Direct Link to Latest News

Below-Sex has made us Stupid (scroll down)

Is Director of Gillette Toxic Masculinity Ad a Lesbian?

January 16, 2019

vulva.png Libresse, the feminine hygiene brand who shocked many with their #BloodNormal campaign last year, is back with a lighter tone and far more fun in this new spot from Somesuch director Kim Gehrig with post by Time Based Arts.
According to the release, the goal of the ad is "to contribute to a more open culture where women can feel proud of what they have, can feel OK about talking about their genitals, and can care for it without feeling ashamed."
But such ads tend to demystify and degrade women in the eyes of men.

Kim Gehrig who Gillette selected to direct the first commercial in a series making heterosexuality a pathology is a single mother and given her hatred of men and fixation on female genitals, likely a lesbian.
Below, a Reddit contributor looks at her anti-male work.
Happily, men no longer are tolerating this attack on masculinity which originates with the Illuminati bankers. "A brainwashed emotionally weak feminine man is much easier to control than a masculine independent man."

"On the 30th anniversary of its famous tagline "The Best a Man Can Get," Gillette is taking a fresh look at what it means to be "the best."  The company is introducing a marketing campaign and charitable program dedicated to celebrating the stories of men who are making a positive impact and inspiring other in the process. 

The program-leading short film, entitled "We Believe," was developed by Gillette's global advertising agency Grey and directed by Kim Gehrig of production company Somesuch. It showcases Gillette's POV of how we can work together to set the right example for the next generation of men and take positive actions that push back against bullying, sexual harassment and the "boys will be boys" mentality, changing the culture of "toxic masculinity." 

Additionally, Gillette has committed to donating $1 million per year for the next three years to non-profit organizations executing programs in the U.S. designed to help men of all ages achieve their personal "best," changing the conversation of modern manhood for generations to come."

This is the first time I post here. I've been following the MGTOW philosophy and I've decided to be on my own 2 years ago after a break up with my ex with whom I lived with for 9 years.

(Ad stigmatizes male overtures to women as crude and offensive)

The Gillette ad started out with the recent video depicting men as the only source of male violence and the only ones who can stop it. Especially in relation to how men treat boys.

This, of course, ignores the facts that 1) women commit most infanticides and 2) women are more aggressive to children and 3) a lot of boys are raised by single mothers and never see their fathers.

So, after watching this massive piece of crap, I looked into who was behind this stupid idea for a marketing campaign. Kim Gehrig was the Director who thought this was going to sell more razors to men.

(Gehrig, left)

I went and looked up her recent work. I was not surprised. And I'll post some examples of how she views men and women.

1st video: "Womankind"   Just watch the message, the words, and you'll find out pretty quickly that, in her world, women have no agency and are only the object of oppression (by men, we suppose). When talking about bras and breasts, she puts a radical feminist message - through words - on top of the image and sound.

This was made to address the rise in the use of steroids (or alcohol related violence according to a different source) in Australia, apparently. But how does she think those numbers are justified? Unemployment? Depression? Divorce? Increase in the cost of living in general? Women? Motherhood (single mothers)? Nahhh! Of course not.

The reasons, in this video, are: 1) Fathers that hit their children (boys) and 2) boys that are bullies.

You don't see a single female in the video who interacts with the victim. Not one. It stinks of misandry.

Well, here everything is straight forward. The ideal "man" for her is the soy-boy dude from the video, who's made fun of by the girl, treated like a joke, behaves like a stupid kid and is called a "man".


This is all, I guess. Maybe it's not interesting for you, maybe it is. I was interested to know who was behind the Gillette ad and I found exactly what I expected.

She's talented as a director, no doubt. But her views about men and women are fucking ridiculous and clearly from a radical feminist


Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Is Director of Gillette Toxic Masculinity Ad a Lesbian? "

Diana said (January 16, 2019):

Did you see the last boy in the screen shot ! Looks like a girl

Tony B said (January 16, 2019):

Ya' know, when all this crap about "Oh. the poor misused women" started after WW2 and men started dropping out after some criminal judge handed a greedy divorcee everything the ditched man had worn himself out to acquire for them as a family, plus pauperizing the man's future by stealing most of his pay and handing it to the selfish ex, who usually already had another man in her bed; more and more men began making statements such as, "Screw women, that's all they're good for anyway."

Now, thanks to miseducation and catered selfishness and greed as a life object of many women, these "feminists" have made such statements literally true. Do they really think men cannot figure out their total self-interest and thus simply use them as they use men?

They really are good for nothing else. Is any normal man really as selfishly calloused as a woman who murders her own unborn child for the sake of mis-considered convenience? What sort of man wants to bed such a self-centred murderess?

Most of today's women, western women anyway, are totally screwed up because they have no clue of what a woman actually is. They keep chasing rainbows that have nothing whatever to do with being a woman and wonder why they are never satisfied. The criminal courts and insane universities are doing no one any favours with this ludicrous, totally insane and obviously satanic garbage mislabeled "feminism," especially not women.

As you consistently note in these articles, "feminism" is an agenda to destroy the family, the rock foundation of civilization the existence of which depends totally on God the Creator's principles. Women deprived of family cannot exist as women as that is what they were created to sustain. Family is the very heart of women; without it they have no true reason for their existence, no focal point for their lives.

Mike B said (January 16, 2019):

Never in all of human history was there a time where mass and mass instant communication existed as it does today - telephones, radio, television, newsprint publications, "academic" writings, e-mail, twitter, f/b, 'social media', online publications of all sorts, etc., and etc.

Has any "identifiable group", other than boys and men, received such mass local and worldwide disdain, derision and utter contempt before and especially during our common era of instant communication? Name one, lurking doubters.

And, at the same time, lurking doubters - how dare you and others collectively treat defenceless boys and little boys in these such heinous of manners as mentioned above and discussed in this online publication? This ain't over yet and countless people have much to answer to.

Below- The Lost Art of Femininity (scroll down)

Sex Has Made Us Stupid

January 15, 2019

Men want to have intercourse with 
every attractive woman they see. 

It's stupid, dehumanizing and it's
self-defeating too. 

We've forgotten, or want to forget,
that sexual attraction is about 
marriage and family and that we seek
much more than sex.

It's time to admit when it comes to sex, society is increasingly dysfunctional. This is not progress. It is sickness and decline. It's time we turned around and began the arduous climb back to a higher place.

Revised from June 29, 2017
by Henry Makow Ph.D. 

Considering that our most powerful instinct is also our stupidest, no wonder humanity is in such a sorry state. 

Sexual attraction is all about procreation. The act of procreation is sacred. We are simulating an act that creates life even if we practise conception. We are surrogates of God. A man plants his seed in the fertile ground and regards the child as his natural extension. He sustains both mother and child and prepares the child to take his place in the world.

Sexual intercourse is the most intimate physical act between man and woman. It is dehumanizing if it does not correspond to a human connection. It is an act of possession. If a man takes possession of a woman, and then tosses her away like a piece of litter, the psychological effect on the woman is devastating.  

Yet most men (and women) are more than willing to let the Illuminati degrade this sacred act to the level of sensual titillation. 

Men fantasize about impregnating every attractive young woman they see. They're obsessed with planting their seed in that ground. But most think the job ends there. They really don't care what happens after the seed grows.  If we are disconnected from our progeny, we are disconnected from ourselves.


There were 50 million abortions in the US  since 1970. Twenty million worldwide this year alone. 

necro (1).jpg
But do these possibilities even enter a man's mind? 

No. Seed planted. Job over. Goodbye.

Apparently, men were designed to spread their seed, not consider the consequences. 

Talk about stupid. 

What could be dumber than using another human being for selfish sensual gratification?



Under the Christian dispensation, the culture recognized that sexual attraction is really about procreation. Men generally are not attracted to women who are not fertile.  The culture sensibly linked sex to procreation by insisting on marriage. If a man wanted the milk, he had to buy the cow. This way, if sex had its intended consequence, there would be a structure to care for it. 

"Love and marriage...go together like a horse and carriage" was a popular song at the time.

Sex was a sacrament, the symbol of a sacred bond between man and woman. Men and women "made love." They expressed their feelings by giving pleasure. It wasn't mutual masturbation with a stranger. 

Thinking of sex in these terms meant other women become off limits. You can focus on more important and more fulfilling things. 

But upon entering the Satanist (Masonic) dispensation, things have gone off the rails. The act of procreation was transformed from a sacrament of marriage into sensual indulgence, a carnival ride. Sex has become a lifelong sexual addiction, an end in itself and the more the better. 


Hence, the stupidity of mindless sexual attraction is on full display.  

Let me count the ways.

1. Love is blind. By love, I mean lust.  We are sexually attracted to people who otherwise we often cannot stand. Because sex has been detached from marriage and procreation, we do not consider a woman's[personality and fitness as wife and mother.  
These considerations go out the window: character, personality, intelligence, skills, talent. Men are not looking for a wife, but momentary diversion and release. 

(At sea for weeks at a time, mostly male Canadian navy crews are encouraged to embrace sodomy.) 

2. The Illuminati use sexual attraction to create chaos and control us. They prefer that we obsess on sex rather than on their credit monopoly and permanent wars.  Heterosexual society is the victim of a massive behaviour modification program. We are taught to behave like homosexuals who generally indulge in sex for its own sake. Homosexuals generally don't bond and don't want to marry. 

Homosexuality is caused by gender confusion due to an overbearing mother, absent father or same-sex molestation. The Illuminati are reengineering healthy heterosexuals to question our gender identity and behave like homosexuals.

Normalizing paedophilia is next. They are sexualizing children in public schools. After that, incest and bestiality. There is no depravity our satanist masters won't indulge because they indulge in them all. Necrophilia for example. Some people are in love with inanimate objects. 

3. "Free love" is disastrous for women who get nothing in exchange. How is giving away their most important asset empowering?  After 35, their sex appeal is in steep decline. Women want the lifelong love and dedication of one man, their husband. They need to marry when they are young and attractive. For their own sake, they need to reserve sex for courtship, love and marriage. 

4.  Men and women seem incapable of governing sexual attraction. It wasn't until I arrived at a ripe old age that I was able to appreciate that appearance (sex attraction) bears no relationship to character, personality and intelligence. Women especially have been objectified. Hollywood has put them on a pedestal. But women are very complex creations, not sperm receptacles.  

5. Dare we admit it? This thing we are conditioned to obsess about, anonymous sex, is not that great. Sex without love is a sad imitation. They've convinced us we want sex when we're really looking for much more.


Joseph Daniel (J.D.) Unwin was an Oxford university social anthropologist whose research on 80 primitive tribes and six civilizations demonstrated that societies that practised heterosexual monogamy were far more successful. Let's face it. Society needs to replace itself and
nature has deemed that the heterosexual family is the most effective way to do this. 

(Only two genders. Nuclear family. Good for nature but not for Satanists who overrule God and nature)

Satanists know this. That's why they promote "sexual liberation" (promiscuity, porn) and gender confusion. 

We need to re-establish the bond between sex and marriage/procreation.  Sexual attraction is a primitive program geared to procreation. By harnessing the sex drive to marriage and family, Christian Western culture has humanized it. This is for the benefit of men, women, children and society as a whole. For our own sakes, we need to return to our cultural roots. 


Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Sex Has Made Us Stupid "

Christine said (January 15, 2019):

Seems those who choose to engage in careless, callous sex don’t realize they have simply reduced themselves to an orgasm.

Al Thompson said (January 15, 2019):

As I look back, I never got anything good out of fornicating. There's always a payback with a bad result. I wrote an article about sex before marriage and all of the results do not work out. In fact, anything that does not have good moral standards is going to be a disaster. If it ever is going to be fixed, there should be more of an emphasis in teaching basic morality to the children at an early age.

Jeremy C said (June 30, 2017):

Great article Henry. A whole lot of people do not realize that there is a very dark side of the studies and research into human psychology. Understanding human sexual desire and motivations and biological responses is a key towards learning how to manipulate and control the masses.

Kinsey and other dark scientists have conducted research and experiments involving just about every sexual act or stimulation possible. There has also been research into fetish and submission/domination, rape, sexualizing violence as they have worked very diligently to map out the human brain and biology in response to every kind of stimuli.

They have realized that we human beings can be conditioned towards sexual attraction to things that are very bad for us. They have realized that a permissive atmosphere and encouragement towards perceived sexual pleasure will influence the sexual behaviour in a vulnerable part of the population.

Grooming young people to be vulnerable and more easily manipulated by sex is accomplished by weakening the loving bond between the child and their parents. This is done by the public school system removing kids from their parents for approximately half of the waking hours of the year and television and media programming and sexualizing and conditioning a Pavlovian response to different sexual stimuli. The kids that are really vulnerable are the children of divorce and separated homes. Likewise, even fully grown adults are far more vulnerable to toxic sexual impulses post divorce. Divorce is traumatic and has an effect on a community that witnesses divorce. It strongly attacks the marriage bond and causes people to lose faith in monogamy.

Addiction is a sign of a starving person seeking pleasure in something toxic. One addiction often leads to others and so if you can be conditioned to become a shopaholic and buy things to try to give yourself pleasure (as advertising does) then this addiction can be associated with sexual pleasure in advertising and also conditions people to grow their sexual desires too. Leading people to become addicted to forbidden and dirty sex (like adultery) is done incrementally throughout their lives and it seems to have a cumulative effect to the point where it destroys marriages and family relationships.
The illuminati know this and they are confident and doubling down hard that the powerful toxic drives they have created will salt the earth and keep humanity under their thumb like a crack dealer keeps his crack addicted customers in line because he has a well tested lever that he can pull anytime the crack addict thinks about dealing with their addiction.

Currently they are turning kids into Satanic ritual sex addicts involving homosexuality, orgies, and pretty much any kind of depravity. If it feels "bad" do it. Niceness, softness, sweetness are inverted to be seen as boring and plain and not stimulating. Pornography is programming and it exposes and conditions the viewer to desire the kinds of things the illuminati want to lead us towards to destroy love and hurt our Father in Heaven as he watches His children being led to destructive depravity by the Devil.

Articles like this one are very important because it wakes people up and they can realize that they are addicted and conditioned.

Bruce said (June 30, 2017):

Z states below the New Testament is silent on polygamy. On the basis of what? Who made the christian scriptures silent? Early Christians were polygamous? When, where, why?

Here are a few scriptures from the NT on what it has to say about monogamy:

1 Timothy 3:2-12: A bishop must be then blameless, THE HUSBAND OF ONE WIFE, vigilant, sober, of good behavior, given to hospitality, apt to teach.

Matthew 19:4-6:
And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, 5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? 6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

Notice Jesus said a man shall cleave to his wife (singular, not plural). God took two people and united them together as one in an exclusive relationship. Commitment within marriage, like commitment to God, is exclusive. God cannot have a rival for his love. he requires all of our heart to be for Him alone. Marriage is designed to reflect the exclusive relationship between God and his people and polygamy cannot reflect that.

A man is mothered by is wife? That may be in some instances, but I'm not mothered by my wife nor was my father. Plus I never sought my mother's appraisals. And the picture of a women adjusting her husband's tie? What's that prove? Nothing.

In conclusion, your article is spot on regarding need for a monogamous relationship.

Tony B said (June 29, 2017):

This one more example of all the hassle concerning sex as our means of reproduction has a funny side when considering the RELIGION of the THEORY of evolution which makes the ridiculous claim that everything gets better as it "evolves."

When it comes to reproduction, what could be better than dividing cells, creating two out of one? Seems to be the perfect, seamless, simple, painless, emotionless, no problem method - highly superior to sex.

But its restricted to the lowest forms of life. Gee, how could God be so dumb?

Z said (June 29, 2017):

Monogamy is in fact the root of all evil and the reason number one why we’ve been living in this highly feminized civilization.

Monogamy was created in order to motivate more men to become wage slaves and be able "to support a family".
It's a conspiracy in its own way.

Women hate it when the man is exclusively devoted to them. They instinctively start to question his sexual worth. Because they know deep inside that a man can love more than one woman but it does not work in reverse.

Early Christians were polygamous. The New Testament is largely silent on the issue.

The polygamous instinct is not stupid - monogamy is stupid. When a man is with one woman only he gets “mothered” by her sooner or later. As he is usually addicted to his mother’s appraisals and he needs another woman to replace his mother.
This can not happen in a polygamous marriage as the Mother is just one.

Robert K said (June 29, 2017):

Every time you write about sex and love you seem to take your readers a step farther in the direction of sanity. It's a delight to follow, and benefit from, the evolution of your thinking in this area, which probably has more potential to upset the globalist's apple cart than any other ideas out there. This is because sanity gets a mighty grip on people once they figure it out and personal ethics are a hard obstacle to overcome.

In Czarist Russia people, including serfs, were consistently referred to as "souls"--a potent reminder that, contrary to the communists' contention that there is nothing in the universe more significant than molecules in motion, humanity has a precious spiritual essence.

Unfortunately, the Czarist regime, like others, was unable to successfully resist the power of international finance with its assumptions that men are just "fodder" for wage slavery, war and lustful indulgence. The top bankers must live in mortal fear that a higher vision of human purpose might once more take hold among the masses.

Below -- Exterminating the Goyim is Basis of the Cabala (scroll down)

The Lost Art of Femininity

January 14, 2019


Helen Andelin, 21 in 1941 -Beautiful women are a dime a dozen but feminine women are extremely rare. 

Femininity is a gentle tender quality found in a woman's appearance, manner and nature. A feminine woman gives the impression of softness and delicateness. She has a spirit of sweet submission and a dependency on men for their care and protection. Nothing about her appears masculine, no male aggressiveness, competence, efficiency, fearlessness, strength, or the ability to kill her own snakes." Helen Andelin, Fascinating Womanhood p. 247

Femininity is based on a woman making husband, 

children and home her first priority.  

Her self sacrifice is the way that love comes into the world. 

So the Satanists taught women to seek fulfilment in careers instead.

"By cultivating in all a sense of self-importance, we shall destroy among the goyim the importance of the family and its educational value...In this way, we shall create a blind mighty force which will never be in a position to move in any direction without the guidance of our agents..." (Protocol 10-5)

I am becoming more conscious of psychological dislocation caused by the occult assault on gender and the nuclear family.  Masculine and feminine energy complement each other. We naturally crave that essence which is best found in marriage and conjugal sex. Destroy masculine and feminine and you undermine this fundamental yin-yang. Society is simply oblivious to this pernicious attack by its traitorous elite. 

By Henry Makow, PhD

(Update from Jan. 2013)

Helen Andelin's book Fascinating Womanhood (1963) PDF is subversive to the New World Order because it upholds the inherent difference between the sexes and the basic laws governing marriage.


(Helen Andelin, 1920-2009)

Such a book would never be published today. It is only available because it appeared 53 years ago and sold more than 2 million copies. If you have any doubt about your sexual identity, I recommend Fascinating Womanhood. It is pertinent to men as well as women. I also recommend Andelin's Fascinating Girl for single women and her husband's Man of Steel and Velvet for men.

I'm not saying you should treat this model as gospel or that it's for everyone. For eg., Andelin implies women should reward men with sex. That seems dated and I told her so in an email. My comment was met with a frosty silence!

Nevertheless, the book represents a timeless heterosexual paradigm that works. Every couple is different. Choose what is relevant to you and chuck the rest.

Femininity and masculinity are art like playing the piano. They must be learned. We have to know the basics before we can improvise.

People are very malleable. Society is the target of a long-term hate campaign designed to degrade and discredit heterosexuality. Domestic violence and rape are highlighted to make women fear men, reject femininity and become masculine. The destruction of the family has always been the goal of the financial elite in order to control people. (See "The Illuminati Program") I will elaborate below.


Andelin says a woman's happiness depends on her husband's lifelong devotion and love. This book teaches women how to be attractive to men, how to be feminine.
Andelin writes that women don't have to be beautiful to be feminine. "Acquire a feminine manner by accentuating the differences between yourself and men, not the similarities. Since the masculine manner is strong firm and heavy, yours should be gentle, delicate and light. Apply this in the way you walk, talk, use your hands and carry yourself." (256)

I can still remember how a girl I knew closed a kitchen cupboard with a motion of her hips. This happened 49 years ago when I was 20!

When Andelin writes that a feminine woman is never "crude, vulgar, harsh, overbearing or critical," it is apparent that the fair sex is being deliberately degraded and neutered by the media. "All your conversation should reflect tenderness, patience, forgiveness, tolerance and love."

A wife's first priority is her husband and then her children. Thus a single woman will consecrate herself for her future husband and children as much as possible. She will not be promiscuous.

Wives tend to put career, friends, parents, success and appearance before their husbands. "If you are a successful career woman, keep your priorities straight," Andelin writes. "Let your husband know by words and actions that he is number one." (95)

The woman's primary role is to be a wife, mother and homemaker. The man's role is to be a guide, protector and provider. This doesn't mean women can't have careers or men can't cook or change a diaper.

fascinating_womanhood (1).jpg

A man needs to feel that he is needed and that he excels his woman in his role. If she becomes independent, he may question his purpose and his feelings for her "since his romantic feelings partly arise from her need to be protected, sheltered and cared for." (102)

A woman should accept her husband at face-value and not try to change him. His pride and freedom are inviolable. She should focus on his good qualities and he will improve naturally in response to her.

Reactions to Andelin are either very positive or very negative. One minister wrote on Amazon:" I have given approximately 250 copies of this book to women I have counselled in the past 5 years. In this period of time, I have yet to see ANY of them NOT improve their marriage by working on what they bring to the marriage, as an individual and to the whole."

Many women find the book outdated and laughable. One contentious point is that Andelin advises wives to adopt childlike petulance when upset with their husband. A lot of women find this demeaning. But in practice, most men will respond positively when their authority is not directly challenged.

Andelin may be outdated at times but she has the basic principles right; it's up to us to adopt them.

Beautiful women are a dime a dozen but feminine women are extremely rare. The world suffers the loss of feminine spiritual qualities: trust, modesty, grace, innocence, serenity, tenderness, patience and love. This is behind the male obsession with pornographic sex. Men unconsciously seek femininity and love to balance them. The restless masculine spirit seeks a calm harbour.

Young women don't realize that men find purity and innocence very attractive. Conversely, they are repelled by tough, jaded, experienced women. The willingness of women today to be promiscuous often can be counterproductive.


Men and women are the victims of a cruel hoax. They are taught that sexual differences are "socially conditioned." Ironically this lie is the actual "social conditioning". Sexual differences are inborn. For example, males have ten times the level of testosterone as women, and this determines their willingness to take risks, etc. Sex roles express natural differences and form the spice of life.

ftGCtMr.jpgFeminism's Marxist principles of "equality" do not apply to loving heterosexual relationships and are in fact toxic. As I often say, heterosexual marriage is based on the exchange of female worldly power for male power expressed as love. Equal power neuters both sexes.

Our leaders are accomplices to this monstrous hoax. Behind them are the private central bankers who print our currency in the form of a debt to them. They need a world government so no country can default on it. They need a dictatorship so the people cannot end this scam. They need to stunt our natural development by fostering gender confusion so we can be controlled.

The elitists present women's liberation as if a cherished housewife were the same as a concentration camp inmate. They present this vicious psychological assault as "progress," when in fact it is subversion on a grand scale.

Ladies, where do you think feminism came from? It was organized by the US Communist Party, the CIA and the elite media, all instruments of the central bankers. It is funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.

This weekend yet another movie opens about a woman who is a violent killer. "Domino" is the story of a female bounty hunter. The real-life inspiration for this story Domino Harvey died recently of a drug overdose or murder. No wonder young women are confused! Where do they see wives and mothers presented in a positive light? Women are always harried, arguing with men and running off to work.

I get email from feminists who say my articles are "hurtful." It's eerie how they all use that word and repeat the party line. I think it's "hurtful" that the super rich want to take the place of God and nature and enslave humanity. But these feminists don't get it. They don't get "A"'s for connecting feminism with the Rockefellers, Sept. 11 and Iraq, i.e. NWO Central Banker Dictatorship.

Feminism is designed to make women feel unworthy for devoting their lives to the people they love. It forces them out of the house where their employers can control them. It forces infants into joyless daycares subject to conditioning and who-knows-what-else.

I would never stand between anyone and their idea of fulfilment. But ladies, don't be so gullible! You're being defrauded of a lifetime of love. Have your careers later but don't forfeit your femininity and your chance to have a family.


Related - Helen Andelin and the Fascinating Womanhood Movement 

Makow - Men Must Champion Feminine Women (What is Feminine?)

Makow- It's OK to be a Woman!     and  Feminism Can be Cured (if Diagnosed Early)

Fascinating Woman Website and Documentary 

Another review of Fascinating Womanhood

515BMKKWTAL._AA160_.jpgTwo Great Books on Biological Gender Differences

First Comment from Ken Adachi

The loss of gentleness and sweetness among American-born womanhood is a glaring and terrible devolution for both sexes as they both lose out on the sublime love tapestry that was once woven by that tender feminine mystique of yesterday. While some may superficially appear beautiful, their eyes tell a different story. I almost never see American women, at least not white women, with soft eyes anymore; least of all among the young. Soft eyes betray a soft heart and there are few of them it seems. If you look at the eyes, voice, and body language of white females in American movies from the 1930s and 40s, for example, and then compare that to what you see in America today, it's like you've landed on a different planet. 

Asian-born and even American-born Asian women still rank high, in my opinion, for feminine allure and sweetness, as do Muslim women I suspect. And many Hispanic women, thank God, manage to retain a feminine fire, but sadly, the greatest devolution seems to be among white American females, who are today so very, very different from that of their mother's mother. A soft, gentle girl is the product of a two-parent family home where the guidance of parents and daily tutelage in lessons of morality will forge the fairest garden for motherhood and marital bliss. I hope that woman will one day return to this land. We miss her. 

William wrote:

In the professional setting, I am immersed in - women want to land a financially successful husband so they can precisely do this. Have children, make home a priority, and have an interested father to their kids. They have careers - but if the husband is wealthy enough, it becomes secondary to what they truly like to do - manage the home, social life, children, etc. 

Having a career, education, and something to do outside of the home is important for a married woman, I truly believe this. But women themselves, I'm finding, only want this as a secondary compartment to their primary desire - children and a family. 

But I believe the propaganda is only successful because men simply do not have financial means anymore to offer this. That's the real problem. Every "career-oriented" woman I know, and I know a lot, secretly ADORE the idea of being able to make home and family #1. You'll always have outliers, but for the majority of women, this holds.

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "The Lost Art of Femininity"

JJ said (January 14, 2019):

The world, as always, twists things around. The strong woman is now the woman who sues every man that looks at her and works outside of the home (apparently it takes great strength to walk out on your needy children). The strong man is the man who stays at home and changes diapers all day. The strong person is the person who is willing to go through the gut-wrenching work of changing their gender.

For centuries the strong woman was the woman who successfully (without government help of any kind no less) navigated herself through the tumultuous relationships of being a daughter, wife and mother. At the end of her life she was satisfied and had a glow on her face that no cosmetic surgery could produce. She, of course, didn't get any public money or recognition for any of this. The world called her weak but she had had to be very strong, staving off unwanted sexual advances for years from numerous angles, forgiving her parents for their humanity, negotiating with a husband who could often be narrow-minded, putting her foot down with her children and dealing with the unfortunate deaths of one or several of them, living often in impoverished conditions where there was little in the way of comforts or beauty, and then growing old while wondering which child was going to take care of her.

None of that process is recognized by the feminist as being of any value. Instead, they kill their children, sue their parents or encourage euthanasia, totally reject men, pursue useless careers and at the end of their lives cost the taxpayer millions without care for anyone but themselves.

Kim said (April 25, 2016):

All Canadian men should go on relationship strike with Canadian women. The world has many real women to marry, who enjoy a traditional life: a real family. Canada's sexist Femi-Nazi hags have "Outrighted" themselves and should be avoided like the plague. Ending up with them, has a very high likelihood of eventually being fleeced by the parasitic billion dollar Family Destruction Industry. Being divorced and disfranchised by corrupted "Family Court Judges" is an over 50% certainty!

Question about the very real loss of their children and the loss of all their savings, while filling the pockets of divorce and custody parasites? Ask a Canadian single father forced into being a visiting "Uncle.". I am one. Have no children with a temporary Canadian wife. For the sake of safety and for the fight for natural gender roles, rightly called freedom, lets generalize the now factually Canada ruling Femi-Nazis, the same way as all the people were generalized as Nazis in former fascist controlled Germany. The latter were evil and the present ones are Satanically evil. Seeking a real wife? Use the internet and travel and avoid falling for gold diggers in foreign lands. You will be deeply surprised about the difference between Canadian Femi-Nazi hags and real women..

Of course, I agree with Henry that it is social engineering, well supported by the rabid corporate media that "Histerically" overplays hardly existing wife abuse in Canada, is the cause of the destruction of Europe and North America. The Canada ruling Femi-Nazis are just willing goons delusionally believing that they will survive the outcome of the destructive spectacle they are helping in.

David said (April 24, 2016):

Henry, this was never truer than it is today. Feminism as you have documented was a Trojan horse to get women out of the home and into the workplace, where they can be regulated, taxed and worked to death like any man who has been trapped in a 9-to-5 regimen to support and shelter a family knows.

Feminism always was a stealth weapon to destroy the nuclear family. Among its arsenal were false rape charges (a "good thing for men to go through" in the words of one activist), family courts that strip men of their flesh-and-blood offspring, and divorce courts that have actually brought back the debtor prisons of ancient European regimes, which the New World attempted to throw off over 200 years ago.

Kurt said (April 23, 2016):

My wife, who has worked most of her life, told me all she ever wanted to do was raise a family and tend to the home. She has two well adjusted children from a former marriage and her daughter is a stay at home mother with a supportive husband. She thinks most women from her era (she’s 68) feel this way, however many of the younger ones she works with, less so.

This made me think about the chickens my brother raised for many years. He had a device to warm and turn the eggs in order to hatch new chicks. When I asked why the hen that laid them didn’t do that, he that said years of selective breading had diminished the ‘broodiness’ of hens, which is a term for sitting and hatching the eggs.
Perhaps this is what our overseers have in mind for the human race.

Art said (April 23, 2016):

I remember that during the 70s & 80s hippie era, androgynous faggots were finding more favour with women.

I used to weep at this, as the outcome was inevitable. Another wasted relationship, & a disorientated woman.

Yin Yang has to be balanced. Women are compensating for an oversupply of yin men, I think.

Western foods are poisonously yin.

Tony said (April 23, 2016):

I disagree on one statement in this article, which I must pass on anyway, it is so needed.

You say that femininity and masculinity have to be learned. I have seen that they are inborn but are insidiously unlearned. I worked at a U.S. government school for over ten years and watched the boys treated as criminals for being boys and the girls turned into spoiled brats that could get away with anything - so they did. Plus from day one the girls were told they are all "superwoman" and, unlike boys, can do anything and everything regardless of reality. Unfortunately, the government backs them up with this lie as much as possible.

It was impossible not to notice that the girls "advanced" by grade from natural sweet femininity to overbearing, self-centred and otherwise thoughtless shallow-minded brats.


Thanks for making my point Tony. Gender is innate but it has to be nurtured by culture and example.


Art said (April 23, 2016):

I remember that during the 70s & 80s hippie era, androgynous faggots were finding more favour with women.

I used to weep at this, as the outcome was inevitable. Another wasted relationship, & a disorientated woman.

Yin Yang has to be balanced. Women are compensating for an oversupply of yin men, I think.

Western foods are poisonously yin.

Pat said (April 23, 2016):

f men would really cherish and protect - then it works. But as long as men are domineering and abusive, it doesn't. I think women have it much harder than before. Working women today have to work at a job and doing most of the housework as well.

Should Whites Retreat to Countryside?

January 12, 2019

Should Whites Retreat to Countryside?

by Wise Man

I think there will be no mass awakening of the population. The average Canadian is a candy-ass. There is no fight in them. I'm past sick of hearing the term "wake-up" or "waking up" the population. They don't want to be woken. You ever stop and watch a flock of Jets fans walking downtown in their jerseys during a home game? Small groups of highly motivated, disciplined individuals are the ones who effect change and this is the way it's been done throughout history. Populations adapt to and eventually support the changes these mavericks pave the way for. 
One thing to mention to those living in rural areas; do not sell your land! China is more a threat than the Muslims are. They buy up large chunks of farmland + the mineral rights to same. They've already bought many a vineyard in B.C. Chinese are the silent invasion. They've got money and they aren't stupid, and many are still loyal to the communist party back home.
 All these 3rd worlders are city dwellers. They tend to avoid rural areas. Whites will have to re-group by creating new planned communities in these rural regions far enough away from the big cities and let the immigrants have them. The committee of 300 / agenda 21 scum wants everyone in compact cities. I say fuck them and get back to the land.
As long as cops are mercenaries, they will not risk that $100k+ per year for anyone let alone their nation. Where else is someone with a 93 IQ to make that sort of money in this economy? Cops stand in the way of the natural demographic re-adjustment to normalcy and will enforce any law they're told to (unless it affects their salary). This means they will continue to carry the bags of invaders as they walk across the border.

Examining some Leonard Cohen Lyrics by Brabantian

January 6, 2019

Examining some Leonard Cohen Lyrics   

by Brabantian

Canadian-Jewish musical artist Leonard Cohen (1934-2016) is a profound and ambiguous character, with some clearly spooky elements. But there is an astonishing, unique amount of 'truth' in some Cohen songs - tho, of course, the insider cabal likes revealing much of what they do.
Interestingly, Cohen long ago riffed on some of the key issues of male-female psychology.
Cohen's most stunning 'truth' songs, both date from the same 1988 album. 'First We Take Manhattan' as above, is one of the most profound songs ever about the mind of a terrorist; and 'Everybody Knows', is maybe one of the best songs ever about the total corruption of society.
'First We Take Manhattan' was composed during the late 1980s transition between the classic Gladio era 'Gladio A' terrorism (mostly in Europe, some lesser similar events in Canada), and Gladio B that was just about to get underway, peaking with 9-11.
'First We Take Manhattan' is a dialogue between a terrorist and his girlfriend. She reminded him that she could have been one of the people he is about to kill. The song captures the lure of the 'rebel - bad boy - criminal' for the female hind-brain, prizing male aggressiveness to the point that mass-murderers in prison get stacks of love letters sometimes.
Great live version of this song from 1988 on German television - Berlin! - Cohen with multi-cultural female counterparts:

The woman's voice sings in the above:
You see that line there moving through the station?
I told you, I told you, I was one of those!
[She tells him he is killing people just like her, but she neither acts to leave him nor tries to stop him ... the terrorist replies:]
Well, it's Father's Day, and everybody's wounded
[Men are all wounded inside, but that doesn't stop them]
From the same point in Cohen's life, his haunting song 'Everybody Knows' is still cited as one of the ultimate musical statements on the corruption around us. Once again, Cohen also looks deeply into male-female sexuality; here, after political, rich vs poor statements, Cohen sings about how normal sexuality is being destroyed by modern society, how women now go loose to cheat for 'alpha dalliances', and how the surveillance & data-gathering world will make this all much worse.

Some excerpted lyrics:
Everybody knows that the dice are loaded
Everybody knows the good guys lost
Everybody knows the deal is rotten
The poor stay poor, the rich get rich
That's how it goes
Everybody knows
Everybody knows that you've been faithful
Ah give or take a night or two
Everybody knows you've been discreet
But there were so many people you just had to meet
Without your clothes
And everybody knows
Everybody knows that the naked man and woman
Are just a shining artefact of the past
Everybody knows the scene is dead
But there's gonna be a meter on your bed
That will disclose
What everybody knows

Fe-male Mutant Cannot Name any Positive Male Qualities by Michael Berg

December 18, 2018

Fe-male Mutant Cannot Name any Positive Male Qualities  by Michael Berg
Hope she is not typical but this
woman is psychologically troubled. She burst into tears after interview causing some males to intervene, ironically, in her defence.

by Michael Berg

The following video will SHOCK you to the core. A YouTube Channel named "The Sasha Show" interviews a normal White female student (who doesn't even look like a feminist from the outside) about the differences between Males & Females. This beautiful woman completely denies the differences between the sexes to a point when it is literally a sign of Schizophrenia or a mental disorder - complete disconnect from the REAL WORLD.

We already know that the illuminati (i.e. Globalism/Communism) brainwashes women to deny their own femininity and to deny the masculinity of men - i.e. complete denial that the sexes complement each other.

But women - especially White women - are brainwashed even more by the Feminist SJW agenda pushed in universities. The following video had completely blown my mind. I already knew that the brainwashing in the Schools and in the universities was bad, but I DID NOT IMAGINE THAT IT WAS THAT BAD - Not the extent of completely ignoring biological and physical reality and simple truths!!!

Now I understand why heterosexual relationships are in the decline, and why marriage are in a decline. White men are finding it increasingly difficult to find a woman who is feminine, honest, gentle, loving and supportive. Many of today's woman are simply not a "marriage material" due to Feminism. Their disconnect from reality, as well as their arrogance, selfishness as well as their extreme sense of Entitlement are simply too much for any normal man to bear (Marrying the following woman would be nothing more than a mental abuse for the poor guy) : 

Here's the video Henry; it is worth watching all of it, GET READY TO BE SHOCKED! : (There are also Youtubers that give an anti-SJW analysis to this video, you can find their videos in the "Up Next" section in YouTube):