Direct Link to Latest News

Below- Is Our War Against the Nephilim? (scroll down)

Rhodesia -- Portal into Future of the West

September 20, 2019


Ian Smith 1919-2007  - Still waiting for Hollywood to film his memoirs. 

"We May Be a Small Country, But We Are a Determined People 

who have been called upon to play a role of world-wide significance"  

Ian Douglas Smith, Prime Minister of Rhodesia, 1964-1979 

And so they were and they are - now more than ever as the world-wide Communist Revolution

 hammers the global control grid into place over all Western nations.

by "Linde"


From 1960 A.D, when UK Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan chanted the 'Wind of Change' mantra in Cape Town, Rhodesia stripped the mask of 'anti-Communism' from ZOG  UK and US. 

The Rhodesians declared independence unilaterally on November 11, 1965, and fought a war of independence against the Communist Revolution in Africa. They may have won that war militarily, but they were betrayed by ZOG treachery. 

Thinking perhaps that a little international law might also win the peace, they agreed to an election under the UN Charter in 1980. This was your typical 'all get out' - not only all Communist parties able to stand candidates but also their guerrilla forces and their mates across the border brought over to help persuade the electorate, add a little ethnic cleansing of the rival tribe (the electoral redistribution), ZOG protections for the guys who drive around with somebody's head in the boot of their cars and Bob's Your Uncle. 

That would be Robert Mugabe, Zim president for life. I am sure they didn't see that in the fine print - but that is UN Charter one vote = one value: no boundaries and no brakes.

Consider well this little time portal to a Western future. When the White minority surrenders its weapons in respect of democracy and international law, there will be Zim elections under the UN Charter.


It may be hard to believe now, but once upon a time this small country of Rhodesia, about the size of Montana, was the number one threat to world peace. Their 'racist, settler, White minority' government was presented to the entire English speaking world as the capital of White supremacy, colonial nationalism (very bad), racial prejudice (even worse) and 'antiziganism'( shudder ). 


I grew up in the American heartland during the sixties.  Later, I worked in London for a South African based touring and safari company which marketed tour packages to corporate honchos. 


This company was part of a secret UK business network organized between London, Johannesburg, and Salisbury to bust the UN sanctions on Rhodesia and obtain the necessaries for the war of independence. The company was a cog in the Rhodesian war machine. 

In my early twenties, I was a go-fer writing travelers' cheques for their tours and safaris in Rhodesian dollars. Little did I realize at the time, I was literally on the margins of one of the twentieth century's defining events.

On the face of it, Rhodesia's war of independence made no sense. Here you had this tiny little nation, supposedly the paragon of white racial supremacy, sanctioned by the UN, denounced by the entire Western media, condemned by the World Council of Churches as a racist monstrosity. 

Their reserve bank was seized by H.M. Government. They were fighting two, later three, Zimbabwean Communist armies on three borders. Yet the majority of their non-conscripted population, the Shona and Matabele people fought with the white Rhodesian Front.  

The entire Rhodesian phenom was a complete stumper in terms of modern Liberaldom, unless, of course, you had access to Lenin's dictate of 1920, namely "that the expulsion of the colonial powers from their territories was vital to world communism. In the years 1960-1966 Western 'liberalism' supported this Leninist aim. The partnership indeed, between the governments of the 'free world' and communism, their professed enemy, is the basic fact of the years 1960 - 1966 in Africa. Only when that is understood does the picture of what has happened become plain, as a photograph emerges from a film in developing liquid." ( Douglas Reed. 1966. The Battle for Rhodesia. p. 5 ). 


In the matter of the Rhodesian bank, the UK Parliament gagged any peer who dared rise in the Lords to speak a word on their behalf. 

Briefly, the Reserve Bank of the old Crown Colony of Southern Rhodesia was seized by H.M. Government in London December 1965 with all assets and its sterling balances frozen. 


But one month before the declaration of their republic, 2 March 1970, the Rhodesian Front Government created its own bank and introduced the Rhodesian dollar to replace the sterling at a rate of two Rhodesian dollars to one British pound. Although it was never fully convertible, those who worked on the financial side of the Rhodesian war effort worked to keep that dollar at transactional parity with the pound right up until 1980 when the young nation capitulated to its enemies under the UN Charter election. 

 A patriotic American, I cared about Rhodesia, the only nation besides us to declare independence from Great Britain and fight a war of independence to get it. I felt that Rhodesia was fighting our war. It would, however, have been considered bad form to get into all that. 

With the Rhodesians, there is a certain style. You have to observe their standards and keep it light. There is nothing they hate more than a fuss. Even fighting the Communist Revolution with their backs to the wall and the entire sterling balance of their Reserve Bank frozen by order of H.M. Government - massive defaults on their securities contrived by the iniquitous actions of the London Board of Governors ( getting themselves handsomely censured in the Lords and in the Hansard April 20 1967 for that one ) - not a bit of it, the Rhodesians are still going to set their standards and not have a fuss, especially an emotional fuss - even if they are shorting the sterling with a blacklisted currency and have to make it plain to the go-fer they are only going to short by so much. This is Rhodesians.

On the 11th of November, I will be raising the glass to Rhodesia - last bastion of the once and future West. Their legend can not die. 


Related - Salisbury Rhodesia 1971 - Compare with "Harare" today 

-----------YouTube  The Bush War

----------Our Brothers in Arms 

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Below- Part 1- Did Israel Genocide the Bronze Age Empires? (scroll down)

Is Our War With the Nephilim?

September 19, 2019

"There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown." Genesis 6:4

The underlying current of world history 
is the war between Homo Sapiens, 
led by the Logos and his Prophets, 
and the Giants, the Nephilim, 
the sons and grandchildren of the Fallen Angels.

There is every reason to believe that Cabalists
are channeling these demons, acquiring knowledge
and power from them.

Anthony Migchels is the founder of De Florijn, the first fully fledged interest-free, privately operated currency in the World.

Migchels' Disclaimer: While I'm incredibly grateful for, and humbled by the Spirit's offer of friendship, I'm not a Bible believer or a member of any denomination. I have no desire or need to prove the Bible correct. I'm a mere truth-seeker, having come to the conclusion that the Bible and associated texts are right on the money in these matters. The above is not intended as 'proof', it is just a very short introduction to the narrative that has been evolving over the last few decades.

by Anthony Migchels 

Yes, with modern eyes, this brazen, clearly genocidal attack on the Bronze Age Empires seems criminal.

But the war was not against Homo Sapiens. There were Giants on the Earth in those days, and they were the offspring of the Sons of God. They were evil, and the underlying current of world history is the war between Homo Sapiens, led by the Logos and his Prophets, and the Giants, the Nephilim, the sons and grandchildren of the Fallen Angels.

They had not all been destroyed in the Flood, and Civilization was restarted by them. A famous example is Gilgamesh, the leader and founder of the Sumerian Civilization. He must have been at least three times taller, and ten times heavier than normal men. Above he is seen in one of the famous sculptures his contemporaries left. That cute little feline pet he's holding, is a 300 pound male lion.

When Moses sent scouts into Canaan, they came back and reported: "And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight." (Numbers 13:33).

These Giants were the men of renown that have been passed on in 'myths' and 'legends': Achilles, Hercules, but also monstrous miscegenations, as for instance the Minotaur, the monster of the Minoan Labyrinth, which seems to have been half Bull, half Man.

They were not just enormously big and strong, but also unimaginably intelligent: Gilgamesh himself must have had a massive cranium, just look at his head. A five or ten litre brain. Their mental powers must have been quite something. And this explains the 'unexplainable' high tech that is associated with all the Megaliths of the lost Civilizations that preceded ours. The builders of these structures had very advanced knowledge about engineering, astronomy, physics, geography, tool making, probably in many ways even more advanced than we are today.

There is an enormous, longstanding, and worldwide effort by the occult hierarchy to suppress all evidence of the giants and the remains of their civilization(s). But there are countless archaeological finds, and texts and oral traditions of basically every culture in the World.

These beings were involved in all sorts of heinous practices: demonology, human, and child sacrifice. The Giants were also eaters of human flesh. It's not cannibalism: they really are a different species. To them, we are mere game.

And these were the enemies of God and his Chosen People, Israel.


The Jews are not Israel, the House of Judah is only of the twelve tribes, and in John 8, Jesus clearly and directly accuses them of being of Abraham's seed in the flesh, but having utterly betrayed Abraham's God in the Spirit.

Religious Jews are fiercely against Zionism, and accept that God had ended his covenant with them, due to their disobedience, losing their rights to Canaan.

What happened? After 1177 BC, which is the date of the Bronze Age Collapse in the official timeline, Israel was supreme in Canaan and vicinity. But they started degenerating, under the influence of the Nephilim. Jeremiah accuses Israel of worshiping the Gods of the Nephilim, Baal, Moloch, etc.

Later, in the mid sixth century BC, the First Temple was destroyed and the Tribes of Israel were exiled to Babylon.

Babylon was a successor empire of Sumer, and it was also the place where Nimrod, another major Nephilim figure, built his Tower. It seems clear that the Jews were instructed in the evil occult knowledge of the Nephilim. This is now known as the Kabbalah.

Outright demonology is part and parcel of it. The texts relate how the Nephilim souls are refused access to Heaven, and are condemned to remain bound to the Earthly realm, without having bodies. They exist in some sort of parallel dimension.

There is every reason to believe that our current owners are channeling these demons, acquiring knowledge and power from them.

Sickeningly, the Jews are pretending to be Israel, God's Chosen People, and they are pretending that the rest of us are basically Nephilim. When the Old Testament speaks of the Gentiles, they mean the Nephilim off spring. The current Jewish playbook is pretending we are the soulless monsters like those that were destroyed by Moses. And that they have the right to use the same methods against us, as Moses used against the Giants.

While they themselves are in fact the tools of these Fallen Angels.

A good example is Old Testament Usury prohibition: God forbids lending at interest to his People, but NOT to his enemies, the Nephilim offspring.

It's a gigantic projection and identity theft.

It also puts the Jewish resentment against Jesus in a very different and relevant light. Of course they could not accept him: he was denying their 'right' to enslave and destroy everybody for the Fallen Angels, as they would be doing in the centuries after their destruction by the Romans.


The main undercurrent of our history is the war between God and his People, Homo Sapiens, and the Fallen Angels and their half human, half Nephilim offspring.

There were a number of key events: 

1. The Flood, the first attempt by God to cleanse the Earth, killing most of the massive Giants and their offspring, but some of the evil seed survived. 

2. In the Bronze Age Collapse, Israel was disciplined and instructed to be God's Chosen People, getting them to attack and destroy the Nephilim Empires that arose after the Flood. 

3. Jesus, who did not attack the Roman Empire, a monstrous tyranny of Usury and Genocide, but a seemingly small and inconsequential semi-autonomous province of the Empire held by the last known remnants of the Twelve Tribes, the House of Judah. Clearly, Jesus knew the game, and he realized that the Kabbalistic Jews would ultimately subvert the Gentile empires. 

4. We are nearing the End Game of the New World Order, which is the current and final attempt of the Fallen Angels to usurp God, make humanity worship them and their Leader, and ultimately destroy us.

The Jews are a usurpation of Israel. Instead of God's Chosen People, they're now God's Chosen Traitors, and the representatives of the Fallen Angels.

Through the Kabbalah, they know the secrets of the fallen angels and their offspring. This is the source of their power.

They have also been shepherding the Nephilim genes throughout the generations. This explains their obsession with bloodlines. 

Incidentally, it's not just the Jews. Many Kings did and do indeed claim all sorts of direct lineage to the 'Gods', ie powerful Nephilim Giants. Chinese Emperors referred to the 'dragon blood', which is what it is about.

This is NOT to say these claims were all (equally) legitimate, but it is the original background of the claim to 'divine right' for their 'bloodlines' to rule. I'm pretty sure these 'nobles' are full of shit, many 'royal' lineages are corrupt, but on the other hand, it's not for nothing they are so hell bent on intermarriage, often at the risk of inbreeding.

All this explains the evil genius and seemingly impossible scope of the Conspiracy. With a 10 litre brain (and the older incarnations were even MUCH more powerful) one can think ahead. No doubt about it. They are not 'aliens', but they claim to 'be from the stars' since the old days: the Annunaki (Nephilim) said the same things to the people of Sumer.

Moses was indeed a hero. His war was just: his enemies were simply insanely evil, and much mightier than he and his men were. He could only do crush his enemies with the direct leadership of God himself.

Israel will have to rise to the occasion again: God's Chosen People, no longer Abraham's seed, but those who are reborn in the Spirit and keep His Commandments, will be fighting the same enemies in the decades ahead. The Nephilim are coming back. Their genome is known to the initiated. With current technology, they are undoubtedly trying to genetically re-engineer them.

Perhaps this is what Jesus had in mind, when he said: "But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be."

We are very close to the endgame, and young people will witness most, if not all of it.


Related- Chuck Misler has done great work on this stuff, and the others are building on him:

The Godrules channel on Youtube is a treasure trove; here's some perspective on the Giants and the Smithsonian coverup.

Rob Skiba also has great stuff; here is his take.

Some of these guys are nominally 'suspect' because they buy Zionism yadayada, but they are Bible scholars. Skiba has been waking up to the JQ.  But their work on the Book of Enoch and its contents is top notch, no doubt about it.


I was cured from the lure of the Nephilim fantasy by research, serious study of the Bible and prayer. There is a real industry spilling "Bible conspiracy" fiction about Nephilim, giants and altered DNA, making big money from books, conferences and DVDs. It's a typical American thing. The origin of this nonsense is the apocryphal book of Enoch with its fantastic tales of fallen angels and visions of the spiritual world.

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Is Our War With the Nephilim?"

BM said (September 20, 2019):

Hi Henry,

Chuck Missler is well versed in the scriptures but he’s a Zionist.

Met him years ago at Church. He’s a card carrying member of the CNP aka (“Bilderberg Light”) & runs in the same circles as Alex Jones.

I respect his academic prowess but think it prudent to highlight this piece of the puzzle for those of the “awakening” who aren’t aware of him at this time.

Mike said (September 20, 2019):

Right now it is with the children of the Nephilim ie the raphaim and their current living descendants. According to my buddy Lt. Col Greg Rinchik the rephaim giants are coming back to the surface in 2020. Only real faith and copper bullets are the only thing that will stop them from eating you. His words not mine

James C said (September 20, 2019):

No. Our war is with an unbiblical fetish that has become almost universal.

The Nephilim were the offspring of the "sons of God" and the "daughters of men" before the Deluge, according to various interpretations of Genesis 6:1–4.

One interpretation suggests that the “sons of God” in this passage were actually fallen angels who put on fleshly bodies, had sexual relations with earthly women, and produced the Nephilim, or the “giants” of Genesis 6:4.
Thus this idea came to be known as the angel marriage thesis.

Supporters of the angel marriage thesis often rely heavily on the nonconical Book of Enoch, which is full of patent absurdities and blatant heresies, such as eartly women giving birth to 450 foot giants (7:11-12), or an angel named Phanuel being “set over repentance” (40:9).

In reality, the unbiblical myth of angels marrying earthly women and producing viable offspring is a Jewish fable that can be traced back to the Talmud and related Jewish writings (see Titus 1:14; Shabbath 146a; Yebamoth 103b; and Zohar 1, 28b).

Another source for the idea of “extraterrestrials” producing offspring through earthly women are the writings of Zecharia Sitchin, who turns out to have been a complete fraud:

IMO, there are many false teachers who have made an absolute fetish out of the angel marriage heresy. They have constructed an elaborate fable out of their fetish, and they are making money dealing deceitfully with the word of God.

The angel marriage heresy is also known as the “Seedline Hypothesis.” In his
book Eve: Did She or Didn’t She? evangelist Ted R. Weiland delivers a
devastating critique of the Seedline Hypothesis. His website is:

Lucie said (September 20, 2019):

Great article about the fallen angels and the Nephilim. Demons are their offspring, the Nephilim, who were killed by the flood but they are still here in spiritual bodies.

The fallen angels were imprisoned by God as a punishment for procreating with earthly women. Now CERN is opening the portal and they will come back. The worst ones are inside Saturn. This is what Kaabalah and Kaaba are all about. The black cube which is a hexagon on one of the Saturn s poles and the Devil s eye on the other pole of Saturn. They will open the way for them to return.

The tribe of Dan and the Feros or Pharaos are the Nephilim royal bloodlines.

And also the Cainites are of their blood because the Serpent had sex with Eve and Cain was of the Devil not of Adam like Abel.

Jews are descentants of Esau who was the son of Isaac and married Canaanite wives.

I believe, some of them might be of Judah but a big part of Judah are the Jutes who invaded Britain in the 5th century A.D. and who gave the name of Juta peninsula in Denmark.

Well, these are my theories and we ll soon find out how things really are because the End is at hand.

Frank said (September 20, 2019):

I read an Amazon Kindle book this past summer that totally supports what Anthony Migchels is putting down here, although in an unconventional manner.

"Egypt knew neither Pharaoh nor Moses"

This work is a short (cheap also, at whichever Amazon you choose) summation of what Arab historians have been saying for over a thousand years: That the "Israel" of the Bible is not AT ALL the Israel of history.

It seems we are dealing with a North Yemen tribe of Arabs who "misplaced" their homeland when they created the Torah in Ptolemy's Alexandria. Maybe it was less a translation than an ancient version of the Book of Mormon.

But Ashraf Ezzat gives an odd perspective about the current wars out there that dovetails with one of Migchels' links: That there's archeological evidence being systematically destroyed out there to cover up the ancient lie.

Whoever the "Alexandrian Jews" were, they were not from Canaan... and they caused REAL Jews a whole lot of problems, which continues to this day.

Christopher G said (September 20, 2019):

The word "Angel" simply means "Messenger", not invisible spirit. Spirits without bodies do not get erections to impregnate women. The Nephilim are sentient tangible beings, distinct and completely different from Humans. Humans are not the only smart creatures The Creator ever made. The Nephilim appear similar to rodents, just as Humans appear similar to apes. The Nephilim that cross bred with Humans created a race of red headed Giants that have been found all over the world. It's not just the Jews that encountered Giants. The Piute Nation from Nevada, USA has accounts of fighting Giants with physical evidence that keeps springing up. Greeks, Irish,etc.. you name it, all have the stories about Giants, all of which have red hair, the recessive gene of the Nephilim.

Pedro said (September 20, 2019):

All this focus on huge brains, what about the other end of the wick? How did huge penises ( I assume) go down with the relatively diminutive fair maidens in the fields, and how did the birthing process go? Was it IVF
and Ceasarian's (if I can use that word for b.c. affairs) or GM in labs and dumbed down metaphors for the records.

"I don't know" is all I should say, but that would be a boring comment.

DD said (September 19, 2019):

I have read THE BIBLE FRAUD by Tony Bushby. I don't think that it should be used to back up any theoretical construct such as this. Bushby and his research has been widely critiqued. I disagree with him in that Jesus was a real teacher not a fabrication contrived from the lives of 2 brothers. Christ true teachings are more or less set out in the Essene Gospel of Truth Bk 1. I agree with Bushby that AD 325 is the wrong time to have truthful expose of a bein born in AD 0.1. The Roman Empire produced the fraud for mind-controlling the masses, even unto this day.

I agree that giants, generally over ten feet tall, once roamed the earth. I do not know that they were ONLY evil. Archaeologists digs are showing huge skeletons globally. Even the Mahabharat book has evidence of people who could uproot a tree to smite an elephant with. We know nothing really of the existence of the giants. When did they live? Are they earthlings or aliens? Are they the ones who created the different shorter races in laboratories in different places on earth? If they were wonderfully intelligent and good giants, who created snakes, reptiles, sharks, eagles and other predators?

Migchels thinks that we are fighting the descendents of giants who are evil. Does he not know that that mankind is satanically possessed? Like Christ said in the Essene Gospel of Peace Bk 1, satan is also within the body. We have no tall people now. We know the elites/bankers are the enemy. We know that they are rearing us in this prison. We are divided and ruled, so that we fight each other instead of fighting the evil elites. The elites are called bankers, cabalists, illuminati, khazarian mafia, etc etc. That's who we fight. Maybe they are descendents of the Annunaki, the Nephilim, or the Reptilians. Maybe they are Marduk's brigands roaming the world. Those bodies are piloted from within by evil forces. Goyim, infidel, non-black, is all racist bull$#!T. In this, the endgame, it is fighting-to-win techniques that are needed, not speculation about an already identified enemy!

See- Is Our War with the Nephilim? Above

Marcos' Rebuttal of the Nephilim

I was cured from the lure of the Nephilim fantasy by research, serious study of the Bible and prayer. There is a real industry spilling "Bible conspiracy" fiction about Nephilim, giants and altered DNA, making big money from books, conferences and DVDs. It's a typical American thing. The origin of this nonsense is the apocryphal book of Enoch with its fantastic tales of fallen angels and visions of the spiritual world.

by Marcos 

First of all, there is no consensus that the sons of God who had mighty powerful children were angels, and not simply powerful evil men. Even if by some divine exception angels copulated with women, the Bible is very clear that the reason for the Flood was widespread evil, not necessarily DNA cleansing. Also, it is also clear in stating that all sentient beings with the exception of Noah's family died.

"And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained [alive], and they that [were] with him in the ark. (Gen 7)"

It looks like there were some few giants in antiquity, but nobody knows if they were not simply genetic variations that appeared at random. Definitely, nowhere in the Bible it is stated that people like Goliath were descendants of Nephilim. Also, the Israelii spied who reported seeing a people of giants were basically cowards who exaggerated their account in order to discourage the invasion, and were severely punished for it. They were lying. A possibility is that the genetic, natural line of tall people was extinct, by disease or persecution.

However, the main problem is that there are several bad consequences with the Nephilim line of thought:

1) It creates two classes of people, one that supposedly can be redeemed and one that has "bad blood" or bad DNA. Jesus came to save the whole world. Every each individual. [Jesus] is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world." (1 John 2:2 - also John 12:47, 1 Tim 1:15 and many other verses) Believing that only some can be saved is a sure way to prevent people from telling the gospel to them. Also, God blots out people from the book of life. Everybody is born with his name there, it is sin that removes it. (Rev 3:5) If you ever meet Lord Rothschild, be sure to tell him about Jesus` salvation.

2) It minimizes the work of demons and the power of individual choice. God gave us freedom of choice. We choose evil because we love sin, not because we have bad Nephilim DNA. (John 3:19, Eph 2:3). "This is the judgment: the light (Jesus) has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil. For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed." We are free to turn away from sin and accept Jesus' offer of forgiveness. Of course, some people have already made up their minds towards evil, and it's too late for them. Regardless, it was a decision.

Also, rebellion, witchcraft and sin will eventually lead to submission and control (possession) of people by demons. Those horrible crimes and perversions we see today are committed by people who are possessed. But they are only normal people who one day opened the doors of their souls to evil spirits.

3) It makes people waste time with foolish fables. Christians are supposed to focus on helping their neighbors, raising godly children and  developing their spiritual lives. The Bible warns us about fables in several places: Have nothing to do with godless myths and old wives' tales; rather, train yourself to be godly. (1 Tim 4:7)

4) It robs God from His glory when we say His creation was flawed or that He has no power over Satan's capacity to taint it. Human beings were made in the image of God and their bodies were wonderfully made, including their genetic code (Psalm 139:14). All this talk about transhumanism, altered DNA does not come from God. I believe that possibly Satan will use the promise of DNA advancement to lure people to his government. Let's not help him in his advertising.

I've wasted some time with those fables, but not anymore. I believe Anthony's problem is that he doesn't believe in the accuracy of the Bible and because of that, he fails to understand the consistency and coherence of the whole. Jesus did and taught about it. You can't have Jesus and a flawed Bible. It is a whole package deal.

Try to find the core principle behind the doctrine: the world (everyone) has fallen because of love for sin. The world (everyone) can be saved by curing this disease through the forgiveness Jesus provided at the cross. No place for irredeemable DNA here!

Scruples - the game of moral dillemas

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Bankers' Children's Climate Crusade (from Andrew)

September 9, 2019

This image from Friday protest, Sydney, Australia, November 2018

Bankers' Children's Climate Crusade  (from Andrew) 

THE INTERCEPT INVITES you to watch a special event 6:00pm in New York City this evening, hosted by Intercept senior correspondent Naomi Klein, author of the forthcoming book "On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal," and headlined by trailblazing climate activist Greta Thunberg, author of "No One Is Too Small to Make a Difference."

We're supposed to believe that an autistic 16-year-old, Greta Thunberg, single-handedly created The Global Climate Strike a year ago when she started skipping school on Fridays to protest Climate Change outside Sweden's parliament. Purportedly like magic and without any outside funding or organizational support, kids around the world began to follow her example skipping school on Fridays to demand action on climate change.

Why would the Global Elite like Soros select an autistic, clinically depressed teenager with learning disabilities like Greta Thunberg? To begin with, it's harder to criticize a handicapped person. And of course a teenage alarmist must behave as simple-mindedly as her supporters so they can think they are as smart as her.  And children are traditionally gullible and easily misled, so Greta is perfect for this hoax...

I learned about The Global Climate Strike firsthand last May 10 (which was a Friday) in Rome when on tour with a private guide at Piazza del Popolo (People's Square). It began with 300 or 400 young girls (13-16 years of age) marching in with whistles blowing and began to chant in Italian. I couldn't hear my guide, so she suggested we take a cab to The Pantheon to escape the noise.

In the cab, my guide explained that these were children's climate protests and that they had been getting worse. The cab driver understood English and chimed in that there were several other children's climate protests in progress in Rome that afternoon. They weren't protesting at the Pantheon so there we continued my tour, but worldwide The Global Climate Strike is huge.

Feminism isn't New---Aristophanes - Assembly of Women

August 21, 2019

41yoIQNTEnL._SX315_BO1,204,203,200_.jpgFeminism isn't new
A specter is haunting Athens, the specter of communism. This premise animates the plot of Aristophanes' comedy "Ecclesiazusae" (or "Assembly of Women"), wherein the heroine Praxagora leads a conspiracy of hags dressed as men to vote themselves into power. Fresh from her victory, Praxagora unveils her plan for a brave, new world where all property, children, and sex are held in common. What follows is an uproariously funny, shockingly vulgar, tremendously insightful satire of communists and the logical consequences of their ideology. Mayhew's translation and introduction would make for a perfect adjunct to any discussion of Plato's *Republic*, especially in an introductory Greek Lit & Civ course. 

First, Aristophanes has arguably innovated aspects of communism that would later influence Plato. Second, the play contains so many allusions to contemporary events (helpfully explained by Mayhew), that it provides a useful introduction to ancient history, political philosophy, and dramatic literature. Last, the comedy is funny enough for anyone (particularly sophomores!) to enjoy, and if it's the only play they actually read, they'll know something important about ancient Athens, thanks to the guidance of Robert Mayhew. (Amazon Review)

A Few Random facts about the LGBTQ "Community"

July 19, 2019