Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Below- Russian Sovereignty is under Attack- Putin (scroll down)

Profit Motive Drives US Police State

July 25, 2014

Whatever else the US police state is intended to accomplish, it is also a boondoggle.

The rationalizations for the American police state are
merely excuses for the growth of a government behemoth,
which helps corporations profit from a society
kept under lockdown and in fear.

Makow Note- This was the first I heard of "Fusion Centers," a network of more than 70 Orwellian "operations centers" throughout the US. It seems to be an infrastructure to deal with a  domestic insurgenc, i.e. popular revolution.. 

The Stealing of America by the Cops, the Courts, the Corporations and Congress

John-Whitehead.jpgBy John W. Whitehead
(Condensed by

Instead of Robin Hood stealing from the rich to feed the poor, you've got the government and its merry band of corporate thieves stealing from the poor to fatten the rich. In this way, the poor get poorer and the rich get richer. All the while, the American Dream of peace, prosperity, and liberty has turned into a nightmare of endless wars, debilitating debt, and outright tyranny.

What Americans don't seem to comprehend is that if the government can arbitrarily take away your property, have no true rights. You're nothing more than a serf or a slave.

In this way, the police state with all of its little more than a front for ... laundering as much money as possible through government agencies and into the bank accounts of corporations.

wolves1.jpgThe rationalizations for the American police state are many. There's the so-called threat of terrorism, the ongoing Drug War, the influx of illegal immigrants, the threat of civil unrest in the face of economic collapse, etc. However, as I point out in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, the real motivating factor behind erecting a police state is not to protect the people, but to further enrich the powerful.

Consider the following costly line items, all part of the government's so-called quest to keep us safe and fight terrorism while entrenching the police state, enriching the elite, and further shredding our constitutional rights:

*$34 billion for police departments to add to their arsenals of weapons and equipment. Since President Obama took office, police departments across the country "have received tens of thousands of machine guns; nearly 200,000 ammunition magazines; thousands of pieces of camouflage and night-vision equipment; and hundreds of silencers, armored cars and aircraft."

*$6 billion in "proceeds of crime" assets seized...because police "suspect" they may be connected to criminal activity. Then whether or not any crime is actually proven, the cops keeps the citizen's property. Eighty percent of these asset forfeiture cases result in no charge against the property owner. ...

*$61 billion for the Department of Homeland Security, one of the most notoriously bloated government agencies ever created. The third largest federal agency behind the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense, the DHS--with its 240,000 full-time workers and sub-agencies--has been aptly dubbed a "runaway train."

fc_31.jpg*$1.4 billion for "fusion centers." These fusion centers, which represent the combined surveillance and intelligence efforts of federal, state and local law enforcement, have proven to be exercises in incompetence, often producing irrelevant, useless or inappropriate intelligence, while spending millions of dollars on "flat-screen televisions, sport utility vehicles, hidden cameras and other gadgets."

*$80 billion spent on incarceration by the states and the federal government in 2010. While providing security, housing, food, medical care, etc., for six million Americans is a hardship for cash-strapped states, it's a gold mine to profit-hungry corporations such as Corrections Corp of America and GEO Group, the leaders in the partnership corrections industry. Thus, with an eye toward increasing its bottom line, CCA has floated a proposal to prison officials in 48 states offering to buy and manage public prisons at a substantial cost savings to the states. In exchange, the prisons would have to contain at least 1,000 beds and states would have to maintain a 90% occupancy rate for at least 20 years. This has led to the phenomenon of overcriminalization of everyday activities, in which mundane activities such as growing vegetables in your yard or collecting rainwater on your property are criminalized, resulting in jail sentences for individuals who might otherwise have never seen the inside of a jail cell.

fusion_centers_map.png*93 cents an hour for forced, prison labor in service to for-profit corporations .... A good portion of the 2 million prisoners in public facilities are forced to work for corporations, making products on the cheap, undermining free laborers... "Prison labor reportedly produces 100 percent of military helmets, shirts, pants, tents, bags, canteens, and a variety of other equipment. Prison labor makes circuit boards for IBM, Texas Instruments, and Dell. Many McDonald's uniforms are sewn by inmates. Other corporations--Microsoft, Victoria's Secret, Boeing, Motorola, Compaq, Revlon, and Kmart--also benefit from prison labor."

*$84.9 million collected in one year by the District of Columbia as a result of tickets issued by speeding and traffic light cameras stationed around the city. Multiply that income hundreds of times over to account for the growing number of localities latching onto these revenue-generating, photo-enforced camera schemes, and you'll understand why community governments and police agencies are lining up in droves to install them, despite reports of wide scale corruption by the companies operating the cameras. Although nine states have banned the cameras, they're in 24 states already and rising.

prison.jpg(left, the US has over 2.2 million people in prison, about 6 times as many as China
on a per capita basis.)


In sum, the American police state is a multi-billion dollar boondoggle, meant to keep the property and the resources of the American people flowing into corrupt government agencies and their corporate partners.

For those with any accounting ability, it's clear that the total sum of the expenses being charged to the American taxpayer's account by the government add up to only one thing: the loss of our freedoms.

It's time to seriously consider a plan to begin de-funding this beast and keeping our resources where they belong: in our communities, working for us.

Read this article about Fusion Centers

Most people aren't aware of Fusion Centers, but the people who are, are wondering what they are and what they do! Are they part of the local, state, federal government, military? Do they collect information on militias, illegal aliens, big businesses who are doing illegal things, you, me? And who pays for them, communities, state, federal government, military? Are they privately owned? A lot of questions, but not many answers in the public media.

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Profit Motive Drives US Police State"

JG said (July 25, 2014):

he unelected Neo Cons that have been ruling Washington since 911 under the Bush Administration have used their unwarranted power to create a plethora of new government agencies that they themselves control.

The agency of Homeland Security was designed to protect this newly unelected government from within against a possible revolt by the masses who are against the coming suspension of almost all their liberties that were guaranteed by their once Constitutional Republic. 911 suspended the US Constitution and it will never return again.
Any nation, organization, or group of people that demand their sovereignty from these anti national agents of World Marxism are classified as terrorists.

Yes, the War on Terror has been declared on the American Silent Majority who George W. Bush and now Barack Obama have abandoned.

Below- Flashback: Mainstreaming Homosexuality 1967-2014 (scroll down)

Russian Sovereignty Under Attack- Putin

July 24, 2014

aaaPutin.jpg"The very notion of state sovereignty is being washed out."


A reader tipped me to an important statement made by Vladimir Putin Tuesday
to the Russian Security Council at the Kremlin. Russia is under attack
by the globalists who wish to exploit internal divisions to destabilize Russia and install a
puppet, as they have done in so many places. Russia cannot be expected to turn its back
on fellow Russians living in E. Ukraine. The ABM system installed by NATO in Poland and inevitably in Ukraine is an offensive system. Russia must be prepared for war. 
I think Putin's opposition to the Illuminati banker-controlled NWO (or "unipolar world" as he puts it) is credible. The Illuminati Jews and their Masonic proxies are sowing the seeds for WW3.  We in the West will get what we deserve for allowing them to subvert society.

Here are key excerpts from his statement:

However, ever more frequently today we hear of ultimatums and sanctions. The very notion of state sovereignty is being washed out. Undesirable regimes, countries that conduct an independent policy or that simply stand in the way of somebody's interests get destabilized. Tools used for this purpose are the so-called colour revolutions, or, in simple terms - takeovers instigated and financed from the outside.

The focus is of course on internal problems. Any country always has plenty of problems, especially the more unstable states, or states with a complicated regime. Problems do exist, still it is not clear why they should be used to destabilize and break down a country - something we see rather frequently in various parts of the world.

Frequently the forces used here are radical, nationalist, often even neo-fascist, fundamental forces, as was the case, unfortunately, in many post-Soviet states, and as is the case with Ukraine now. What we see is practically the same thing.

People came to power through the use of armed force and by unconstitutional means. True, they held elections after the takeover, however, for some strange reason, power ended up again in the hands of those who either funded or carried out this takeover. Meanwhile, without any attempt at negotiations, they are trying to suppress by force that part of the population that does not agree with such a turn of events.

At the same time, they present Russia with an ultimatum: either you let us destroy the part of the population that is ethnically, culturally and historically close to Russia, or we introduce sanctions against you. This is a strange logic, and absolutely unacceptable, of course.

Undoubtedly, such methods will not work with Russia. The recipes used regarding weaker states fraught with internal conflict will not work with us. Our people, the citizens of Russia will not let this happen and will never accept this.

However, attempts are clearly being made to destabilize the social and economic situation, to weaken Russia in one way or another or to strike at our weaker spots, and they will continue primarily to make us more agreeable in resolving international issues.

So-called international competition mechanisms are being used as well (this applies to both politics and the economy); for this purpose, the special services' capabilities are used, along with modern information and communication technologies and dependent, puppet non-governmental organizations - so-called soft force mechanisms. [i.e. NGO's] This, obviously, is how some countries understand democracy.

We have to give an adequate response to such challenges, and, most importantly, to continue working in a systematic way to resolve the issues that carry a potential risk for the unity of our country and our society.

NATOexpansion (2).jpgI also feel that we must think about additional steps to decrease the dependence of the national economy and financial system on negative external factors. I am not just referring to instability in global markets, but possible political risks as well....

Fourth, our Armed Forces remain the most important guarantor of our sovereignty and Russia's territorial integrity. We will react appropriately and proportionately to the approach of NATO's military infrastructure toward our borders, and we will not fail to notice the expansion of global missile defence systems and increases in the reserves of strategic non-nuclear precision weaponry.

We are often told that the ABM system is a defence system. But that's not the case. This is an offensive system; it is part of the offensive defence system of the United States on the periphery. Regardless of what our foreign colleagues say, we can clearly see what is actually happening: groups of NATO troops are clearly being reinforced in Eastern European states, including in the Black and Baltic seas. And the scale and intensity of operational and combat training is growing. In this regard, it is imperative to implement all planned measures to strength our nation's defence capacity fully and on schedule, including, of course, in Crimea and Sevastopol, where essentially we need to fully recreate the military infrastructure.
Related- Look at the diabolical spin in the Masonic Jewish press:
If Putin isn't Punished, Europe Risks Wider War  and
Why Putin Can't Back Down Now
as usual, the aggressors make themselves out to be victims

------MH-17 Atrocity is Another Illuminati False Flag
NATO Poland base may be prepared for blitz against Russia

First Comment by Sandeep:

I think that it becomes more apparent that Putin is not a NWO puppet, but someone who seems to have a conscious left. You see it in his actions and his words. Though he cloaks what he really tries to say in 'code language', using terms like 'unipolar world' when he really means 'New World Order', people who are politically awake understand what he is trying to say. I have not seen any world leader here who has spoken so sincerely about national sovereignty, NATO aggression, etc. I understand why people say that Putin is just another puppet because he plays along with the game at times and certain institutions are part of the banking establishment, but to me it appears that all that is crumbling as well. As it was stated recently 'Putin betrayed the NWO'.

To take a different approach, I recently found out that Putin was a great admirer of Alexander Solzhenitsyn who criticised Communism as a complete evil failure and even criticised Gorbachov and Yeltsin as weak leaders (Gorbachov was probably a banker agent who gets a lot of speech time in the West to promote the New World Order, and Yeltsin was just a complete drunk) who sold out Russia to the West and only continued Russia's misery from the Communist times. On the other hand, he praised Putin shortly before his death as someone who was 'helping nation rediscover what it was to be Russian'

Solzhenitsyn foresaw that the US was going to collapse due to moral decadence in a speech he gave in front of a Harvard class when he lived in the US. He believed that Communism wasn't what Russia really represented, suggesting that a real Russia would be revealed in the future, where the Russian Orthodox faith with its spirituality, rituals, etc would be in the centre of society (he was a deeply religious, Russian Orthodox due to his experiences during the Communist reign). He also said that the government should control the markets and not the other way around and guarantee wealth and well-being to its citizens. For more detailed information read this very interesting article 'Solzhenitsyn and the Struggle for Russia's Soul':

Does this look like what Putin did and tries to do coincidentally? Yes, because under him Russian Orthodoxy saw a massive reemergence in Russia, the state controls the market and not the other way around, and I believe from what I am observing that Putin tries to help the people in his country. Of course Russia has a lot of problems, in big part due to the banker imposed Communist horror, but also due to natural problems every nations has, like Putin points out in his speech correctly, but the essential thing is he is trying to do something about it. Solzhenitsyn was a great mind, and I think Putin was influenced by him.

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Russian Sovereignty Under Attack- Putin "

CF said (July 25, 2014):

Putin is not only former, top level KGB, but he constantly waxes nostalgic, to his inner circle, over the good 'ole Soviet days. He hypes the strong man image as part of his new hero role (possibly also cover for less acceptable sexual proclivities). There are also reports Putin is a high ranking Mason.

His military have been preparing seriously for global conflict for a very long time. When asked by his generals, a few years ago, «What should we prepare for?» Putin replied, «Armageddon!» Russian and China now run joint military exercises with increasing frequency. Meanwhile, the U. S. Military has never been so messed up, and spread so thin... all by design.

The collapse of the former Soviet Union was a ruse, a giant, slick slight of hand trick. What solid evidence did Americans have? What did they really see?... Just a handful of old, rotting Soviet ships, in some old ship junkyard - on the MSM, and some fancy speeches. Like gullible dopes, most people bought it.

Look up the video of Bush and Putin, giving each other signals, at the Birds Nest Stadium, in China, during the Olympics. Look up the video of Obama promising (directly to the top echelon) something good for the Soviets, oops, I mean Russians. «Please tell Vlad, I'll be able to do a LOT more after I WIN the (re)election.» The West has been deeply, horrifically betrayed.

What is happening now is ALL part of a very slick, dark script. Only this time, America is playing the role of «bad guy», and the Soviet Union,... er, I mean, Russia plays «savior.» The corporations already know the USSR, er, Russia, will be part of and controlling the entire EU. They even put it on their corporate (business zones) maps! And it doesn't stop there.

Anyone who thinks they are witnessing someone who is not part of «The Club», who is not deeply invested in this new Great (END) Game, is seriously not paying attention.

BW said (July 25, 2014):

Stop with the Putin our savior against the NWO nonsense already...

Putin is a former KGB mafia punk who is worth an estimated $40 billion

because he stole large from ex soviet state assets

and is also a pedophile according to the dead Russian-British spy Litvinenko

Search for the picture of Putin kissing the tummy of an unknown boy.

This idolization of Putin makes me sick

How stupid are you people?


Marcos said (July 25, 2014):

It may be true that Putin is part of a Eastern Marxist group with China in opposition to the Western Illuminati. However, this doesn't make him a good guy.

Last week, before he came to the BRICS meeting, he made a visit to Raul Castro in Cuba. Cuba has been the main sponsor of a Marxist Latin America for 50 years, and now is close to achieving total success, always with the support and training from the KGB. Putin himself has been a good help in selling guns to murderer dictator Chavez in Venezuela and now is in talks with populist Marxist Argentina in order to build a nuclear plant and a jet fighter factory in the country.
Remember that all BRICS countries are Marxist, oppressive regimes.

Putin is also a disciple of Alexander Dugin, a crazy Marxist/fascist who aims to achieve a new Eurasian Empire led by Russia, who has openly defended the killing of Ukrainians and take over of the country and who absolutely hates the United States.

OR said (July 25, 2014):

Just an advice to,the Illuminati Jews and their Masonic proxies & the Illuminati banker-controlled NWO.

Get a OUIJA board & ask Napoleon & Adolph, if an attack upon Russia is a good idea???

Anonymous said (July 25, 2014):

Part of me thinks it's all theater for the deluded masses. I truly hope Putin is indeed genuine. It seems this is all a diversion from other things. He, himself, is removing rights from his citizens as our government continues to do.

Revelation does speak of "The Bear" sweeping in from the north. And it looks like there is growing disdain across the globe for Israel. I am no advocate of their actions, but it is plausible they'll be surrounded as is prophesied soon.

Who knows what the truth is anymore? Did we ever?

C said (July 25, 2014):

I notice that he is giving some sort of cryptic hand gesture here

Look here the USA takes orders from the UN which takes orders from the global power brokers . It is written in the document that founds the UN

the US is made to look the enemy so the UN can be the "good cop " , when it falls apart . NATO is an offshoot of the UN

99% is already done without our consent

pray that the ETERNAL Father does not allow mr Albert pikes now "prophecy" come to pass about ww3 . Pray He revokes and dismantles any mans' wisdom for that attempts to steal glory from the Eternal I AM

Mike B said (July 24, 2014):

The post by Maciek (below) says that Putin should have nationalized the banks, if he really stands against the New World Order. The question is weather this would be possible without severe economic repercussions from the international bank syndicate that effectively has control of the worlds currencies. Likewise getting rid of the oligarchs, whose capital is attached to the banks, would seem to invite reprisal. Even refusing IMF loans and all the controlling economic stipulations that come with the loans seems to be a risky venture. Operating as gangsters, the bankers and their BIS, WTO, IMF etc would be 'making you an offer that you can't refuse.' There should be a few good economists out there who can verify and elaborate on my contention, or correct me.

Maciek said (July 24, 2014):

Henry I'd like to believe how you look at it; that the BRICS countries are a real opposition to the Western Judeo-Masonic Cabal but unfortunately the facts seem to prove otherwise...

Putin has been in control of Russia for about 15 years and if he would be a really genuine opposition the first thing he would have done is Nationalized the Russian Banks but he has not done that so Russian banks are just as much owned and controlled by the International Banksters (Russia’s central bank is a member of the Bank of International Settlements)

This article goes into the details:!bk535R

Below- False Flags Highlight Our Satanic Possession (scroll down)

Flashback: Mainstreaming Homosexuality 1967-2014

July 23, 2014

"The Homosexuals," a 46-min documentary
from 1967, reveals how the Illuminati have
transformed America in less than 50 years. 

In 1967, homosexual acts in private were illegal in every state but Illinois. Ninety per cent of Americans felt it was an illness and two-thirds were "disgusted" by it.

But more important, the men interviewed for the documentary were masculine and had a moral compass. They spoke in terms of morality and social good.

The film makes many excellent points but it was made by CBS. I suspect its hidden agenda was to get private homosexual activity legalized - the proverbial camel nose under the tent. In 1973, just six years later, the Rockefellers forced the American Psychological Association to reclassify homosexuality as "normal." 
Today, our public school are inviting our children to experiment with homosexuality and are actively grooming our children for pedophiles.

This is further evidence that society is controlled by Illuminati central bankers and is being inducted into a cabalist sex cult dedicated to Lucifer.

If you can't watch the documentary, this 2012 article by Mathew Hoffman provides an excellent summary.

Note: Even if you don't read this article, be sure to read the First Comment by Dan directly below it.

(From  Apr 23, 2012)

February 9, 2011 ( - In 1967, the veteran CBS journalist Mike Wallace did what today would seem revolutionary: he hosted a 43-minute documentary that exposed the stark truth about homosexuality, speaking openly of well-established facts that have since been consigned to the memory hole of political correctness.

Wallace's documentary, The Homosexuals, is a frank examination of the self-destructive behavior of sexually-active homosexuals, the underlying psychological causes of their impulses, and their troubling influence on American culture. It also discusses curative therapy for homosexual orientation, which had a success rate in the 1960s of about one third, a result similar to that yielded by modern therapeutic methods.

"The average homosexual, if there be such, is promiscuous," Wallace states matter-of-factly. "He is not interested in nor capable of a lasting relationship like that of a heterosexual marriage. His sex life, his love life, consists of a series of chance encounters at the clubs and bars he inhabits, and even the streets of the city - the quick one night stand. These are characteristic of the homosexual relationship."

During the course of this pioneering work, Wallace and the CBS' news team interview four homosexuals, two psychologists, a district attorney and a judge. Although Wallace allows two gay activists to air their arguments in favor of decriminalizing sodomy, he also gives time to others who speak of the devastating impact of homosexual behavior on their lives.

Beginning with the pseudonymous "Warren Adkins" (in reality, Jack Nichols), a representative of the polished Mattachine Society who advanced many of the arguments still used by homosexual activists today, Wallace moves on to the testimony of a 27-year-old man whose sexual misconduct had ruined his career and landed him in jail several times. He describes his formative years in terms familiar to therapists who treat same-sex attraction.

"I had a very domineering mother, a tyrant. A very sweet tyrant, but a tyrant nonetheless," he tells Wallace. "It was a love that I had that was kind of killing me."

Overweight and taunted by children, he was never allowed to develop independence from his overbearing mother, of whom he was "scared to death."
"I know that inside now, I'm sick," he says with simple directness. "I'm not sick just sexually, I'm sick in a lot of ways. Immature, childlike. And the sex part of it is a symptom, like a stomach ache is a symptom of who knows what."

220px-Charles_Socarides1.jpgDr. Charles Socarides, left, a pathbreaking psychologist who for decades led the way in treating homosexuals rather than simply prosecuting them, is equally frank before the CBS camera.

"Homosexuality is, in fact, a mental illness, which has reached epidemiological proportions," says Socarides during a lecture. When asked by a student if homosexuals can be happy in the gay lifestyle, Socarides is unequivocal:  "The fact that somebody is homosexual--a true, obligatory homosexual - automatically rules out the possibility that he will remain happy for long in my opinion."

"The stresses and strains the psychic apparatus is subjected to over the years will cause him in time, I think, to have increasing difficulties. I think the whole idea of saying 'the happy homosexual' is to again, create a mythology about the nature of homosexuality."

Wallace's cautionary note on Socaride's teaching resonates with irony only a few decades later, informing us that "It should be pointed out that Dr. Socaride's views are not universally held. There is a smaller group who do not consider homosexuality an illness at all. Instead, they regard it as a deviation within the range of normalcy."

We are reminded even more of the almost total inversion of sexual morality that has occurred in the last 45 years with the following remark by Wallace: "Most Americans are repelled by the mere notion of homosexuality. The CBS news survey shows that two out of three of Americans look upon homosexuals with disgust, discomfort, or fear. One out of ten says 'hatred'. A vast majority believe that homosexuality is an illness, only ten percent say it is a crime. And yet, and here's the paradox, the majority of Americans favor legal punishment, even for homosexual acts performed in private, between consenting adults."

The documentary examines other politically-incorrect facts about homosexual behavior, including the high frequency of public sex acts associated with the orientation (three thousand arrests in one jurisdiction alone in 1964). It also examines the draconian penalties for homosexual sexual acts in existence at the time, which included sentences of up to 60 years for a single conviction.

Perhaps the most insightful portion of the documentary are two juxtaposed interviews of the libertine novelist Gore Vidal and cultural critic Dr. Albert Goldman. Vidal begins by insisting that the family is not under threat from the homosexual subculture, and then proceeds to argue that marriage and sexual fidelity are "obsolete."

In contrast, Goldman dissects the phenomenon of cultural homosexuality, and its relationship with the general corruption of modern society, with ruthless concision.

"It seems to me today we are in the course of gradually rolling back from our former cultural values or cultural identifications, to a more narcissistic, to a more self indulgent, to a more self-centered and essentially adolescent lifestyle," says Goldman. "The homosexual thing cannot really be separated form a a lot of other parallel phenomena in our society today."

"I mean, we see this on every hand. Forty percent of modern marriages end in divorce. We have a very widespread tendency to live lives of nonstop promiscuity. This is played up in a kind of playboy philosophy which is celebrated and sugar-coated and offered to the masses and received with pleasure. We have all sorts of fun and games approaches to sex. We have rampant exhibitionism today in every conceivable form.

"We have a sort of masochistic sadistic vogue. We have a smut industry that grinds out millions of dollars worth of pornography a year. We have a sort of masturbatory dance style that's embraced as if it were something profoundly sexual, whereas actually all those dances do is just grind away without any consciousness of other people or their partners. And homosexuality is just one of a number of such things, all tending towards the subversion, towards the final erosion of our traditional cultural values."

Wallace died on April 7, 2012, at the age of 93, recognized as one of the most substantial and hard-hitting journalists in American history, and famous for asking difficult questions other interviewers avoided. Unlike the majority of his colleagues, he regarded himself as a political moderate. He was a personal friend of Ronald Reagan.

Thanks to Eric for the tip!

Related - Charles Socarides MD - How America Went Gay

First Comment from Dan:

This CBS documentary was disturbing during the dinner hour on a Sunday evening in 1967, due to the loathsome topic.  The only reason CBS could air such a thing without blowback was to use their most credible presenter (Wallace), wrapped in the most 'clinical' terms.  Wallace' intro feigned a smug sense of moral high ground.   His opening line is "Homosexuality is an enigma."  That's hardly how his 1967 audience would have put it.  Would you say syphilis is an enigma?  Or "sodomy is an enigma"?   I wouldn't.   But Wallace chose the word enigma to imply to the 1967 audience, "here is something that is so taboo, maybe there's something to it you need to know".    Next Wallace plays the authority card, invoking something called the "Opinion Research Corporation"  and states how how his 1967 audience thought of homosexuals. "More harmful to society than adultery, abortion, and prostitution" - (and now here's the blow line...)  "We shall present other results of the survey later in the broadcast".

This genre of TV documentary is a formula that grabs the viewers curiosity - just when you're about to change to channel - then establishes trust by using assuring words to make you think the presenter agrees with the current public opinion.  But watch how the documentary is really building a subtle argument for tolerance of homosexuals.  By the conclusion of this documentary the viewer is more open to thinking of homosexuals as an underclass suffering discrimination, rather than suffering a personality disorder which endangers themselves, and others.   Before 1972, one term for homosexuality was 'antisocial behavior'.  Very funny, since now the definition of 'antisocial' has been flipped upside down.

Mike Wallace was notorious for editing taped interviews to cast remarks out of context.  In the documentary, Wallace created the impression of a new public interest in homosexuals, "because of their increasing visibility".   Let me repeat what Morgan Freeman said to Wallace decades later, when Wallace said "how can we stop racism?"  Freeman said, "STOP TALKING ABOUT IT".

Take at look at The 1972 Gay Rights Platform:  National Coalition of Gay Organizations Convention held in Chicago that year.   See that they've achieved nearly all the items.  One was simply dictated by Obama this week, by EXECUTIVE ORDER.  Notice how often the 1972 Gay Rights Platform uses the term Presidential 'executive order' to ram the platform's planks up America's ass.   Also notice the item, "Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent".. 


1. Amend all federal Civil Rights Acts, other legislation and government controls to prohibit discrimination in employment, housing, public accommodations and public services.   <---ACHIEVED BY EXECUTIVE ORDER BY OBAMA, July 22, 2014

2. Issuance by the President of an executive order prohibiting the military from excluding for reasons of their sexual orientation, persons who of their own volition desire entrance into the Armed Services; and from issuing less-than-fully-honorable discharges for homosexuality; and the upgrading to fully honorable all such discharges previously issued, with retroactive benefits.

3. Issuance by the President of an executive order prohibiting discrimination in the federal civil service because of sexual orientation, in hiring and promoting; and prohibiting discriminations against homosexuals in security clearances.

4. Elimination of tax inequities victimizing single persons and same-sex couples.

5. Elimination of bars to the entry, immigration and naturalization of homosexual aliens.

6. Federal encouragement and support for sex education courses, prepared and taught by gay women and men, presenting homosexuality as a valid, healthy preference and lifestyle as a viable alternative to heterosexuality.

7. Appropriate executive orders, regulations and legislation banning the compiling, maintenance and dissemination of information on an individual's sexual preferences, behavior, and social and political activities for dossiers and data banks.

8. Federal funding of aid programs of gay men's and women's organizations designed to alleviate the problems encountered by Gay women and men which are engendered by an oppressive sexist society.

9. Immediate release of all Gay women and men now incarcerated in detention centers, prisons and mental institutions because of sexual offense charges relating to victimless crimes or sexual orientation; and that adequate compensation be made for the physical and mental duress encountered; and that all existing records relating to the incarceration be immediately expunged.


1. All federal legislation and programs enumerated in Demands 1, 6, 7, 8, and 9 above should be implemented at the State level where applicable.

2. Repeal of all state laws prohibiting private sexual acts involving consenting persons; equalization for homosexuals and heterosexuals for the enforcement of all laws.

3. Repeal all state laws prohibiting solicitation for private voluntary sexual liaisons; and laws prohibiting prostitution, both male and female.

4. Enactment of legislation prohibiting insurance companies and any other state-regulated enterprises from discriminating because of sexual orientation, in insurance and in bonding or any other prerequisite to employment or control of one's personal demesne.

5. Enactment of legislation so that child custody, adoption, visitation rights, foster parenting, and the like shall not be denied because of sexual orientation or marital status.

6. Repeal of all state laws prohibiting transvestism and cross-dressing.

7. Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent.

8. Repeal of all legislative provisions that restrict the sex or number of persons entering into a marriage unit; and the extension of legal benefits to all persons who cohabit regardless of sex or numbers

Dan adds:

I've been questioning people here to get opinions on current events and they are too far gone to even try to snap out of their FOX News coma.
They have a completely delusional understanding of world news.  It's television that's doing it.

Example - quoting  verbatim what an acquaintance said this week.  "Putin is a dictator who doesn't understand anything but war.  The Russians hate him."

Try telling somebody so programmed about 'false flag' ops.  It's like 911 all over again. Whatever they've been doing on TV this summer, it's working.
The public is back in la la land around here.

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Flashback: Mainstreaming Homosexuality 1967-2014"

Jim said (July 24, 2014):

Homosexuality is indeed a mental illness. In a nutshell, for men, homosexuality is caused by a domineering or an over-mothering mother and an absent (either physically or emotionally) father. In a boy, this situation can create an over identification with the mother and an un-sated hunger for his father's attention.

The cause for lesbianism is similar but has other complicating factors.

In evolutionary terms homosexuality is an aberration because gays tend to not reproduce so there shouldn't be any homosexuals on the planet. The only explanation for their existence is either mental (for reasons stated above) or hormonal or a combination of both.

Only about 2% of the population identify themselves as gay but one would think that the number is much greater because of its widespread promotion. To me, this means that there is an agenda to force the acceptance of homosexuality upon the other 98%. But why?

The Illuminati goal is to break down the patriarchal structure of the family unit which will leave women and children vulnerable to government control via food stamps, WIC, subsidized housing, daycare programs, etc. Can you think of a better way to create a government dependent slave race?

Strong husbands and fathers are needed for strong and vibrant families. Without them our society will continue in it decline.

Anonymous said (July 24, 2014):

You're right about motivation for the show, Henry. Still the idea of marriage,
a divine institution, as one 'licensed' by the state is a con of its own. Gays
and straights battle over whom the state shall permit to marry? Huh? In old
days, a couple said vows in public, signed a family Bible, and that was that.
You can still marry that way.

Smaller churches still know anal sex is ill, but not Traditional Denominations
or Mainstream Christian Media (MSCM) like Christianity Today or Christian Rock
hall-of-famers. These people aim to please men.

The Illuminati sink their clutches into all social venues for social engineering.
The holy churches are a special target. Recall Carolyn Hamlett's infiltration for the Dark Side. Seduction was a common tactic, and in her cult, homosexuality was common and sometimes mandatory.

Curiously, her minders raised Hamlett in straight, upright morality for downstream
social engineering purposes. Satan uses everyone.

Gnostics and researchers should grasp what Hamlett finally knew; what Descended Slavemasters needed her to know, and in a hurry, for heavier cult service:
that Lucifer and Satan are the same creature, not two, nor imaginary, while Creator God is Someone else. If you want tales of astral travel and the paranormal, why, Hamlett has them for you. I suggest Dan Duval's seven interviews.

As Doc Marquis says, Satan is not God's opposite, for God has no equal; Satan's opposites would be archangels.

Tony B said (July 24, 2014):

Henry, I believe that the opposition to homos was a much greater ratio than these men put forth. In the 1950s it was a given that if a faggot made a pass at you, you beat the shit out of him, took his money and whatever else, such as his car, and used it until you didn't want to.

If he ran to the cops they laughed at him and then angrily told him to get the hell out of their police station. It was just about total. Even in Hollywood, as I bummed around there for some time as a teenager, wearing Levis and a T shirt (no free advertising on them in those days), I constantly ran into queers wanting to make a pass. It was extremely easy to tell them to get lost. They were very timid and cautious.

As for today's schools, at least in the U.S., every one of them has signs all over the place against "bullying" as "mandated" by the federal government - which lawfully can't mandate a damned thing about education but uses taxpayer money as the carrot at the end of the stick to take over local schools.

The "bullying" campaign is simply to prevent the kids from calling a queer a queer, or a lesbian a dyke, as the girls, ever gullible, seem to fall for this crap more than the boys. It actually has nothing to do with what normal people consider bullying.

Anonymous said (July 23, 2014):

The biological science of what hormone is predominate at birth ( male or female) is what determines our sex.

Also, no one has an identical balance of these two hormones either and for this reason some men are more masculine than others and some less masculine than others. That is what is beyond your control and NOT your own personal behavoir.
No two people either have had the same identical type of sexual encounters either. And its those encounters that happen either willingly or unwillingly at an early age that often shapes our perspective of what sexual expression is. I've yet to have a person tell me that they have had a perfectly normal sex life free from all abnormalities.

It only defeats us when we let these abnormal encounters become acceptable as normal by way of learned behavior.

A moral compass is a Godly virtue but an immoral compass is a devilish desire that believes he can only be totally at peace with himself through illicit sexual encounters of his own desires regardless of how perverted they may be.

Ray said (July 23, 2014):

I recently discovered a good way to educate my 9- and 11-year-old sons in the social morality that existed in the 1950s and '60s prior to the accelerated dismantling of our cultural framework.

My kids love watching "Lassie" on YouTube. They also enjoyed a recent viewing of the 1960 film "Old Yeller," vintage Disney prior to its turning 100% into a Satanic mind-control mill.

The old TV shows and movies on which I grew up (or was "force fed", to be more precise), such as "Father Knows Best", are a potent time capsule that my kids love to experience.

They tell me, "People were nicer back then and they dressed better." My sons' new favorite show is "Lassie." (We don't have cable so they've never been exposed to today's TV fare.) We watch it together and I tell them how I watched it every Sunday night for years when I was a kid (I'm 62).

Anyway, just a tip for parents who want to give their kids or grandkids a chance to learn about the "old ways": Turn the youngsters on to "Leave it to Beaver," "My Three Sons," "Father Knows Best," "Lassie," "Rin-Tin-Tin," "Sky King," etc. Many such shows are on YouTube or available on DVD.

"Back in my day," most kids' TV shows taught a moral lesson (while peddling sugar-coated cereal!), and many of those lessons still hold up today.


July 24, 2014




that a woman

capable of so much love

for a man

should lose him

in the senseless war

in Iraq

Women like Cats? A Defense of Cats! by Annette

July 13, 2014

img142.jpgLeft, A  photo of the sweetheart who protected our family as valiantly as any dog. The kids used to sneak her into the house. They placed the crown on her and took the pic. She deserved it.

Annette's Response to  "Men are like Dogs; Women Like Cats"

Oh brother Henry, I can't believe I am writing  you again over all this nonsense , but here goes again. Geeeez this business about women and cats... I won't start or even end my rebuttal on the woman part. I'm here to defend cats !

We have had four cats in our family and every one of them was an amazing loving being. The guy who wrote the article obviously not only hates women - he hates cats too !

All of my kitties were stray, abused or unwanted by neighbors. We loved them and treated them with respect and they returned everything a thousand-fold. Both of my female cats showed incredible loyalty and protectiveness.

One cat, if we were out in front as a family would run to the end of the driveway to attack any dog walking by in a show of protectiveness towards us. She put her life in jeopardy by doing that.

Other times when my husband would lose his temper with the kids, the same kitty would come and show concern and try to get in between my husband and our kids. Again the same kitty would follow me to a neighbor's where I took piano lessons and wait for me on the front porch until I came out and then escort me home.

My other female cat left my neighbors and came to live at our house because she had been abused by them. She was terrified of them and the dogs they had brought into their home, and yet in a display of protectiveness towards me, she would growl when she heard their voices over the fence. I think it was all show, as  she was very frightened and timid. But she was showing me where her loyalties lay.

These cats would follow us around the yard or house as we did work or chores just to be in our company.  Cats give back what you give them- that is my experience. 

Yes dogs have some wonderful qualities but they can be totally gross and obnoxious, and vicious. No animal control ever had to put a cat down for an unprovoked attack on a child or adult. Once again some guy had problems with women and instead of contemplating himself has to demonize not only women , but for god sakes cats too ! What a loser. I'm all for hearing genuine complaints from men, but this is misogyny and not worthy of linking to your site. The coward wouldn't even sign his name to the blog.
Remember this good for nothing cat that saved a little boy's life ?   I rest my case.

Carolyn Hamlett Replies to a Reader

July 10, 2014

Carolyn Hamlett (2).jpg

Carolyn Hamlett replies to a reader who asked
 how she had the nostalgia for America
described in this July 4 article, if she were
undergoing MK-Ultra programming.
(See, Underground Pedophilia: A Victim's Memoir)

Reader's Comment:

(Henry, off the record - I thought Carolyn Hamlett said that in 1958 she was being programmed with 'kitten' training by Illuminati handlers in secret underground MKULTRA facilities    -  did I miss something? I guess one of her 'alters' wrote the current article! )

Carolyn's Response:

Yes, you did "miss something", actually quite a few some things, but that is understandable. Many people are familiar with a few terms, such as "kitten", "programming", "alters", "handlers", MKULTRA, and yet not understand some of the very basics.  

First of all, I have never used the term, "kitten" to describe any of my programming.

I have mentioned an underground facility where one type of "education" took place. That "education" was a type of programming, but nothing compared to the complexity of other types of programming that I was subjected to.

Secondly, it appears that you are either under the assumption that programmed children do not have a life outside of the programming facilities, or that programmed children are not capable of blending in with other children and appearing normal in all ways.

It is true that some children lived at the facilities where training or programming took place. Those children had no life outside of the facility such as family and school.  I saw many such children.

There were other children who were taken from their homes at night, usually by adult family members, to various places for programming, experimentation and rituals. I was one of these children. I had a good life outside of the facilities.

Last year, Daniel Duval helped me lay down some highlights of my life story by way of 7 interviews (available on YouTube) and yet we only scratched the surface on some topics and other areas we didn't cover at all. Some of the areas not covered have to do with my early childhood programming and the areas I was used in. I was not used in just one capacity, I was used in numerous areas and experienced some very complex programming. I was fully capable of carrying out more than a double life. The only surface side effect I had was fatigue, which I ignored. Children like myself were trained to ignore pain and fatigue.

In answer to your comment that you "guess one of her [my] alters wrote the article!":

This last statement of yours most especially sounds like it is coming from a person who is totally ignorant of high level programming, ignorant of the selection process of those chosen to undergo high level programming and ignorant of the dynamics of alter systems.  

The best way I know to describe myself is that I have what some would say is a strong core personality. I do have alter systems and at times another alter or two will be in the front with my core. My core personality has always had the memories of the everyday life I led. The articles I wrote about my childhood memories are my memories, just as I experienced them back in the early years of my life.

Though I am now in the autumn years of my life, that little girl who lived in the late 1950's and early 1960's is still me. Maybe many people my age have forgotten our true golden years, but for me, those memories are forever etched in my very soul. I can not read my article about the 4th of July without crying. It's because I truly morn the loss of what America used to be! America was a country where common sense was common and the majority of the citizens were people of integrity having strong moral character. The fact that I was used in government projects did not affect my ability to love my life, my country and the people around me.  

When I wrote the articles, I was hoping to refresh the dying memories of the readers of my generation and at the same time, paint an accurate picture to the younger generations, of the days when life for most Americans was good.