Direct Link to Latest News

Below - Ken Adachi- The Truth about JFK's Assassination (scroll down)

Why Is Israel Permitted to be Racist ?

March 22, 2017



Tired of being browbeaten daily about the evils of racism and the joys of diversity?

Then, cast a glance at Israel, the only Western country allowed to maintain its racial identity.  Wonder why that is?

Last week, a UN official quit rather than apologize for referring to Israel's "Apartheid" policies. 

Below, "Saul" an Israeli American, reviews Israel's race laws which includes a prohibition on interracial marriage. 

The fact Israel gets a free pass means the Masonic Jewish central bankers intend for whites to become a minority.


Makow comment- Jews don't need a national homeland. Americans, Canadians, British, French, Australians, Germans do.  Central bankers and their Masonic toadies in government, education and media have subverted eroded their national identity.  ("We will destroy every collective force but our own," say the Protocols of Zion. 16)

(From Dec 10, 2013)

by Saul 


TEL AVIV -- Despite Zionist denials, Israel is an apartheid state. The term apartheid means "the state of being apart" and was a system of legislated racial separatism in South Africa. There are striking parallels between Zionist Israel and apartheid South Africa.

1) Jewish Right of Return

With very few exceptions, only Jews can immigrate. Outside of Russian immigration, immigrants to Israel must prove that their mother was or is Jewish. Christians cannot immigrate to Israel. Muslims most certainly cannot immigrate to Israel.

Why have such a racist law on the books when 20% of the population are Muslim Arabs? Simple. Zionists claim that Jews deserve a homeland. 

2) Jewish Marriage Law

Jews cannot marry anyone other than Jews. Muslims in Israel cannot marry anyone other than Muslims. Even secular Jews cannot marry Christians or Muslims in Israel. This is the law. To marry outside one's faith, couples need to leave Israel to countries like Cyprus where they can marry and return as a married couple. Even apartheid South Africa abolished the Prohibition of Mixed Marriage act in 1985, prior to which time whites could not marry blacks and vice versa. In Israel this racism is still going on today! Not just similar to Apartheid, WORSE than Apartheid.

In Judaism, to be Jewish, one's mother must be Jewish. 

One of my friends had problems getting married in Israel recently.  He is a provable Jew with a Jewish mother and father.  His bride to be was a Russian immigrant with only a Jewish father.  The Zionist secular government bends the rules for Russian Jews so they qualify under the Jewish right of return.  Alas, to the religious court, which has a monopoly on marriage and divorce law in the country, she was NOT deemed a Jew.  Thus, they could not get married within Israel.

3. The Racial Hierarchy 

While Judaism is considered a religion, it acts like a race. Within that race, there is a hierarchy of privilege. Israelis can be broken down into two main categories: European "Ashkenazi" Jews and Middle Eastern "Mizrahi" Jews. 

These two distinct subgroups also observe two distinct types of Judaism. Ashkenazi Judaism and Sephardic Judaism. 

Every Israeli Prime Minister has been a European, lighter skinned, Ashkenazi Jew. Only one figurehead President of Israel has been a darker skinned Mizrahi Jew, and he is currently in prison for raping one of his secretaries. 


The "white" Ashkenazi Jews are the elite in Israel. The "darker" Mizrahi, or Arab Jews are a slightly lower caste.  Mizrahi Jews look identical to their Arab Muslim and Christian cousins. 

Israeli police and military are not politically correct. They racially profile people at every checkpoint, supermarket, movie theater, etc. Thus, Mizrahi Jews are given a closer look and only their Hebrew accent confirms them as Jews. Israelis unabashedly describe people by their skin color, religion, race or country of origin. It's simply the culture. 

In America, my children were raised differently. They would never call a person of color "nigger" in America. Yet here in Israel they quickly learned Ethiopians are called "cushy" in reference to the biblical Cushites. Israelis also use the term "nigger". They don't recognize these terms to be racist. Zionists don't realize Jewish-only land, Jewish-only immigration, Jewish-only marriage are racist. They simply accept their racism as normal.

It's a caste system, plain and simple, and what kids learn in childhood carries over into adulthood. That's the culture.

Going "down" the ladder, you have your Arab Muslim and Arab Christian Israelis. They're not Jewish. But more important, they aren't trusted. Israelis consider them a fifth column, ready and willing to rise up at a moments notice in rebellion. It's comical to me, because it is the inherent racism that oppresses the Arab Israeli population and they have good reason to be disgruntled and unhappy.


All Israeli boys and girls must serve a mandatory military duty. They are conditioned to follow orders and to be desensitized to the "enemy." While Israeli schools, and even Jewish schools abroad, rely heavily on emotional manipulation of the holocaust, the Germans are no longer the hated enemy here. The Arabs are. 

Thus, children are manipulated to turn their anger and hatred of Nazi Germany towards Arabs. In the words of my Israeli ex-wife, "A good Arab is a dead one." 

There is outright fear and hostility to the Palestinians living in the autonomous zones. It is a culture of racism and war, and there is no arguing it.


(Migrants who refuse to leave are held in detention indefinitely.) 


The African migrant workers are treated the worst by far. They are truly the untouchables. In fact, I've never seen an African, other than an Ethiopian Jew, inside any Israeli home, mall or major supermarket. 

They almost invariably live in one area near the Central Bus Station in Tel Aviv, many homeless, most crowded in small rooms. The Israeli government doesn't know what to do with them, and it's a big problem. They live in slums, are treated terribly, and are looked at as feral cats or rats. They are called names, they are heavily discriminated against.

And Israel is nothing like America in terms of "anchor babies." Being born in Israel does not guarantee one citizenship unless the baby is Jewish. For non-Jews born to non-citizens, the child is not a citizen and is subject to deportation. 

I will conclude with a comment that might surprise you. I am not anti-Israel or anti-Jew. I am a Jew. I am Israeli. I am anti-racism and anti-Zionist. There's a difference. Israel does not have to be an Apartheid state. She chooses to be. She is ruled by racist Zionists who believe in separatism, colonialism, and militarism. I believe in another, more open and humane Israel.


Note on Muslim Marriage law:

Muslim women are NOT allowed to marry non-Muslim men, while Muslim men are allowed to marry women of the books (Christian and Jewish.)  


Jewish Power rears its ugly head at UN 

Top Israelis Have Warned of Apartheid, So Why the Outrage?

Israel's Unwanted Migrants 

Tel Aviv Service Pays European Cleaners More than African

Are Israelis Racists? 

Israeli Hypocrites Support Multiculturalism Elsewhere 

Israel passes law to jail up to 60,000 African Migrants

Israel Marriage Laws are Discriminatory 

Israel Red Cross Rejects Blood Donation from Black Member of Parliament

First Comment by David A:

I do not believe any people is spiritually inherently superior to another people.  However, there are racial differences.  Acknowledging racial differences, which stem from nature, and directed by nurture, is not racist.  The Jewish people have a right their own nation, just as others have a right to their own nation.  Ashkenazim Jewry are in fact more intelligent at tests and academic ON AVERAGE than Mizrahi Jewry, who are of a very different racial history.  The Mizrahi Jewry only had to be smarter than the local Arabs, whose IQ averages around 80, while the Ashkenazim had to be smarter than the Germans, who IQ averages in urban areas at above 104.  

The behavior of an ethnic group is in large part due to its genetics.  Please see this article, titled ""Differences in educational achievement owe more to genetics than environment" 

Ashkenazim, having the highest concentration of administrative and financial skills of any group on the planet, have a right to maintain their group, and are right to be untrustworthy of out-marriage to Mizrahi Jews.

Additionally, European Sephardic Jews are not the same as Mizrahi Shephardic Jews.  Please see this article be Steve Sailer on "Ashkenazi vs. 'Shephardic' Intelligence", where he breaks down the notion that European Shephardic Jews should even be classed with Shephardic Jews from Arab lands.  The truth is that our societies DO have castes, which are separated by ability to function in a highly-developed world.  There is nothing "racist" about desiring to maintain the advantages and uniqueness of your own racial group.  Because of differences in average intelligence, and then subsequent cultural intelligence, there will be societal differences.  The only "racist" thing to do to a person would be to demand more quotas and spots in administration for Shephardim or Blacks, regardless of the fact that the Ashkenazim are more qualified.  

As to Blacks in Israel, Israelis have every right to be suspicious of them.  Africans, due to their long racial incubation in the uncivilized, chaotic environment of Africa, are genetically far more prone to committing crime and causing disorder.  The local Israelis do not want Africans among their people, because in far larger numbers, Africans harass women, rob people, and leave trash.  

Please see this article on what happened to a beach area in Tel Aviv when many Africans showed up: " Israel Police: Unemployed African refugees turning Tel Aviv beaches into high crime spots"

No, African crime is not caused by "lack of employment opportunities".  The lack of employment opportunities for Africans is caused by their average of lower IQ, far lower impulse control, and tendency to promote and bring in their own ethnic group.  An exploration of the story of "Ham" is instructive, as they are the descendants of Ham, who shamed Noah, and was cursed.

Jews deserve a nation of their own.  Every nation on earth deserves a nation of their own, and this included White European nations.  This perspective will help settle all the disputes, we need to drop this "racism" nonsense. 

[Makow Disclaimer- I think socialization and economic opportunity can counteract much of this but why should countries make all this effort to integrate foreigners?}

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Why Is Israel Permitted to be Racist ?"

Dan said (March 23, 2017):

The Realpolitik of the special circumstances of Jews is that it's not merely a question of whether some Jews don't think they need a homeland. The rest of the nations need them to have one so that they can be left to run theirs the way they know is best for their own race and culture.

I don't believe that Americans or the UN has any more right to tell Jews how to run Israel than dual-citizen Israelis have making our laws in Washington DC.

The old JQ is back after 70 years down the Memory Hole. They told us it was solved in 1947, but nothing's changed. The JQ is still as relevant as it was 100 years ago in 1917.

Except that Jews have a cholce. Want to realize a Jewish vision of the world?

Move to Israel. Feel more comfortable in the land you were born in, speaking it's language? Assimilate and relax; don't agitate to change everything. Let people be who they are.

Steven said (December 11, 2013):

If these two people (in the picture) got married could they both go home to Israel/ Palestine?


Dear Steven

I don't think so.

Muhammed said (December 11, 2013):

It is sad and unfortunate that the majority of the so called Muslims don't know their own scripture, and are ignorant.

P (below) is incorrect in his comment stating, "Only Muslim women have to marry Muslim men as written in Quran" nowhere in the Quran is this written.

Its a lie,and people better check twice before they say ,this is what God is telling us in the scripture...its a sin to do this.

What is written in the Scripture is this:
[Quran 2:221] Do not marry idolatresses unless they believe; a believing woman is better than an idolatress, even if you like her. Nor shall you give your daughters in marriage to idolatrous men, unless they believe. A believing man is better than an idolater, even if you like him. These invite to Hell, while God invites to Paradise and forgiveness, as He wills. He clarifies His revelations for the people, that they may take heed.

You can all read more here

And by the way I do have to say this, the problem with the Muslims is not their literal interpretation of the Quran, but, on the contrary,it is not following it, or obeying it.


P replies:


My mistake brother, i hope Allah will forgive me about this. You are right; i just have a bad memory sometimes, it was not a lie. The verse you quoted is the one i was thinking about but i've read a hadith or maybe an ulema about what i said, and i thought it was from the Quran.

Thanks you, without you, i would have spread incorrect facts for a long time ;)

Salam aleykoum

Nurie said (December 11, 2013):

Thank you for this amazing article. Just out of curiosity, do you believe that the Illuminati ultimately plan to have the State of Israel physically destroyed as part of a future third world war, as per Albert Pike's predictions; will it be dismantled peacefully as per the South African model in 1994; or perhaps another
fate awaits it?

I do find it rather curious that Israel has not gotten its way lately with regard to Iran and Syria.

The Illuminati also do not seem to be doing anything to stop the growing anti-Zionist student movements on University campuses in North America and Europe. Mandela's recent death is throwing the comparison between Israel and Apartheid South Africa back into the spotlight again. Even major celebrities such as Alice Walker and Roger Waters are openly criticizing Israel and comparing it to Nazi Germany, something which would have been a career ruiner only a few short years ago...



The Illuminati control by creating a dichotomy. Otherwise how would they control Israel? And no, I don't think Israel will be destroyed any more than London or NYC. It is a center of the NWO.


P said (December 10, 2013):

There is a mistake in this text about religious rules. Muslims are not Muslim because their fathers was. You become Muslim by having faith in God, his holy Quran and his messenger Mohammed (peace be upon him). Muslim is not a race.

And Muslim men can marry Jewish or christian women, even if it's recommended to marry with Muslim women for couple harmony. Only Muslim women have to marry Muslim men as written in Quran.

A religion is not a race or an inheritance. If you don't have faith how could you tell "i am christian/Jewish/Muslim" ?

The mother's rule for the Jews is so weird. So you can be the worst guy on the planet but because your mother was Jewish so you are ? kind of funny isn't. Jews are supposed to follow God's order, not spread Chaos on earth. But they failed and began to tell lies about religion, so much lies that they believe in it now.

Al Thompson said (December 10, 2013):

But Henry, Jews are special; God's chosen people, to hear them tell it. The only thing we all can rely upon is what we can see and experience. Racism is a completely insane way of persecuting people, and it is the government and religious people who do the race-baiting. The purpose of it is to allow them to take charge out of the chaos of racism. A man can't help what race he is born into, so why should it ever be used as any kind of guideline to judge anyone?

In this article it is the hypocrisy that is so outstanding. Here in the USA, the ADL promotes racism and bigotry under the guise of helping Jews avoid the persecution of racism. The problems is that these nations such as Israel provide a very useful example of what not to do. Racism serves no other purpose but to intentionally cause trouble among people where there is no trouble. So, as I understand this, Jews supposedly despise racism, yet they practice it themselves. This is why I try not to pay any attention to them as they lose any credibility because of their own hypocrisy.

JG said (December 10, 2013):

Apartheid is the history of the world.
Multiculturalism destroys culture, identity, and nationalism. It is rooted in Marxist ideology that makes only one distinction between the races, the Jews being racial supreme, and all other races being inferior to them.

Therefore, creating a whole new class of people equal in their enslavement to World Order Communism with no distinction or heritage to race or religion because Marxism is a Godless theology.
Israel is trying to turn back the hands of time by re-establishing the State of Israel but this State is a Worldly Kingdom where God and Christianity are outlawed. Their Talmudic Rabbis make the rules and play the role of "self appointed" prophets. There always seems to be a new discovery in their rabbinical discourses that justifies their negligent actions including murder, theft, and immorality.

They have misrepresented God and are still attempting to eradicate Christianity from the world to this very day.

This will have a real bad ending for Israel because the God of Heaven and Earth is no longer their God and his son Jesus Christ is not their messiah.

Tony B said (December 10, 2013):

Saul is in error here - not about Israeli apartheid but the African variety.

In my school geography of the 1940s, Africa was not called the dark continent, it was still called the empty continent. The Dutch Boers (farmers) settled EMPTY wilderness, not black African owned land. There were a few small tribes in southern Africa but the Boers did not bother them or try to take their lands. They even befriended them somewhat.

After taking over the diamond mines originally set up by Cecil Rhodes as De Beers, it was Ernest Oppenheimer who massively imported blacks from central Africa into the south to work the mines. These blacks, even the English commercial interests, came AFTER the Boers, not before. The Boers were the rightful owners of their land. The English (Oppenheimer was German Jew who had become an English citizen) screwed the place up, often misusing the imported blacks, and the Afrikaner Boers (native born) paid dearly for it.

Below- Left Vs Right: Freemasonry Promotes Both Sides (scroll down)

Henry Klein: The Sanhedrin's Tyranny

March 21, 2017

Sanhedrin.jpg"The Sanhedrin now rules the United States, Great Britain and Russia and with the atomic bomb, it has enough power to back up its rulership over all the world."  

In 1945, Jewish lawyer and writer Henry Klein  revealed that the thrall the Sanhedrin holds over the Jewish people is a template for totalitarianism. He wrote:

"The Sanhedrin today consists of more than seventy men. Their identity is well concealed. Their agents are legion. They use Jews and Gentiles to fulfill their purpose. Most of the so-called leading Jews in public and political life, are their agents. Many of the so-called leading Christians in public and political life, are their tools. Many judges and lawyers serve them. There is no anti-semitism in the United States. There is anti-Sanhedrinism, but neither Jews nor Christians understand the difference, so thoroughly have they been faked by propaganda, which will be continued until the Sanhedrin accomplishes its end or its efforts results in complete destruction. We are face to face with complete ruin or complete reform."

by Henry Klein
The Poison in the Jews Cup (1945)

The Protocols say we will keep our people herded together. The Protocols is the plan by which a handful of Jews who compose the Sanhedrin, aim to rule the world by first destroying Christian civilization. The Jews as a group, know nothing about this plan. They are as much the victims of the Sanhedrin as are Christians and those of other religious faiths.

The Sanhedrin operates through the Kehillah. The Kehillah is the controlling Jewish organizations ' in each community where Jews live. Most Jewish organizations are represented in the Kehillah. It Is the local Jewish governing body. All representations in it is by delegates apportioned according to the membership of the constituent bodies. Each Jewish organization, whether a lodge, fraternal order, synagogue or otherwise, is entitled to representation. This unity is in accordance with the advice of the late Louis D. Brandeis who urged Jews to "unite, unite, unite."

The Kehillah in New York City is run by an executive committee over which there is an advisory body. This executive committee is elected from year to year or continued in office. It is responsible for the operation of the Kehillah which is an old Jewish institution going back before the time of Jesus, who was the Kehillah's target in His day. So was Moses Maimonides in the twelfth century ; so was Spinoza in the eighteenth century; so was Jacob Branfmann in the nineteenth century and so am I today.

Why was I the Kehillah's target? Because I defended a Christian who was persecuted with other Christians, in the fake sedition trial in Washington, D.C., during 1944 and because I exposed and stopped the graft of some of the so-called pro-Jewish organizations and publications behind that persecution.

What has the Kehillah done to me? It sent word to all Jewish organizations that I am an outcast Jew; that I am a renegade Jew; that I am against Jews; that I betrayed Jewish secrets which I did not know existed; that I should be shunned by all Jews and by Christians who serve Jews. As a result, I have been ostracized by Jews with whom I have associated many years, many of whom I aided, and by a few so-called Christians who were good friends and clients and who have been scared away from me.

I have been surrounded by spies and followed: my telephone wires were tapped and I have been threatened by mail, telephone and telegraph. Attempts were made to knock me off by violence and poison. This is all in accordance with the plan outlined in the Protocols which say we will exterminate those who oppose us ; they will die as if from natural causes. The plan also includes my ostracism from my own family; the same as was done to Jesus two thousand years ago. 

One of the many threats I received, was sent to me from the Waldorf Hotel in New York City, where one of the so-called Jewish leaders lives. That letter denounced me in unmeasured terms after my opening statement 'to the jury in the fake sedition trial in Washington, D.C., in May, 1944, and said "without making any wild threats, you have been provided for.'' A copy of this letter is on file in the district court in Washington.

The brutality of the Sanhedrin is undisguised.

In Protocol 17 (there are 24 Protocols), it says: "Just as nowadays our brothers are obligated at their own risk to denounce the Kahal, apostates of their own family, or members who have been noticed doing anything in opposition to the Kahal, so in our Kingdom over all the world, it will be obligatory for all our subjects to observe the duty of service to the state in this direction." (Hitler was only an imitator. The word Kahal is English for Kehillah, which is Hebrew) .

In fulfillment of this program, the Kehillah intimidated my sisters and brothers-in-law so that they were afraid to have social intercourse with me even though I raised the members of my family from childhood. What can be thought of an organization that resorts to such base tactics?

Nothing that the Sanhedrin or Kehillah can do or has done, will deter me from my task of exposing those I regard as enemies of the human race. I knew nothing about the Kehillah or the Sanhedrin when I entered the fake sedition case two years ago, ,but what I learned convinced me that an exposure of the madmen behind that persecution was absolutely necessary to save Jews and Christians from their diabolical design. I only knew then that such a thing as a Kehillah existed. I didn't know anything about it. I thought its purpose was benevolent -- to help poor Jews. I didn't even suspect the existence of a Sanhedrin and I regarded the Protocols as apocryphal. I didn't believe that human beings could devise such a mad program as outlined in them.

My understanding has been greatly enlightened. Not only are the Protocols genuine in my opinion, but they have been almost entirely fulfilled. The latest step in their fulfillment was the adoption of the so- called united nation's charter by Congress, creating a super-government, the super-government outlined in the Protocols which say that with the creation of the super-government, the plan in the Protocols will be fulfilled. The Sanhedrin will be in power. The

The Sanhedrin now rules the United States, Great Britain and Russia and with the atomic bomb, it has enough power to back up its rulership over all the world.


I could never understand why for many years it was "thumbs down" on Klein in the newspaper business in New York City, where I had served honorably and courageously for many years as a crusader and graft exposer, at the risk of my life. I regarded such work as the duty of a newspaperman.

I was the leading expose reporter on the World under Joseph Pulitzer, and on The American under Hearst. in the early days of his newspaper career in New York City; and I was chief investigator for some of the important official and unofficial investigating bodies. I exposed single-handed, more political corruption than most newspapermen, public officials and investigators put together, in a period of more than forty years of the sixty-six years of my life, of which, all but the first two years were spent in New York City. One of these exposures included the sewer graft in Queens Borough, N. Y. City in 1927 and 1928, by the late "Jack" Phillips and Maurice Connolly and their gang. By that exposure, I made the City of New York pay back to the property owners of the Jamaica district of Queens Borough, five million four hundred thousand dollars of which they had been swindled by over assessment for sewer construction. This exposure brought about one million dollars additional income tax to the U. S. government. It cost me eight thousand dollars cash and two and a half years time for which I received nothing. It caused the grafters to have four gunmen on my trail for five months.

Why was it "thumbs down" on Klein in the newspaper business? Because the Kehillah, through the Sanhedrin, rules the newspapers and because the Sanhedrin can't stand for an honest and courageous Jew. When I ran for Mayor of New York City in 1933, on the Taxpayers' Party and Five Cent Fare Party tickets, no newspaper in the city was permitted to mention my name though one or two did. I distributed three million leaflets to overcome newspaper suppression, in spite of which I received 57,500 votes though the Board of Election credited me with only 2607 votes and reported 55,000 votes cast for mayor but "not recorded." Ten thousand voters signed my nominating petition to enable me to run.

All this means that no decent Jew has a chance to be known to other Jews or to the people generally if the Sanhedrin wills that he should not be known.' Yet one of the leading lights in the Kehillah was associated with me in a real estate transaction only a dozen years before and most leading lights in the Kehillah know my career intimately. I was not a rubber stamp Jew or an orthodox and that was enough to bar me; besides I was independent and creative and that was taboo. The Kehillah tries to keep Jews orthodox and ignorant so that they can be more easily frightened and controlled. They want Jews to remain docile and obey orders.

Well the Jews are thoroughly controlled, but for what? The reaction against them in all countries has been terrific. Should they continue to go alone as they have up to now and conform to the tenets of their self-appointed masters, or should they throw off the yoke and proclaim their freedom from racial and religious control? 

Unless they do the latter, the Jews are doomed. Up to now most of them have been counted as willing slaves. They have been fed all kinds of false propaganda to keep them ignorant and in fear. Jews and Christians have been used to stir up racial animosities, the better to keep the Jews herded together and in line. The Protocols say we must have anti-semitism in order to keep our people together even if we sacrifice some of them for the greater gain.

Greater gain for whom; for the Jews as a mass or only for the handful of power-mad Sanhedrinites?

Certainly, the Jews as a mass know nothing about the plans of the handful. Not one in ten thousand Jews know / what the Sanhedrin is doing. All they know is what the Kehillah, the controlled press and the faking propagandists, tell them. I stopped a great deal of this humbug and racketeering by my exposure during the fake sedition trial. I charged in my opening statement during that trial, that professional Jews were making a business of scaring other Jews in order to keep them in line and to be better able to shake them down. One of the results of my exposures was vicious attacks on me in controlled Jewish and English publications, some of which I am suing for a total of one million three hundred thousand dollars, for libel. 

Another result was repeated attempts to put me out of business, one communist orator in New York City urging my death in public speeches. These two weapons -- poison and physical violence -- have been used on many prominent persons who opposed some of those in political power in the United States and in other countries, during recent years. The Sanhedrin is, in my opinion, a greater menace by far, than the Mafia ever was. It is a secret world organization, backed by the power of great wealth in all countries.
Related- Israel Shahak - Judaism is Template for NWO Tyranny

First Comment from Tony B

Leslie.Fry (1).JPG
This straight truth by Henry Klein brings back memories of my time with "Mady" de Shishmareff (1882-1970.) The terminology used by Klein is identical to that used by Mady, who spoke often of him and likely got to know him while she was indicted and spent time in court in the sedition trial.  

It also reminds me of her mention of when she was running her NY City half-way house for Russian survivors of the Bolshevik murder of Tsarist Russia (and her husband) which also included writing and circulating a regular broadsheet exposing talmudic crimes as well as the facts she contributed to Henry Ford's newspaper on those subjects which became a major part of his "The International Jew."  

She revealed that a local Jewish business man came to her mansion to tell her that all the Jews in the area knew that there was a "hit" out on her and to be careful of leaving the area but not to worry within it as they would not allow it to happen.  The assumption being that they approved of her exposure of the talmudic criminal control as welcome relief to themselves and their families.


You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Henry Klein: The Sanhedrin's Tyranny"

George said (March 21, 2017):

The remark about Spinoza is certainly right on target. Of the three great so-called Continental Rationalists (Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz) he stands out for his integrity and courage. Incidentally, he is frequently called the father of modern Biblical scholarship. He proved beyond any reasonable doubt that the story of the Pentateuch being authored by Moses is totally untenable. This was a shock to the rabbinical and Talmudic system, since Moses allegedly spoke with God, thus making the Pentateuch in a sense (a tenuous sense indeed) the Word of God.

Below - Are Many Celebrities Secret Trannies? (scroll down)

Left Vs Right: Freemasonry Promotes Both Sides

March 20, 2017

Hitler-masonic-handshake-petain.jpg(Left. Hitler in classic Masonic handshake -thumb on knuckle- with Marshall Petain)

Normally we associate Freemasonry with the "Jews" and the Left. But
Freemasonry also has a conservative branch which establishes Conservative,
Nationalist and Fascist leaders as a form of false opposition. 

These leaders destroy genuine conservative, nationalist and Christian forces, as Hitler did.
Often, like Hitler, they make a show of being anti Mason. (Trump is an exception.
He is constantly signalling his Masonic loyalty.) 

Fascism is just as Masonic as Communism, hence their similarities.
Politics is a charade. We are bystanders. Both Trump and Putin are part of 
this classic Masonic dialectic. Of course, we prefer them but we are best forewarned.

The bottom line: 1. The central bankers empower Freemasons to control society by fomenting division and championing both sides. This is why Trump is bound to disappoint (eg. no investigation of Pedogate, Clinton Foundation.)  Also, just because some Freemasons pretend to champion the conservative values of nation, religion (God), race and family (gender), this doesn't discredit these values. The Illuminati agenda ultimately is to re-engineer society by erasing them. 

2. You could deport every Jew to Israel and nothing would change as long as Freemason goyim are in charge. The answer is for the government to neutralize the central banking cartel by creating the medium of exchange i.e. currency and credit.

(Updated from May 24, 2012)

by David Richards



In Mein Kampf, Hitler said Freemasonry had "succumbed" to the Jews and was an "excellent instrument" to entice the upper classes into their agenda.

After the Nazis rose to power, Hitler outlawed Freemasonry and shut down many lodges. Many brethren were arrested and sent to the concentration camps. The stolen items from Lodges were used to create anti-Masonic exhibitions across Germany, designed to create fear and hostility towards the fraternity.

Freemasons were also executed, and their property stolen in countries invaded and occupied by the Nazi's (Norway, Denmark, Holland, Belgium, France, Poland, Hungary, Greece etc). Historians tell us that at least 80,000 masons were murdered across Europe.


(Left, Hitler making the Triad Claw hand sign.)

However, in reality Hitler's anti-Masonic policy was very selective.The Nazis only persecuted fringe lodges associated with the Communists. Mainstream German Freemasonry, which was allied with American and British masonry, was exempted. This because Hitler himself secretly was aligned with them. Indeed he was their agent.

A 1997 edition of the Freemasonic journal Philalthes featured an article titled 'German Freemasonry and Its Attitudes Toward The Nazi Regime', that reveals the demographics of the Fraternity in 1930s Germany.

'Several Masonic spiritual families existed side by side in Germany, [and] were treated differently by the Nazis.'

'About two-thirds of the brethren belonged to the three oldest, always Christian-oriented and at that time strongly nationalistic Grand Lodges founded in the 18th century which were called 'Old Prussian' because they were founded and had their seats in Berlin. They never initiated 'non Christians', that is, Jews.'

This faction was Pro-Nazi. It contained the captains of industry, commerce and finance, Royalty and leading citizens who backed Hitler. Many of these men were high-ranking members of the Nazi Party.

These lodges were not persecuted, but they did have to make a few minor adjustments consistent with anti-Masonic policy. Their Grand Master's sent formal written oaths of allegiance to Hitler and they removed Hebraic wording from their rituals.

stamps.pngThey united and called themselves 'The Frederick the Great Association'. The Prussian King Frederick the Great (1712-1786) was  a nationalist symbol in Nazi propaganda. However, he was also the founder and patron of 'regular' Freemasonry in Germany!


The Nazis liquidated the fringe lodges that allowed Jews to be initiated.

'During the 19th century, five more German Grand Lodges were founded and a further one in 1924. They were called 'humanitarian' and initiated men of any religious denomination.'

They espoused liberal and internationalist politics. They were allied with the Communists: Hitler shut them down.

The Prussian alliance refused to recognize these lodges.

'In 1922, the Old Prussian Grand Lodges decided to withdraw from the German Grand Lodges' Alliance founded in 1872, explaining: 'There is a border which strongly differentiates humanitarian from Old Prussian national Freemasonry. We, the three Old Prussian Grand Lodges refuse to take part in the general humanitarian fraternization movement between people in the world.'

kissinger_putin_masonic_handshake (1).jpg

(Putin, Kissinger exchange Masonic handshake.)

Essentially, the large and powerful lodges in Germany united to eliminate their much smaller neighbors. So, rather than being an attack on the Fraternity as a whole, Hitler's anti-Masonic policy was really contrived Masonic in-fighting! 

World War Two should also be seen in this light.



The Prussian Lodges were the only German Lodges recognized by British and American Freemasonry.

They share a common history. Prussian King Frederick the Great played an important role in the creation of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. Official Masonic history records:


mqdefault (1).jpg

  (Trump constantly makes Eye of Horus and Inverted Pyramid signs. Admits he is a Freemason) 

"The Scottish Rite had its beginning in France, when in 1754, the Chevalier de Bonneville established in Paris, a chapter of twenty-five so-called High Degrees which, including the three symbolic Degrees, these High Degrees were called the Rite of Perfection.

 In 1758 these Degrees were taken to Berlin and placed under a body called the Council of Emperors of the East and West, and in 1762 Frederick the Great of Prussia became the head of the Rite and promulgated what is known as the Constitution of 1762. In 1786 a reorganization took place in which eight Degrees were added to the twenty-five, and the name changed to the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry."

 The Prussian Lodges were what tied the Western powers to Nazi Germany. This is why Freemasons like Henry Ford aided Hitler.

The lodges had particularly strong ties with the Prussian Royal family in Britain. It is well known that the British Royals were Nazi sympathizers, for instance, all four of Prince Philip's sisters married high-ranking Nazis.

However, some Royals were privy to the agenda for WW2 and some weren't. The Illuminati planned for Germany to lose the war, so the genuine Nazi collaborators had to be purged in case they sabotaged the script.

geo.jpegOne of the most infamous murders of WW2 was of Prince George, Duke of Kent.

The Duke was a virulent Nazi supporter. In 1939, he was elected Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England.

In 1941, Prince George and the Duke of Hamilton conducted a secret meeting with Rudolf Hess in Scotland in an attempt to negotiate a peace treaty between the rival powers. The British government arrested Hess and put him in prison for the rest of his life.

The repercussions for Prince George were even more severe. Six months after this meeting, his plane was shot down.

 Sir Anthony Blunt claims that the Prince was murdered on the orders of Winston Churchill.




Freemasonry was behind all of the major players in WW2

Freemasonry was behind the 'right-wing' Fascist Nazis. The Prussian Lodges in Germany were integral to building up the Nazi party. The Swastika is a symbol used in high Masonic Degrees today; apparently it is the ancient "Furthore" Rune Script for the letter "G", the most important and universal symbol in Freemasonry.


( Fascism is just as Masonic as Communism, hence their similarities.)

Freemasonry was also behind the 'left-wing' Soviets. Karl Marx, Lenin and Trotsky were all Masons. The flag of Communist East Germany featured the Masonic compass.

Freemasonry was also behind the 'Capitalists.' Both Churchill and FDR were Masons.

Politics and history are a charade. The real war is between Satanists and humanity. Freemasonry organizes our elections and wars so nations remain divided and are destroyed. (Thus British Masons betrayed British agents to the Nazis.)  We are indeed mind prisoners of a satanic cult, mice in their laboratory



(l. Mike Pence-- Sign of Baphomet) 

Related - Russia Lawmaker Demands Investigation of Freemasons 

Makow ---Freemasons Stage Our Political Charade 

------------Hitler's Many Masonic Hand Signs 

------Historian Brought Freemasons to Heel

The "Ugly Secret" of WW2


'The Rainbow Swastika' by Hannah Neuman has an informative chapter on Hitler & the occult

Freemasonic and Nazi History -

History of the Scottish Rite -

Some similarities between Freemasonry and Nazism -


Freemasonry and Communism -


First Comment by Eliezer


Pursuant to "Nazis were Against Freemasonry -- Masonic Ruse" by David Richards, many are those who have mistaken the Nazi movement for a right-wing conservative ideological movement. Nothing could be further from the truth. As researcher Rabbi Marvin Antelman writes... "Indeed, even though Hitler in his later years did condemn Karl Marx and Marxism, the fact of the matter is that National Socialism was Socialism and that, indeed..." early Nazi regalia combined busts of Karl Marx and Nazi Emblems along with the hammer and sickle, as shown in the 1934 Nazi Labor Day Medal Depicting a dominant bust of a young Karl Marx, Hammer and Sickle, Nazi Eagle and Swastika . [Nazi Regalia, Ballantine 1971]

ivanka.jpg(Ivana- triad claw) 

Further, Antelman writes, "Once we realize the regalia is a dead giveaway of the Nazi connection (with Marxism), we can better begin to understand why there was a treaty between Communist Stalin and Hitler. The treaty provided that Stalin would remain neutral against Hitler. It began in August, 1939, and terminated with the invasion of Russia by Hitler in June of 1941. It would also better explain why leftists -- cooperated with Hitler. This includes such infamous personalities as a practicing Christian named Walerner Von Oppenheim. He was a member of the Board of Directors of I.G. Farben, sentenced to death at the Nuremberg trials and executed. He was considered a Jew under the Nuremberg Laws, but Hitler had him exempted as an "Honorary Aryan." [Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman, To Eliminate The Opiate, Vol. 2, 2002:215-216]
Rabbi Antelman explains, "What is often forgotten is that much of American anti-Semitism during the 19th century was aggravated by none other than Karl Marx, who was given a free hand in Horace Greely's Herald Tribune to write diatribes about Jews, and which Marx published in his infamous "A World Without Jews." [ibid]
When it comes to an occultic history of Hitler's more plausible origins, and the true makeup and motives for the Holocaust itself, Rabbi Antelman takes us further down the rabbit hole than any man in recent history. Indeed, Antelman explains how... "The Sabbatian ritual which conceived Adolph Hitler on the 9th of Av, fast Day for the destruction of the First and Second Temples on July 20, 1888, Hitler was born 9 months later April 20, 1889. Accordingly, his real father was not Alois Shickelgruber and his Sabbatian roots are also maternal stemming from the Strones family." For further reading...
See, To Eliminate The Opiate, Vols 1 & 2 - 
Also, Listen to Interview with Rabbi Antelman @
To Eliminate The Opiate Vol 1, complete book online here...

"...Be this as it may, the Führer's origin remains (still) more or less shrouded in darkness, as it is not possible to trace any further than to those dates and individuals mentioned above, at least not with any certainty. Even the village Strones, the scene of this fateful childbirth exists no longer--Adolf Hitler ordered it destroyed ... So far, one can find no mention or history of a "Strones Family" on search engines, ostensibly after which the town of Strones was named. One does however, gain a distinct but guarded impression, Hitler was conceived specifically for what he became. By way of curiosity, one asks which other national leader's background still remains shrouded in darkness & obfuscation - a leader who apparently knew he was going to be President of the United States in 1989, 20 years before he was "elected?" Are the Sabbateans up to their old tricks? Was Barry Soetoro also groomed from birth?


Second Comment by David Livingstone:

Rabbi Antelman says, in To Eliminate the Opiate, that Hitler was deliberately produced through a Frankist ritual, on their traditional holiday, Tisha Bav, celebrated as Shabbetai Zevi's birthday.

Turns out genetic tests have proven Hitler had Sephardic DNA, of the E1b1b haplogroup.

(source: Nebel; Filon, D; Brinkmann, B; Majumder, P; Faerman, M; Oppenheim, A (2001), "The Y Chromosome Pool of Jews as Part of the Genetic Landscape of the Middle East", American Journal of Human Genetics 69 (5): 1095-1112)

That Haplogroup also happens to be the exact same as found in Napoleon.

This is no accident. Both Hitler and Napoleon represent the two major attempt to set up world orders (or deliberately set up to fail doing so). 

Napoleon was worshipped by the Polish Frankists as a messiah. He was called the "World Soul" by Illuminati oracle Hegel.

Likewise, we have to remember that Hitler's Ariosphy was the Jewish Kabbalah of the Frankist variety, produced by Blavatsky, taught to her by Jamal Afghani, and inherited from the Asiatic Brethren, founded by Jacob Frank's nephew.

Hitler is commonly believed in occult circles to have been possessed. Consider Carl Jung's opinion on the subject. I'm willing to believe Jung was a Sabbatean, as it has been proven that Freud certainly was.

See Wikipedia article on Esoteric Hitlerism

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for " Left Vs Right: Freemasonry Promotes Both Sides "

Doug P said (March 21, 2017):

I think your conclusions on the pictures of Trump and Hitler making a secret signs is a little "optimistic", for lack of a better stronger term at this time. I make the signal that Trump made, lots of people do it. As far as Hitler with his hand on the hip, the Lions Claw is usually made much more obvious even today. I wonder if those people "in the circle" are starting to feel like suckers. I wonder what it is like to get lead into something, just for the sake of having an unfair advantage over everyone else, then have almost everyone else know what you did, then find out the agenda is against you and your family. I wonder what the suicide rate is like for people like attorneys.

I have no doubt that the fundamental premise of your argument is true.

Milenko said (March 20, 2017):

The Spanish fascists were different from the German Nazis. Actually, the Falangist movement had only at first some fascist traits, but it really was not fascism. They maintained that the state must be impregnated with the Christian tradition.

In fact, Falangist leader Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera had a meeting with Hitler. Regarding the dialogue he had with him, he said: "We can learn from them in some things, as to the organization of work and elimination of unemployment. But Hitler does not believe in God, and we have nothing to do with him. "

Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera was deeply Catholic. He was assassinated by communists at the beginning of the Spanish Civil War in 1936. Spanish dictator Francisco Franco was also a man of strong faith. They eliminated all the Masonic lodges in Spain, to the point that lodges informed: "the columns have fallen". Franco said that he was fighting against the "Judeo-Masonic conspiracy."

As for Hitler, one could not say that he was an Illuminati agent, but he did act as if he were. His agreement with the Soviet Union at the time of the invasion of Poland is inexplicable. However, it should be noted that the Versailles peace agreement in 1919 gave Poland three German provinces in which some three million Germans lived. However, the agreement between Hitler and Stalin was really inexplicable. Without that agreement, Germany would probably not be destroyed in the Second World War. The Germans had enough strength to repel any aggression, but not to beat everyone far from Germany. Why then does Hitler have to fight on both fronts, why he enters Russia, and does not defend Poland from the Soviet Union?

I think that Hitler was a man literally possessed by the devil, and that he was actually an agent not of the Illuminati, but of the devil himself. Hence the irrationality of his behavior.

Joe said (May 26, 2012):

I can't prove this,of course, I just have a feeling that Hitler was sent in to undermine and usurp any collective action on the part of patriotic Germans to save themselves from the inflictions imposed on Germany at Versailles and also to protect themselves from the communists that had just won in Russia and were threatening Germany.

.Every major decision that Hitler made was a mistake and lead Germany to destruction. This is just not hidsight. It was obvious to at least some Germans at the time that Hitler's action would lead to ruin. The Germans who could see this clearly were conveniently "disappeared".

My guess is that Hitler was an agent for the Rothschilds (who also supported the communists). Maybe the connection between the Rothschilds and Hitler was made through the Freemasons.
Whatever Hitler was, deep in his heart, he did not have the best interests of Germany in mind. He wanted Germany destroyed.
He was on one hand very intelligent and a genius,of sorts. On the other hand, he was very sick and perverted in his mind. He was a monster.

It was always very strange to me to read in the history books how Hitler was a penniless and friendless artist/vagabond living in a single-room-occupancy building in Vienna, yet out of nowhere, all of a sudden, He is marching down the main boulevard of Berlin with 5,000 men, all well-fed, in full uniforms, horses (very expensive horses, too boot, and very well groomed), well armed with expensive weaponry. This Hitler, friendless and penniless one day, the next day has put together a battalion costing a fortune. At a time, no less,when inflation was destroying the average working people of Germany, this poor and penniless and friendless Hitler has the money to form a little army for himself. Amazing.Unbelievable!

The history books never explain the inconsistencies of this absurdity.Penniless and powerless men at the bottom of society do not just one day have the wherewhithal and the means to form for themselves a battalion and then march down the main boulevard of a capital city, or any city, just like that.

The history books never explain who exactly was financing Hitler. The books don't touch upon that subject at all. We are simply expected to believe this fairy tale, albeit sick and perverted fairy tale

I detest Hitler. I detest him because in his heart he wanted Germany destroyed.

Clifford Shack said (May 26, 2012):

Understanding modern history could not be simpler. Some people say, "Follow the money," but it is simpler than even that. The clever folks who fashion "money" out of nothing rule us all. It is they that also fashion "history" out of nothing. Modern history and modern money are just two among the other brazen, illusionary ideas that control us from cradle to grave.

Adam said (May 25, 2012):

Correct me where I am wrong here. I do not intend to come-off as a 'know-it-all' in these matters but I am sharing what I've learned. Dissecting this organization that has us by our collective throats is, as intended, not simple.

Within the Illuminati there are many Orders that make-up the whole with Masonry being the most predominant of them. George W. Bush, for example, was a member of Skull and Bones which is a branch of the Illuminati but some may argue that it is not related to Masonry. Likewise, Hitler was a member of the Thule society which shares common traits with Skull and Bones.

Within Masonry, as well as the greater body of the Illuminati, are Left and Right "paths" (some Masons even use the term the Left and Right body of Masonry). This is the dialectic at work...I suspect they believe 'religiously' that the dialectic is an integral part of their "Craft"...If nothing else, the dialectic keeps the masses confused about who to blame for whatever crisis is at hand -- one branch creates a problem while the other condemns and offers their solution and the masses are mesmerized by the theatrics of it.

John said (May 25, 2012):

Hi Henry. The article about the Masons in WWII was where your writer has a misunderstanding. And it is part of a narrative that you also espouse and that is "too conspiratorial by half". WWII was not a conspiracy. It was a real war and the masons and sabbatean Jews won. The pinkos and commies won, to use another terminology.

To try and say that both sides were Masons and it was all contrived is just childish.

Reading the facts it is easy to understand that, yes, there were at the time two types of Masonry. And other books written before then, after the French Revolution allude to this. But specifically at the time between the wars, there was a type of masonry that was basically goys being goys and carrying on about "free will", the "rights of man" and all that type of silly stuff. And then there were lodges that were controlled by sabbateans that had an agenda, THE agenda. And it was these latter ones that were the real threat and it was these ones that Hitler shut down. The other ones were reformable and included in the nationalist programme.

Same thing in England. Those masons that were just idle goys engaging in fruitless talk were one thing. Then there were the others controlled by the sabbateans. Prince George was murdered by the sabbatean masons.

The naive goy masons that really didn't know what was going on (the dupes, useful idiots) found themselves on the "wrong" side of the real masons, the ones controlled by the Sabbateans. And it is these sabbatean masons that won WWII.

And that is still where we are today.

Thanks for all the good stuff you put out there for people to educate themselves.

Ken Adachi- The Truth about JFK's Assassination

March 22, 2017

The story that the intelligence services, the FBI, the Secret Service, etc., and gatekeepers like Jim Marrs don't want you to know

by Ken Adachi 

As a result of you mentioning that you posted the article, I re-read all the articles I sent to you and re-read the link I had embedded of the sworn testimony of JFK assassination witness Hugh William Betzner, Jr.

I hadn't read it since I first posted the Larry Jamison article in 2007, 

but upon re-reading it,  I suddenly realized that Betzner's testimony of the loud sounds he heard matches most closely with the sequence of shots described in the book, "Murder from Within" by Fred Newcomb and Perry Adams. The book was published for the first time in 2011, just a month before Fred Newcomb died. Newcomb and Adams had originally made 100 Kinko copies of their book in 1973, after 5 years of investigation, and sent it to DOJ, FBI, many members of congress, etc. etc. and NO ONE got back to them. No publisher would touch the book. A German publisher said he would publish the book until he read the manuscript and then backed out, realizing it revealed too much and might get him killed. .

The reason I'm emphasizing this is that the ONLY book which accurately describes how JFK and Connally were shot is Murder from Within. All of the well known JFK assassination experts/authors, or video documentaries, etc, want to keep your attention OUTSIDE of the limo. The two bullets that hit JFK and the one bullet that hit Connally in the back ALL came from Greer's gun:

Greer first shot JFK in the throat.
As JFK was clutching his throat, Connally (who was in on the assassination plan but didn't know it was going to happen in the limo) turned around 180 degrees and was gawking at him, mouth agape. 
Because he was blocking Greer's line of sight, Greer had to shoot him in the back to get him to lay down. Nellie Connally, who could see what was taking place, pulled Connally down on top of her to get him to lay down.  Greer then shot JFK in the head in Zapruder frame 313.

The very first shot heard at 12:30PM (before Greer started shooting) was described by all street witnesses as either a "firecracker" or a car backfiring. It was actually a "Decoy shot" from the revolver of Secret Service agent Woody Taylor who fired into the air from the rear seat of the 1963 yellow  Mercury he was riding in as it made the turn onto Elm St from Houston. 

The details and photos are here: 

February 5, 2013, Augmented Nov. 22, 2013
Tiny url:
 THIS is the story that the intelligence services, the FBI, the Secret Service, etc., and gatekeepers like Jim Marrs doesn't want the world to know

Canada-EU "Trade Deal" Contains a Gift for the Rothschilds

March 16, 2017


Canada-EU "Trade Deal" Contains a Gift for the Rothschilds

Ostensibly a trade deal, Bill C-30 will forever prevents the 
Bank of Canada from creating debt free currency.

Dear Senators,

I suspect by now you have received emails and letters about the many problems that are an inherent part of Bill C-30 for the implementation of the CETA agreement between Canada and Europe. To say there are problems with the agreement are an understatement but I would like to focus on just one aspect of the agreement and it relates to the Bank of Canada.

If I may I would like to give you just a very brief history of The Bank of Canada which was created in the 1930's. The primary purpose of the Bank of Canada was to create money for the various levels of government in Canada during a very difficult time for our country. We were in middle of the Great Depression and we were soon to be involved in World War II in Europe. The Bank of Canada was given the power to create money for Canada in the form of low interest loans to the various levels of government in Canada.

 The move was a huge success. It paid for the War, got us out of the Depression and paid for a great deal of infrastructure such as the Dew Line, the Trans-Canada Highway, and allowed us to create a health care system that was the envy of the world. It achieved all this with no more inflation than was taking place in the rest of the OECD countries. When the money was paid back to the Bank of Canada it was actually being paid back to WE THE PEOPLE OF CANADA because we own The Bank of Canada.

The Bank of Canada continued to be used up until 1974 when for some reason Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau discontinued the ability of the Bank of Canada to make those low interest loans to the governments of Canada. From that point on the governments of Canada were forced to borrow their money on the open market. The result has been that since 1974 our country has had to pay over $1.8 trillion dollars in extra interest on the debt that never should have been accumulated. I'm sure you would agree that this decision has contributed in a major way to the huge debt that now hangs over the Canadian people.

Up  until now, the Bank of Canada has always had the power to to make those low interest loans to the governments of Canada but has never used it. Politicians have always maintained that to do so would be inflationary. That of course has never been true. There is absolutely no evidence of that at all.

Now to the present day. Finance Minister Morneau and Prime Minister Trudeau for some inexplicable reason have included a clause in the CETA agreement that would forever eliminate the ability of The Bank of Canada to create low interest loans for the governments of Canada. One could be forgiven for asking why a clause on banking and money creation would be included in a trade agreement not to mention a clause that will have a catastrophic impact on Canada and Canadians. I would suggest to you that such a decision could not come at a worse time when the world finds itself in an increasingly perilous financial situation. The Bank of Canada could have helped our country get through difficult financial times just like it did when it got us out of the Great Depression.

Senator, I would urge you to take a very hard look at Bill C-30 and think seriously of its implications for the future of our country.
Rick Tufts 

Into the Mental Vortex/ Human Detritus by Henry Makow

March 15, 2017

Into the Mental Vortex/ Human Detritus   by Henry Makow 

I was in a bookstore recently and realized I have been oppressed by ...books all my life! 
I have a room in my house that looks like this. I have scoured books (and to a lesser extent films)
looking for "the answer" -- some explanation for wtf was happening here on the planet earth. 
I realize now that books keep us mentally subservient. There was never a shortage of
professors ready to exaggerate their value in order to justify their inflated salaries.  If cockroaches
could write books, would you read them? Even if you were a cockroach? 
Books are human detritus - the record of the meandering and maundering
of a benighted species, kept in darkness by demons who use books to 
lure us into the mental vortex. Books do not liberate us.  "Knowledge" is a prison. Freedom lies in separating oneself
from the material world, the world of forms. The poet Henry More (1614-1687) wrote:

"When the inordinate desire after knowledge of things was allayed in me,  and I aspired after nothing but purity and simplicity of mind, 
there shone in me daily a greater assurance than ever I could have expected, even of those things which before I had the greatest desire to know." 

I  am not saying, don't read. But don't look for "meaning" like I did. Read for information, escape or inspiration.