Sorry, you need to update your flash player to view this flash animation. You may download the flash player from here. However, you should still be able to view the rest of this page.

Below- Why is Poland Suddenly so Anti-Russian? - (SCROLL DOWN)

Abused for Being Defiant - Brendon O'Connell's Prison Ordeal

April 24, 2014


ehbdbbdj (1).jpg
Australian activist Brendon O'Connell, 42, was arrested
and jailed in 2009 for making "anti-Semitic" statements.
He was released last January.

Life can be easy in a West Australian prison
if you "play ball" but that isn't Brendon's style.





"You haven't seen pathetic, desperate, and low-life until you've been to jail. Sad fact is you end up heading that way yourself - how else do you get along? Especially in maximum security. "


by Brendon O'Connell
(henrymakow.com)


I've been out of jail for just on three months - since January 23rd 2014. It feels like jail is a distant memory. I feel like I've simply been transferred to a "Extra Minimum" security jail with internet and shopping privileges rather than "freedom."

Henry, you asked me about the psychological aspects of jail and "maturing". Well, jail was an incredibly stressful time for me and I have an extremely high threshold for stress - so when I say it was stressful, I mean it was stressful.

This was partly of my own making. It was clear the establishment wanted to make my ride as easy as possible. They wanted me to shut up. They wanted me to apologize and simply leave the [Jewish] issue alone.

Most of all they wanted me to admit I was "bi-polar" and needed medication. In fact, they pushed that one all day, every day, and twice on Tuesdays.

Apparently my "talking fast" and "fearlessness" indicated a clear mental illness - bipolar...with aspects of "delusional" fantasies.

You know, "fantasies" of people out to get me; fantasies of speaking with a High Court Appeals Barrister who traveled the world over seeing high profile court cases (Dr Walsh); fantasies of the Israeli Ambassador interfering in my case; fantasies of being invited out for coffee with the head of counter terrorism in this State; fantasies of speaking with a journalist in the US with contacts with Iranian leadership (Mark Glenn); fantasies, fantasies, fantasies.

Eventually, after many "assessments," they worked out my "fantasies" were true. My paperwork being online and my hunger strike helped. Clearly one level of 'upper' prison management knew what was happening but another didn't. In fact, I was begged by one level of prison security to please stop being so provocative in my letters (whatever that meant) as he had the Australian Federal Police and other government agencies giving him grief all day.

In fact, he asked me to go underground, to keep completely silent and do my time quietly. Apparently, the AFP and local counter terrorism were running around all day all over the Western Australian prison system threatening the large Muslim communities in the jails with all sorts of sanctions if they didn't ignore me and spoke with me.

"PAIN IN THE ARSE"

Fat chance of that :-) So, I could have had it easy and lived it up in "self-care" but I felt obliged to be a "pain in the arse" which isn't hard in jail because just exercising your most basic of rights in a West Australian jail makes you a "trouble maker" and they do know how to deal with troublemakers.

Don't get me wrong, "play ball" in a W.A jail and life can be easy, very easy. But fight for your rights, exercise your legal avenues and articulate to staff their rights and obligations towards you, including official prison policy, and they will come down on you like a ton of bricks.

Their greatest fear is "monkey see, monkey do" - one prisoner has a win and the rest will start learning real quick because in jail there is simply nothing else to do, and a prisoner - even a low IQ one - can learn 'real quick'. "Good order and management of the prison" is the mantra and anyone so much as disturbing the tea break time of a prison officer is liable for being written up as a "troublemaker". Not unlike what happens to people on the "outside" right now.

After all, Henry, there have been plenty of people on the "outside" written up as trouble makers over the years - JFK, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Ezra Pound, Khalid Marshal, Yasser Arafat, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and up to and including the ultimate trouble maker - Jesus. I guess we're all on the 'hit list' ultimately, but I think the times they are a changin' :-)

PASSED THE TEST

Though jail was stressful in more ways than you could imagine, I wouldn't change it for the world. They've physically wrecked my shoulder, my arm and at times my dignity but what a life experience! For me it was a "rite of passage". I've been to battle. I've survived. I've earned my stripes and they can do their worst - I spit on them.

There were times in jail I would have gladly been in Iraq in a USMC squad in the worst part of Baghdad and that would have been a relief for me, and again, I'm not being funny. There is nothing more stressful than having ALL your personal power taken from you. Where you can hear the words, "O'Connell to Reception! O'Connell to Reception!" and your heart starts racing, "What now?" You ask a guard, "what's happening?" "Oh I'm sure its nothing, just a medical escort or something."

 But you know better. So, 30 minutes later you're stripped naked and in front of two people you are lifting your testicles, squatting naked and 'coughing' and getting thrown in a prison truck to God knows where.

All your meager possessions will be gone through. Many will "disappear" - some stolen by prisoners in the property section of the jail or things like paper work sent to 'Justice Intelligence Service' (diaries+xrays+Qu'ran) to be "disappeared" until you kick up such a stink they give them back - minus a few things ;-) "They" have complete control over you and you never know what little game they are going to play next. In that way - solitary confinement was like paradise and I would have happily done the entire three years alone in solitary if it hadn't been for the need to do paperwork.

TRANSFERS


Now, off to a new jail where I have to start all over again. I have to explain my case to the long line of "Noongyar" boys (Native Australian Tribe) who have heard through the prison grape vine you are here and you are a "racist". Stressful as it was they accepted my explanations at face value and I gave Elders within the jail some of the reporting and paperwork. Some even knew about Palestine and the bad habits of Jewish racial supremacism so I taught them more.

That was something the legal establishment wasn't expecting - they did their best to make sure I was bashed the moment I went in. Prison Officers were also clearly stirring up trouble. Just as things would settle down, it would start again - comments in the food line, harsh stares etc. This all stopped when a few well known prisoners I had become friends with started demanding from the 'tattle tales' exactly "who was saying what to whom?"

It all stopped right there because a simple 'working down the line' would have ended back at the local prison informant population and the prison officer who handled them. Don't ever try to out Scorpio a Scorpio on the Machiavellian battlefield. I thrived in that dark little cesspit environment. I like getting dirty and there are a few prison officers with their tails stuck firmly between their legs since meeting me. One day we might meet on the outside and I will record the meeting for posterity. Absolute fucking cowards. They disgust me more than the pathetic informants they handle in the jail.

CONCLUSION

The ultimate lesson learned was that with population pressure and 'scarcity' (artificial or otherwise), you are going to get a nightmare. Civilized behavior will go out the window. You haven't seen pathetic, desperate, and low-life until you've been to jail. Sad fact is you end up heading that way yourself - how else do you get along? Especially in maximum security.

As they make it all a "Prison Planet" I can see exactly how people are going to behave. They will gladly accept a Police State as long as they are fed, watered and entertained. I bet Henry if a poll was taken where "The Leader" stood up and said these words: "Citizens, democracy doesn't work. Too much infighting and most of you are stupid and uninterested in running your own life anyway so we have decided that a fascist/corporatist system is the best way of doing things.

Your betters (Elders) will decide what is good for you. We will do psychological profiling based on your Facebook and Google data collected from your Smart Phone and put you in the right job. We will do detailed profiling and run it through our Quantum Computer in Jerusalem to decide on your best sexual Mate to produce children with; as well as genetic testing before licensing you to have children and you will be able to keep them and raise them if you make sure the correct "values" are instilled - otherwise the State will do it in a child care center for you. Only the best and brightest will be able to breed. Population reduction will be done humanely. Return to work citizen."

Henry, I bet 90% of people would accept such a system. The other 9% would bitch about it and swear to die fighting it - but as soon as their internet connection was cut and they couldn't watch funny You Tube video's and their kids complained, they would buckle under, especially when the food is controlled. The final %1 will head "a little further out West" to isolated places. True Israelites who don't want to be dictated to by corrupt King Herod and counted by Rome. I might see you out there.
 
Related:


Australia Plans to Amend Racial Discrimination Act- "People have a right to be Bigots
What Brendon said that caused him to be jailed

First Comment by Bill:

I salute Brendan O"Connell's courage in the face of a system that was overwhelmingly stacked against him, and indeed anyone who steps out of bounds of what the elites dictate.
When Brendan states, "I feel like I've simply been transferred to a 'Extra Minimum' security jail with internet and shopping privileges rather than 'freedom.'", it struck a chord with me, since I went through my own small (when compared to Brendan's) battle last year.

I worked for a large Canadian bank and the trouble for me began when I started questioning things.  Questioning the banking system itself never fazed the bosses, since many of the low-level V.P.s didn't fully understand it themselves.  I think they did, however, think I was odd for asking. 

What really bothered them was when I questioned why they were always promoting multiculturalism and "diversity".  I would question why they had to hold special events and promotions for homosexuals, for instance.  My reasoning was that homosexuals should have the same banking needs as anyone else, so why is there a need to cater specifically to them?  They didn't like that, and would give me short, dismissive answers.  I also questioned why, for a supposed "Canada Day" potluck in the department, the e-mail announcement was adorned with a plethora of foreign flags, but none Canadian.  I got no answer to that.

They were constantly bombarding us with propaganda to promote anything other than white, heterosexual males.  International Women's Day was a big one, as was anything for minorities (both racial and sexual).  I would casually ask whether the company was in business to make a profit or to be an instrument of social engineering.  Again, no answer was provided and I was looked upon as if I was the red-headed stepchild.

They provided us with our own web page on the company intranet, similar to a Facebook set-up where people could put their own posts concerning status, quotes they liked, etc.  As soon as I put up some quotes by George Washington that were supportive of gun rights, I was summoned to H.R., suspended for three days, and ordered to undergo "sensitivity training".  I noticed that no one who quoted Jack Layton or any other socialist source was reprimanded, since they were obviously quoting "approved" sentiments.

Throughout all this, I was unrepentant.  I simply could not tolerate the idea that I was going to have to put my brain in low-power mode in order to get by.  This horrified many of my sheep co-workers, since they have been conditioned to go along in order to get along and that anyone who speaks up is a troublemaker. 

Despite the fact that I was consistently a top-performer in my department, and won numerous awards, they eventually concocted enough specious "evidence" to fire me.  They made sure to pay me off to avoid a lawsuit, however.

I am very appreciative of your site, Henry, since it speaks a lot of truth to a world that is under a gag order from the powers-that-be.  How much "freedom" do we actually have when we cannot question anything outside the parameters that are bestowed upon us from the upper echelon?  They not only want us to shut up about certain things, but are determined to try to brainwash us into thinking in a certain way, as evidenced by the bank forcing me into so-called "sensitivity" training.  The over-arching message they proclaim is that you'd better fall into line or else your livelihood will be taken away from you, as it was from me. Keep up the good work.

---
Thanks Bill,

The banks get their "money" from the Rothschilds, so they are forced to promote their bullshit.

Related- Scotiabank Prepares Whites for Minority Status






You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2014/04/hot-potato.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Abused for Being Defiant - Brendon O'Connell's Prison Ordeal "

Robert K said (April 24, 2014):

The author's assessment of how people will react to having the shackles of a political and social strait-jacket tightened around them is true. We see it happening all around us. Why?

For well over a century, and indeed probably for very much longer than that, we have had false concepts of economics, sociology, psychology, education, culture, etc., developed by subversive elitists calling themselves the Fabian ("conquest by stealth") Society inculcated into us, to the point where realistic thinking in these areas has become virtually impossible. We are now seeing the final assault on the capacity to reason in the form of ubiquitous cognitive dissonance, which operates destructively on the passive mind from virtually all output from mainstream and so-called alternative media.

Consider: If I decided to build a shed during a week off work with a hammer and a handsaw, it would be a slow and laborious task. But if a few friends pitched in with hauling the lumber for cutting and nailing the pieces together, the work would proceed much faster. Then if one of them made available a power saw and an electric nailer, the progress would accelerate even more. With proper planning and oversight, the shed could probably be erected in a few hours and everybody could go off to fish or practice in a band or tend a garden or do whatever else appealed to them.

This domestic project is analogous to our economy. Its productive capacity has been magically multiplied thousands-fold by task specialization (the division of labour) and by the introduction of power machinery. Now we are in a new era of superproduction as a result of robotics. Concomitantly, the opportunities to enjoy leisure are immensely increased. Yet the effects of robotization--namely, abundant production together with a rapid shrinkage of the human involvement in economic productivity--are perceived by orthodox economists as being problematic.

The solution of the Planners to the new situation is to employ the "surplus labour" in contending with the ramifying social effects of gnawing financial insecurity and to give armies of people jobs policing and spying on what is perceived as potentially rebellious population.

Is this really the best we can make of the opportunities inherent in the greatest productive apparatus in human history?


Al Thompson said (April 24, 2014):

Having been in prison myself, my feeling about it is that if Brendon got put in prison for criticizing Jews, then there must be a lot of truth in his remarks about them. I can't argue with the criticism because my experience with Jewish people is about the same. But if one expresses it then he is a racist and a bigot. Thus, the most honorable position is in jail because at least in there, you know where you stand. It's real and the interesting part for me is that after awhile I didn't mind it. Since I had worked most of my life, I enjoyed the rest. I knew I was wrongfully imprisoned so the real scumbags where the people who put me there. If you think about it, the people in the government are kidnappers and that is a capital offense under God's law. Being on the receiving end of the government's wrath may be uncomfortable but it certainly is an honor if it is due to an injustice.

Jews ought to take responsibility for their own actions and learn a good set of morals instead of being whining little bitches when someone objects to their behavior. If they were nice and honorable people, there would be little if any criticism. But because of their lies and hypocrisy, people resent them. Once one group of people think they are better than everyone else, the relationships among people go on a downhill slide. Having said that, race is only a superficial issue, it is the conduct of the person that should get the judgment and not the race alone. But if we have a lot of Jews acting like jackasses, then the criticism is warranted.

It seems to me that Brendon's problems stem from a form of religious persecution instigated by Jews in this case.


Below- Brendon O'Connell - Jailed Four Years for "Anti Semitism" (Scroll Down)

"Inherit the Wind"- How the Illuminati Brainwashed Christians

April 23, 2014

inherit-the-wind-original.jpg(left, In the movie, Clarence Darrow, played by Spencer Tracy, interrogates William Jennings Bryan, played by Frederic March.)

The movie "Inherit the Wind" (1960) based
on the Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925, helped make
Americans adopt the doctrine of evolution.
James Perloff shows how Hollywood
distorted the facts to advance the Illuminati agenda.












"We are constantly, by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories... Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism." (Protocols 2:2-3)

"Now only years divide us from the moment of the complete wrecking of that Christian religion." (Protocol 17:2)



by James Perloff
(henrymakow.com)


Darwinism used spurious "science" (evolution) to supplant God as man's creator.

Perhaps nothing advanced evolution so effectively as the play and movie Inherit the Wind. It depicts the 1925 "Monkey Trial." The defendant was John Scopes, a Dayton, Tennessee schoolteacher charged with violating the Butler Act, a state law that forbade teaching that man descended from lower forms.

Leading Scopes's defense was famed attorney Clarence Darrow. Assisting the prosecution was former Democratic Presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan. The most common impression about this trial is that Darrow humiliated Bryan in cross-examination, scoring a powerful victory for Darwinism over religious fundamentalism.

Public beliefs regarding the trial are based mostly on Inherit the Wind, which portrayed a battle between enlightened evolutionists and imbecilic Christians. My book Tornado in a Junkyard compares the screenplay (the Oscar-nominated Spencer Tracy version) to the trial transcript and other records. Here are highlights. (The complete comparison is posted on my blog.)

John Scopes.jpgTHE MOVIE opens with the grim town minister and other prudes marching to the local high school. They arrest young Scopes, who is forthrightly teaching biology using Darwin.

IN REALITY, Scopes was not a biology teacher. He taught math, but had briefly substituted for a biology teacher during an illness. The ACLU recruited him to challenge the Butler Act. Scopes never taught evolution. He wrote in his autobiography, Center of the Storm: "Darrow had been afraid for me to go on the stand. Darrow realized that I was not a science teacher and he was afraid that if I were put on the stand I would be asked if I actually taught biology."

"If the boys had got their review of evolution from me, I was unaware of it. I didn't remember teaching it."

IN THE MOVIE, we see Scopes in jail, a persecuted martyr. Aroused by the town preacher's sermon, a lynch mob gathers outside the jail, burning Scopes in effigy. A rock sails through the window, injuring him.

IN REALITY, Scopes didn't spent one second in jail. Violating the Butler Act was not an imprisonable offense. Furthermore, no bad blood existed between Scopes and Dayton's people, who were delighted that the trial put Dayton on the map.

Darrow.jpgIN THE MOVIE, Clarence Darrow arrives, bravely taking the case singled-handedly. The local Christians boo him; a mob outside his hotel threatens a lynching.

IN REALITY, Darrow, left, brought a team of lawyers, and here's what he himself said of his Dayton experience: "Yet, I came here a perfect stranger and I can say what I have said before that I have not found upon anybody's part - any citizen here in this town or outside, the slightest discourtesy. I have been better treated, kindlier and more hospitably than I fancied would have been the case in the north."

IN THE MOVIE, William Jennings Bryan is an ignorant bigot opposed to science. He says: "The people of this state have made it very clear that they do not want this zoological hogwash slobbered around the schoolrooms!" "The way of scientism is the way of darkness."

IN REALITY, Bryan was a member of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. What he really said about science during the trial: "Give science a fact and it is not only invincible, but of incalculable service to man."

IN THE MOVIE, the judge disallows any testimony from eminent scientists whom Darrow has brought. The judge declares "zoology" (which he can barely pronounce) and other sciences "irrelevant to the case."

Bryan.jpgIN REALITY, Darrow called as a witness zoologist Maynard Metcalf, who testified at length. Bryan, left, quickly recognized that the atheistic Darrow was orchestrating a parade of witnesses to promote Darwinism. (The trial was being broadcast on radio nationwide, and reported in newspapers globally.) Bryan asked Judge John Raulston: "Will we be entitled to cross-examine their witnesses?" Raulston said they would.

This enraged Darrow, who knew Bryan would ask his witnesses embarrassing questions like "Where are Darwin's missing links?" and "Are you an atheist?" Darrow therefore had his remaining witnesses submit affidavits. These totaled 60,000 words and occupy 54 pages of trial transcript; excerpts were read in court. The decision to stay off the stand was not made by a bigoted judge, but by Darrow himself, to elude cross-examination. Ironically, most of the "evidence" Darrow's experts discussed - Piltdown Man, "useless vestigial organs" - are long discredited.

THE "DEBATE"

But what of that famous "debate" where Darrow supposedly trounced Bryan, symbolizing Darwinian triumph over the Bible?

It was not a debate. Darrow called Bryan as a witness. Thus only Darrow could ask questions, completely controlling the exchange. He peppered Bryan with anti-Bible questions he had spent years developing. On the preceding evening, he rehearsed his inquisition with an associate; Bryan, on the other hand, had to answer everything off-the-cuff.

Naturally, with these advantages, Darrow looked better than Bryan - but not nearly as decisively as in Inherit the Wind, which grossly distorts the event. For example, it has Bryan say that the Bible defines sex as "original sin" (nothing resembling this was said.) And when the movie's cross-examination finishes, Bryan cracks up mentally, wildly shouting the names of the Bible's books (another complete fabrication).

Hollywood distortions aside, why did Bryan place himself in a position where only Darrow could go on offense? The answer is simple. Darrow tricked Bryan into believing that, after this, their roles would reverse: Bryan would be able to question Darrow about Darwinism. This was important to Bryan, since he had been denied cross-examination of Darrow's "experts."

But the next morning, Bryan sat stunned as Darrow changed Scopes's plea from "not guilty" to "guilty," thus ending the trial.

Darrow's words to the judge: "We will ask the court to bring in the jury and instruct the jury to find the defendant guilty."

Darrow had no intention of going on the stand and letting Bryan get revenge by quizzing him on evolution. The trial had NEVER been about John Scopes's guilt or innocence. Its sole purpose was to disseminate Darwinism and assail Christianity.

But in Inherit the Wind, Darrow fights to the bitter end for his client. The backwoods jury finds Scopes "guilty."

Gloom falls on the defendant and his noble attorney, as "bigotry and ignorance" have won the day.

---

James Perloff is author of several books; his latest is Truth Is a Lonely Warrior.

 


First Comment from Len:

You know, Henry, I remember watching "Inherit the Wind" on TV when I was a kid way back in the 1950's and 60's. Even then I knew and said to myself, "This kind of movie is a real putdown to the Christian community and Christian Faith."  Only much later did I come to understand just how sinister the agenda was: the Christ-hating, Christianity-despising Talmudic Jews and "illuminati-elite" were [and continue to this very moment] mock and cartoonize Christians and biblical faith oriented values. The idea of Darwinism and luciferian/satanism is to make "the Animal Kingdom of Mankind" divided between just three classes: the elite who rule and lend money hither & yon; the masses whom they use as "employable & useful to create wealth"; ... and "the useless eaters" who are to be eliminated from the "ecological equation."

 Yeah.  A nice little cabal of Darwinists they are. In their mind & mindset: they are "the gods who rule." we are only the animals and cattle and pack-mules that they manage.

And the truth is: WITHOUT DIVINE INTERVENTION they will probably pull this off. ... but only over my dead body and over the dead bodies of those who love freedom and decent human [and divine] values. I will NEVER yield to their sinister and vile satanic agenda.





You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2014/04/inherit-the-wind.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for ""Inherit the Wind"- How the Illuminati Brainwashed Christians "

Peter G said (April 24, 2014):

Well done Henry another fantastic article by James Perloff on your site.

Anyone that's slightly ok in the head knows what a load of bollocks Darwins theories are but in this day and age they are reluctant to speak up.


Lance said (April 24, 2014):

Thank you James Perloff, for your excellent article

I hadn't heard about this story before.

I'd like to mention something that I've thought about for many years about Darwin.

I think Darwin was wavering between science and religion.

The Captain (Fiitzroy) of the Beagle became a Christian.

Why? I don't know.

But, Darwin published info in his book, "Origin of the Species",which could be taken as evidence of a Great Flood, which happened a few thousand years ago.

That was the old sea shore he found in South America, that was 1500 m above the present sea level, which had unfossilized shells.

Lance (retired science teacher)


RR said (April 24, 2014):

Clarence Darrow was frequently called upon to advance the antitheist (A true atheist has no particular agenda and does not attack Christian beliefs) cause.

One case in particular was prior to the monkey trials involving a labor thug that assassinated ex-Idaho governor Frank Steunenberg, in 1905.

The assassin supposedly had a jailhouse conversion and decided to turn state evidence against his union cohorts. Steunenberg was a fierce opponent of the labor unions and they decided to finish him off.

Anyway, Darrow's communist leanings and his antitheism became famous before the monkey trials. To me, he is one of the most prominent infidels in North American history, if not the entire world.


JG said (April 23, 2014):

Thanks for setting the record straight on this Hollywood spin of the Scope's Trial, 'Inherit the Wind'.

Like most of Hollywood's works an agenda is being promoted. This movie's objective was to belittle William Jennings Bryan and his Christian constituents of Dayton and also to put the Holy Bible on trial. This also was the agenda of the ACLU.

Bryan wrote a long paper of rebuttal on Darwinism, the movie did touch on this towards the end.

I own the DVD of 'Inheret the Wind' and do enjoy it because it's refreshing to experience the Christian atmosphere that's in the town of Dayton in this movie even though the screenwriters are doing it for a reason.

The acting in it was well done and Spencer Tracy was cunningly convincing at times. But, most of all, this movie does show a" well knit" part of a solid Christian Community that once existed in America. Yes the 'Old Time Religion' is good enough for me.


Andrew said (April 23, 2014):

On a personal level, we are our memories.

As a nation, America has become a land of false memories.

The quiet elite have hijacked our history and with it what used to be genuine American culture.

James Perloff makes it easy to see how Hollywood misleads Americans.

The 1980’s anti-drug cliché JUST SAY NO applies to Hollywood.

We should just turn off Satanically possessed entertainment, TV, movies, etc.

Perloff is a real gem.


Below - Feminism is the real Terrorism - Young Turk (scroll down)

Brendon O'Connell - Jailed Four Years for "Anti Semitism"

April 22, 2014

ifhaffhd.jpg

Australian activist Brendon O'Connell, 42, was arrested
and jailed in 2009 for making "anti-Semitic" statements.
He was released last January. Brendon reveals exactly what he said
and how an apology would have spared him
a four-year prison term. 





"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."- Voltaire



by Brendon O'Connell
(henrymakow.com)



I was arrested by 7 members of the State Security Investigation group on May the 12th 2009 for calling Stanley Elliot Keyser a "racist Jew" and "racially vilifying him in the process. Section 80B. That was one year jail time.

I then used words such as, "your days are numbered" talking about Rabbinic Pharisaic Judaism etc. This came under a different part of the legislation, Section 77, the most serious in that I was "inciting others" to go and kill Jews.

These are comments from my Blog at the time - after I was arrested - that got me more charges under Section 77 -

"1,500 Gazan's are dead, one million plus Iraqi's. We can only hope and pray that the international community strikes hard and makes sure that gaggle of Satan's children in occupied Palestine are brought to justice."
 
Transcript Page 626 - 2 years jail.

"Fairly soon Jews will realize that people are thoroughly sick of them, their whining, their perpetual victimhood and their demands for people to bow down and worship their dodgy religion of Holocaustianity."
 
Transcript Page 630 - 2 years jail

"The Jew community could of at least made their lies and slander half-believable, but I guess after years of inventive and over the top Holocaust memoirs they've gotten lazy."
 
Transcript Page 632- 2 years jail

"Former Ku Klux Clown lectures Aussies to stamp out racism. Unfortunately our former clown has never read the Talmud, so he forgot to mention Jews as the biggest racists of all."
 
Transcript p.633 - 2 years jail

Then 2 years jail for saying "your days are numbered in the video.

All up I was given 11 years jail which was then made "concurrent" which mean it all ran together as one charge. If they really don't like you, they run the charges "consecutive" and you do all 11 years. They were trying to scare me. I made sure I said, "Jail here is a holiday camp compared to Gaza!" which the media reported. I wanted to be as defiant as possible.

This Blog links to two video's I did explaining things

Here Justice Buss at my appeal indicates that if I would just say sorry they would let me out of jail. This was in December of 2011:

JA BUSS: One can readily understand that a suspended sentence would have been appropriate had someone in your client's position pleaded guilty even if not at the first opportunity, had expressed some remorse at some stage or even given an apology. If these had been the facts, then it is very difficult to see how a term of immediate imprisonment could possibly have been justified, but those are not the facts.
 
Transcript 13/12/2011 Page 18 WASCA

Below is a section from a synopsis I prepared for the High Court. It explains a lot. I have also included pictures taken from the raid video's. I don't think anyone has published these before.

[G] Hansard of Debate - Criticism of West Australian  Racial Vilification Legislation by Hon John Fischer Nov.. 2004
 
"This legislation is atrociously drawn up. It will not achieve what it is intended to achieve, although I am not sure what the intent is. The Government has introduced the legislation and I do not believe there has been any consultation with the general public. I believe this legislation has been brought on as a red herring. From the people I have spoken to, I believe that this legislation will do the Government a great deal of harm. It represents without doubt, a loss of freedom of speech and a loss of freedom of knowledge.
...
I believe these laws will increase problems. The whole of the legislation will be thrown out. It is absolutely pathetic. I cannot emphasize enough that this is probably some of the worst legislation I have read."

Criticism by Greg Craven,
'Conversations With The Constitution: Not Just A Piece Of Paper'. UNSW PRESS.

"The most obvious feature of this rights discourse is its unremitting focus on the rights of minorities. New constitutionalists are relatively uninterested in the rights of common or garden Australians to live dull, secure lives in dull, secure suburbs, unmolested alike by burglars and intrusive governmental gate crashers. They are transfixed, however, by the rights of minority groups: indigenous people, ethnic minorities, sexual and gender groupings though not (of course) by the rights of unfashionable minorities such as conservative religious groups or right wing nutters. New constitutionalists argue, with obvious force, that it is the rights of minorities that most need protection. But there is more than necessity at work here."
---

Related- Jailed Christian Activist on Hunger Strike
---------- Australia plans to amend racial discrimination act:"People have a right to be bigots"
--------- Oz Foreign Minister Lifts Veil on Jewish Control




You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2014/04/Brendon-OConnell-Jailed-for.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Brendon O'Connell - Jailed Four Years for "Anti Semitism""

Tom said (April 24, 2014):

The saddest truth about this case, and what has been taking place globally forever is, absolutely none of this can take place without the brainwashed cowards doing the physical dirty work of these worthless devils!


WK said (April 22, 2014):

My comment re the above story in response to comment (below) by Robert K.

Great comment, Robert! I believe that it is much easier for someone, upon hearing about someone saying something allegedly “offensive” to or about other persons, to accept that he or she must have done something improper and so perhaps deserves censoring or even punishment. But when someone is told that THEY cannot hear something the issue is brought clearly to “home base” and is much more likely to cause that person to “get their hackles up.” E.g., “You can’t dictate to ME what, or what not, I am going to listen to!" In other words if the situation is reversed so that the imposition is shown to bear directly upon the rights of the individual listener, it is going to be taken more personally and seriously than are more removed or distant rumours or reports of someone else’s rights being abused. Surely, this "reverse strategy" is a potent force to be exploited in the struggle for the preservation of freedom of speech and enquiry—without which intellectual freedom, life can have no meaning.


JG said (April 22, 2014):

The anti-semitism canard was basically designed to outlaw exposure and criticism of Jewish crimes against humanity. It has been a highly effective defense mechanism for the protection of the "perpetual victimhood" aspect of Jewish Identity.
This canard really should not be labelled anti-semitism because Arab Semites and Christian Semites are not protected under these laws.


Robert K said (April 22, 2014):

This business of abjectly apologizing is straight out of the communist rulebook. It is public acknowledgment, under coercion, that one is wrong in one's views, and thereby in fact a public nullification of one's self.

This is reminiscent of the congratulations to the court that apparently are de rigueur for convicted persons to express at the time of sentencing in, for example, China--a public profession of faith that the "authorities" are invariably on the side of the angels.

A proof of evil (i.e., alignment with the will of Satan), Jesus said, is hypocrisy. The world control system being installed ravenously craves evidence of your capacity for hypocrisy. Apparently, despite the penalty he risked, this man couldn't stomach the induction efforts of the kangaroo court that sentenced him to such a preposterous punishment for speaking his mind.

Maybe it's time to stop talking about the right to freedom of speech, which usually involves consideration for others--about whose character,sadly, it seems quite easy to insinuate doubt--and instead view the matter from the other end, i.e. from the standpoint of the individual's right to hear. What information or point of view do you believe you personally should not be entitled to hear? If your answer is "I should be able to hear anything I bloody well want", then you have clarified in your mind the "issue" of freedom of speech.


Why is Poland Suddenly so Anti-Russian?

April 24, 2014

Vladimir_Putin-6.jpgWhy is Poland Suddenly so Anti-Russian?

I asked blogger Polish ZZ to explain why Poland is so anti Russian.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/poland-presses-for-shift-from-russian-gas-as-ukraine-standoff-escalates/article18182218/

I thought Tusk collaborated with Russia re Smolensk etc.





Hi Henry

You just posed one very pertinent question. Why the "polish" government, so obstinately sticking to the "restart", reconciliation and "opening up to the east" with Putin narrative, so abruptly changed course, now being overtly and sometimes rabidly anti-Putin?

The answer is a very simple one. The quasi overnight change of heart came with the Kiev crisis. For correct tenor you can blame ketchup Kerry personally and the NATO officialdom, giving unmistakable marching orders - Putin is on a warpath with us in Ukraine. Poland is an important NATO member in the region, although new, and to be exact the most important in the Ukraine showdown, being immediate and biggest Ukraine's neighbor.

The streetwise wisdom here on the ground is closer to reality, namely the previous infatuation with Putin was entirely fake and propaganda creation, what you can corroborate in surfacing now popular demand to USA to immediately beef up their military presence, finding a willing ear now in Washington. The people are suspicious of Russian imperial belligerence - and historically justifiably so, because over the last 300 years Moscow was intermittently at war of aggression against Poland and slayed millions in the field, as well in XIX century tsarist gulags in Siberia. You did not know? Gulag is only a modernized version of this barbaric, morbidly Asiatic idea. I talked of this historical context on Inside the Eye shows. There is no way out of history and geography - you have to know it, to understand, what is happening.

And finally, make no mistake about it. The people, on either side of the border, do not want war, they are only reacting on artificially instigated fear. The current anti-Russian propaganda is obviously as much fake as the previous pro-Russian love campaign. We are now to be afraid of Putin - that's all. The reality of the gambit is a bit more complicated than that. The Neocons are belligerently pushing Putin on his backyard and he does not miss the occasion to mount a long overdue in his optics "reunification" campaign. Make no mistake about it - contrary to public perception Moscow, as always, acts in lockstep with Berlin. As endresult they will partition Ukraine between themselves, exactly as was done with Poland in 1939. So started WW2, and now there will be its immediate continuation, WW3. Is it so hard to grasp? I do not think so.

Regards!
zezorro says: easy ZZ
http://zezorro.blogspot.com

Emails from Satanists

April 21, 2014

teensatanist.jpgEmails from Satanists, Would-be Satanists and a Feminist


What if you got it all wrong, Henry?

Have you ever thought of that possibility? Have you ever noticed that all the conspiracy websites on the internet point to Christianity as the answer?

Isn't that odd, considering that those websites are built by so called free thinkers? Yet they all give the same answer; save your soul with Jesus because the world is gripped by a ''Satanic conspiracy''. Do you realize that you are promoting that which you say you don't want?

If we were are all Christians, a one world government would be in place soon. Like the Vatican used to rule the West, just a little bigger than that. You are promoting that which you say you are against.

I have seen this pattern when I was looking for answers, and obviously started to think something was off. Free thinkers shouldn't all give the same answers, maybe this conspiracy is not Satanic at all; but in fact Christian.

I have thought about this extensively; and my conclusion is obviously opposite to yours. For that reason I have become a Satanist. I believe Satan is the true liberator of mankind, which is why he is demonized and put away as 'evil''. The ruling elite have no use for independent thinkers, they rather have ''sheep'' who flock to their ''shepherd''. Christianity promotes weakness, turning the other cheek and being a good slave. Satanism is the opposite of that and stands for true liberation of the soul.

The occult is a system one can work to empower oneself, and therefore no longer be a slave to the elite. The elite don't want us to realize we are all Gods, and want to keep this knowledge to themselves. The letters ''JHVH'' are nothing more but the four elements of the Jewish magical system. JHVH is a false deity, invented to keep the masses quiet.

Thankfully, the Church is globally losing power. Religion is becoming less popular, and more people are questioning mindless obedience. The age of Aquarius is coming, and soon the tables will be turned. More people will openly oppose religion then ever, and more people will find the truth. I look forward to the coming time; we Satanists are growing in numbers. Soon the true conspiracy will be known for all, and we will reign victorious!

With all due respect,
Windigo

--

Sir I appreciate your article on how to spot a satanist but I find a few flaws in it. For one, Sacrifices are not requires, and there are no modern day cults. Satanists are not devil worshipers they believe in the power of them self. I know because I am one.

PDF
The_Satanic_Bible_Underground_Edition_-1.pdf

Henry Makow <[email protected]>
Apr 19 (2 days ago)

to Ashlyn

Can you expand on this email? I plan to post a feature by people like you. I won't use names or email addresses

henry

I sent you the satanic bible as an attachment. I worship me. I am aware that I am amazing. Men externalized divine cell because they feel like they are not worthy of a good in fact we are all god we are creators

--

my name is guyo saghav. i am kenyan...am 19yrs...i want to join
illuminati am ready to do anythg that you ask me to do as long as i
wll join so please am beggng you if you want i can be your slave as
long as i wll become rich and help ma family

------

Truly, your wisdom knows no boundaries. « Two people don't become one by fighting over the same territory. Generally speaking, the man "makes the house, the woman makes the home." ». Basically, what I am trying to say is : you are a butt-penis who likes to fuck donkeys. I know because I read the Bible everyday. If you were here, I would fart in your mouth. Are your parents siblings? If I ever need a brain transplant, I`d choose yours because I`d want a brain that had never been used. But have no fear, one day you will die, and the world will be a better place for all. --[email protected]

-----
From Tim:

In the end, think about it. The Jews liberated us from slavery to the traditional norms. In the traditional society, men were considered as cannon fodder.

In the modern society, both men and women have the freedom to pursue self realization and enlightenment. Remember, Lucifer was trying to give humanity KNOWLEDGE which would set them free. That pissed off Enlil, the "control freak god" and he threw them out of the garden.

Feminism has set men free from slavery to women and marriage!

Praise LUCIFER, the glorious Light Bringer!
Praise LUCIFER, the Light of the Star of David!
Heil Henry Kissinger!
Heil the Illuminati!
Heil Nathanel Rothschild!
Heil the Jews, the Master Race!

ALL HAIL SATAN!

-----------------------

Linda K comments:

Dear Henry...well, that was disturbing to read.
 
One of the posts said:
 
...they [Satanists] believe in the power of them self.
 
I got a perfect Scripture for that mindset: James 3:16
 
For where envy and self-seeking exist, confusion and every evil thing are there.
 

Abortion is a Rite of Witchcraft

April 10, 2014


Windle.jpeg(left, Patricia Baird Windle)

Abortion is a Rite of  Witchcraft


by Dan

There's a long history of abortions being performed by practicing witches.  This has come out in public again again all along, many times in blatant statements by the witches themselves.  It amazes me how the public simply tunes out things that don't into their little window on the world.
I can give you one quote off the top of my head right here:  Patricia Baird Windle, founder and owner of an abortion business called 'Aware Woman'.  She was an avowed witch who raised a stink years ago saying "You practice your religion and let me practice mine. My religion is a holy ritual child sacrifice." 

She got away with saying that because her abortion clinic is LEGAL.  In fact she meant to make the news to promote one of her books 'Targets of Hatred: Anti-Abortion Terrorism',  which labels the "pro life" position as fundamentalist fanatics endangering the lives of women, yada yada yada...

She's just one of five I can cite to show it's a religion and they're proud of it.  They share this insanity that claiming feminine power involves this initiation of taking the life she creates. That's how a woman graduates to 'goddess'.

The Masonic maxim is true.  Everything really is out there 'in plain sight'.  But people don't believe their eyes and ears if they don't believe evil is real and there's a non-human aspect to it.  That's why everything that came out in broad daylight in the 1980's about the epidemic of Satanism already went down the memory hole.   We're always having to start from scratch trying to explain these things over, and over and over.

Of interest, abortion clinics are on the run here in Texas. The Legislature and Governor have closed most of them down by pulling State funding from Planned Parenthood.  We'll see how long it sticks.