Direct Link to Latest News

Below- 9-11 Truthers Part of the Cover Up? (scroll down)

Trump & The Masonic Jewish Tag Team

January 17, 2017

(On the left, Communist Jewish Gulag commandants in the USSR. On the right, Zionist Jewish pioneers at Kibbutz Gan Shmuel in 1921. Both are making the classic Masonic hand sign.) 

A pattern reminiscent of pre-war Germany
has emerged in the US and Europe. 
The "Left" and the "Right" are backed by
two Masonic Jewish factions, Communism and Zionism,
which in fact are joined at the hip. Trump, of course, belongs
to the Zionist faction. 

By Henry Makow Ph.D. 

What is Donald Trump's place in the big picture? 

Trump is a Freemason and probably a crypto Jew. He is surrounded by Jews. The Masonic Jewish (Illuminati) goal is the reduction of the human race (goyim) to the status of domestic animals serving the elite. We see this emergent pattern in the gross disparities of wealth  in today's world. 

The Illuminati advance this agenda using war. They can't subjugate humanity alone; they need the goyim to destroy each other.  "War is revolutionary," insider Chaim Rakofski said. 

Thus, they have developed a tag team to promote war. On the one hand, we have the Communist Jews who attack the goyim by undermining their national, religious, racial and gender identity. On the other hand, are the "Fascists," Nazis or Zionist Jews, who pretend to defend the goyim from this onslaught. Trump won election by appealing to the latter demography. 

From a different angle, we have a conflict between Masonic Jews (Communists) and "anti-semitic" Masonic Jews (Fascists, Nazis, Zionists.)  While claiming to defend Jews, Zionism creates anti semitism to coerce Jews into serving their megalomaniacal agenda. 
In  Zionism in the Age of the Dictators (1983), author Lenni Brenner claims that Zionists have always betrayed the Jewish masses, whose interests were, in reality, defended by the Bolsheviks and their heirs, the Trotskyists; and that during the 1930s and 1940s all branches of Zionism collaborated with the fascists and Nazis. (27-37)

The goy elite has been all but erased in wars contrived by the Illuminati. The vestige has been coopted with promises that they will share in the spoils. 

The conflict between the Communists and the Zionist Masonic factions ensures perpetual war.  

Zionism is not only about a Jewish state; it is about a Jewish world-order. The same applies to Communism: "social justice" is a ruse. The Jew World Order will be achieved by pitting the goyim against each other. Most Jews are not aware of this. They would gladly assimilate but, like the goyim, they have been tricked into supporting Zionism or Communism. 

Arnold J. Toynbee was a propagandist for the Cecil Rhodes' Round Table group, i.e. Communist faction. 

He wrote, "Judaism is a development of the Pre-Exilic religion of Judah that was created in and by the Babylonian diaspora and was imposed by it on the Jewish population in Judaea. ... There has also been the aim of converting the gentile world to the worship of Yahweh under the aegis of a world-empire centred on Eretz Israel and ruled by 'the Lord's Anointed': a coming human king of Davidic lineage." (Reconsiderations, 1961, p. 486).

"The guilt - or merit - of having put Jesus to death is ascribed in the Talmud to the Jews, not to the Romans." (p. 481)  In other words, classical Judaism is satanic.

There are many signs that the Nazism was funded by Zionist Jews.  For example, Churchill said ex-German Chancellor (1930-1932) Heinrich Brüning  revealed  the identities of Hitler's backers in a 1937 letter:  'I didn't, and do not even today for understandable reasons, wish to reveal from October 1928, the two largest regular contributors to the Nazi Party were the general managers of two of the largest Berlin banks, both of Jewish faith and one of them the leader of Zionism in Germany." 

download (84).jpeg

Barack Obama is a toady and lickspittle for the Communist Jewish faction, i.e. George Soros.  "Communist" Jews are in the forefront of the hysterical opposition to Donald Trump, threatening an ongoing campaign of civil disobedience and worse. Thus we have a situation similar to Weimar Germany where Communist and Nazis fought each other in the streets, and later Communists and homosexuals were rounded up. 
Apart from Trump's unqualified support for Israel, many indications suggest Trump is in the Zionist camp described above. His "chief strategist" Steve Bannon is from, a probable Mossad front which defined Trump's anti migrant, anti-Iran deal, anti free trade and pro Russia policy. See Makow "Have Americans Been NeoConned?"  

Uber Zionist Sheldon Adelson is reported to have promised Trump $100 million for his election campaign.

Then there are the dog whistles.  Trump's extremely effective final campaign commercial pictured Janet Yellin and implied that Trump would "drain the swamp" by attacking the Fed and Goldman Sachs.  An earlier ad attacking Clinton corruption featured a Star of David. The Commie Jew faction was quick to assert that Trump represents "white supremacists." 
All the European populist "far right" parties seem to be lining up behind Zionism  while the globalist anti-Putin factions are in the Communist Jewish (Soros) camp.   The latter flooded Europe with Muslim migrants, Now Europeans are identifying with Israel.


Recently 70 nations beholden to the Communist Jew agenda held a meeting in Paris which could be interpreted as anti Zionist because it held up hope for a two-nation solution to the Israeli Palestinian conflict. 

Netanyahu dismissed this as the last vestige of a dying era. "This conference belongs to yesterday's world. Tomorrow's world will be different -- and it is very near." 

 What does "tomorrow's world" look like? 

Like most sensible people, I am relieved Trump won and hopeful that he is genuine. 

But current events recall an established historical charade, a conflict energized by two Masonic Jewish factions. That charade has always produced war.  


You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Below- 9-11 Terrorists Used Jaw-Dropping Secret Technology - (Scroll Down)

9-11 Truthers Part of the Cover Up?

January 16, 2017


Top to bottom counterclockwise: Dr. Steven Jones (top left); Dr. David Ray Griffin, Mr. Kevin Barrett, Mr. Richard Gage, Dr. James Fetzer

Why have most of the 9-11 Truthers ignored the obvious?

No mere "terrorists" would have access to 
secret technology that turned millions of tons of steel,
glass and concrete into dust in mere seconds. 

by Thomas Potter

Here are ways to cover up Dr. Wood's research:

1.) Create and promote unscientific alternate forms of destruction.

2.) Promote Dr. Wood's research and then find fault with it.

3.) Make personal attacks against Dr. Wood's character.

4.) Marginalize Dr. Wood's research and call it "voodoo science".

5.) Promote Dr. Wood's research but misquote her and run it into the ditch.

6.) Ignore Dr. Wood's research and evidence then call it a "theory".

7.) Say that you have read Dr. Wood's book and find fault with it when you did not read her book.

8.) Create other faux groups like the "Sandy Hook Hoaxers" to keep people from asking the right questions and looking at the evidence Dr. Wood presents. This also creates distrust in our government and people that ask questions. If our government was responsible for 9/11, our government is the only way to reverse the damage it has caused. This is why Dr. Wood filed her Federal Qui-Tam lawsuit. Too bad the Truthers didn't support it. The phrase, "use it or or lose it" comes to mind. If the system is broken, then fix it. Otherwise, you are condoning the broken state that it's in. (The "we are change" characters, the "loose change" characters, and Richard Gage & Co. going to the AIA office with ambush video interview attempts are good examples.)  Ambush journalism does not solve problems; it covers them up.
If the "thousands of engineers" that Mr. Gage brags about had stood behind Dr. Wood's Federal Qui-Tam lawsuit, it would have been a lot harder for them to dismiss it... especially if they stood in and outside of the courtroom during the 8-minute "hearing" by the Court of Appeals.  

(left, Dr. Judy Wood) 

After all, the written decision from that hearing did not refute Dr. Wood's collection of evidence and her conclusions from that evidence. The court actually acknowledged the law applied to Dr. Wood's case but admitted they were ignoring the law to dismiss the case!  Why were the Truthers satisfied with that outcome? Anarchy is not the answer and fixes nothing.


Popular theories about what destroyed the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001 are:

1 Fires from jet fuel and office materials weakened steel in the upper floors and the buildings collapsed

2 Conventional controlled demolition blew out supports at the base and the buildings collapsed

3 Thermite cut steel columns on virtually every floor and the buildings collapsed

4 Conventional explosives blew the buildings up

5 Mini-nukes blew the buildings up

Theories 1, 2 and 3 rely on gravity to bring the buildings down while the last two blow them up. Popular theories, yes, and dead wrong. Five facts scientifically documented in Ph.D. engineer Judy Wood's comprehensive textbook (Where Did The Towers Go?) prove the popular theories false beyond any doubt whatsoever. Yes, I know it's amazing. Who'd a thunk it'd be this easy?


DEBRIS: What debris? There was so little debris from each 110-story building that there was no "pile" or "stack." Rubble totalled less than a story. It was a football field as a survivor who emerged from Stairwell B, North Tower, exclaimed. No computers, toilets, and only one small piece from one Steelcase file cabinet were found. Some steel and mostly dust remained. Lack of debris on the ground from quarter-mile-high twin towers whispers "no collapse." See Chapter 9.

DUST: Photos, videos and witness testimony show the towers turned to powder in mid-air. Tim McGinn, NYPD, said, "I was standing there for a couple of seconds thinking where the f**k is the tower? I simply couldn't comprehend it." The dust rollout was so enormous and thick it blocked out sunlight and left an inch or more of dust covering downtown. Much of it wafted into the upper atmosphere. The volume was incredible. Particles from dust samples were smaller than red blood cells and about the size of DNA. As for toxicity, researchers said the dust "recorded the highest levels we have ever seen in over 7,000 measurements we have made of very fine air pollution throughout the world, including Kuwait and China." See Chapters 8, 9, 14-16.    

BATHTUB: A bathtub or slurry wall surrounded 70 feet of WTC subbasements to prevent the Hudson River from flooding the WTC and downtown. If each 500,000-ton tower had slammed into the bathtub in 10 seconds or less, the protective wall would collapse. Did not happen. Upshot? Collapses did not happen. See Chapter 5.

SEISMIC IMPACT: "Had the towers collapsed, foundation bedrock would have experienced tremendous force hammering on it throughout the 'collapse,'" writes Dr. Wood. Seismic instruments registered disturbances far too short in duration and far too small to record tower collapses. This was true of both the twin towers and 47-story WTC7. Again, no evidence of collapses. See Chapter 6.

 SOUND: There were no loud explosions, as established by videos, witnesses, and the official report of NIST. Nor were there loud screeches and screams from massive metal falling, colliding, scraping and collapsing on metal. See Chapter 6.



You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "9-11 Truthers Part of the Cover Up? "

Barry (UK) said (January 17, 2017):

I have been following the 911 saga for over ten years. As an engineer I have no doubt that the official story is nonsense. However, too many researchers are trying to prove exactly how it was done and offer up various theories to back up their case. As interesting as these theories may be, they are unnecessary and only serve to distract and divide 911 truthers. This cacophony of argument causes them to miss the most important point: that it is only necessary to prove the official story is nonsense (which has been done) and use that evidence to push for a thorough independent investigation that is well funded and with full access to all relevant documents. Of course it isn’t going to happen. The establishment are well aware that an increasing number of people are determined to have the truth. They are just as determined that we are not going to have it. We have reached an impasse and no progress is possible without massive public pressure.

While we argue over “how it was done” and “who dunnit” the chance of a united front ever forming to challenge the establishment is not going to happen. The establishment is also playing for time. Another major event is on the cards, which most likely will be a global financial collapse. When that happens, efforts into finding the truth of 911 will be on the back burner.

James Perloff said (January 17, 2017):

I acknowledge that there are many sincere and intelligent people on all sides of this debate. My own take on the Towers’ destruction is at

I will only note here that (as you will see in the post), Chris Bollyn has stated that a Mossad asset tried interest him in the DEW hypothesis long before Dr. Wood came on the scene. Mossad’s interest in promoting the DEW theory would not be surprising, since Israel would not have possessed “Star Wars Beam Weapons” (as Dr. Wood initially called them in 2006) and it goes a long way toward taking Israel off the hook for 9/11.

C said (January 17, 2017):

Well, I am A long-time Alex Jones listener and remember how he would shut anyone down in the most ham-fisted way when anyone even mentioned this lady's name. YEs, she makes a lot of sense. I do think he is part of the controlled opposition, much as I like him. But I don't trust him 100per cent.

Having said that though, this technology doesn't free society from anything as long as the criminals running the show are in place. And I should add, the people in general with their "end justifies the means" hearts and minds.

David S said (January 17, 2017):

George 2 critique citing the simplest (Occam's razor) answer doesn't apply. Dr. Wood DID consider nukes but states that the tritium, light, sound and heat is not in the evidence. Therefore to remain open to an explanation that fits the results is the scientific method.

Art said (January 17, 2017):

If one were to neatly stack, as efficiently as possible, all the steel used in each tower it would stand over 10 stories tall inside the footprint of each building. It's easily proven that falling steel won't arrange itself efficiently into a uniform pile. It would be MUCH higher. So where'd it go?

The directed energy weapon theory is a hypothesis that she is using in an attempt to explain a physical fact. Most of the material that went into the construction of the towers ISN'T there after they crashed to the ground. That's a FACT and it would be great if everyone takes a break regurgitating what's been programmed into you long enough to answer one question. Where'd the mass go? We're all ears.

in response to George 2- below

One who brings Occam into it should know that the least complex answer is "preferable", not necessarily fact. Have you considered the perpe"traitors" using Occam's razor when planning their deed? If 80% of us only consider Occam, this crime will never be solved.

Besides ... Occam's razor has a caveat. It was intended to be used when analyzing natural systems, not the demented thought processes of mass murderers.

George 2 said (January 16, 2017):

I have read Judy Wood's book. It is voluminous and filled with all sorts of references to URLs and other sources. It suffers from one insuperable fault.

Her book violates what may be the most basic rule of scientific thought: Ockham's Razor. Entia non multiplicanda praeter necessitatem sunt. (The order of the Latin words is variable). Entities are not to be multiplied beyond what is necessary. Put another way, the simplest explanation is always preferable.

Judy hypothesizes some unknown mechanism by which WTC1 and WTC2 were pulverized, steel and concrete vaporized, bodies simply disappeared. The facts are adequately explained by the use of tactical nukes, which have been around in one form or another since the 50s.

That gives a new meaning to the phrase "Manhattan Project."

There is obviously a very major incentive on the part of the perpetrators to avoid the conclusion that they nuked our nation to facilitate an assault on our Constitution, Bill of Rights, and innocent nations around the world.

The problem with Judy Wood's book, which I did in fact read, is that it violates the principle of Ockham's Razor, or simplicity of hypothesis.

David S said (January 16, 2017):

Judy Wood is a disciplined scientist. Her strong point is that she constantly reminds one to consider what you see rather than what others tell you what you see. She also went to the trouble of acquiring massive documents in response to public information requests.

I reject the conventional controlled demolition hypothesis. More energy is needed to turn concrete and gypsum into dust blowing away in the wind which is obviously what happened based on pictures and video. The lack of mass from a collapse still has to be answered.

Some other force was needed to toast cars within a 5 block radius in a line of sight exposure. Whether it was a nuclear EMP blast, I don't know. But something is needed to explain how aluminum door handles were vaporized, and iron engine blocks burned up, seemingly by spontaneous combustion. An examination of the photos must exclude raining burning embers as an explanation as offered by Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth.

Woods lays out a compelling case which is needed for the debate. Hopefully, we can get a fair re investigation in the new administration.

Those of us who study the research on 911 do not know everything. But what we do know is sufficient to render the government explanation a lie.

Pat said (January 16, 2017):

When I first mentioned everything turning into dust, my brother said it didn't. Later he mocked Dr. Wood. I also had a falling out with a truther, who was stuck on thermite and demolition. Lost an American friend living here too. She was intelligent but very patriotic.

But now I remember the testimony of the workers who were on the lower level staircases, wondering what was happening and then suddenly they saw the sky above them. I hope these articles get around.

Below- In Defence of Male and Female (scroll down)

9-11 Perps Used Jaw-Dropping Secret Technology

January 14, 2017

Dr. Judy Wood Proves that We Only Saw What We Were Told to See

The controversy over who did 9-11 obscures a more important fact. 

9-11 was the first demonstration of a mysterious free-energy technology 
that, used constructively, could change the destiny of mankind. 
The buildings did not collapse or explode. 
Millions of tons of concrete and steel literally turned to dust.  
This video is one of the most astounding things you will ever see.

By Cab McCann

9/11 is not what the Jewish media TV stations all told us, in a perfectly synchronized reporting effort, on that dreadful day.

Truth about 9/11 is also nothing at all like what the so-called "Truth Movement" under Alex Jones and Company told us either.   As Dr. Judy Wood says, "If you don't like Lie No. 1, try Lie No. 2.   Dr. Wood says Alex Jones and Company are Gatekeepers for the Military Industrial Complex.

(Special effects offered the public by the Jewish media - the kind of thing you'd see on Saturday2 Morning cartoon shows, but not on the news. Planes don't melt into buildings.) 

The above short video is the real truth gathered by Dr. Judy Wood by using FOIA request to obtain the mountains of evidence gathered by the State of NY at the 9/11 crime scene.   She analyzed, organized and presented all of it perfectly:  pictures, videos, transcripts and interviews--evidence, and more evidence of the crime scene.   Dr. Wood is a materials forensics Ph. D, a genius at her profession, a perfectionist in her work, an excellent teacher, and she gives us an analysis of the evidence that is impeccable to the last detail and presented perfectly.

The above video is one of her latest, and is rather a Last Hurrah! kind of reaching-out-to-the-public.   In this video, she's combined hundreds of hours of her work into one cut-to-the-chase message concerning the kind of weapon that was used to disappear seven huge buildings.  

Dr. Wood has poured herself out for 9/11 Truth, the most important issue of our century to rightly understand. Dr. Wood is hard to find these days - in hiding you might say.   Since her student was murdered, it is understandable that she would pull back a bit from her public ministry to present 9/11 Truth to the world. 

There are many fascinating details this video doesn't touch - such as the huge number of jumpers (or flyers) which were more like 1,500 rather than the 5 or 6 the media told us there were;  or the 1500 wilted cars within a half-mile radius of the crime scene; or the Category 3 Hurricane Erin that was parked just outside of NY Harbor on 9/11 ;  or the lack of a seismic record other than surface waves that showed buildings LEAVING, not crashing.   

And many other intriguing and shocking things most of us never knew about 9/11 are not dealt with in this video. The video deals with only the one single issue of the demolecularization of seven huge buildings in a few hours, which turned to dust and blew away. I urge people to go to her website and take the time to look into all of it, a task that may take you months to complete.  But it's worth it.

Dr. Wood's video has condensed the main conclusion for us, evidence which demonstrates that the Banksters and their minions are in possession of a destructive weapon the likes of which the world has never known or imagined.

(Building 6 hollowed out to the lowest floor. ½ million sq. foot building hollowed out down to the basement  There were 7 buildings that 'went away' on 9/11.  Not 2-3 buildings as the gatekeepers told us.)

It's something we all need to know, because the world is spiralling into total destruction and WWIII, all over the lies the controlled media told about 9/11.   9/11 was indeed a big false flag attack done by our own government against its own people, all to provide the excuse to go to war against the entire world.   Be aware though that this is me talking and not Dr. Wood.   Dr. Judy Wood does not draw any conclusions about who did 9/11 or why.   She only wants us to know WHAT HAPPENED.    We can never know who did it or why until we know what actually happened.

But Dr. Wood's evidence proves there was no plane or young Muslims with box cutters who were able to perform the feats you will see in the video.   It had to have been done by our own government to provide a reason to go to war against the world, and by using a new weapon that can demolecularize the WTC in a few hours and blow it away in a dust cloud.

We really do need to take another look at 9/11 - a look that doesn't include what the Jewish media and the false alternative media sellouts have told us to believe.   We need to look at the evidence Dr. Judy Wood gathered with her FOIA request from the actual hours of investigation and evidence gained from the crime scene.  No guesses, just evidence.  

Plain old evidence does the body good. 
Cab McCann responds to comment from George:

Hi, George.   I'm sorry to see you have fallen for the pathetic disinformation against Dr. Wood's report on 9/11 evidence - crazy talk put out by MIC shills.   What a sorry joke that grown men claiming to have military and scientific knowledge would put forth such nonsense as the idea of 'thermite paint' and/or 'one-directional-mini-nano-nukes'--neither one of which exists in reality, and even the fantasy doesn't fit the crime scene or the obvious and voluminous evidence.
CoverPage_blue_s (1).jpg
Nukes produce heat and light and a big noise too.    There was no boom, no heat, no blinding flash, no mushroom cloud.  Also no seismic record, other than the one showing the earth springing back as the buildings LEFT.   No seismic records of any crashing buildings at all let alone any nuclear explosions.  The buildings were fuming away for several hours, and then they just unraveled.   If you watch the video, you will see that.   In fact, we saw on television that people were talking with their backs to the Towers, and then Tower 2 began its 8-second fizzaway.   The television footage shows people talking with their backs to the building, having no idea that anything was happening behind them until they saw people facing them having looks of horror on their faces and beginning to scream in horror.
It was as though the buildings were enveloped in some kind of a field, like an alka seltzer that is dropped into water would start to fizz away.
The MIC gatekeepers also fed us fairy tales about thermite paint --  AKA Lie Number 2, coming from Alex Jones and Company (ie Loose Change and 9/11 Mysteries) ... and we were told by Sylvia Smallstorm that Jeb Bush hired thousands of painters to go into the WTC and paint all the metal beams with 'thermite paint.'    Thermite is an incendiary chemical used for welding and the military uses it also for certain maneuvers.    It is highly explosive and would take but a spark to set it off.   It would be the biggest 4th of July show anybody had ever seen in the entire world: the explosions would be deafening, and the heat would melt half the city away.   There was no 'thermite paint,' and indeed no such stupid invention exists.  The buildings gave off no heat at all while they unraveled quicker than a tab of Alka Seltzer dropped into a glass water on 9/11.  And there was a Category 3 hurricane parked outside NYC Harbor that day, which may have contributed a field to permit the events of 9/11.  Maybe.   Quite strange tho that a dangerous hurricane was not even reported on the news, and no warnings to evacuate were given.
The World Trade Center was built on what is called the 'bathtub' - which is a concrete base below sea level (of the Hudson River) - and walls built to surround and keep the water out.    A one-directional mini-nano-micro-nuke would have damaged the bathtub, and the Hudson River would have come flooding in.   But the 'bath-tub' was not the least bit damaged.   The subways were not flooded.   Also,  none of the basements of any of the 7 destroyed buildings on 9/11 were damaged--other than water damage from the firemen's hoses.   Firemen were hosing down the crime scene for months thereafter, in order to keep the dust from fuming away and contaminating whatever it touched (as the wilted cars we have seen were wilted away).   Each night trucks of dirt were brought and laid down over the ground to absorb the fuming dust, and the old dirt was taken up and away.   The disintegrating dust came from contaminated larger particles and chunks that continued to demolecularize.   Years later the bank across from the WTC had to be taken down because it continued to rust and demolecularize from contamination from the dust from the destroyed WTC.
So Dr. Wood has done her homework thoroughly and her text Where Did The Towers Go? is the definitive last word used by foreign universities studying 9/11.   You can get her book here:
------------ Judy Wood- 9-11 Anomalies 
------------ A dozen people trapped in a lower-level stairwell should have been crushed. Instead the building was lifted off of them. Full Doc.

Correction- Thanks Tom Potter 

I noticed a couple of errors but didn't want to correct you until someone else brought it to my attention:

"The above short video is the real truth gathered by Dr. Judy Wood by using FOIA request to obtain the mountains of evidence gathered by the State of NY at the 9/11 crime scene."

Dr Wood used publicly available images and to the best of my knowledge, she never submitted an FOIA.

Dr Wood didn't make the Irrefutable video - it was made by Adam Dwyer

First Comment by Doug P, an engineer

I spend two years looking at 9-11 extensively. I signed onto I came to the conclusion that Judy Wood had the best case. I also realized that the 9-11 truth movement was a controlled opposition that often used bad tactics if their goal was to expose 9-11 as an inside job.
Glen writes:

Although 90 plus percent of the so called "truth movement" call Dr. Judy Wood a shill, a carnival barker, a gate keeper, CIA and God knows what else, after watching several of her video's and looking at the evidence as she presents it, I found myself squarely in her camp. As any who have been a part of the truth movement for any length of time know it is a considered a sin against God himself to hold any view other than that of say A&E for 9/11 truth or Pilots for 9/11 truth 

You will basically be run out of "truther town" for even bringing up any of her evidence or simply saying she makes some good points. 9/11 truth is where I learned the cold, hard facts of "truther" life.  If you believe any different than the two organizations previously mentioned you are to be scorned and ridiculed yourself.

You will know you have turned the corner in your personal quest for 9/11 truth when you can simply look at ALL the evidence as Dr. Wood suggests and base your conclusions on that evidence, and that evidence alone. Happy hunting in your search for the "truth".  

You can find this article permanently at

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at

Comments for "9-11 Perps Used Jaw-Dropping Secret Technology "

Gary said (January 15, 2017):

Osama Bin Laden the caveman did it, Mossad did it, the US gov. did it, Saudi Arabia did it, aliens did it blah blah blah. No airplane hit the towers, airplanes with explosives hit the towers, nukes brought them down, thermite brought them down, pancakes brought them down, blah blah blah. Does it really make any difference? All we really need to be concerned with is it was an ORCHESTRATED EVENT. Being it was such a massive operation and happened on US soil we can be certain elements in the US government were involved.

Also don't forget the Pentagon and Shanksville. No airplane wreckage at either location. Strange wouldn't you say? All these different theories/facts muddy the waters, get people arguing among themselves about what transpired. Unless you were a high official involved in the event there is no way of knowing exactly how it was accomplished. It was probably so compartmentalized no one has all the details.

Nobody with a lick of sense believes the official fairy tail. The gov. knows this so the best they can do is get people arguing the various theories, some of which they have planted. 911 is the litmus test. If you didn't already realize it certainly makes you aware of what the US government is all about. It damn sure isn't a Republic of, by, and for the American people.

Phil said (January 15, 2017):

Buildings dustified, huge cavities at base of
buildings filled with molten metal for weeks,
abundance of tritium.

Buildings nuked, obviously.

Alex and Judy are two sides of the same coin.

Love your stuff,

PS Modern physics is a sustained fraud. Check
Miles Mathis com for new Unified Theory.

Chad said (January 14, 2017):

While Trump is indeed an improvement over Hillary, there’s only so much Trump can do. Especially, while on the campaign trail and even before assuming the office. Imagine being on the campaign trail and trying to win the hearts and minds of America. You’re not going to get very far screaming, “9-11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!”


Think of the veterans. They lost their lives and souls, while engaged in murder, on behalf of a lie. They aren’t going to side with you too quickly, if you remind them their sacrifice was all for Goldman Sachs, the CFR, Bilderberg, the Zionists and the rest. They need to have some pride in themselves. There are also tons of Americans, Trump voters, will still believe in the official story. Trump is aware of all this. However, he has to be cautious in his statements.

Everyone in D.C. knows all this stuff. There’s no new news. Not to mention, there’s a huge criminal cabal who live in the woodwork. A person would be a fool to just claim before becoming President that he’s going to expose the entire operation. And of course he might not do anything while in office. What would help him is if there was a huge public outcry for a reopening of the investigation. This would make it a lot easier for Trump. If he acted alone and without support from the people, he’d be alone. Yet if he were to respond to the desires of the public, his case would be much easier. Trump may not want to be the lone voice in the woods, on this issue. Even his own peers will be calling him a conspiracy theorist.

The same could be said for exposing the IRS and Federal Reserve scam. Then there’s vaccines, GMO and Common Core. You really need strength in numbers for these types of things. Trump can only accomplish so much. The act of recovering jobs will be monumental enough in undoing a lot of the damage from the Globalists.


Thanks Chad

I don't expect he will ever address the 9-11 hoax


George said (January 14, 2017):

I am not sure who this blogger is, but the reasons for nukes at the WTC are correct. Judy Woods need not speculate about unknown means of demolition when there are known means abundantly fitting the facts.


December 25, 2016


Some of what Alex Jones says in the latest Israel video is appalling and disgusting - repeating the zionist propaganda about Palestinians using suicide bomber kids etc; excusing the slaughter of civilians in Gaza etc by Israel as acts of "war"; or equating those deaths to (Israel & western-funded) jihadist death squads is beyond the pale.....not to mention failing to point out that jewish cabalists are the main promoters of weaponized immigration and jewish neo-cons (and shabbas goy) are behind the de-stabilization of the middle east that creates chaos etc (Yion Plan/Eretz Israel)

Claiming that jihadists and saudis have more influence on hollywood than jewish cabalists or that jihadists and islamists have more influence than zionists is pathetic.

JONES has to perform so many mental acrobatics to justify his support for zionist israel it's painful to watch.

Jones IS now confirmed as fake news. Jones is a psy-op - if most people fail to see this after this latest awful monologue, then the future is very bleak as infowars influences a huge amount of people especially in the so-called truth community.

Just a few thoughts - have a blesses day (as pockets of the future says!)

PS - Alex finishes his Zionist shilling by claiming that leftists and islamists hate Christmas as it symbolises Jesus Christ's "birthday" but of course he fails to mention that most leftist thinking is from the cabalist jewish cultural marxism and communist schools and that in the Talmud, the greatest hatred toward Jesus Christ anywhere is to be found (as Michael Hoffman and E Michael Jones etc all point out!).

Also - in Lebanon and Syria conflicts - Hezbollah and other Shi'ite forces have protected Christians as they view Jesus Christ as a prophet (as do all true Muslims - not wahaabists or crypto-jew salafists etc).


Alex Jones states: "I support the jewish state of israel - it is the UN that is persecuting israel"

Alex Jones supports Zionist israel

ergo - Infowars/Alex Jones/Paul Joseph Watson/PRIZION PLANET are almost certainly stratfor/mossad cognitive infiltration operation or at the very minimu are zionist shills


Paul Joseph Watson on Jews

Alex Jones Good for Jews uh-oh

Reply from Chad:

As a regular listener of Alex Jones, I'm beginning to think that even he is getting tired of his own act.  He desperately needs a replacement he can trust.  The focus of Infowars now is to maintain funds to keep his overmanned ship afloat while he tries to cram more crew in.  Sure, he needs the staff to cover several events at once and the requisite funds.  This leads him to pimp out product after product.  It's understandable.  There's no free lunch and people don't work for free.
Regarding the comments on Israel, I think Mr. Jones is just getting lazy.  It's a lot easier to parrot the official narrative than to challenge it.  These days, he's even quick to echo the government/MSM version of many of the latest terror attacks.  With such an approach, he'd never be able to produce an "Terrorstorm 2.0."
Israel?  Alex Jones is quite aware of the history.  But maybe since he's gone ALL IN for Drumpf, he's chosen to hop along and drink the Kool-Aid.  I don't buy this nonsense about him being some kind of CIA or Zionist agent.  He's not a Jew.  Alex Jones is just getting long in the tooth and needs to bow out of the alternative media for a while.  He's getting tired and delirious.  Maybe a case of over working himself.  It's no different than a music band that is exhausted from playing their own music year after year.
The unfortunate thing is, there's nothing quite like Alex Jones to replace him and even he knows it.  Therefore, he has to keep burning the candle at both ends.  The more the candle burns, the more rope he puts around his neck with ill-thought out statements.  The very statements people misconstrue.
My advice is to focus on the big picture and not get tied up in the latest Tweet or self-made video.  Learn to understand how that man communicates and you'll see where he's coming from.  You'll also need to have been listening for a good ten years or more to really have a clue.  Tuning in for the first time in the past few months is not going to help you.
No, I'm not an Alex Jones apologist.  I'm getting worn out from his antics as well.  However, if I see a criticism that's kind of off, I'd like to give my opinion and point a few things out.

US Government Collaboration in Crime and Terror

December 21, 2016

HolderMrHonesty.jpegUS Government Collaboration in Crime and Terror    (from Dan)

A few years ago the ATF was used to run guns to Mexican crime cartels that run drugs to our cities and also run the human trafficking in the Border states, under a phoney sting operation called "Fast and Furious". Documents confirm Eric Holder's role in Fast and Furious cover-up

This was premeditated top down misuse of government agencies to provide guns for gangs , but the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform covered up the coverup by playing like it was lawful operation gone wrong. 

The peak of public awareness that US government was supplying all the "rebels" in Syria was fall of 2014.  Somehow they haven't put two and two together:  that the Obama administration has been doing the same thing on our Southern border, and "Sanctuary Cities".   Sanctuaries for terrorists from the Middle East and Africa, and Mexican gangs.   In short, the domestic operations are the same as "regime change" and "Arab Spring" abroad. 

The question is;  will the new Attorney General and director of DHS, and the 
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform expose their predecessors and dare call it treason? 

DECEMBER 15, 2016

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and State Department teamed up with an Islamic terrorist front group this month to train foreign officials how to protect Muslim civil rights and avoid discrimination and profiling when countering violent extremism. It marks the latest of many collaborations between the Obama administration and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a group with extensive links to foreign and domestic Islamists that was founded by three Middle Eastern extremists (Omar Ahmad, Nihad Awad and Rafeeq Jaber) and reportedly raises money for Hamas.

In 2008 CAIR, which claims to be America's largest Muslim civil liberties organization, was a co-conspirator in a federal terror-finance case involving the Hamas front group Holy Land Foundation. Read more in a Judicial Watch special report that focuses on Muslim charities. Despite the group's radical ties, it wields tremendous power in the Obama administration. This is especially true when it comes to the way the nation's local and federal law enforcement agencies conduct anti-terrorism training. In fact, it was CAIR that got the FBI to purge anti-terrorism material determined to be offensive to Muslims. Judicial Watch uncovered that scandal a few years ago and obtained hundreds of pages of FBI documents with details of the arrangement. Judicial Watch also published a special in-depth report on the subject. CAIR also got several police departments in Obama's home state of Illinois to cancel essential counterterrorism courses over accusations that the instructor was anti-Muslim. The course was called "Islamic Awareness as a Counter-Terrorist Strategy" and departments in Lombard, Elmhurst and Highland Park caved into CAIR's demands....

Even if MI-6 Created Them, Beatles Deserve Respect by Gino K

December 18, 2016

Even if MI-6 Created Them, Beatles Deserve Respect

by Geno K

Although I agree that England, Tavistock, mind control, MI6, pop music as a weapon to split generations is all very true... what angers me is when people make comments about actors, like Staycer and Adorno... I find it very hard to believe people making these comments understand how to write and record music, or even theatrical impersonations...

As a musician, actor, impressionist, vocalist, voiceover artist, film and music producer and a Beatles fanatic who read every single book written about the Beatles, watched their films and know the dialogue by heart, can impersonate all 4 distinctly, grew up from 1960 forward and watched them on the Ed Sullivan show... not to mention have been very much involved in the conspiracy truther movement since the 1990s...

I know that one only has to watch the Beatles writing and arranging and rehearsing music in the studio with the insane amount of footage available to know that they played their own instruments...they sang their own vocals and harmonies... they wrote their own songs...

I have read the Apple recording notes cover to cover... Yes the producers added arrangements and studio musicians... they utilized voice enhancing as all popular music does, echo, reverb, phaser... they even physically used a razor blade to splice take 3 with take 24....but this imagined conspiracy that the Beatles weren't a genuine pop group who could make records and perform on stage is pure idiocy by people who don't know the difference between being a spectator and someone who lives inside the process. So many simply repeat what they read without having the finely tuned ear to know that hundreds of thousands of film and recordings completely debunk the conspiracy claptrap written well after the fact and having a purpose that apparently includes altering reality.

I too can stand in awe of new information like the film The Rotten Apple that tells me Paul McCartney actually spent a night partying at Beach Boy producer's house Terry Melcher with Charles Manson because i know the Laurel Canyon scene and all their biographies verify the whereabouts of McCartney and company.

Yes, we have actors playing parts of many famous icons for sociological purposes... and it continues today... but when EMI and British Intelligence decided they too needed an Elvis.... they didn't pick just anyone... They found 3 guys... friends... Lennon, McCartney, Harrison who had great voices, striking looks, fantastic charisma and humor... which cannot be faked... if it could... then there would be thousands of Beatles... and a tight music trio, and budding ability to compose music... The Beatles and their talent is REAL... and brilliant talents such as George Martin and his engineers knew how to groom it to a sweet contagious sound... This deserves the respect of being organic and appreciated as such.

Now did they replace McCartney after an accident? Did they replace the charming Lennon with a different Lennon? I remain on the fence due to such things as Lennon's clowning in 63, 64, 65 and the sudden appearance of a dour Lennon... and the footage of two McCartneys that seemingly shows something that just feels incongruous...

When people control media with trillions of dollars fakery is achieved by the best in the business... But certain things cannot be faked... the original Beatles with spontaneous answers to the press... charm, humor, talent... mannerisms... requires people who come to know a subject the way a mother knows her child... Not people who repeat the most unproven and weak ideas set forth after the fact. It is annoying.