from the worship of Negros that has overwhelmed my country, the USA.  2. Escape from Femi-Nazis.  Escape from the social construct that females are always right and men are always wrong.  3. Escape from the suffocating insanity of political correctness, "PC".  4. Escape from the mushrooming "security state".  Everywhere cameras, security inspections, ID badges, and the overwhelming gloom of suspicion.  

 I've found that life outside The West can be far more safe, and very pleasant, too. albeit not heaven on earth.  For the first year, my yearnings for warm weather, exotic food, available women, etc, were totally satisfied here.  But then, slowly, things began to go change.  My honeymoon here came to an end. 

The smiling mask of "welcome" started to come off once the locals realized that I was living here, not just visiting.  They had been happy to see me staying at an expensive hotel, eating in tourist restaurants, spending big money, and leaving tips.  But they were not so pleased to see me at the local supermarket buying bread, cheese, and mayonnaise to make lunch at home.   I hadn't expected that change in attitude.  

Staying in a hotel is wonderful:  inviting swimming pool, maid service every morning, room service 24 hours.  On the other hand, renting a local apartment is quite different.   Yes, a swimming pool, but the water is dirty green because the filter hasn't been cleaned in months.  Hiring a maid to to clean and do laundry is awkward if you don't speak her  language.   Plus, finding a maid who won't steal too much is even more difficult.  Those cheese sandwiches are far less glamorous than room service.  So full time living here is not at all like a vacation holiday.  Still, compared to the risks "back home", I'll stay here.


The surrounding culture here can be difficult in unexpected ways. For example, in The West we expect most things to work, most of the time.  If something doesn't work, we expect someone to come and fix it: elevator, traffic light, restaurant meal gone wrong.  Whatever it is, we assume it will be fixed.


Not like that out here.  In Thailand, things often just don't work as expected.  And if I say something -- perhaps I ordered a chocolate milk shake, but was served strawberry flavor -- they don't want to know about it.  To them, even a small mistake is a big embarrassment.   To avoid the embarrassment, they avoid knowing. 

And, often, they don't know how to fix things that have gone wrong.   So, in order to avoid embarrassment, their response is often stunningly irrational.  For example, sometimes, the elevators in my condo building just stop working for a few minutes.  They don't fall down with a crash, but just stop moving up or down.   Nobody does anything, because nobody knows what to do.  In response, building management put up signs saying something like, "These elevators are professionally maintained.  Don't panic.  You are perfectly safe."  Doesn't solve the problem, but management can say, "We put up signs!  What more do you want?"  Putting up signs is a frequent response to things not working.  Actually making repairs happens far less.  And preventive maintenance, almost never.  

In The West we assume that most people will be honest most of the time.  Not all the time, and not all people, but most.  Out here that assumption is reversed.  Here most people lie, most of the time.  

As for Political Correctness, there is very little risk from that.  Of course, all governments everywhere wish to limit what individuals can say in public.  Now, here in Thailand, with a military government, you might think there are police behind every palm tree listening to what people are saying.  I live in Bangkok.  Can't remember the last time I saw a policeman -- other than weekday afternoons, in front of the nearby school, directing traffic.   

There is, however, one limit to speech here.  Unlike PC, where there are lots of restrictions in the US, here the limit is very clear:  Local people may not talk about the military government.  That's it.  Easy to follow.  But back in The West, what can a white man talk about?  So many topics are "forbidden" by political correctness and the topics change so often.  Protected minorities can say anything at all, but a white man must endure in silent acceptance, or else risk losing his job, or possible arrest, or something else very unpleasant.

Here, unless one violates that one, forbidden, topic mentioned above, chances are you will never be bothered by the "security state".  


So, what about the women?  White men in The West have been starved for female attention for so long, that even just a hint of a smile can feel like true love.  Here in Thailand, there are a lot of smiles.  But, please, be careful.  A smile here is usually just a gesture of greeting, just a way to say, "hello", nothing more.  Still, for an older, white man, even a smile like that is so much better than what's available to us in The West these days.


Is there anything behind the smiles of the women here?  Well, yes, it's true, sex is easily available.  But it is also true that a man is expected to pay for it.   Here, they don't "fall in love".  To have sex with a woman is easy.  But to have sex without paying, one way or another, is dangerous.  The payment is a measure of the woman's self-worth.  If you don't pay, she feels severely damaged, as if she had been robbed and raped.  Here, if that happens, watch out!

Beyond the sex, what are the females like?  In all my observations, most are empty-headed.   But not stupid.  Quite clever, actually, in some ways.    Sparkling, witty, funny, too.   But anything resembling intelligence or rational thinking is just not on the menu here.  Compared to back in The West, that's no problem.  I hadn't seen anything resembling rational thinking in Western females for many years.  Here, none of that either, but easy sex, and with far less risk.  I can bear it.

If you are interested in more conversation about these topics, I've asked Henry to provide my email address below. 

[email protected]

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Exile in Thailand Better Than Exile at Home - US Retiree "

FS said (June 27, 2016):

Great reasons, the author provides, to stay far away from Thailand: a disease-ridden, mutually exploitive flesh-pot set up by the Powers That Be since the start of the Viet Nam war as the world's one-stop shopping whore house, catering to every manner of fetish, perversion and moral abomination.

An escape for frustrated, socially inept male sexual refugees from one of their traps into another, taking pressure off the coddled prick teasers of the West to put out and giving 3rd World women economic independence of their men on the cheap, plus initiating the world into Their depraved sex cult. Make no mistake, they see them coming and are duely taking note.

Magda said (June 25, 2016):

Your writer today Marcus has left the US for reasons similar to those for which many "privileged" minorities leave and more. It would have been interesting for myself if he had realized that many do not feel privileged but are in a similar condition. We are all being played against each other and no one feels safe from persecution. Also, there is nothing offensive about his article except his self oppression in paying for something that shouldn't be paid for. PS Malaysia is better run than his description of Thailand and he would have been married by now with kids in a loving marriage had he wished it. Many women in most countries need husbands and want kids.)

To Marcus: I understand your frustration, but you will NEVER find a geographical solution to what is said (June 25, 2016):

To Marcus: I understand your frustration, but you will NEVER find a geographical solution to what is a spiritual dilemma everywhere in this world, which is fallen and corrupt by design. My fantasy used to be one of living in a different time, pre-feminist. pre-PC, pre-beast system etc. Sounds great, but impossible, and those times had their drawbacks, too.

Seek first the Kingdom of God and know that He wins in the end. Just my humble 2 cents, hopefully without getting preachy. The problem of being alienated from women and being isolated is no small thing. Where I am, people actually get married young and stay that way! Great, but I'm a transplant, so there's nothing left for me. After a while, you begin to realize that women aren't everything, and the more you fixate on not having a wife, the more miserable you become. OK, that's all.

The Latest news from Brazil by Marcos

June 23, 2016

The Olympics will be a failure. Rio is dirty, chaotic and dangerous. Ironically, the scare that everybody is talking about, zika virus, is a hoax, as nobody is sick in the city. It is easier to get shot than to get the virus. Be as it may, the motto for the games has been chosen:   A New World (Order).

by Marcos

Glenn Greenwald now has a good excuse for writing lies in Russian government websites, defending the corrupt Marxist government of Brazil: he did it for love.

His Brazilian gay lover, David Miranda, will run for Rio's City Council by the PSOL party, a radical marxist party which supports Dilma's Workers's Party. It is a bunch of deranged communists. One of its founders was Achille Loro, an Italian terrorist who set fire to the sons of an adversary (one of them an 8 year-old boy) but fled to Brazil. 

This happened in the same week the country found out that another ally, the Communist Party, was getting 30% in bribes in housing construction projects for the poor they say they protect. Becoming a leftist politician means being on the receiving end of a never ending flow of financial help, bribes and all kinds of subsidies for parties and NGOs. It doesn't matter that the country may be bankrupt and people starving. Greenwald's lover has his retirement plan set.

With little more than a month to go to the Olympics, Rio is officially bankrupt and not paying its (too many) public employees. Last week, a gang of drug dealers with automatic rifles and grenades invaded a hospital and rescued one of their brethren, killing a passer-by and wounding others. It was also revealed that criminals patrol the avenue from the airport to town, with machine guns and rifles. Any foreign dignitary coming to the Games will pass right in front of their rifle scopes.

Today the former Minister of Planning for Dilma, Paulo Bernardo, was arrested. The man is also the husband of a Workers Party senator who is in the front of Dilma's defense. He was stealing from public pensioners and sharing his gains with the party. Dilma is being impeached for one crime, but she has six other crimes that can be used against her. The woman is such a mafia boss that even the motorcycle of a friend who became famous by giving her rides in Brasilia was confiscated by the police.

As predicted in this site, the only potential conservative candidate (not aligned with the globalists) for 2018 elections, Bolsonaro, a former Army parachuter captain,  was framed and may not run anymore. Some time ago, a Marxist Congresswoman called him falsely a rapist, and he said jokingly that he would never rape her because she was too ugly. Bad taste, maybe, but a joke in response to defamation (this, a real crime). The Leftist Supreme Court judges want to strip him of political rights for that. These judges are puppets of the Workers Party and have been sitting on Lula's lawsuit for months.

What is interesting is that we know now why there was so much effort and propaganda from the Left about the fake rape of a girl in Rio last month. It was a frenzy. They needed the public outcry in order to convict Bolsonaro, because otherwise it would have been too clear that the judges were doing the work for political reasons. A masterful plan.

There is no end to the flow of news about corruption and scandals, now that Dilma can't stop the investigations. Huge mobile company "Oi", the one which paid bribes to Lula's son, went bankrupt, leaving debts of US$ 20 BI. Most of the debt is conveniently with state banks (approved by Lula) so the poor citizens will carry the burden. 

In another scandal, it was discovered that the presidential campaign and the jet for Marina Silva (Prince Phillip's darling) and her partner Eduardo Campos were paid with bribes. The jet went down in 2014 with candidate Campos in it. Now the head of the bribe scandal was found "suicided" in a motel in his home state of Pernambuco. The only viable candidate left seems to be Aecio Neves, about whom Lord Rothschild said he would be the future president of Brazil.

The chaos and misery we see in Brazil are prototypes of what is coming to the rest of the world. Marxism creates scorched earth so the new world order can advance quicker. Watch and learn.


June 19, 2016


A talk by Jeanice Barcelo, left, about the plot to effectuate dramatic changes in our sexual behavior and attitudes. Jeanice shows pornography is a product of satanic occultism. 

Description by Jeanice:  

Tonight I came across an article stating that 40% of U.S. babies are born to unmarried women.  This article was rather shocking in its content and reminded me of how important it is for people to understand the forces that have driven the concept of "family" into the gutter and used us to create a world that is filled with single parents, fatherless children and endless suffering from the wounds of abandonment and rejection.

In my double DVD set on pornography and the deliberate manipulation of human sexuality, I show how the Luciferian bloodlines have orchestrated the mind control of the American people and totally altered our beliefs and behavior in the realm of sex and relationships. The dark forces did this with the help of Professor Alfred Kinsey (pedophile and sadomasochist) who, through his child raping "research," claimed that children are "sexual from birth," and can benefit from having sex with adults. Kinsey also claimed that women are like cats in heat -- although the difference between human females and felines is that cats "have sex" in order to reproduce, whereas, according to Kinsey, human women just want to get off -- all the time, as much as possible, and without restraint. 

According to Kinsey, what women really want is unrestrained physical pleasure and to hell with the spiritual and psychic consequences of their carnal activity (which consequences include the murder of infants while they are still in the womb as well as the birth of billions of haphazardly conceived children who are gestated in wombs where they are not wanted and who are imprinted for life with the idea that they are not loved and not lovable and will never be loved or wanted).

Kinsey's "research" was cited by Hugh Hefner in the first publication of Playboy, which was released the very same year Kinsey's book about female sexuality was released (1953). All of this was orchestrated and paid for by the Rockefeller Foundation (i.e., the Rockenfelders who are Luciferian Jews). This was also the basis of the "sexual revolution" and the "women's liberation" movement, which led to the legalization of abortion and the creation of the highly satanic and evil organization known as Planned Parenthood.

In just 50 years after the publication of Kinsey's research (along with the mainstreaming of pornography into American culture by Luciferian Jews), the number of women giving birth to children who will likely be fatherless jumped from 3.8% to more than 40%. This is because women have bought into the lies about so-called "female sexuality" and "women's lib" and have come to believe their carnal activity is good for them and the way the Creator wanted it. Nothing could be further from the Truth. And American children (as well as children worldwide) are suffering.

To learn more about what I have just shared, I encourage you to check out my double DVD set and share the information widely. People need to understand what is being done to us -- and the fact that these same Luciferian forces have now moved pornography into kindergarten classrooms (with the help of Planned Parenthood's "Comprehensive Sexual Education Program," of course) should concern us greatly. This "curriculum" is preparing children for pedophilia -- which is exactly what Kinsey and the Rockefellers were after all along.

Here is a link to check out the DVD set.  Thank you for taking the time to check it out.

"Anti-Semitism" Trickery by Bishop Williamson

June 18, 2016

images (51).jpeg
Is "antisemite" wielded like a sword?  Just ask the wielder to define the word.

by Bishop Williamson

There are treacherous words which seem to mean one thing and are used to mean quite another. One of the most treacherous words of all is "anti-semitism." The word seems to mean opposition to all Jews purely and simply because they are Jews, and in this sense it rightly condemns something bad, because some Jews are wicked, but certainly not all. On the other hand it is often used to condemn absolutely any opposition to anything that any Jews do, and then the word is wrongly condemning something good, because whenever Jews do anything bad then opposition to them is good. But do Jews do things bad? Obviously. They created Islam for Arabs, Freemasonry for Gentiles and Communism for the modern world, all three primarily to fight Jesus Christ and Christianity, and so send souls to Hell.

A book which all Catholics should read who wish to defend the Church against Islam, Freemasonry and Communism, now Globalism, is The Plot Against the Church by Maurice Pinay. The book was written just before Vatican II to be put into the hands of all Council Fathers, to warn them of the great danger in which the Church would find herself at the Council. Sure enough. The Council Fathers ended up praising Islam (Unitatis Redintegratio),adopting Freemasonic principles (Dignitatis Humanae) and never mentioning, still less condemning, the evil system of Communism. Here is how in his Chapter on "Antisemitism and Christianity" Maurice Pinay analyses the treachery of the word "antisemitism":--

Down the ages the Jews have always used vague words with a variety of meanings, writes Pinay, to snare Gentile minds and so prevent them from defending themselves against the Jewish drive towards world domination in that 2,000-year war on Christianity which he carefully documents throughout his book. So in a first stage, by three arguments they seek to prevail upon Gentile leaders to condemn "antisemitism" in its first sense, given above, of opposition to everything and everybody Jewish: firstly, Christ, by establishing the equality of all men before God, condemned any such degrading of a whole race; secondly, Christ told all men to "love one another"; thirdly, Christ and his Mother were both Jewish.

But in a second stage the Jews, having once obtained the Gentiles' condemnation of a vague "antisemitism," then proceed to give the word a quite different meaning, the second sense above, of any and all opposition to anything whatsoever that Jews do. Thus "antisemites" become: all patriots exerting their right of self-defence against Jewish subversion of their country; all defenders of the family against the errors and vices of all sorts fomented by the Jews to dissolve it (e.g. abortion, pornography); all Catholics defending their holy religion against every form of corruption being openly or secretly promoted by the Jews to undermine it; all truth-tellers unmasking Jews as the originators of Freemasonry and Communism (now of Globalism and feminism, etc.); and all people in general opposing Jewish subversion of the Church and of Christian civilisation. And by their control of politics, finance, films and above all by their media, the Jews have succeeded in giving such an electric charge to this one little word "anti-semite," that it is enough to electrocute anyone that it touches.

But who is foolish enough to have allowed them to control politics and finance? Who has allowed them to virtually monopolise the film industry and the media? Who thinks it is so smart to have done away with all censorship and is now co-operating with them to enable them to censor the Internet? Gentile liberals in every case, who are therefore being enslaved, by the minute, in their New World Order. Doctor, cure thyself! For who that reads their newpapers or watches their television programmes has anybody to blame but himself for letting them take over his mind,and his civilisation?

Catholics, read The Plot against the Church. If anybody is accusing you of being an "antisemite," it is quite possible you have reason to be proud.

Kyrie eleison.