Direct Link to Latest News

Below - The Tyranny of the Titty (scroll down)

Hitler's First Murder

February 16, 2017


hitler-geli.jpgHitler murdered his 24-year-old niece as result
 of a bisexual love triangle involving the Nazi leader
 and his Jewish chauffeur-bodyguard, Emil Maurice










(from March 19, 2012) 

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

To say
Adolf Hitler was a psychopath and killer might seem redundant, but few know that he murdered his first victim with his own hands. It was swept under the carpet and has yet to see the light of day. Western historians are as determined as Nazis to protect the Fuhrer's reputation. 

On Sept 18, 1931, he shot his beloved niece Geli Raubal, 24. The murder was ruled a suicide by the Bavarian Minister of Justice, a political ally.


hitler-time_man_of_year_1938.jpg
(Time Magazine's Man of the Year for 1938)

However, Raubal's body was badly bruised and her nose was broken. An unfinished letter indicated she was leaving her uncle's apartment to go to Vienna. She was buried in a Catholic cemetery that would bar suicides.
(
The Münchener Post, 20th September 1931)

The bisexual love triangle that led to Raubal's murder reveals the true perverted character of a man that many "patriots" still worship.

Although a homosexual, Hitler still enjoyed the company of buxom young blonds and brunettes that fit the Nazi mold. Raubal was the daughter of Hitler's half-sister and cook. Nineteen years his junior, she was an unselfconscious extrovert who brightened every room she entered. Hitler seemed to relax when she was around.

"I love Geli and could marry her," Hitler told his friend Heinrich Hoffman. [But] "I want to remain single. So I retain the right to exert an influence on her circle of friends until such a time as she finds the right man." (Hoffman, Hitler Was My Friend, 1955.)

Hitler's rival was his own bisexual, Jewish chauffeur and bodyguard, Emil Maurice. In December 1927, Hitler prevented his niece from marrying Maurice and fired him. The following year, Raubal wrote to Maurice: 

"Uncle Adolf is insisting that we should wait two years. Think of it, Emil, two whole years of only being able to kiss each other now and then and always having Uncle Adolf in charge. I can only give you my love and be unconditionally faithful to you. I love you so infinitely much. Uncle Adolf insists that I should go on with my studies." (Dec. 24,1928)

HITLER-MAURICE.png(The Jewish-looking Maurice and Hitler in Landsberg prison,1924)


EMIL MAURICE (1897-1972)

In Mein Kampf , Hitler describes a fracas at a beer hall when Communists tried to break up an event. He marveled at how his "storm troopers,"  although bloodied, "swept the enemy literally out of the hall...at their head, my splendid Maurice."

Maurice was a pioneer member of the SA and later the SS. He and Hess took Hitler's dictation of Mein Kampf; and like Hess, Maurice was one of Hitler's lovers. After their release from prison, Maurice became Hitler's personal bodyguard and chauffeur. He accompanied Hitler during the 1934 Purge and personally dispatched people who had become liabilities.

"It is absolutely inconceivable that Maurice was not known as Jewish," Dr. Judith Reisman writes. [Considering] "his appearance, his family, and the very high probability of his circumcision...homosexual lust easily overpowered anti Semitic hate."

maurice.pngWhen it later emerged that Maurice had a Jewish great grandfather, Hitler made an exemption for him and his family. Since one-sixteenth Jews were already exempt from the Nuremberg Laws, Maurice, who became an SS general, was probably more Jewish than that. Nazi race laws were a matter of expediency, mostly designed to persecute non-Zionist Jews and justify the formation of the Jewish State.

Despite his prowess as a bouncer, Maurice, a watchmaker by training, had an artistic temperament, and played the guitar at Nazi gatherings. Raubal, also a  musician, took a fancy to him during her visits to Landsberg Prison in 1924, at age 16. Thus began a passionate romance that blossomed over the years.


HITLER'S DEPRAVITY

gelinude1.jpgFor his book, Hitler and Eva (1974) Glen Infield interviewed Wilhelm Stocker, a SS Guard at Hitler's apartment. Stocker said that when her Uncle Adolf was away, Geli had many suitors.
 
Because he kept her secrets, Geli told him
"that at times Hitler made her do things in the privacy of her room that sickened her but when I asked her why she didn't refuse to do them, she just shrugged and said that she didn't want to lose him to some woman that would do what he wanted."

Gregor Strasser, a Nazi leader who had a fling with Geli said she told him the Nazi dictator forced her to urinate and defecate on him. Strasser was one of the Nazi leaders who met in Hitler's apartment after the murder to decide on a story. Hitler wanted it called an "accident." But the word had already gone out that Raubel had committed suicide using Hitler's gun.

Strasser was murdered in the 1934 Purge.


hitlergeli.jpgRAUBAL'S MURDER


Michael Dean reports  that after leaving Hitler's service, Maurice sued the Nazi Party for unlawful dismissal and won a tidy sum. He opened a watchmaker shop a few blocks from Hitler's apartment and resumed his affair with Raubal.

Apparently she became pregnant and wanted to go to Vienna to have the baby. Hitler was furious at this betrayal and refused permission. When she defied him, he killed her.

It is not clear which betrayal was greater to Hitler since he had feelings for both Raubal and Maurice.

In any case, Hitler's relationship with Maurice proved resilient. Maurice became a senior SS official and Hitler protected him against rivals resentful accepting orders from a Jew.

The take-away is that before Hitler indirectly killed millions of people, Jews and non-Jews alike, he first bloodied his hands on the young niece he supposedly loved. Millions of people chose to follow a murderer and psychopath. Nothing has changed.  


---------

Related - Jacob Hitler
The Hidden Hitler
Hitler's Salad Days  








You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/hitlersfirstmurderhtml.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "Hitler's First Murder"

Edgar said (March 21, 2012):

It should be remembered that black magic and the satanic evil groupings underlying all governments and secret services.

Someone having adhered to their one-world-totalitarian mindset, having been initiated in Vienna long before the first WW, with the hypnotic powers he openly displayed, would never have seen "sex" or "love" in any normal way.

Those are acts to recharge the batteries of evil, to thrive on fear and often pit different people against each other out of simple spite. So, Adolf, Jacob or whatever, definitely an agent for various diabolic secret organizations, called "clubs" then, would have had all kinds of relationships that did not involve any normal human feelings.

No wonder, as a great-grand child of Solomon Rothschild of Vienna, he was singled out very early. This character is not to be taken as a human. Those "people" are agents of entropy, of evil.


AF said (March 20, 2012):

Another angle that is rarely visited is the body-double issue, which clouds who the real Hitler was. The initial Hitler was most likely the deviant who lived in the Viennese flophouse and was the illegitimate grandson of a Rothschild. He was groomed and was a complete puppet.

However, as this man's nature, history and actions became better understood, and the recruiting and hiring of "bull" homosexuals reached its peak, there were certainly numerous Prussian / German men of intellect and power who could no longer tolerate the intentional destruction of their Fatherland.

Mainstream history tells us there was essentially one assassination attempt on Hitler that failed, but I contend there were many and at least a few of them succeeded.

I also contend that a few body-doubles were thrust into the limelight and perhaps controlled by forces other than the "central bankers / Illuminati" for short periods of time.

In other words, the persona of Hitler was always a puppet, but controlled by different hands at different times. Greg Hallet's book, "Hitler was a British Agent," details Hitler's (which one?) dental work, which was supposedly configured as a wireless receiver, accounting for his "divine" inspirations. Whoever had access to that wireless set-up controlled the Fuhrer.

From analysis of photographs, there were at least 4 Hitlers who were used publicly as far as I know, but I am unaware of any detailed voice analysis that might shed light on how many were reading his speeches. Churchill had his primary doubles (Norman Shelley and Leslie Howard) who made appearances and speeches, and there is some speculation that the original may have died (or was it Leslie Howard?).

Regardless, an important question becomes, what Hitler (if any) escaped from the bunker in 1945? According to the Russians, there were 3 or 4 body-doubles found dead in the bunker and evidence that someone of prominence escaped. If the real Hitler was killed years earlier, why rescue a body-double? Did the rescuers know? Was it Borman who escaped instead? Surely, Borman had doubles too and would not have been in a bunker as a sitting duck (the man controlled billions worth of loot, after all).

Strange times indeed, but the body-double strategy is still playing a huge part of history and politics as evidenced by the Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden debacles. Understanding World War 2 is crucial to understanding what is happening all around us today, but it's a very hard nut to crack...


V said (March 20, 2012):

I love Clifford Shack's comments to "Hitler First Murder". So true.

Hitler was a 'sick' individual but he was not the greatest monster of the century that media makes him out to be. He knew how to take orders and follow them. If he didn't his Anglo/Jewish handlers on orders from Rothschild & Sons would have gotten rid of him and r replaced by another dupe. Hitler should have hung just for the one murder of his poor niece.

Hitler helped fit the role of the events of WWII which created a crisis thereby causing a massive Jewish migration to Palestine.

WWI had the British occupy Palestine. Millions of men, women and children died in both world wars to create the present state of Israel by the Rothschilds and other London banking families (Jew and gentile).

It will take another 'Hitler' to precipitate WWIII which will crown Jerusalem as the worlds seat of global government where the centuries old Jewish messianic plan for world dominion over the goyim will finally take hold.


MS-reply to C Shack said (March 20, 2012):

Clifford,

You said "Hitler didn't kill millions"...proof? If the best that you can come up with is the old "Hitler was just a puppet" argument, then you need to be schooled about human nature. Does a rapist need to be prompted to rape? Does a murderer need to be "nudged" in the right direction to murder? Obviously, the answer is no.

No, I propose it's easier to believe a bunch of faceless "bankers" pull everyone's strings to accomplish a fiendish end rather than an obvious homosexual madman who's mental equilibrium is unbalanced at best. Because of his hatred of God and all things decent, he chooses to murder the things that threaten his defiled ego whether an innocent niece or a race of Torah honoring and fearing Jews.


Clifford Shack said (March 20, 2012):

Hitler didn't murder millions, he murdered one person, his niece. The millions were murdered by London bankers. Hitler was a tiny cog in the wheel. He had as much to do with WWII as Oswald had to do with the JFK assassination.

Hitler was a recruit. He played his part well, no doubt, but he didn't fart unless he received instructions from his handlers who in turn received their instructions from the coordinated intelligence efforts of London and Washington.

Orders were filtered through various channels. Why do you think there were so many double and triple agents on all sides? Orders to Hitler were transferred through a spy network akin to osmosis.

There are stories of Hitler locking himself in a room for days until he received Divine inspiration. In reality, he was waiting for orders. WWI & II were not fought...they were orchestrated. To fight a real war requires real enemies. The Illuminati have a talent for staging wars.

As for Hitler, he was a real murderer. He murdered his niece. Don't give him more credit than that. He was a vegetarian for God's sake. People can't accept Hitler the puppet. If they do they would have to accept the truth. People hate the truth.


Below- The Scent ofFeminist Desperation (scroll down)

Pastor Denies Israel's Biblical Identity - Angers Flock

ChuckBaldwin6_IMG.jpg
"The entire faith system of many professing Christians depends on their allegiance to the modern State of Israel. These Christian Zionists might recite a pledge of allegiance to the United States of America, but their true allegiance is to the State of Israel."

Chuck Baldwin, left, writes:

"With all of the controversial positions I have taken over my forty-plus years in the ministry, I have NEVER received the hate-filled opposition I am receiving right now because of my position that the modern State of Israel is NOT the Israel of the Bible or the "Israel of God." (Galatians 6:16) That position is NOT based on racism or prejudice or anything of the kind. It is based strictly on my study and understanding of the Holy Scriptures."


A Reader writes: 

"Chuck Baldwin is just beginning to experience the "spirit of murder" that lurks behind and fuels Christian Zionism!  D.T. aligned himself with these people during his entire campaign.  Woe to him if he ever betrays them.  I have lived around Zionist and Evangelical Christians much of my life....and have been deserted and hated by many, including close friends.  If you do not ascribe to every jot and tittle of their mind control program, you are not welcome in their Club.    Pointing out contradictions and flaws in their beliefs is a no-no.  End time prophecy, the rapture and the second coming all depend upon the State of Israel.  If the lie is uncovered, Evangelical and Zionist Christianity will collapse."



by Chuck Baldwin
(Abridged by henrymakow.com) 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is one of the most corrupt political leaders on the planet. He is also one of the most heavily financed political leaders on the planet.

In spite of his billionaire friends and supporters, however, he is facing almost certain political destruction. His many crimes are being intensely investigated by Israeli authorities. The only reason he hasn't been removed from office already is due to the immense political and financial support he has from bankers, casino owners, land developers, etc., from other countries--especially in the United States.

But it is doubtful that Bibi will be able to tread water much longer. It appears that his political demise is inevitable. And you haven't heard a word about it from the controlled mainstream media in the U.S., have you? Of course not. The men who own the mainstream media are among Bibi's largest contributors.

Neither have you heard anything about it from the so-called conservative publications, periodicals and websites. There is one common denominator that links the mainstream media with the so-called conservative media: infatuation with the modern State of Israel.

Without a doubt, Netanyahu's plummet in popularity at home is one of the reasons (maybe the MAJOR reason) why he is pressuring Donald Trump to ratchet up a war against Iran and why he is mobilizing accelerated (illegal) Israeli settlements on private land owned by Palestinian people. War and military conflict has always been a favored tactic of embattled politicians to increase their popularity and deflect negativity. Neither does it hurt that Jared Kushner, Donald Trump's son-in-law and presidential adviser, is a MAJOR financial backer of the (illegal) land settlements.

One indicator that Netanyahu will be removed from office soon is longtime Bibi supporter, billionaire Sheldon Adelson, is starting to back away from the embattled Israeli Prime Minister. That's NOT a good sign for Bibi at all.

The removal of Netanyahu from office would be a very good thing for the entire world. The problem is the State of Israel is controlled by about 20 mega-rich Zionist families. To think that these power-brokers would replace Bibi with a truly honest man is as likely as the sun rising in the west tomorrow morning.

Read this honest and objective analysis of what I am talking about here: Netanyahu Scandals Reflect Corruption At The Heart Of Israeli Society

BACKLASH

As I often do, I tested this column by writing a brief post on this subject on my Facebook page. I wasn't surprised when Christians came out of the woodwork in a vitriolic attack against me for what I said about Bibi. Many accused me of heresy and vowed to never read my Facebook page again.

Since my lengthy personal research and study into the Biblical teaching on Israel, I have come to learn this: the entire faith system of many professing Christians depends on their allegiance to the modern State of Israel. These Christian Zionists might recite a pledge of allegiance to the United States of America, but their true allegiance is to the State of Israel.

It is no hyperbole to say that for many professing Christians, the modern State of Israel is every bit as important as Jesus Christ Himself and their own personal salvation. In fact, many of these folks equate their allegiance to the State of Israel with their own personal salvation. And they are quick to condemn anyone to hell who does not share their allegiance to the State of Israel. I find this extremely perplexing. I truly wonder if this cultish infatuation with the modern faux Israel might be the great "falling away" and devilish deception of the last days. But I digress.

Faithful readers of this column and followers of my ministry know that for most of my adult life I subscribed to dispensational modern-Israel-is-the-fulfillment-of-Bible-prophecy theology. And while I would debate with people holding alternative opinions (as I hold now), I never felt that their differences of opinion on this subject somehow invalidated their Christian faith.

So, why is it that so many Christians are so dependent upon a commitment to the modern State of Israel to the point that it is part and parcel to the very core of their Christian faith? For some nineteen centuries there was no modern State of Israel, and believers were quite cemented and steadfast in the Christian faith. In fact, most Bible scholars who wrote previous to 1948 had an entirely different perspective on the subject. Try reading some of them, and see for yourself.

Today, however, anyone who challenges the scriptural validity of the modern State of Israel is cast off by many professing Christians in the meanest and most vitriolic terms. Why does the modern State of Israel hold such a strong grip on people's faith? It's as if their faith itself depends on the modern State of Israel, not Christ.

Christians seem oblivious to the fact that Netanyahu is not only a globalist, crook, and murderer, he is also a Talmudist. Not long ago, he promised that Talmudism would be official Israeli law. See the report: Netanyahu Promises Talmud Will Be Israeli Law

If you think the Koran is bad, try reading the Talmud. As a point of reference, the Pharisees that hated Jesus were devout disciples of the Mishnah, the oral traditions which later formed the Talmud. In other words, the Pharisees were Talmudists. And, as you probably know, Jesus strongly condemned them for their devotion to the Mishnah.

Consider, too: Tel Aviv is the international capital of homosexuality. That is no exaggeration. Also, the government of Israel pays for women to receive an abortion at any stage of the baby's development. Plus, as seen in Cook's article linked above, Israel is known globally as being a safe haven for all kinds of money laundering for international criminal gangs, especially from Russia. "A leaked U.S. embassy cable in 2009 warned that Israel was in danger of becoming a 'promised land' for organised crime.

"The Haaretz newspaper observed recently that this underground economy [from the money laundering by international criminal gangs] had become so big - with an annual turnover reaching as much $39 billion - Israel could find itself on the same list as Iran as 'one of the leading state financiers of global terrorism.'"

Furthermore, for all intents and purposes, many (if not most) Talmudists are practicing atheists. The Lord Jesus Christ (true Israel's Messiah) is scorned and hated as much in the modern State of Israel today as He was during the days when the Pharisees crucified Him. If you think there is religious liberty for Hebrew Christians in Israel today, you couldn't be more wrong.

The last time I was in Israel, I spoke at two Baptist churches. One was in Jerusalem, and the other was in Bethlehem. Take a guess at the composition of the Christians in those churches. They were 99% Palestinian.

In addition, Zionist bankers, casino owners, land developers, media magnates, entertainers, movie producers, etc., are among Christianity's biggest enemies. That is NOT a racist statement at all. That is a cold, hard fact.

You must understand that Zionism has nothing to do with race; it is a political philosophy. At its core, Zionism is communistic and atheistic. Accordingly, it is little wonder that Zionists are found among the liberal/progressive political parties in virtually every Western country. Zionists are found among all races and creeds. This is NOT a racial issue at all.


Folks, consider: I had believed, taught, and preached dispensational, Israel-First theology for over thirty years--why would I take an opposite view NOW, after all these years? Why would I risk my ministry, my livelihood, and my family's future? And with the hateful reaction to my position, that's exactly what I've done.

Continued attacks against me for my position on websites, radio talk shows, periodicals, and newspapers make columns such as this one obligatory. Like my positions or not, I have always tried to be true to my conscience and my beliefs. And if I go to the poor house over this issue, so be it. I will be faithful to the truth as I understand it, regardless.
----
Related


First Comment by Dan:

I live in the Christian Zionist capitol of the world (Texas), and I've had direct conversations with several people since 2015 who surprised me by souring on it.   I always recognized it as political exploitation of religion.  It exploits vanity, and anything that exploits human vices for sake of attraction won't last, since that's what fads are made of.

But I think that's neither here nor there in the fortunes of Netanyahu.  The Israelis knew all along the Christian Zionist fad wasn't going to last forever, and they've successfully transitioned to a new paradigm of American alliance with Trump's movement. That's not necessarily a bad thing if Trump remains at the head of that movement.  Not so good if anything happens to Trump and certain members of his Administration take over.

If Bibi goes down, it will be due to his enemies in Israeli politics, little or nothing to do with anything going on in the United States.   On the contrary, in light of Trump ditching the 'two state solution' preference of US/Israeli policy in the past, Netanyahu seems to getting close enough to victory for the hard liners everywhere to taste it, so I wouldn't count him out just yet.   As LBJ once said, "you don't change horses in mid-stream".

Anon writes:

My experience has shown me there are two types of Christian Zionists: paid infiltrators and tricked dupes.

I personally know some prominent Christian Zionists that get millions in donations or " business deals" from mysterious Israel-linked groups (deep state?).  They told me- Bible translations that refer to Jesus as Rabbi instead of Master or Teacher as in Mark 9: 5 KJV -'And Peter answered and said to Jesus, Master, it is good for us to be here...' as opposed to NIV, ESV, ISV, ASV, D-R, 'Then Peter told Jesus, "Rabbi, it's good...' This was done to "Give a nod to Israel."  

There are many other phrases in these Zionist Bibles that "Give a nod to Israel."  Thus no wonder Christians are confused they heavily rely on the written word in the Bible. 








You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/2017/02/Pastor-Who-Spurns-Israel .html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for " Pastor Denies Israel's Biblical Identity - Angers Flock "

Michael said (February 16, 2017):

Yes its good to see that apostate ministers are slowly but surely beginning to see the light, I quote from the Gods own word in part revelation 18;4, 'get out of her my people , if you do not want to share with her in her sins and if you do not want to receive part of her plagues'


Tony B said (February 16, 2017):

Henry, it gives me great pleasure to learn that Chuck Baldwin, whom I have always disdained for his "Scofield-warped pretend Christianity" has seen the light, at least on ersatz Israel. Makes for a pleasant day.


Robert K said (February 16, 2017):

The invention of the term "Judeo-Christian", as used ubiquitously today, coincided with the final push to establish the State of Israel. In other words, it is a composite neologism that has been insinuated into the language for political purposes. During the preceding nineteen centuries Christians would have regarded it as being self-contradictory, and therefore patently intended (in modern parlance) to instil cognitive dissonance. Contemporary language is seeded with many such mind-mushing expressions. The late Dr. Geoffrey Dobbs identified the "technique of the essential adjective"--the association of a noun with a modifier that logically destroys the noun's meaning--as a key component of the subversive war on culture.


Magda said (February 16, 2017):

The Arabs have a moral and ethical basis for the holy land and it would have been in the interest for the Jews to peacefully co-exist with them as they did for many centuries under Islamic rule and before Zionist rule.

The immoral and ethical claims to these lands and against the Palestinians are explained by a South African sheikh who looks at the religious bases of these claims:

Israel and Palestine: The Solution sh. Ahmed Deedat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvxlmFTnCnw


Below-- Flashback: Illuminati Pedophiles Rule Society (scroll down)

The Scent of Feminist Desperation

February 15, 2017

settle.jpg



Millions of women who outsourced their common sense
and trusted the media, their teachers, their leaders and
their society are now high-and-dry.











by Henry Makow Ph.D.

(Slightly revised from "Feminist at the End of Her Rope," July 11, 2008)

Who better to dispense advice than  a veteran feminist who totally messed up her life?

In an article entitled "Marry Him" (Atlantic Monthly, March 2008)  Lori Gottlieb advises her sisters to "settle"--marry anything  in sight...and fast.  This kind of abject surrender, while satisfying in an "I told you so" way, is also sad.

Millions of women who outsourced their common sense and trusted the media, their teachers, their leaders and their society are now high-and-dry. They were told they could have it all but most can't.

There are three times as many single women in their 30's now than there were in the 1970's. By the time these women have established their careers, many are too thread bare and hard bitten to marry, and the good men are all gone.

They are the victims of the most evil, most successful, social engineering program in history. It was  designed to give women career instead of family. But until feminists acknowledge that they are victims of a cruel hoax, they won't be able to salvage whatever is left.

I'll elaborate later but first Ill give you a taste of the wisdom of a woman who defines "pathetic."

MS The BOAT

Ms. Gottlieb begins by describing a picnic where she and a friend (both mothers of sperm donor babies) are not feeling "satisfied." Surprise. They miss not having husbands. No doubt the children will miss not having fathers.

"Ask any soul-baring 40-year-old single heterosexual woman what she longs for in life...what she really wants is a husband..." Gottlieb confesses.

While she and her friends "still call ourselves feminists and insist we're independent and self sufficient...every woman I know--no matter how successful and ambitious, how financially and emotionally secure, feels panic ..if she hits 30 and find herself unmarried."

Sounding very much like a Jewish hysteric, her advice is to "Settle!" Forget about true love, his annoying habits, his halitosis or abysmal sense of aesthetics. Marriage, she has discovered, is about having a team-mate, even if he's not the love of your life. She even recommends gays as possible mates.

How did she end up like this? Too much "education" I imagine. Too much feminist empowerment and Hollywood- fueled expectations of romance and men. Earlier in life, she dumped someone because, although they had "strong physical chemistry" and their sensibilities were similar,  they proved to be "a half-note off, so we never quite felt in harmony, or never viewed the world through quite the same lens."

Apparently, she was looking for a clone.

"Now, though, I realize that if I don't want to be alone for the rest of my life, I'm at the age where I'll likely need to settle for someone who is settling for me. .. We lose sight of our mortality. We forget that we, too, will age and become less alluring. ...Which is all the more reason to settle before settling is no longer an option."

"Take the date I went on last night. The guy was substantially older. He had a long history of major depression and said, in reference to the movies he was writing, "I'm fascinated by comas" and "I have a strong interest in terrorists." He'd never been married. He was rude to the waiter. But he very much wanted a family, and he was successful, handsome, and smart. As I looked at him from across the table, I thought, Yeah, I'll see him again. Maybe I can settle for that. But my very next thought was, maybe I can settle for better. It's like musical chairs--when do you take a seat, any seat, just so you're not left standing alone?

"But then my married friends say things like, "Oh, you're so lucky, you don't have to negotiate with your husband about the cost of piano lessons" or "You're so lucky, you don't have anyone putting the kid in front of the TV and you can raise your son the way you want." I'll even hear things like, "You're so lucky, you don't have to have sex with someone you don't want to."

"The lists go on, and each time, I say, "OK, if you're so unhappy, and if I'm so lucky, leave your husband! In fact, send him over here!"

"Not one person has taken me up on this offer."

Did I say Pathetic? 

COMMENTARY

My advice to single women in their 30's-40's is -Do Not Panic. Do not "Settle." You are far better off alone than with a misfit. Also, whatever you do, do not have a child out-of-wedlock or from a sperm bank. That diminishes your chances of marriage big-time. Gottlieb is desperate to "settle" mainly because she has an infant on her hands.

The key thing to realize is that feminism was not spontaneous grassroots social change as portrayed. It was social engineering  designed to phase out gender, marriage and the nuclear family. There are half as many nuclear families now than there were in the 1960's. The destruction of the family is part of a larger agenda to destabilize and depopulate society in advance of a thinly veiled totalitarian world government.

Sexual liberation is part of this agenda. Men see no reason to marry now that unfettered sex is so plentiful. I advise women to consecrate sex for long-term loving relationships and end them in 6-8 mos. if marriage is not imminent. Don't waste time on window shoppers.

Feminists have been neutered by adopting the male role model and eschewing the feminine one. They need to rediscover their natural feminine instincts. This involves finding a man they can believe in, and nurture, and not settling for less. True love stems from the sacrifice that women make for the person they love. Let him lead and keep quiet about all his faults. But don't let him take you for granted and dump him if he doesn't love you back (i.e look after your interests and needs.)

Generally speaking, the people behind elite social engineering are satanists in the sense they want to override God (Truth) AND Nature. They deliberately do evil against humanity.

Women were designed to marry and have children in their late teens and early twenties. That's when they are irresistible to young men. They should marry men who have graduated and are starting their careers.

Raising children is not an afterthought. It is what married people do together, what they have in common. It's natural growth, both biological and in terms of our personal development and fulfillment.

Nature doesn't give rain checks, as millions of women are discovering, the hard way.

 --------------------

Thanks to JD for sending this article.

Read the classic article in support of nuclear families: "Dan Quayle Was Right" by Barbara Dafoe Whitehead







You can find this article permanently at https://www.henrymakow.com/feminist_at_the_end_of_her_rop.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "The Scent of Feminist Desperation"

Connie said (February 16, 2017):

Amen to ditching the window shoppers! A woman who agrees to shack up with no commitment is making a big mistake, and it is something "everybody" knew in the old days. Remember the saying, "Why buy a cow when you can get the milk for free?" Twice, I've seen this arrangement drag on for years, then end with a sudden tragic break-up, the couple in their mid-30s. He is simply blindsided when one day she wakes up and wants a ring and a baby, something he never signed up for.


Dave said (February 16, 2017):

Women who missed out are still going to live longer and have the government look after them far more than unmarried men.


Sheila said (February 16, 2017):

Henry, I appreciate your perspective, but given that women are victims of their programming, can't you spare just a smidge of compassion? With phrases like "thread bare and hard bitten" you seem to be gloating over the lot of women past their prime, and it seems mean spirited.

--

Thanks Sheila

I guess men are angry and it shows

henry


Steve said (March 16, 2009):

One other factor you should consider is also the economic position of more and more men. Marriage is seen as an expense that has been priced out of reach. Wages are so low in workplace or stagnating so much men like me just don't have that extra cash to date and do the "entertaining" women expect anyway. Never mind paying for the expensive wedding ceremonies women want to celebrate "their day".

God fearing straight men like me who have been "on the market" give up eventually.


Amy said (March 13, 2009):

I just had to comment on this article and say thank you yet again.

I was 19 when my eldest son was born and 2 more later, I am still in my mid 20's. My husband and I chose to start straight away. So many older women ask me all the time "why didn't you want go to university? or start your career first? or wait until you've traveled and seen the world?"...

My answer is pretty simple- a career can not hug you and say I love you. By the time my children are ready to 'leave the nest' I will have plenty of time to study or travel or work and enjoy my husbands companionship as I will still only be in my mid 40's... Yeah lady, still think I made a dumb choice?

Reading this article this morning before I took my son to school, put a huge smile on my face and I held my head high as I walked passed all the other 30+ years mums who (because of feminism) feel they have the right to judge me for being "old fashioned".


Tony said (March 13, 2009):

Henry, I must disagree with your statement that "women were designed to marry and have children in their late teens and early twenties." That seems logical these days because of the utter lack of preparation for either of these things in the lives of young girls.

Little princesses (and princes) used to be raised by at least three governesses, each speaking a different language. Before puberty they were fluent in each. That's just one item from the old monarchies.

For the average family, mothers used to have their girl children with them most of the time as learning helpers. "Formal" education was considered wasted on them - and that consideration is absolutely proved correct in the vast majority of cases. Girls in school are interested in anything but an education. I observe every day that, especially for girls, school is one long playtime. Some girls "excel" (by today's lack of real standards) in subjects they enjoy, which, in reality, is just more playtime. Girls who graduate from dumbed down colleges usually end up as dead end secretaries anyway. As some woman mentioned to you recently, they don't have the balls to "make it" in the world the way men do. To them a level playing field is being handed a man's job by court enforcement.

All that said, women were DESIGNED to marry and have children at or shortly after puberty, not when society has decided it is convenient to society. In a saner age they were prepared for their purposeful lives by then instead of being converted into self-centered, worthless, rude, uncultured users; void of any common courtesies, and unprepared for anything beyond being babied. Believe me, this is not an exaggeration.

Boys are not being prepared for life either but they become more mature for the simple reason of being mistreated by schools simply because they are boys. This forces them to gain some sense of self protection; survival, if you will.

In that saner age, boys became established in some manner before being able to afford marriage so they were older when they married - the age difference between husbands and wives was much greater than now. There was no nonsense about "equal partners" in marriage, there were separate roles as demanded by nature and common sense.

This (marriage situation) is another area wherein "change" - always the byword of communism - was not required because, by sticking to the dictates of nature, marriage worked - modern day propaganda concerning the supposed helplessness of those wives of yore notwithstanding.

How many young lives today are destroyed before they begin because society has set back the time for marriage but puberty remains as God made it? Society compounds its insanity with its double standards about sex, generating more and more idiot laws against early marriage and at the same time saying any perversion goes when one hits the magic age? And teaching the perversions to school children. The sexual urge is never stronger than when puberty hits. One would think the puritans would be able to understand that. Or at least the politicians, too many of whom have a continual history of being highly sexed in an illicit manner.


Dan said (March 13, 2009):

In my youth during the 70's college women did such a good job of showing no interest in marriage or motherhood that neither I, or they, suspected homes, ie husband and family, would ever matter to them. It wasn't till I was over 40 that every woman my age I met had been those women 30 years ago. And every one of them were still single and expressed openly their regrets. Quite bitterly.

I understood then that the sex 'revolution' and feminism had conned them as effectively as 'sex drugs and rock n' roll' had conned me.
I think I see now that the trick is, when you're 21 male or female, a lifetime seems forever, so you can try on a 'lifestyle' and if you don't like it later you can do something else. Women didn't realize things look very different from 40. And 40 creeps up on people in their 20's, before you know it -- you're there.

Another thing I realized, is because women lose the possibility of having children by 40 (if not sooner), they're still in a relatively young mind set when they learn they've missed that possibility - and that's forever. A man may begin feeling a fleeting moment of regret at never raised a family when he's invited to a college buddy's daughter or son's college graduation, or wedding. It's often not till such a happenstance that it occurs to a middle aged man the children he might have had would already be grown. But that's a 'guy' thought that doesn't have the same 'finality' that a woman realizing she's infertile forever can have. As a man, I think childless men think of not having been a father the way they might occasionally regret a profession they wanted to be, but didn't pursue till it was too late. It doesn't seem to have the same impact that a woman feels realizing she'll never be a mother.

And does have. Rather often. I know it does, I've heard it from too many women my age who's photos from the 70's tell me they could have had their pick of men. And they did! They picked ALL of them, one a month. Like shopping. These were the girls who had that bumper sticker, "So many men, too little time" back in '77". Well, time's up.

So my advise to young people whether male or female is, don't let this happen to YOU. Don't be conned.


Paul said (July 12, 2008):

I applaud your articles week after week, your insight and perspective.

The missing ingredient is love. The solution is conservatism. We get there by self-denial.

It seems to me that by undermining the man, the family is challenged to fall apart because if this "micro-government ; i.e. man as leader of household" goes away, it would (path of least resistance) fall away to a large and powerful entity, government...one that seeks to drastically reduce the population.

I've come to realize though that their plan is completely manufactured and thus cannot stand. The devil and socialism go hand in hand. This go around is most likely to be the most refined effort in the history of man. As for the chip, this would mark ( no pun intended) the 2nd attempt at numbering the people ( refer to 2nd Chronicles Chpt 21). Satan is up to the same thing now.. albeit more subtly. And as long as the world is full of its' own stanky arrogance, it will be none the wiser.

I'm certain you see the femanization of man taking place ("soyafied") and how it has drastically changed our world. I have found that provided we hold on to the "old world" values, we are the rich ones. This is the torch that we need to pass on with no shame.

Men are to be spiritual leaders rather than sexual followers ( discovered this in a most difficult way) and that by continually gawking and oogling so many attractive females only reinforces the lie. They need leadership rather than, well you know!


Why Women Watch "My 600 lb Life"

February 15, 2017

my-600-lb-life-kirsten.jpg
Why Women Watch "My 600 lb Life" 

Kirsten is 38 years old. She lives at her parents', with her two children. She doesn't work. She can hardly get out of bed. She can't even take a shower on her own. Why? Kirsten weighs 612 lbs.

In my never-ending quest to understand women, I asked
a female friend to explain why she watches "My 600 lb Life"








by Juliette Mitchell
(henrymakow.com) 

Kirsten wasn't always like this. She was a normal child, but she felt unwanted by her hyper-critical father. To deal with the perceived rejection she turned to drugs and food.

After leaving home at 17, Kirsten was gang raped at a party. After that, she stopped caring. Had 2 kids (by unknown men) who had to be raised by her parents. Her weight went out of control.

By 30 she was over 500 lbs. and couldn't take care of herself. Her parents took her in. She got clean, except for food. That's her only remaining addiction. She eats all the time.

She's depressed, and often talks of how easier everything would be if she were to die in her sleep. She feels like a burden, but that doesn't stop her from bullying her 14-year-old son (with whom she shares a room) into bringing her food. He knows that what he's doing is not helping his mom, but it's easier to give in than to have a fight.

As you can tell, I've been watching TLC's "My 600 lb. Life". Every week they follow a different person who is close or over the 600 lb. mark, and their attempts to lose weight.

Why do I watch this gem? I have to admit that at first, it was out of morbid fascination (pun!). But after a while, I have to say that I find it inspiring. Here are these people that dug a super deep hole for themselves, and we get to see them slowly, and painfully climb out of it. Not all of them get all the way out, but they sure make great improvements. It gives me great satisfaction to see the before and after pictures at the end of the episode.

Kirsten travels 2500 miles (5-day car trip) to see Dr. Nowzaradan (affectionately referred to as Dr. Now) in Houston, TX. Many of his patients consider him their last hope. Dr. Now puts Kirsten in a 1200-calorie diet. She has to prove to him that she can follow a regime. There is no point on getting gastric bypass surgery if she can't control her eating.

After losing 50 lbs in one month, Kirsten is cleared for surgery. She gets a partial gastric bypass due to a severe hernia. The procedure is enough, though. She starts to lose weight while she's in the hospital. Up to this point in the episode, I feel sorry for Kirsten. She's made bad decisions, but she's trying to change. I respect her commitment.

Kirsten spends weeks in the hospital. She's a terrible patient. She complains and cries about everything. My respect for her is dwindling. No, Kirsten, you are not in a concentration camp for fat people (her words). She's convinced they are starving her to death.

Another reason why I find the show appealing is its natural sense of justice. The more people work, the more weight they lose. Lazy, whiny people don't loose as much weight. I prefer episodes where people have good attitudes, do the most work, and loose the most weight. This episode is not one of my favorites so far.

After Kirsten leaves the hospital, her progress halts, and she even gains weight. She's not exercising, not following her diet, and has refused to see the psychologist Dr. Now recommended. Dr. Now lays down the law, as he often is forced to; unless she sees a shrink to deal with her issues, he won't be seeing her anymore.

I always find fascinating the lack of insight some people have. You don't get to over 600 lbs. by having a healthy relationship with food. You obviously need to deal with your issues. Many of the people on the show don't seem to make the connection and ultimately make little progress.

Kirsten reluctantly goes to see the psychologist and at the end admits that dealing with her feelings helps her curve her eating.

By the end of the episode, a whole year has passed. Kirsten has lost a total of 144 pounds. She's still very obese at 468 lbs., but her life is much improved both physically, and psychologically. She can walk much further, help around the house, and through therapy has begun to heal her wounds, and her relationship with her father (he even told her he's proud of her progress).

Other episodes are much better. For example, Tara, a mother of two ended up losing 278 pounds in that first year. Or Olivia, who lost 240 lbs. It's very satisfying to see those before and after pictures.

I won't pretend all my motives for watching this show are noble; I also enjoy the schadenfreude. I struggle with my weight, but in comparison, the 20 pounds I'd like to loose are but a drop in the buckets and buckets these people have to deal with. They are so excited when they drop 200lb, and they are still at 400lb. I'd die if I ever were that weight. Sorry, that's just the way I feel. I guess I'm shallow.

Also, I do feel that at some level, these people are being taken advantage of. That's why I feel ashamed of watching it.  They must get paid because otherwise, I don't see why they would expose such a personal struggle to the world. I would never go to the circus and gawk at the fat lady, but if I can root for her to lose weight from home, without anyone knowing...

Declining Gender Identity Means Declining Life Skills by Connie

January 29, 2017


shop-class-post.jpg
Declining Gender Identity Means Declining Life Skills


by Connie
(henrymakow.com) 

I can't believe I am about to ruminate about the "good old days," when "girls were girls and men were men."  It's about the teen years, both NOW and THEN, for whatever use you like, even food for thought.
You know about this history, but the millennials need to see a revival -- before us oldsters die off. Think it could actually happen??  Here goes... starting with girls, but mostly about men...

Nowadays teenage girls are pet sitters, not baby sitters, and they are often paid well. There is not much call for babysitters, due to fewer kids, more daycare. Kind of irksome to see so much human love misdirected to mere animals. There is no shortage of volunteers at the animal shelter, and they will even get high school "community service" credit for it.

At our own local high school, students are offered a renamed home economics class ("life skills") without a shop counterpart. Boys and girls both take it, but nobody owns tools anymore. They stopped offering Wood shop and Auto shop in the 90s, changed focus to college prep (so they could indoctrinate all of them, not just the rich kids.) Not to mention, boys are no longer itching for their drivers license. Why should they? They now have garage bands along with their youtube channels!

More on lost male identity...

Once a boy's first job was a paper route and his second job was pumping gas. Today's young man doesn't know how to check fluids or change a flat, and they don't ask to be shown parts, because that's not nice. Actually, we all have become lousy consumers and as I have said before, we just throw money at things -- mostly on plastic to pay later.  For example, we buy experimental software, and literally line up to be guineau pigs on the first version, which we know will have bugs. 

(Women will throw out perfectly good clothing because it's "not in style," so they don't end up sewing, after all.)

At college, kids actually hire movers when they switch to a new apartment. The guys have strong backs, and UHauls are cheap, yet they still hire professionals. Too busy on Facebook, I guess.

With my son and his age-mates, their homes are filled with loose hanging cabinet doors, leaky faucets, walls that need painting.  Neither are the dads in the neighborhood passing these skills along, because of the misguided belief that teaching anything at all to children is womens work, though child rearing is of course hired out, now, as well. 

What we have here is the Prevailing impression that there is no need to nurture things at all in the private domain. There is no private sphere in which to exercise our personal (including gender related) talents, and so those talents which remain are minimized.  

After all, everything worthwhile is public, there is no such thing as "typical" private family life being recognized by the culture. So the end of babysitting and shop class signal the virtual ignoring of what was once the nuts and bolts of our daily living.

Mass Media and Democratic Party - Family Ties

January 28, 2017

Fake News? - Mass Media and Democratic Party - Family Ties 

fakepg-large.jpg